ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To measure surrogate markers of coagulation activation as well as of the systemic inflammatory response in patients undergoing primary elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using either the so-called Smart suction device or a continuous autotransfusion system (C.A.T.S.®). METHODS: Fifty-eight patients being operated with a miniaturized circuit (minimal extracorporeal circuit, MECC) were prospectively randomized to using a so-called Smart suction device or a routine continuous autotransfusion system (C.A.T.S.®) for collection of mediastinal shed blood. The coagulation response was measured by thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) and D-dimer. The inflammatory response was measured by Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and complement factor 3a (C3a) at three different time points, before surgery, 2h after surgery, as well as 18 h after surgery. RESULTS: No serious adverse cardiovascular event was observed. Serum levels of TAT significantly differed between both groups 2h after surgery (Smart suction 16.12 ± 13.51 µg l⻹ vs C.A.T.S® 9.83 ± 7.81 µg l⻹, p = 0.040) and returned to baseline values after 18 h in both groups. Serum levels of D-dimer showed a corresponding pattern with a peak 2h after surgery (Smart suction 1115 ± 1231 ng ml⻹ vs C.A.T.S.® 507 ± 604 ng ml⻹, p = 0.025). IL-6 levels also significantly differed between both groups 2h after surgery (Smart suction 186 ± 306 pg ml⻹ vs C.A.T.S.® 82 ± 71 pg ml⻹, p = 0.072). No significant changes in serum levels of C3a over time could be observed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite no differences in the clinical course of patients with either Smart suction or C.A.T.S.® being observed, surrogate markers of coagulation and inflammation seem to be less pronounced in patients where cardiotomy blood is not being directly reinfused. As such, C.A.T.S.® should be preferred in routine CABG, as long as no extensive volume substitution is anticipated.