ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Due to the recent introduction of new biologic drugs for chronic migraine, a global evaluation in real clinical practice is necessary. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety in real clinical practice of drugs targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor (CGRPr) in patients with chronic migraine. METHODS: Single-center, restrospective study (2019-2022), including patients with chronic migraine treated with erenumab, galcanezumab, or fremanezumab. Effectiveness variables were recorded, namely, number of migraine headache days per month (MHD), Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) score, and Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score, assessing changes at week 12, 24 from baseline. Toxicity was recorded following the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 criteria. RESULTS: In all, 104 patients were included (46.2% erenumab, 41.3% galcanezumab, 12.5% fremanezumab). A reduction in MHD, MIDAS, and HIT-6 was achieved at weeks 12 and 24 with erenumab (p75% at week 24 than those intensified; P = 0.041). There was no difference in efficacy (P = 0.154) or improvement in quality of life (P = 0.783, P = 0.150), but there was greater toxicity (P < 0.001) among nonresponders with erenumab 70 mg versus erenumab 140 mg. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm the effectiveness and safety of anticalcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) drugs in real clinical practice. However, the study shows little benefit from erenumab intensification, with similar effectiveness and worse tolerability than the standard dose.
Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders , Quality of Life , Humans , Migraine Disorders/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) have become a fundamental pillar in optimizing antimicrobial usage, improving patient care, and reducing antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Herein we evaluated the impact of an ASP on antimicrobial consumption and AMR in Colombia. METHODS: We designed a retrospective observational study and measured trends in antibiotic consumption and AMR before and after the implementation of an ASP using interrupted time series analysis over a 4-year period (24 months before and 24 months after ASP implementation). RESULTS: ASPs were implemented according to the available resources in each of the institutions. Before ASP implementation, there was a trend toward an increase in the antibiotic consumption of all measured antimicrobials selected. Afterward, an overall decrease in antibiotic consumption was observed. The use of ertapenem and meropenem decreased in hospital wards, while a decrease in the use of ceftriaxone, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, and vancomycin was observed in intensive care units. After ASP implementation, the trend toward an increase of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, ceftriaxone-resistant Escherichia coli, and meropenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa was reversed. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we showed that ASPs are a key strategy in tackling the emerging threat of AMR and have a positive impact on antibiotic consumption and resistance.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Ceftriaxone , Colombia , Delivery of Health Care , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Humans , Meropenem/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) causes about 10% of cases of end stage renal disease. Disease progression rate is heterogeneous. Tolvaptan is presently the only specific therapeutic option to slow kidney function decline in adults at risk of rapidly progressing ADPKD with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 1-4. Thus, a reliable evaluation of kidney function in patients with ADPKD is needed. METHODS: We evaluated the agreement between measured (mGFR) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by 61 formulas based on creatinine and/or cystatin-C (eGFR) in 226 ADPKD patients with diverse GFR values, from predialysis to glomerular hyperfiltration. Also, we evaluated whether incorrect categorization of CKD using eGFR may interfere with the indication and/or reimbursement of Tolvaptan treatment. RESULTS: No formula showed acceptable agreement with mGFR. Total Deviation Index averaged about 50% for eGFR based on creatinine and/or cystatin-C, indicating that 90% of the estimations of GFR showed bounds of error of 50% when compared with mGFR. In 1 out of 4 cases with mGFR < 30 ml/min, eGFR provided estimations above this threshold. Also, in half of the cases with mGFR between 30 and 40 ml/min, formulas estimated values < 30 ml/min. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of renal function with formulas in ADPKD patients is unreliable. Extreme deviation from real renal function is quite frequent. The consequences of this error deserve attention, especially in rapid progressors who may benefit from starting treatment with tolvaptan and in whom specific GFR thresholds are needed for the indication or reimbursement. Whenever possible, mGFR is recommended.
Subject(s)
Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Adult , Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant/complications , Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant/diagnosis , Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant/drug therapy , Tolvaptan/therapeutic use , Creatinine , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/etiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapyABSTRACT
Introducción: Las instituciones penitenciarias en muchos países han sido escenarios de brotes de la COVID-19, debido a los inconvenientes para mantener el distanciamiento social, a la falta de protección individual y la mala cobertura sanitaria, que se conjugan para condicionar esta situación. Objetivo: Caracterizar el cumplimiento de la vigilancia y las medidas de prevención y control de la COVID-19 en instituciones penitenciarias. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo y transversal en 8 centros penitenciarios de la provincia de Santiago de Cuba durante mayo del 2020. Con independencia de los datos numéricos aportados, se decidió efectuar resúmenes fundamentalmente cualitativos de los aspectos considerados en cada una de las visitas. Resultados: En la evaluación de la organización y la estructura de cada una de las instituciones visitadas, así como del cumplimiento de las medidas de control y prevención individuales y colectivas, se obtuvieron resultados satisfactorios. También se comprobó que las unidades disponían de los recursos humanos y materiales que garantizaban la observancia de las medidas. Conclusiones: Quedaron demostrados el cuidado y la atención sanitaria a este grupo vulnerable a la COVID-19 y se identificaron otras posibles acciones para ello.
Introduction: In many countries penal institutions have been scenary of COVID-19 outbreaks, due to the adverse conditions for maintaining social distancing, lack of individual protection and bad sanitary structure, which confluence to make possible this situation. Objective: To characterize the fulfilment of survillance and the control and prevention measures for COVID-19 in penal institutions. Methods: A descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out in 8 penal institutions from Santiago de Cuba during May, 2020. Independently from the obtained numerical data, it was decided to carry out summaries mainly of qualitative type, of those aspects considered in each of the visits. Results: Satisfactory results were obtained in the evaluation of the organization and the structure of each of the visited institutions, as well as in the fulfilment of the individual and collective control and prevention measures. It was also verified that the institutions had the human and material resources guarranting the fulfilment of the measures. Conclusions: Care and sanitary survillance to this vulnerable group to COVID-19 were demostrated, and other possible actions were identified for this purpose.
Subject(s)
Prisons , Physical Distancing , COVID-19 , PrisonersABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms, impact on intestinal microbiome, side effects and hospital costs are some of the factors that have encouraged multiple studies over the past two decades to evaluate different duration of antibiotic therapy with the goal of shorter but effective regimens. Here, we reviewed the most recent relevant data on the duration of therapy focused on two of the most common Gram-negative organisms in clinical practice, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies including meta-analysis confirm that short antibiotic courses for both Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa infections have comparable clinical outcomes to longer courses of therapy. Despite the advocacy for short-course therapy in contemporary guidelines, recent evidence in the USA has revealed a high prevalence of inappropriate antibiotic usage due to excessive duration of therapy. SUMMARY: Although the decision process regarding the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy is multifactorial, the vast majority of infections other than endocardial or bone and joint, can be treated with short-course antibiotic therapy (i.e., ≤7âdays). The combination of biomarkers, clinical response to therapy, and microbiologic clearance help determine the optimal duration in patients with infections caused by P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales.
Subject(s)
Pseudomonas Infections , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapyABSTRACT
Introducción: Cuba comenzó de manera temprana sus preparativos ante la emergencia por COVID-19 y ha desplegado muchas capacidades científico-técnicas para su enfrentamiento, entre ellas la gestión de sistemas de información geográfica, a cargo de la empresa GEOCUBA. Objetivo: Identificar posibles sitios de riesgo geoespacial relacionados con la transmisión de COVID-19 en Santiago de Cuba. Métodos: Se desarrolló un estudio ecológico. Se identificaron grupos de transmisión de COVID-19 y riesgos epidemiológicos. Se resumieron variables epidemiológicas, sociales y espaciales. Se realizaron análisis espaciales y sobrevuelos de dron como técnicas de telepidemiología. Resultados: Se identificaron cinco grupos espaciales de transmisión, uno en el municipio Palma Soriano, uno en Contramaestre y tres en Santiago de Cuba. Las distancias espaciales entre casos y confirmados se relacionaron con la forma de transmisión de la COVID-19. Se identificaron bajas tasas de incidencia. Se apreció baja movilidad, cumplimiento de medidas de distanciamiento y protección social. Conclusiones: La creación de un grupo multidisciplinario en Santiago de Cuba, a propuesta de las máximas estructuras del partido y el gobierno, garantizó el despliegue de recursos tecnológicos para el uso de la telepidemiología, lo que permitió la identificación espacial y posterior gestión integral de riesgos ecoepidemiológicos relacionados con la transmisión de COVID-19 en Santiago de Cuba. Las acciones gubernamentales diferenciadas, la percepción de riesgo de la población y la respuesta comunitaria influyeron en las bajas tasas de transmisión y dispersión espacial de la enfermedad, lo que muestra la importancia de la concepción de la salud como producto social(AU)
Introduction: Cuba early started its preparations to face the emergency due to COVID-19 and it has made a deployment of several scientific-technical capacities for it, among them the management of geographical information's systems by GEOCUBA company. Objective: Identify posible sites of geospatial risk related with the transmission of COVID-19 in Santiago de Cuba province. Methods: It was developed an ecologic study. There were identified groups of COVID-19 transmission and epidemiological risks. Epidemiological, social and spatial variables were resumed. Also there were made spatial analyses and overflights of drones as teleepidemiology techniques. Results: There were identified five spatial groups of transmission: one in Palma Soriano municipality, one in Contramaestre municipality and three in Santiago de Cuba municipality. The spatial distances among the cases and confirmed cases were related with the form of transmission of COVID-19. There were identified low incidence rates. It was noticed low mobility, accomplishment of the social distancing rules and social protection. Conclusions: The creation of a multidisciplinary group in Santiago de Cuba province, as a proposal of the highest level of the Communist Party and the Government, secured the deployment of technologic resources for the use of telepidemiology, and this allowed the spatial identification and further comprehensive management of ecoepidemiologic risks related with the transmission of COVID-19 in Santiago de Cuba. The different governmental actions, the perception of risk of the population, and the community response impacted in the low rates of transmission and spatial spreading of the disease, which shows the importance of worthing health as a social productAU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Social Mobility , Geographic Information Systems , COVID-19/transmission , CubaABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Using murine models of infection, we previously reported the potent in vivo activity of carbapenems against MBL-producing Enterobacterales despite the observed resistance in vitro. In the current study, we examined the in vivo activity of a cefepime human-simulated regimen against MBL-producing Enterobacterales in a murine thigh infection model. METHODS: A population of clinical isolates and isogenic engineered MBL-producing Enterobacterales transformants expressing MBLs but no detectable cefepime-hydrolysing serine ß-lactamases were utilized. KPC-producing isolates were included as positive controls. Cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem MICs were determined using broth microdilution in conventional CAMHB and EDTA-supplemented (zinc-limited) broth. In vivo efficacy of a cefepime human-simulated regimen (2 g q8h as a 2 h infusion) was determined in the neutropenic murine thigh infection model against the test strains. Efficacy was measured as the change in log10 cfu/thigh at 24 h compared with 0 h controls. RESULTS: MBL-producing Enterobacterales strains were found to be cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem non-susceptible in conventional broth. Supplementation with EDTA at a concentration of 300 mg/L resulted in multi-fold reduction in the MICs and restoration of susceptibility. In accordance with the MICs generated in zinc-limited broth, administration of a cefepime human-simulated regimen was associated with substantial bacterial reductions among mice infected with MBL-producing Enterobacterales. Absence of MIC reduction in zinc-limited broth and lack of efficacy among mice infected with KPC-producing isolates were observed. CONCLUSIONS: For MBL-producing Enterobacterales, susceptibility testing with Mueller-Hinton broth, a zinc-rich testing medium, is flawed since it does not recapitulate the host environment, in which zinc concentrations are low.
Subject(s)
Carbapenems , beta-Lactamases , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Mice , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , beta-Lactamases/genetics , beta-LactamsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) represent a global public health problem. Precision medicine (PM) is a multicomponent medical approach that should be used to individualize the management of patients infected with CRE. AREAS COVERED: Here, we differentiate carbapenem-producing CRE (CP-CRE) from non-CP-CRE and the importance of this distinction in clinical practice. The current phenotypic CRE-case definition and its implications are also discussed. Additionally, we summarize data regarding phenotypic and molecular diagnostic tools and available antibiotics. In order to review the most relevant data, a comprehensive literature search of peer-reviewed articles in PubMed and abstracts presented at high-impact conferences was performed. EXPERT OPINION: PM in CRE infections entails a multi-step process that includes applying the current phenotypic definition, utilization of the right phenotypic or molecular testing methods, and thorough evaluation of risk factors, source of infection, and comorbidities. A powerful armamentarium is available to treat CRE infections, including recently approved agents. Randomized controlled trials targeting specific pathogens instead of site of infections may be appropriate to fill in the current gaps. In light of the diverse enzymology behind CP-CRE, PM should be employed to provide the best therapy based on the underlying resistance mechanism.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/drug therapy , Animals , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/diagnosis , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Humans , Precision Medicine/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Imipenem/relebactam is a carbapenem/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination with in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales, including KPC producers. OBJECTIVES: To provide translational data to support the clinical utility of the imipenem/relebactam 500/250 mg q6h regimen using a human-simulated regimen (HSR) of imipenem/relebactam, compared with imipenem alone, against a phenotypically and genotypically diverse population of P. aeruginosa. METHODS: Twenty-nine P. aeruginosa isolates, including KPC (n = 6), PDC (n = 9), PAO (n = 4), GES (n = 5) and VIM (n = 1) producers, were used for the in vivo efficacy studies. Neutropenic mice were thigh-inoculated and randomized to receive HSRs of either imipenem 500 mg q6h, imipenem 1 g q8h, imipenem/relebactam 500/250 mg q6h or saline. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of the 29 isolates examined were imipenem resistant, with 24/29 isolates showing imipenem MICs of ≥32 mg/L. The addition of relebactam decreased the MICs up to 64-fold; imipenem/relebactam MICs ranged from 0.25 to >32 mg/L. Efficacies of the imipenem monotherapies and the imipenem/relebactam therapy were comparable for the two imipenem-susceptible organisms. Among the imipenem-resistant isolates, an increased mean growth was observed in the imipenem 500 mg q6h HSR and 1 g q8h HSR treatment groups of 1.31â±â1.01 and 0.18â±â1.67 log10 cfu/thigh, respectively. In contrast, a ≥2 log reduction in bacterial density was observed in 27/29 (93%) of the imipenem-resistant isolates subjected to imipenem/relebactam 500/250 mg q6h HSR. CONCLUSIONS: The imipenem/relebactam 500/250 mg q6h HSR demonstrated superior in vivo activity compared with the conventionally employed imipenem regimens against MDR P. aeruginosa over a wide range of imipenem/relebactam MICs.
Subject(s)
Imipenem , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Azabicyclo Compounds/pharmacology , Azabicyclo Compounds/therapeutic use , Humans , Imipenem/pharmacology , Imipenem/therapeutic use , Mice , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , ThighABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Eravacycline is a broad-spectrum, intravenous fluorocycline antibiotic approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults. A 60-minute infusion is recommended for each infused dose. Compatibility data that may allow convenient Y-site administration of eravacycline with other parenteral medications are unavailable. We aimed to determine the physical compatibility of eravacycline with other intravenous medications by simulated Y-site administration. METHODS: Eravacycline was reconstituted according to published prescribing information and diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride to a concentration of 0.6 mg/mL. Simulated Y-site administration was performed by mixing 5 mL of eravacycline with an equal volume of 51 other intravenous medications, including crystalloid and carbohydrate hydration fluids and 20 antimicrobials. Secondary medications were assessed at the upper range of concentrations considered standard for intravenous infusion. Mixtures underwent visual inspection and turbidity measurement immediately on mixture and at 3 subsequent time points (30, 60, and 120 minutes after admixture), and pH was measured at 60 minutes for comparison with the baseline value of the secondary medication. FINDINGS: Eravacycline was physically compatible with 41 parenteral drugs (80%) by simulated Y-site administration. Incompatibility was observed with albumin, amiodarone hydrochloride, ceftaroline fosamil, colistimethate sodium, furosemide, meropenem, meropenem/vaborbactam, micafungin sodium, propofol, and sodium bicarbonate. IMPLICATIONS: Eravacycline for injection was physically compatible with most parenteral medications assessed. Pharmacists and nurses should be knowledgeable of the observed incompatibilities with eravacycline to prevent the unintentional mixing of incompatible intravenous medications.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Tetracyclines/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Incompatibility , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Sodium Chloride/chemistry , Tetracyclines/administration & dosageABSTRACT
El género Oecopetalum Greenm. & C.H. Thomps. (Metteniusaceae) se distribuye en el sureste de México y en América Central (Guatemala, Nicaragua y Costa Rica). Tres especies han sido descritas. Estudiamos especímenes de herbario de Oecopetalum y realizamos un análisis filogenético basado en los genes de los cloroplastos matK y ndhF para responder a las preguntas principales: ¿Cuántas especies hay en el género Oecopetalum? ¿Es Oecopetalum monofilético? ¿Cuáles son las relaciones genéricas con otros miembros de la familia? Oecopetalum es un género monofilético con solo dos especies y Pittosporosis es el grupo hermano. La relación transatlántica de Oecopetalum y Pittosporosis es un patrón geográfico recurrente en la familia Mettenuisaceae, así como en Icacinaceae. Nuestros resultados, en concordancia con la evidencia fósil y las relaciones de otros grupos, apoyan el modelo boreotropical de migraciones terrestres de táxones tropicales desde latitudes altas durante el Paleoceno-Eoceno, globalmente cálido.
Oecopetalum Greenm. & C.H. Thomps. (Metteniusaceae) is distributed in the southeastern portion of Mexico to Central America (Guatemala, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica). Three species have been described. We studied herbarium specimens of the genus Oecopetalum and performed a phylogenetic analysis based on the plastid genes matK and ndhF to answer several major questions: How many species are in the genus Oecopetalum? Is Oecopetalum monophyletic, and how is the genus related to other members of the family? Our results indicate that Oecopetalum is monophyletic, with only two species, and sister to the Asian genus Pittosporopsis. The Trans-Atlantic relationship of Oecopetalum and Pittosporosis is a recurrent geographic pattern in the families Mettenuisaceae and Icacinaceae. Our results, in agreement the fossil record and previous phylogenetic studies, support the boreotropical model of high-latitude terrestrial migrations of tropical taxa during the globally warm Paleocene-Eocene.
ABSTRACT
Abstract Background: Recent studies suggest that sustained use of generic antibiotics may be associated with clinical failure and emergence of antibacterial resistance. The present study was designed to determine the clinical outcome between the use of generic meropenem (GM) and brand-name meropenem (BNM). Additionally, this study evaluated the economic impact of GM and BNM to determine if the former represents a cost-effective alternative to the latter. Methods: Patients treated between January 2011 and May 2014 received GM while patients treated between June 2014 and March 2017 received BNM. Mortality was compared between groups. Total infection cost was defined by the cost of antimicrobial consumption, length of stay, and laboratory and imaging exams until infection resolution. Findings: A total of 168 patients were included; survival rate for the 68 patients treated with GM was 38% compared to 59% in the patients treated with BNM. Multivariate analysis showed that the variables most strongly-associated with mortality were cardiovascular disease (OR 18.18, 95% CI 1.25-262.3, p = 0.033) and treatment with generic meropenem (OR 18.45, 95% CI 1.45-232.32, p = 0.024). On the other hand, total infection cost did not show a significant difference between groups (BNM $10,771 vs. GM $11,343; p = 0.91). Interpretation: The present study suggests that patients treated with GM have a risk of death 18 times higher compared to those treated with BNM. Furthermore, economic analysis shows that GM is not more cost effective than BNM. Summary: More studies measuring clinical outcomes are needed to confirm the clinical equivalence of brand-name versus generic antibiotics, not only for meropenem but also for other molecules.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Young Adult , Drugs, Generic/economics , Drugs, Generic/therapeutic use , Meropenem/economics , Meropenem/therapeutic use , Intensive Care Units/economics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Logistic Models , Survival Analysis , Multivariate Analysis , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/mortality , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Sex Distribution , Colombia , Age Distribution , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that sustained use of generic antibiotics may be associated with clinical failure and emergence of antibacterial resistance. The present study was designed to determine the clinical outcome between the use of generic meropenem (GM) and brand-name meropenem (BNM). Additionally, this study evaluated the economic impact of GM and BNM to determine if the former represents a cost-effective alternative to the latter. METHODS: Patients treated between January 2011 and May 2014 received GM while patients treated between June 2014 and March 2017 received BNM. Mortality was compared between groups. Total infection cost was defined by the cost of antimicrobial consumption, length of stay, and laboratory and imaging exams until infection resolution. FINDINGS: A total of 168 patients were included; survival rate for the 68 patients treated with GM was 38% compared to 59% in the patients treated with BNM. Multivariate analysis showed that the variables most strongly-associated with mortality were cardiovascular disease (OR 18.18, 95% CI 1.25-262.3, pâ¯=â¯0.033) and treatment with generic meropenem (OR 18.45, 95% CI 1.45-232.32, pâ¯=â¯0.024). On the other hand, total infection cost did not show a significant difference between groups (BNM $10,771 vs. GM $11,343; pâ¯=â¯0.91). INTERPRETATION: The present study suggests that patients treated with GM have a risk of death 18 times higher compared to those treated with BNM. Furthermore, economic analysis shows that GM is not more cost effective than BNM. SUMMARY: More studies measuring clinical outcomes are needed to confirm the clinical equivalence of brand-name versus generic antibiotics, not only for meropenem but also for other molecules.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drugs, Generic/economics , Drugs, Generic/therapeutic use , Intensive Care Units/economics , Meropenem/economics , Meropenem/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Colombia , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/mortality , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Survival Analysis , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Spiegel hernia is an infrequent type of abdominal wall defect. Traditionally, it was repaired with an open technique, currently we have multiple laparoscopic techniques with the use of prosthetic material. CLINICAL CASE: We present two cases of Spiegel hernia, one patient scheduled electively and one patient of urgency due to incarcerated hernia, both diagnosed pre-surgically with abdominal tomography. DISCUSSION: Both patients were successfully operated laparoscopically with intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique using composite mesh and articulated fixation system. CONCLUSION: This technique is shown as a recommended option due to its technical facility, good results, both for elective surgeries and emergency surgeries.
INTRODUCCIÓN: La hernia de Spiegel es un tipo infrecuente de defecto de la pared abdominal. Tradicionalmente se realizaba su reparación con técnica abierta, pero en la actualidad contamos con múltiples técnicas laparoscópicas con uso de material protésico. CASO CLÍNICO: Presentamos dos casos de hernia de Spiegel, un paciente programado de manera electiva y otro de urgencia por hernia incarcerada, ambos diagnosticados de manera prequirúrgica con tomografía abdominal. DISCUSIÓN: Los dos pacientes fueron intervenidos de manera exitosa por vía laparoscópica con técnica de malla intraperitoneal utilizando malla compuesta y sistema de fijación articulado. CONCLUSIONES: Esta técnica se muestra como una opción recomendable por su facilidad de realización y buenos resultados, tanto para cirugías electivas como para cirugías de urgencia.
Subject(s)
Hernia, Ventral/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Laparoscopy , Surgical Mesh , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ertapenem has proven to be effective for extended-spectrum beta-lactamases-producing Enterobacteriaceae but lacks activity against non-fermenters; de-escalation to this antibiotic may reduce the selection of resistance to Pseudomonas aeruginosa and improve clinical outcomes. AIM: To evaluate the clinical impact of de-escalation from broad-spectrum anti-pseudomonal agents to ertapenem, a non-pseudomonal antibiotics for Enterobacteriaceae infections in critically-ill patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in adult patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) who had Enterobacteriaceae infections and were de-escalated from empiric anti-pseudomonal coverage to non-pseudomonal antibiotics. Cox proportional hazards models were performed comparing all-cause mortality and length of hospital stay between patients who remained on anti-pseudomonal coverage versus those who were de-escalated to ertapenem. RESULTS: 105 patients in the anti-pseudomonal group were compared to 148 patients in the ertapenem de-escalation group. De-escalation was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared to patients who remained on anti-pseudomonal coverage (adjusted Hazard Ratio 0.24; 95% CI: 0.12-0.46). The length of ICU stay was similar between the groups. DISCUSSION: ICU patients with Enterobacteriaceae infections de-escalated to ertapenem therapy had better outcomes compared to patients who remained on broad-spectrum, anti-pseudomonal therapy, suggesting that de-escalation is a safe approach amongst ICU patients.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/drug therapy , Ertapenem/administration & dosage , Intensive Care Units , Adult , Aged , Colombia , Critical Illness , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/mortality , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Pseudomonas/drug effects , Risk Factors , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción: Ertapenem ha demostrado eficacia frente a Enterobacteriaceae productoras de β-lactamasas de espectro extendido, pero carece de actividad contra bacterias no fermentadoras; el desescalamiento a este antimicrobiano cuando no existe la presencia de P. aeruginosa podría reducir la presión selectiva contra esta bacteria y mejorar los resultados clínicos. Objetivo: Evaluar el impacto clínico del desescalamiento de antimicrobianos con cobertura anti-pseudomonas a ertapenem, un agente sin este espectro, en pacientes críticos con infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte prospectivo en adultos admitidos a Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo (UCI) con infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae, que habían sido desescalados de una cobertura anti-pseudomonas, a un antimicrobiano sin la misma (ertapenem). Se realizó un modelo de riesgo proporcional de Cox comparando mortalidad por cualquier causa y duración de estancia hospitalaria entre aquellos pacientes que permanecieron con cobertura anti-pseudomonas versus aquellos que fueron desescalados a ertapenem. Resultados: 105 pacientes en el grupo anti-pseudomonas fueron comparados con 148 pacientes del grupo de desescalamiento a ertapenem. El desescalamiento estuvo asociado con una menor mortalidad por cualquier causa comparado con los pacientes que permanecieron con cobertura anti-pseudomonas (hazard ratio ajustado 0,24; IC 95%: 0,12-0,46). La estancia hospitalaria en UCI fue similar en ambos grupos. Discusión: Los pacientes de UCI con infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae desescalados a terapia con ertapenem, tuvieron mejores resultados clínicos comparados con aquellos que permanecieron en terapia anti-pseudomonas, sugiriendo que el desescalamiento es una práctica segura en esta población.
Background: Ertapenem has proven to be effective for extended-spectrum beta-lactamases-producing Enterobacteriaceae but lacks activity against non-fermenters; de-escalation to this antibiotic may reduce the selection of resistance to Pseudomonas aeruginosa and improve clinical outcomes. Aim: To evaluate the clinical impact of de-escalation from broad-spectrum anti-pseudomonal agents to ertapenem, a non-pseudomonal antibiotics for Enterobacteriaceae infections in critically-ill patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study in adult patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) who had Enterobacteriaceae infections and were de-escalated from empiric anti-pseudomonal coverage to non-pseudomonal antibiotics. Cox proportional hazards models were performed comparing all-cause mortality and length of hospital stay between patients who remained on anti-pseudomonal coverage versus those who were de-escalated to ertapenem. Results: 105 patients in the anti-pseudomonal group were compared to 148 patients in the ertapenem de-escalation group. De-escalation was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared to patients who remained on anti-pseudomonal coverage (adjusted Hazard Ratio 0.24; 95% CI: 0.12-0.46). The length of ICU stay was similar between the groups. Discussion: ICU patients with Enterobacteriaceae infections de-escalated to ertapenem therapy had better outcomes compared to patients who remained on broad-spectrum, anti-pseudomonal therapy, suggesting that de-escalation is a safe approach amongst ICU patients.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/drug therapy , Ertapenem/administration & dosage , Intensive Care Units , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Pseudomonas/drug effects , Time Factors , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Critical Illness , Colombia , Statistics, Nonparametric , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/mortality , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Length of StayABSTRACT
Fifteen plant species from a protected cloud forest (CF) in Veracruz, Mexico, were screened for their inâ vitro capacity to inhibit the growth of the phytopathogenic bacteria Chryseobacterium sp., Pseudomonas cichorii, Pectobacterium carotovorum and Pantoea stewartii, causal agents of damage to crops like 'chayote', lettuce, potato and corn. As a result, the bioactivity of Turpinia insignis and Leandra cornoides is reported for the first time against Chryseobacterium sp. and P. cichorii. In addition, 24 and 18 compounds not described for these species were dereplicated by an UPLC/MS-MS method, respectively. The identified compounds included simple phenols, hydroxycinnamic acids, flavonoids and coumarins. The antibacterial assay of 12 of them demonstrated the bacteriostatic effect of vanillin, trans-cinnamic acid, scopoletin and umbelliferone against Chryseobacterium sp. These findings confirm for the first time the value of the CF plants from Veracruz as sources of bioactive natural products with antimicrobial properties against phytopathogenic bacteria.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Magnoliopsida/chemistry , Melastomataceae/chemistry , Phenols/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/isolation & purification , Chryseobacterium/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Mass Spectrometry , Mexico , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Molecular Structure , Pantoea/drug effects , Pectobacterium/drug effects , Phenols/chemistry , Phenols/isolation & purification , Pseudomonas/drug effects , Species Specificity , Structure-Activity RelationshipABSTRACT
INTRODUCTIONBeta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antimicrobials (BLBLIs) are among the most controversial classes of antibiotic agents available for the treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Gram-negative bacteria (ESBL-GNR). Piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) is one of the most frequently utilized antibiotic agents for empirical Gram-negative bacterial coverage and remains active against a large proportion of ESBL-GNR strains. Furthermore, good antimicrobial stewardship practices encourage the use of carbapenem-sparing treatment regimens for infections due to ESBL-GNR. As rapid diagnostics are increasingly used in the clinical microbiology laboratory and have the capability of detecting CTX-M type or other ESBL resistance mechanisms, this issue continues to be pertinent. Some data imply reduced efficacy of PTZ against ESBLs. Several factors may affect a clinician's choice to use BLBLIs, including the isolate's MIC, the site and severity of infection, and the type of resistance mechanism. These factors are explored in this review of the pros and cons of BLBLI treatment of invasive infections due to ESBL-producing bacteria, as well as how laboratories should report results for BLBLIs for these organisms as they relate to antimicrobial stewardship. In this Point-Counterpoint, Audrey Schuetz provides the pro point of view and Sergio Reyes and Pranita Tamma provide the con, counterpoint view.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination/therapeutic use , beta-Lactam Resistance/drug effects , beta-Lactamase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Clinical Decision-Making , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacteria/enzymology , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination/pharmacology , beta-Lactam Resistance/genetics , beta-Lactamase Inhibitors/pharmacologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp., and Acinetobacter spp. infections are major causes of morbidity and mortality, especially due to the emergence and spread of ß-lactamases. Carbapenemases, which are ß-lactamases with the capacity to hydrolyze or inactivate carbapenems, have become a serious concern as they have the largest hydrolytic spectrum and therefore limit the utility of most ß-lactam antibiotics. Areas covered: Here, we present an update of the current status of carbapenemases in Latin America and the Caribbean. Expert commentary: The increased frequency of reports on carbapenemases in Latin America and the Caribbean shows that they have successfully spread and have even become endemic in some countries. Countries such as Brazil, Colombia, Argentina, and Mexico account for the majority of these reports. Early suspicion and detection along with implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs in all healthcare settings are crucial for the control and prevention of carbapenemase-producing bacteria.