IMI-Type Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacter cloacae Complex, France and Overseas Regions, 2012-2022.

We characterized a collection of IMI-like-producing Enterobacter spp. isolates (n = 112) in France. The main clone corresponded to IMI-1-producing sequence type 820 E. cloacae subspecies cloacae that was involved in an outbreak. Clinicians should be aware of potential antimicrobial resistance among these bacteria.

Regional dissemination of NDM-1 producing Enterobacter hormaechei ST1740, with a subset of strains co-producing VIM-4 or IMP-13, France, 2019 to 2022.

BackgroundFrom 2019 to 2022, the French National Reference Centre for Antibiotic Resistance (NRC) received a total of 25 isolates of Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. hoffmannii sequence type (ST)1740. All produced metallo-ß-lactamase(s) and were from the Lyon area.AimTo understand these strains' spread and evolution, more extended microbiological and molecular analyses were conducted.MethodsPatients' demographics and specimen type related to isolates were retrieved. All strains underwent short-read whole genome sequencing, and for 15, long-read sequencing to understand carbapenemase-gene acquisition. Clonal relationships were inferred from core-genome single nt polymorphisms (SNPs). Plasmids and the close genetic environment of each carbapenemase-encoding gene were analysed.ResultsPatients (10 female/15 male) were on average 56.6 years old. Seven isolates were recovered from infections and 18 through screening. With ≤ 27 SNPs difference between each other's genome sequences, the 25 strains represented a clone dissemination. All possessed a chromosome-encoded bla NDM-1 gene inside a composite transposon flanked by two IS3000. While spreading, the clone independently acquired a bla VIM-4-carrying plasmid of IncHI2 type (n = 12 isolates), or a bla IMP-13-carrying plasmid of IncP-1 type (n = 1 isolate). Of the 12 isolates co-producing NDM-1 and VIM-4, seven harboured the colistin resistance gene mcr9.2; the remaining five likely lost this gene through excision.ConclusionThis long-term outbreak was caused by a chromosome-encoded NDM-1-producing ST1740 E. hormaechei subsp. hoffmannii clone, which, during its dissemination, acquired plasmids encoding VIM-4 or IMP-13 metallo-ß-lactamases. To our knowledge, IMP-13 has not prior been reported in Enterobacterales in France. Epidemiological and environmental investigations should be considered alongside microbiological and molecular ones.

Faecal Viral Excretion and Gastrointestinal Co-Infection Do Not Explain Digestive Presentation in COVID-19 Patients.

The physiopathological mechanisms responsible for digestive symptoms in COVID-19 patients are still unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of faecal viral shedding on digestive symptoms and propose differential diagnoses in order to understand the gastrointestinal clinical spectrum in acute cases of COVID-19. All patients managed between March and May 2020, from whom stool samples were collected for microbiological investigations, were included. Microbiological analysis consisted of syndromic PCR screening and microscopic parasitological examination supplemented with microsporidia and multiplex protozoa PCR. SARS-CoV-2 infection was diagnosed via viral detection in respiratory and frozen stool samples, completed via serological test when necessary. Epidemiological, clinical, radiological, and biological data and clinical courses were compared according to COVID-19 status and faecal SARS-CoV-2 shedding and enteric co-infection status. The sample included 50 COVID+ and 67 COVID- patients. Faecal viral shedding was detected in 50% of stool samples and was associated with a higher viral load in the upper respiratory tract. Detected enteric pathogens were not different between subjects with different COVID-19 statuses or faecal SARS-CoV-2 shedding and had no impact on the clinical course for COVID-19 patients. The connection between SARS-CoV-2 shedding and enteric pathogen co-infection involvement in gastrointestinal presentation and clinical course is still unclear, suggesting other processes are involved in digestive disorders in COVID-19 patients.

In vitro activity of apramycin against 16S-RMTase-producing Gram-negative isolates.

OBJECTIVES: Apramycin is an aminoglycoside (AG) with a unique structure that is little affected by plasmid-mediated mechanisms of AG resistance, including most AG-modifying enzymes and 16S rRNA methyltransferases (16S-RMTases). We evaluate the activity of apramycin against a collection of 16S-RMTase-producing isolates, including Enterobacterales, non-fermenting bacteria, and carbapenemase producers. METHODS: In total, 164 non-duplicate 16S-RMTase-producing isolates, including 84 Enterobacterales, 53 Acinetobacter baumannii and 27 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, were included in the study. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on all isolates with Illumina technology. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of apramycin was determined by broth microdilution with customized Sensititre plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Dardilly, France). RESULTS: We found that 95% (156/164) of the 16S-RMTase-producing isolates were susceptible to apramycin, with a MIC50 of 4 mg/L and a MIC90 of 16 mg/L, respectively. Resistance rates were higher in P. aeruginosa (11%) than in A. baumannii (4%) or Enterobacterales (4%) (P < 0.0001 for each comparison). Eight isolates were resistant to apramycin, including one isolate with an MIC >64 mg/L due to the acquisition of the aac(3)-IV gene. The genetic environment of the aac(3)-IV gene was similar to that in the pAH01-4 plasmid of an Escherichia coli isolate from chicken in China. CONCLUSION: Resistance to apramycin remains rare in 16S-RMTase-producing isolates. Apramycin may, therefore, be an interesting alternative treatment for infections caused by 16S-RMTase and carbapenemase producers.

Evaluation of a colorimetric test for the rapid detection of carbapenemase activity in Gram negative bacilli: the MAST® PAcE test.

The MAST® Carba PAcE test is a colorimetric test used to detect carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli from cultured colonies. The performances of this test were compared to ß-CARBA™, Carba NP test and RAPIDEC® CARBA NP tests using a collection of 280 characterized isolates. Sensitivity and specificity of the MAST® Carba PAcE test were 79.8% (95%IC: 73.3%-85.1%) and 98.9% (95%IC: 92.9%-99.9%). The MAST® Carba PAcE sensitivity was the lowest mainly due to interpretation difficulties (particularly OXA-48-like).