Delay in starting radiotherapy due to neoadjuvant therapy does not worsen survival in unresected glioblastoma patients.

PURPOSE: We retrospectively examined the potential effect on overall survival (OS) of delaying radiotherapy to administer neoadjuvant therapy in unresected glioblastoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared OS in 119 patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy followed by standard treatment (NA group) and 96 patients receiving standard treatment without neoadjuvant therapy (NoNA group). The MaxStat package of R identified the optimal cut-off point for waiting time to radiotherapy. RESULTS: OS was similar in the NA and NoNA groups. Median waiting time to radiotherapy after surgery was 13 weeks for the NA group and 4.2 weeks for the NoNA group. The longest OS was attained by patients who started radiotherapy after 12 weeks and the shortest by patients who started radiotherapy within 4 weeks (12.3 vs 6.6 months) (P = 0.05). OS was 6.6 months for patients who started radiotherapy before the optimal cutoff of 6.43 weeks and 19.1 months for those who started after this time (P = 0.005). Patients who completed radiotherapy had longer OS than those who did not, in all 215 patients and in the NA and NoNA groups (P = 0.000). In several multivariate analyses, completing radiotherapy was a universally favorable prognostic factor, while neoadjuvant therapy was never identified as a negative prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: In our series of unresected patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment, in spite of the delay in starting radiotherapy, OS was not inferior to that of a similar group of patients with no delay in starting radiotherapy.

Correction to: SEOM clinical guideline of diagnosis and management of low-grade glioma (2017).

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. Figure 3 was incorrect.

SEOM clinical guideline of diagnosis and management of low-grade glioma (2017).

Diffuse infiltrating low-grade gliomas include oligodendrogliomas and astrocytomas, and account for about 5% of all primary brain tumors. Treatment strategies for these low-grade gliomas in adults have recently changed. The 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification has updated the definition of these tumors to include their molecular characterization, including the presence of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 1p/19p codeletion. In this new classification, the histologic subtype of grade II-mixed oligoastrocytoma has also been eliminated. The precise optimal management of patients with low-grade glioma after resection remains to be determined. The risk-benefit ratio of adjuvant treatment must be weighed for each individual.

A phase II study of feasibility and toxicity of bevacizumab in combination with temozolomide in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective and multicentric phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of temozolomide (TMZ) and bevacizumab (BV) in patients (pts) with recurrent glioblastoma (GB), previously treated with chemoradiotherapy and at least three cycles of adjuvant TMZ. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with GB at first relapse received BV 10 mg/kg day every 2 weeks and TMZ 150 mg/m(2) days 1-7 and 15-21, every 28 days. Patients underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-two evaluable pts were recruited in 8 sites. Fourteen pts (44%) had gross total resection. O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter was methylated in 12 pts, unmethylated in 6 pts, and missing in 14 pts. The estimated 6-month progression free survival (PFS) rate was 21.9% (95% CI 9.3-40.0%). The median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 4.2 months (95% CI 3.6-5.4 months) and 7.3 months (95% CI 5.8-8.8 months), respectively. No significant association with MGMT status was found in terms of OS or PFS. Six of 32 pts (19%; 95% CI 7.2-36.4) were long-term survivors, with a median PFS and OS (50% events) of 9.5 months (95% CI 7.9-23.6) and 15.4 (95% CI 8.9-NA), respectively: no differences in baseline characteristics were identified in comparison with total population. No unexpected toxicities or treatment-related deaths were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen showed to be feasible and well tolerated in pts with recurrent GB pretreated with TMZ. Further investigation is warranted to identify subpopulations that are more likely to benefit from addition of BV to GB therapy.

VEGF and TSP1 levels correlate with prognosis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: There is a need for biomarkers that may help in selecting the most effective anticancer treatments for each patient. We have investigated the prognostic value of a set of angiogenesis, inflammation and coagulation markers in patients treated for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Peripheral blood samples were obtained from 60 patients before first line platinum-based chemotherapy ± bevacizumab, and after the third cycle of treatment. Blood samples from 60 healthy volunteers were also obtained as controls. Angiogenesis, inflammation and coagulation markers vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), their soluble receptors 1 (VEGFR1) and 2 (VEGFR2), thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1), interleukin-6 (IL6), sialic acid (SA) and tissue factor (TF) were quantified by ELISA. RESULTS: Except for TSP-1, pre- and post-treatment levels of all markers were higher in patients than in controls (p < 0.05). There was a positive and significant correlation between VEGF and VEGFR2 before treatment. VEGF also correlated with inflammatory markers IL-6 and SA. Moreover, there was a positive and significant correlation between levels of VEGFR1 and TF. Decreased levels of TSP-1 and increased levels of VEGF were associated with shorter survival. Bevacizumab significantly modified angiogenesis parameters and caused a decrease of VEGF and an increase of TSP-1. CONCLUSION: Angiogenesis, inflammation and coagulation markers were increased in NSCLC patients. Increased levels of VEGF and low levels of TSP-1 correlated with a poor prognosis.