Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol ; 34(6): 629-636, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32150298

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While most known causes of infertility relate to the health of the woman and/or her partner, questions have been raised regarding the possible contributions of transgenerational or epigenetic factors. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this hypothesis-generating work was to examine whether Generation 1's (G1's) age at the delivery of G2 (Generation 2) was associated with G2's fertility in later life. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women (G2s) recruited online in 2016. A questionnaire queried G2s regarding demographics and fertility. The primary exposure was G1's age at G2's birth. Outcome measures included the following: 12-month infertility, time to pregnancy, and childlessness. The adjusted relative risk (RR) of G2 infertility and childlessness by G1 age at G2's birth was estimated through a modified Poisson regression approach. The fecundity odds ratio (FOR) for the association between G1's age at G2 birth and time to pregnancy for G2 was estimated by discrete-time survival models, with complementary log-log link. RESULTS: A total of 2,854 women enrolled. We found no association between G1 age at G2's birth and G2 infertility. Being born to a G1 aged 15-19 years was associated with a longer time to pregnancy for G2 (FOR 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.72, 0.99), relative to being born to a G1 aged 20-24 years. We observed the suggestion of a possible increased risk of childlessness among G2s born to older G1s, but the estimate was imprecise. CONCLUSIONS: While being born to a G1 who was 15-19 years old was associated with an increase in G2 time to pregnancy, we found no association between G1 age at G2's birth and infertility and only the suggestion of a modest association with childlessness. These data suggest a possible subtle effect of G1 age at G2's birth on G2 fertility, which warrants further study.


Subject(s)
Fertility , Infertility , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Infertility/epidemiology , Maternal Age , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
Brain Dev ; 42(2): 205-210, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31704190

ABSTRACT

Patients with germline phosphatidylinositol glycan biosynthesis class A (PIGA) related disorder have historically been categorized into one of two distinct subtypes: a severe form which is often fatal, and a less severe form. However, the increasing number of cases with features indicative of both subtypes raise the possibility of a phenotypic spectrum associated with PIGA disorder. In order to further characterize this phenotypic spectrum, we present two patients with features of both the severe and less severe subtypes with a review of phenotypes reported to date in the literature. In eight year old patient 1, a maternally inherited PIGA likely pathogenic variant was discovered using exome sequencing. He presented with myoclonic epilepsy, mild intellectual disability, spastic diplegia, developmental motor delay, and autism spectrum disorder. Patient 2 is a 13 year old with focal epilepsy, profound developmental delay, coarse facial features, severe intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. A de novo PIGA likely pathogenic variant was found through exome sequencing. Both patients had normal alkaline phosphatase levels and are without related organ abnormalities. We conclude that pathogenic PIGA variants cause a spectrum of phenotypes rather than the categories of "severe" and "less severe" as previously posited.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy/etiology , Membrane Proteins/deficiency , Metabolism, Inborn Errors/complications , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/etiology , Adolescent , Child , Germ-Line Mutation , Humans , Male , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Phenotype
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...