The effect of cochlear implantation on tinnitus in patients with post lingual bilateral profound hearing loss.

INTRODUCTION: In this study we investigated the effect of cochlear implantation on tinnitus in patients with post lingual bilateral profound hearing loss. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 66 post-lingual deaf patients over 18 years old who referred for cochlear implantation and complained of tinnitus were included. Patients were divided into two groups with residual hearing (in frequency 250-500 Hz) and without residual hearing. All data including age, gender, type of implants, type of surgery, cause of the disease, and information on the THI score before cochlear implantation, one month after cochlear implantation and one year after cochlear implantation was recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Nine patients had residual hearing, while 57 patients did not. After one month and one year, in both groups, the mean THI score has decreased significantly (p-value = 0.001), but there was no significant difference in the mean THI score before surgery and one month and one year after surgery between two groups with and without residual hearing. There was no significant difference in tinnitus severity according to THI-grade between two groups. Also there was no significant difference in THI score and the cause of the hearing loss, type and insertion method of implantation, one month and one year after the surgery between two groups. CONCLUSION: According to our results, the was no significant correlation between residual hearing and tinnitus score before surgery, one month and one year after the surgery.

Jugular foramen versus hypoglossal canal in axial CT scan.

Background: Differentiating jugular foramen from hypoglossal canal in computed tomography (CT) scan is vital for correct diagnosis of posterior fossa pathologies; however, it has been shown that the ability for differentiating these skull base elements is limited. The purpose of this study was to produce a simple algorithm for differentiating the jugular foramen from the hypoglossal canal in axial CT scan on two levels (top level where bony carotid canal is evident and lower level where bony carotid canal is not evident). Methods: Data derived from axial CT scan of 250 patients (500 sides) were used for producing algorithm. At top level petro-occipital fissure utilized for recognizing occipital condyle in which hypoglossal canal is located; and, at lower level the distance between the posterior border of the anatomic element (jugular foramen or hypoglossal canal) and the tangent to the anterior bony part is used for producing algorithm. Results: The mean age of patients was 38.1 ± 19 years. The petro-occipital fissure can be used in all patients for differentiating hypoglossal canal. At lower level the distance between the anterior tangent and the posterior border of the element was significantly lower for hypoglossal canal (P value < 0.001). The distance more than 3.5 mm with sensitivity 83.8% and specificity 97.1% differentiate jugular foramen from hypoglossal canal. Conclusion: Simple algorithms based on quantitative morphologic features of the jugular foramen and hypoglossal canal can be used with high sensitivity and specificity to distinguish these elements.

Silastic Electrode Positioner Extrusion as a Late Complication of Cochlear Implantation Surgery.

It was the aim of this study to report a rare case of electrode positioner extrusion in cochlear-implanted patients as a late complication and introduce safe management. A retrospective case report in a tertiary referral center. Extrusion of Silastic electrode positioner through tympanic membrane occurred 17 years after cochlear implantation surgery. Although electrode positioner cochlear implants are not being used anymore, otologists and surgeons should be aware of their possible related complications and provide a proper management.

Gentamicin-mediated ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity: A clinical trial study.

BACKGROUND: Aminoglycosides and mainly gentamicin are the most important antimicrobial agents. Two different methods of administration exist: Single and multiple doses. There has always been a controversy about the less harmful administration method, to minimize adverse effects of gentamicin - deafness and renal insufficiency. In this study, it was aimed to compare two different methods of administration to figure out the least harmful treatment method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a clinical study, eighty patients aged 12-55 years who were admitted with sepsis syndrome were included in the study; they were divided into two groups: The first group received single-dose treatment (5 mg/kg) whereas the second group was treated with multiple doses (1.7 mg/kg three times a day) of gentamicin. RESULTS: The results show that blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (CR) levels were decreased in the first group. Both blood urea nitrogen and creatinine and also mean glomerular filtration rate was increased in the same group. In the second group, mean BUN and CR levels were increased while the GFR was decreased in the same group. There was also a gradual increase in GFR in the first group. GFR <80 was decreased from 20% to 5.1% in the first group while increased from 5% to 27.5% in the second group. Results of audiometric studies show 6.1% hearing problem in the first group and 12.8% in the second one. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the present study showed that nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity are minimized in single-dose administration compared to multiples doses.