Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 26(1): e14204, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38010722

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Because COVID-19 has been associated with high lethality rates among kidney transplant recipients (KTR), but also with a severe disruption and delays in overall healthcare, this study aims to evaluate the excess mortality in the pandemic era among KTR in a high-volume Brazilian transplant center. METHODS: This study used data from a single center that provides follow-up on all its transplant recipients. The population of interest included all the patients who were transplanted between August 31, 1983 and December 31, 2022 and who were live from January 1, 2014. Using the "AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average" forecasting algorithm, the expected mortality for the pandemic era (2020-2022) was modeled from the pre-pandemic era (2014-2019). RESULTS: There were 12 077 KTRs at risk of dying in the entire observation period. In the pre-pandemic era, there were 21 deaths per 1000 patients at risk. In the pandemic era, there were 1429 observed deaths (rate of 47 deaths per 1000 patients at risk) versus the expected 587 deaths, resulting in an absolute number of 842 excess deaths, or an observed-to-expected ratio of 2.4, or an absolute rate of 26 deaths in excess per 1000 patients at risk. The excess deaths exhibited a temporal pattern mirroring that of the surges in new cases and lethality rates of COVID-19. COVID-19-related deaths drove 94% of excess mortality in the pandemic era. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of KTR under centralized follow-up, more than twofold excess mortality was primarily driven by COVID-19-related deaths, highlighting the vulnerability of this population to the most severe presentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Kidney Transplantation , Humans , Transplant Recipients , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Mortality
2.
Transplantation ; 108(4): 963-969, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37953468

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Omicron variant has been associated with milder cases of COVID-19 among kidney transplant recipients. However, little is known about postacute sequelae, referred to as Long COVID. METHODS: Prospective, single-center cohort study investigating prevalence and risk factors for Long COVID among kidney transplant recipients during the omicron predominance in Brazil. The analysis included adult patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between January 5, 2022, and July 18, 2022, were alive, had a functioning kidney transplant 3 mo after symptom onset, and answered a telephonic survey about physical complains of Long COVID. RESULTS: From the 1529 eligible, 602 (39%) patients responded the survey. Sixteen percent reported a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 85% had been fully vaccinated. The prevalence of Long COVID was 52%, with the most common complaints being weakness (46%), myalgia (41%), dizziness (33%), and headache (31%). Among employed patients, 94% were able to resume their normal work activities. In multivariable analysis, female gender (hazard ratio [HR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-3.02; P < 0.0001), previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (HR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.91-6.60; P < 0.0001), fatigue (HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.18-4.55; P = 0.014), myalgia (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.03-2.15; P = 0.036) during the acute phase, and hospitalization because of COVID-19 (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.06-2.76; P = 0.028) were independently associated with Long COVID. CONCLUSIONS: In the "omicron era," Long COVID among kidney transplant recipients exhibited milder characteristics and had a less significant impact on their ability to resume normal life activities. The risk factors for persistent symptoms were similar to those observed in the general population except for the vaccination status, underscoring the importance of closer monitoring in special subgroups.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Kidney Transplantation , Adult , Humans , Female , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Myalgia , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplant Recipients
3.
Transpl Int ; 35: 10205, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35185380

ABSTRACT

Data from the general population suggest that fatality rates declined during the course of the pandemic. This analysis, using data extracted from the Brazilian Kidney Transplant COVID-19 Registry, seeks to determine fatality rates over time since the index case on March 3rd, 2020. Data from hospitalized patients with RT-PCR positive SARS-CoV-2 infection from March to August 2020 (35 sites, 878 patients) were compared using trend tests according to quartiles (Q1: <72 days; Q2: 72-104 days; Q3: 105-140 days; Q4: >140 days after the index case). The 28-day fatality decreased from 29.5% (Q1) to 18.8% (Q4) (pfor-trend = 0.004). In multivariable analysis, patients diagnosed in Q4 showed a 35% reduced risk of death. The trend of reducing fatality was associated with a lower number of comorbidities (20.7-10.6%, p for-trend = 0.002), younger age (55-53 years, pfor-trend = 0.062), and better baseline renal function (43.6-47.7 ml/min/1.73 m2, pfor-trend = 0.060), and were confirmed by multivariable analysis. The proportion of patients presenting dyspnea (pfor-trend = 0.001) and hypoxemia (pfor-trend < 0.001) at diagnosis, and requiring intensive care was also found reduced (pfor-trend = 0.038). Despite possible confounding variables and time-dependent sampling differences, we conclude that COVID-19-associated fatality decreased over time. Differences in demographics, clinical presentation, and treatment options might be involved.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Kidney Transplantation , Cohort Studies , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Registries , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplant Recipients
4.
Clin Transplant ; 32(1)2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28972665

ABSTRACT

Delayed graft function (DGF) is very high in our center (70%-80%), and we usually receive a kidney for transplant after more than 22 hours of static cold ischemia time (CIT). Also, there is an inadequate care of the donors, contributing to a high rate of DGF. We decided to test whether machine perfusion (MP) after a CIT improved the outcome of our transplant patients. We analyzed the incidence of DGF, its duration, and the length of hospital stay (LOS) in patients who received a kidney preserved with MP after a CIT (hybrid perfusion-HP). We included 54 deceased donors kidneys preserved with HP transplanted from Feb/13 to Jul/14, and compared them to 101 kidney transplants preserved by static cold storage (CS) from Nov/08 to May/12. The median pumping time was 11 hours. DGF incidence was 61.1% vs 79.2% (P = .02), median DGF duration was 5 vs 11 days (P < .001), and median LOS was 13 vs 18 days (P < .011), for the HP compared to CS group. The observed reduction of DGF with machine perfusion did not occur in donors over 50 years old. In the multivariate analysis, risk factors for DGF, adjusted for CIT, were donor age (OR, 1.04; P = .005) and the absence of use of MP (OR, 1.54; P = .051). In conclusion, the use of HP contributed to faster recovery of renal function and to a shorter length of hospital stay.


Subject(s)
Cold Ischemia/adverse effects , Delayed Graft Function/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/etiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Organ Preservation/adverse effects , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Adult , Cryopreservation , Delayed Graft Function/etiology , Delayed Graft Function/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Graft Rejection/pathology , Graft Survival , Humans , Incidence , Kidney Function Tests , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge , Perfusion , Postoperative Complications , Prognosis , Risk Factors
5.
Transplant Direct ; 3(5): e155, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28573190

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study compared the use of static cold storage versus continuous hypothermic machine perfusion in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients at high risk for delayed graft function (DGF). METHODS: In this national, multicenter, and controlled trial, 80 pairs of kidneys recovered from brain-dead deceased donors were randomized to cold storage or machine perfusion, transplanted, and followed up for 12 months. The primary endpoint was the incidence of DGF. Secondary endpoints included the duration of DGF, hospital stay, primary nonfunction, estimated glomerular filtration rate, acute rejection, and allograft and patient survivals. RESULTS: Mean cold ischemia time was high but not different between the 2 groups (25.6 ± 6.6 hours vs 25.05 ± 6.3 hours, 0.937). The incidence of DGF was lower in the machine perfusion compared with cold storage group (61% vs. 45%, P = 0.031). Machine perfusion was independently associated with a reduced risk of DGF (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.95). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate tended to be higher at day 28 (40.6 ± 19.9 mL/min per 1.73 m2 vs 49.0 ± 26.9 mL/min per 1.73 m2; P = 0.262) and 1 year (48.3 ± 19.8 mL/min per 1.73 m2 vs 54.4 ± 28.6 mL/min per 1.73 m2; P = 0.201) in the machine perfusion group. No differences in the incidence of acute rejection, primary nonfunction (0% vs 2.5%), graft loss (7.5% vs 10%), or death (8.8% vs 6.3%) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of recipients of deceased donor kidneys with high mean cold ischemia time and high incidence of DGF, the use of continuous machine perfusion was associated with a reduced risk of DGF compared with the traditional cold storage preservation method.

6.
PLoS One ; 10(9): e0138944, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26417949

ABSTRACT

The incidence and outcomes of acute kidney injury (AKI) in kidney transplantation are poorly known. Retrospective cohort analysis was performed on the data of all patients (≥3 months after transplantation and ≥16 years of age) admitted to the hospital due to medical or surgical complications from 2007 to 2010. We analyzed 458 kidney transplant recipients, 55.2% men, median age 49 (IQR, 36-58) years, median of 12.5 (IQR, 3-35) months after kidney transplantation; admitted to the hospital due to medical or surgical complications. Most of the patients received a kidney from a deceased donor (62.2%), the primary cause for hospital admission was infection (60.7%) and 57 (12.4%) individuals were diagnosed with acute rejection (AR). The incidence of AKI was 82.3%: 31.9% stage 1, 29.3% stage 2 and 21.2% stage 3. Intensive care unit (ICU) admission (OR 8.90, 95% CI: 1.77-44.56 p = 0.008), infection (OR 5.73, 95% CI: 2.61-12.56, p<0.001) and the use of contrast media (OR 9.34, 95% CI: 2.04-42.70, p = 0.004) were the independent risk factors for AKI development. The mortality rate was 2.1% and all patients who died were diagnosed with AKI. Even after the exclusion of AR cases, at the end of 12 months, the individuals with AKI exhibited higher percent changes in creatinine values when compared with individuals without AKI (9.1% vs. -4.3%; p<0.001). According to KDIGO system, we found a high incidence of AKI among the complications of renal transplantation. As in other scenarios, AKI was associated with renal function loss at 1-year after the hospital discharge.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Graft Rejection/etiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Transplant Recipients/statistics & numerical data , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Acute Kidney Injury/mortality , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Female , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/mortality , Graft Survival , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
7.
Einstein (Sao Paulo) ; 13(2): 319-25, 2015.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26154553

ABSTRACT

Given the shortage of organs transplantation, some strategies have been adopted by the transplant community to increase the supply of organs. One strategy is the use of expanded criteria for donors, that is, donors aged >60 years or 50 and 59 years, and meeting two or more of the following criteria: history of hypertension, terminal serum creatinine >1.5mg/dL, and stroke as the donor´s cause of death. In this review, emphasis was placed on the use of donors with acute renal failure, a condition considered by many as a contraindication for organ acceptance and therefore one of the main causes for kidney discard. Since these are well-selected donors and with no chronic diseases, such as hypertension, renal disease, or diabetes, many studies showed that the use of donors with acute renal failure should be encouraged, because, in general, acute renal dysfunction is reversible. Although most studies demonstrated these grafts have more delayed function, the results of graft and patient survival after transplant are very similar to those with the use of standard donors. Clinical and morphological findings of donors, the use of machine perfusion, and analysis of its parameters, especially intrarenal resistance, are important tools to support decision-making when considering the supply of organs with renal dysfunction.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/surgery , Graft Survival , Kidney Failure, Chronic/mortality , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Patient Selection , Tissue Donors/supply & distribution , Age Factors , Aged , Creatinine/blood , Delayed Graft Function/mortality , Donor Selection/organization & administration , Graft Survival/physiology , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Survival Rate
8.
Einstein (Säo Paulo) ; 13(2): 319-325, Apr-Jun/2015. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-751435

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Given the shortage of organs transplantation, some strategies have been adopted by the transplant community to increase the supply of organs. One strategy is the use of expanded criteria for donors, that is, donors aged >60 years or 50 and 59 years, and meeting two or more of the following criteria: history of hypertension, terminal serum creatinine >1.5mg/dL, and stroke as the donor´s cause of death. In this review, emphasis was placed on the use of donors with acute renal failure, a condition considered by many as a contraindication for organ acceptance and therefore one of the main causes for kidney discard. Since these are well-selected donors and with no chronic diseases, such as hypertension, renal disease, or diabetes, many studies showed that the use of donors with acute renal failure should be encouraged, because, in general, acute renal dysfunction is reversible. Although most studies demonstrated these grafts have more delayed function, the results of graft and patient survival after transplant are very similar to those with the use of standard donors. Clinical and morphological findings of donors, the use of machine perfusion, and analysis of its parameters, especially intrarenal resistance, are important tools to support decision-making when considering the supply of organs with renal dysfunction.


RESUMO Diante da escassez de órgãos para transplante, algumas estratégias têm sido adotadas pela comunidade transplantadora, no sentido de ampliar a oferta de órgãos. Uma delas é a utilização de rins de doadores com critérios expandidos, ou seja, doadores com idade >60 anos ou entre 50 e 59 anos, e que atendem a dois ou mais dos seguintes critérios: história de hipertensão, creatinina sérica terminal >1,5mg/dL e acidente vascular cerebral como causa de morte do doador. Nesta revisão, foi dada ênfase à utilização de doadores com disfunção renal aguda, condição considerada por muitos uma contraindicação para a aceitação de órgãos e, portanto, uma das principais causas de descarte de órgãos. Desde que sejam doadores bem selecionados e que não tenham doença renal crônica, como hipertensão ou diabetes, muitos trabalhos mostraram que o uso de doadores com disfunção renal aguda deve ser encorajado, pois, em geral, a disfunção renal aguda é de caráter reversível. Embora, a maioria dos estudos tenha demonstrado que há uma maior taxa de função retardada do enxerto com a utilização desses órgãos, os resultados de sobrevida do enxerto e do paciente após o transplante são muito semelhantes aos resultados obtidos da utilização de doadores padrão. Os achados clínicos e morfológicos do doador, a utilização da máquina de perfusão e a análise de seus parâmetros, principalmente a resistência intrarrenal, são importantes ferramentas de apoio para tomada de decisão no momento da oferta de órgãos com disfunção renal.


Subject(s)
Aged , Humans , Middle Aged , Acute Kidney Injury/surgery , Graft Survival , Kidney Failure, Chronic/mortality , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Patient Selection , Tissue Donors/supply & distribution , Age Factors , Creatinine/blood , Delayed Graft Function/mortality , Donor Selection/organization & administration , Graft Survival/physiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Survival Rate
9.
Einstein (Sao Paulo) ; 13(1): 129-35, 2015.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25993079

ABSTRACT

Ischemia and reperfusion injury is an inevitable event in renal transplantation. The most important consequences are delayed graft function, longer length of stay, higher hospital costs, high risk of acute rejection, and negative impact of long-term follow-up. Currently, many factors are involved in their pathophysiology and could be classified into two different paradigms for education purposes: hemodynamic and immune. The hemodynamic paradigm is described as the reduction of oxygen delivery due to blood flow interruption, involving many hormone systems, and oxygen-free radicals produced after reperfusion. The immune paradigm has been recently described and involves immune system cells, especially T cells, with a central role in this injury. According to these concepts, new strategies to prevent ischemia and reperfusion injury have been studied, particularly the more physiological forms of storing the kidney, such as the pump machine and the use of antilymphocyte antibody therapy before reperfusion. Pump machine perfusion reduces delayed graft function prevalence and length of stay at hospital, and increases long-term graft survival. The use of antilymphocyte antibody therapy before reperfusion, such as Thymoglobulin™, can reduce the prevalence of delayed graft function and chronic graft dysfunction.


Subject(s)
Hemodynamics/physiology , Ischemia , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney/blood supply , Reperfusion Injury , Delayed Graft Function/physiopathology , Graft Rejection/physiopathology , Humans , Ischemia/immunology , Ischemia/physiopathology , Ischemia/prevention & control , Reperfusion Injury/immunology , Reperfusion Injury/physiopathology , Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Time Factors
10.
Einstein (Sao Paulo) ; 13(1): 142-8, 2015.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25993081

ABSTRACT

Cytomegalovirus infection is one of most frequent infectious complications after renal transplantation, and can be classified as primo-infection, when the transmission occurs through the graft, or reactivation, when the recipient is cytomegalovirus seropositive. After transplantation, cytomegalovirus can appear as an infection, when the patient presents with evidence of viral replication without symptoms or disease, which has two clinical spectra: typical viral syndrome or invasive disease, which is a less common form. Their effects can be classified as direct, while the disease is developed, or indirect, with an increase of acute rejection and chronic allograft dysfunction risks. Diagnosis must be made based on viremia by one of the standardized methods: antigenemia or PCR, which is more sensitive. The risk factors related to infection after transplantation are the serologic matching (positive donor and negative recipient) and anti-lymphocyte antibody drugs. One of the strategies to reduce risk of disease should be chosen for patients at high risk: preemptive treatment or universal prophylaxis. Recent clinical research has described ganciclovir resistance as an emergent problem in management of cytomegalovirus infection. Two types of mutation that cause resistance were described: UL97 (most frequent) and UL54. Today, sophisticated methods of immunologic monitoring to detect specific T-cell clones against cytomegalovirus are used in clinical practice to improve the management of high-risk patients after renal transplantation.


Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections/virology , Kidney Transplantation , Postoperative Complications/virology , Adult , Cytomegalovirus/pathogenicity , Cytomegalovirus Infections/prevention & control , Female , Graft Rejection/virology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Immunologic , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Virus Activation
11.
Einstein (Säo Paulo) ; 13(1): 129-135, Jan-Mar/2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-745869

ABSTRACT

Ischemia and reperfusion injury is an inevitable event in renal transplantation. The most important consequences are delayed graft function, longer length of stay, higher hospital costs, high risk of acute rejection, and negative impact of long-term follow-up. Currently, many factors are involved in their pathophysiology and could be classified into two different paradigms for education purposes: hemodynamic and immune. The hemodynamic paradigm is described as the reduction of oxygen delivery due to blood flow interruption, involving many hormone systems, and oxygen-free radicals produced after reperfusion. The immune paradigm has been recently described and involves immune system cells, especially T cells, with a central role in this injury. According to these concepts, new strategies to prevent ischemia and reperfusion injury have been studied, particularly the more physiological forms of storing the kidney, such as the pump machine and the use of antilymphocyte antibody therapy before reperfusion. Pump machine perfusion reduces delayed graft function prevalence and length of stay at hospital, and increases long-term graft survival. The use of antilymphocyte antibody therapy before reperfusion, such as Thymoglobulin™, can reduce the prevalence of delayed graft function and chronic graft dysfunction.


A lesão de isquemia e reperfusão é um evento inevitável no transplante de rim, tendo como consequências retardo na função do enxerto, aumento no tempo de hospitalização e dos custos, aumento no risco de rejeição aguda e potencial impacto negativo na evolução a longo prazo. Atualmente, vários fatores estão implicados na fisiopatologia da lesão de isquemia e reperfusão, podendo ser didaticamente divididos em dois paradigmas: hemodinâmico e imunológico. O paradigma hemodinâmico é classicamente descrito como a privação de oxigênio pela interrupção do fluxo sanguíneo, envolvendo diversos sistemas hormonais e pela produção de radicais livres de oxigênio após a reperfusão. O paradigma imunológico tem sido descrito mais recentemente e envolve as células do sistema imune, sobretudo as células T, como papel fundamental na lesão. De acordo com esses conceitos, novas estratégias de prevenção dos impactos da lesão de isquemia e reperfusão têm sido estudadas, especialmente formas mais fisiológicas de preservação do órgão, como a preservação em máquina de perfusão e o uso de anticorpos depletores de linfócitos antes da reperfusão. A perfusão em máquina reduz a prevalência de retardo na função do enxerto e o tempo de hospitalização, além de melhorar a sobrevida do enxerto a longo prazo. Já o uso de anticorpos depletores de linfócitos, como Timoglobulina®, antes da reperfusão, pode diminuir a prevalência de retardo na função do enxerto e a disfunção crônica do mesmo.


Subject(s)
Humans , Hemodynamics/physiology , Ischemia , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney/blood supply , Reperfusion Injury , Delayed Graft Function/physiopathology , Graft Rejection/physiopathology , Ischemia/immunology , Ischemia/physiopathology , Ischemia/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Reperfusion Injury/immunology , Reperfusion Injury/physiopathology , Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Time Factors
12.
Einstein (Säo Paulo) ; 13(1): 142-148, Jan-Mar/2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-745879

ABSTRACT

Cytomegalovirus infection is one of most frequent infectious complications after renal transplantation, and can be classified as primo-infection, when the transmission occurs through the graft, or reactivation, when the recipient is cytomegalovirus seropositive. After transplantation, cytomegalovirus can appear as an infection, when the patient presents with evidence of viral replication without symptoms or disease, which has two clinical spectra: typical viral syndrome or invasive disease, which is a less common form. Their effects can be classified as direct, while the disease is developed, or indirect, with an increase of acute rejection and chronic allograft dysfunction risks. Diagnosis must be made based on viremia by one of the standardized methods: antigenemia or PCR, which is more sensitive. The risk factors related to infection after transplantation are the serologic matching (positive donor and negative recipient) and anti-lymphocyte antibody drugs. One of the strategies to reduce risk of disease should be chosen for patients at high risk: preemptive treatment or universal prophylaxis. Recent clinical research has described ganciclovir resistance as an emergent problem in management of cytomegalovirus infection. Two types of mutation that cause resistance were described: UL97 (most frequent) and UL54. Today, sophisticated methods of immunologic monitoring to detect specific T-cell clones against cytomegalovirus are used in clinical practice to improve the management of high-risk patients after renal transplantation.


A infecção pelo citomegalovírus é uma das principais complicações após o transplante de rim, podendo ser classificada em primoinfecção, quando a transmissão ocorre por meio do enxerto, ou em reativação, quando o receptor é soropositivo. Do ponto de vista clínico, pode se apresentar como infecção, na ausência de sintomas, ou como doença, com dois diferentes espectros: a síndrome viral típica ou, menos comumente, a doença invasiva. Os efeitos podem ser diretos, que é o desenvolvimento da doença, ou indiretos, como aumento no risco de rejeição aguda e de disfunção crônica do enxerto. O diagnóstico deve ser feito por pesquisa de viremia por meio de um dos dois métodos padronizados: antigenemia ou PCR − sendo essa última a mais sensível. Os fatores de risco relacionados com a infecção após o transplante são o match sorológico (doador positivo e receptor negativo) e o uso de anticorpos antilinfócitos. Uma das estratégias de redução de risco de doença deve ser escolhida após o transplante nos pacientes de alto risco: tratamento preemptivo ou profilaxia. Recentemente, linhas de pesquisa clínica têm apontado a resistência ao ganciclovir como um problema emergente no manejo da infecção pelo citomegalovírus. Duas formas de mutação que causam resistência são descritas: UL97, que é a mais frequente, e a UL54. Atualmente, sofisticados métodos de monitorização imunológica, como a detecção de clones específicos de células T contra o citomegalovírus podem ser utilizados na prática clínica para o melhor manejo após o transplante renal dos pacientes de alto risco.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Cytomegalovirus Infections/virology , Kidney Transplantation , Postoperative Complications/virology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/prevention & control , Cytomegalovirus/pathogenicity , Graft Rejection/virology , Monitoring, Immunologic , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Prospective Studies , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Virus Activation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...