Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Behav Med ; 30(6): 790-800, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36631701

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The profound health consequences of loneliness are well-established. However, less is known about the protective factors which may alleviate the effects of loneliness on mental health especially among working-age adults amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. We draw on the social ecology of resilience and examine whether resilience factors can buffer the effects of loneliness on mental distress. METHODS: Data came from the National Well-being Survey-a national study of a demographically representative sample of U.S. working-age adults (N = 4014). We used (a) structural equation models with latent variables to examine the main effects of loneliness, psychological resilience, and perceived social support on mental distress, and (b) latent moderated structural equations to estimate the latent interaction effects. RESULTS: Results revealed that (a) loneliness was positively associated with mental distress and psychological resilience was negatively related to mental distress, and (b) psychological resilience and perceived social support moderated the strength of the relationship between loneliness and mental distress. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the importance of psychological resilience and perceived social support as two protective factors in the relationship between loneliness and mental distress. Given that loneliness significantly predicts worse mental and physical health and higher mortality, identifying protective factors that might disrupt these connections is vital. As such, public health efforts to strengthen and expand familial and community social support networks and foster psychological resilience are urgently needed to support mental health among working-age adults during additional waves of the pandemic or future similar stressors.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Resilience, Psychological , Adult , Humans , Loneliness , Pandemics , Mental Health
2.
J Appl Gerontol ; 41(12): 2583-2588, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35943905

ABSTRACT

Aging services were poised to play an important role in supporting the COVID-19 vaccination rollout for older adults. In this study, we use ordinary least squares regression models of county-level data (N = 3086) to examine if density of aging and disability services is associated with COVID-19 vaccination rates for older adults in rural and urban areas of the United States. We find that net of compositional characteristics, county-level density of aging and disability services is associated with higher older adult vaccination rates. However, in the rural-urban stratified models, this only remained consistently true for rural counties. Given higher risk of COVID-19 mortality for older adults and larger relative shares of older adults in rural areas, rural counties with low vaccination rates should invest in supporting and/or expanding older adult services to facilitate vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , United States/epidemiology , Humans , Aged , Urban Population , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Rural Population , Aging , Vaccination
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(5): 161-166, 2022 Feb 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35113850

ABSTRACT

Poor self-rated physical health is strongly associated with morbidity and premature mortality (1,2). Studies that are now a decade old report worse self-rated health among rural than among urban residents (3,4). Whether the rural disadvantage persists in 2021 is uncertain and the contributing factors to contemporary rural-urban variations in self-rated health are not known. Rural America is diverse by population size and adjacency to metropolitan areas, and rural populations vary demographically and socioeconomically. This analysis used data from the National Well-being Survey (NWS), a national sample of approximately 4,000 U.S. working-aged adults conducted during February and March 2021 to examine differences in self-rated physical health among residents of large urban; medium/small urban; metro-adjacent rural; and remote rural counties. Residents of medium/small urban, metro-adjacent rural, and remote rural counties had significantly higher probabilities of reporting fair/poor self-rated physical health than their large urban county peers. There were no significant differences by sex or race/ethnicity in self-rated physical health. Individual-level socioeconomic resources (including higher educational attainment, higher household income, and higher probability of employment) contributed to the advantage among residents of large urban counties. Although there is no single solution to reducing rural-urban health disparities, these findings suggest that reducing socioeconomic disparities is essential.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Self Report , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , United States , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
5.
Matern Child Health J ; 20(2): 315-25, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26511129

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study is among the first to examine metropolitan status differences in human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine initiation and completion among United States adolescent girls and is unique in its focus on how maternal socioeconomic status and health care access moderate metropolitan status differences in HPV vaccination. METHODS: Using cross-sectional data from 3573 girls aged 12-17 in the U.S. from the 2008-2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we estimate main and interaction effects from binary logistic regression models to identify subgroups of girls for which there are metropolitan versus non-metropolitan differences in HPV vaccination. RESULTS: Overall 34 % of girls initiated vaccination, and 19 % completed all three shots. On average, there were no metropolitan status differences in vaccination odds. However, there were important subgroup differences. Among low-income girls and girls whose mothers did not complete high school, those in non-metropolitan areas had significantly higher probability of vaccine initiation than those in metropolitan areas. Among high-income girls and girls whose mothers completed college, those in metropolitan areas had significantly higher odds of vaccine initiation than those in non-metropolitan areas. Moreover, among girls whose mothers experienced a medical cost barrier, non-metropolitan girls were less likely to initiate vaccination compared to metropolitan girls. CONCLUSIONS: Mothers remain essential targets for public health efforts to increase HPV vaccination and combat cervical cancer. Public health experts who study barriers to HPV vaccination and physicians who come into contact with mothers should be aware of group-specific barriers to vaccination and employ more tailored efforts to increase vaccination.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Mothers , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Social Class , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Immunization Programs/trends , Income , Logistic Models , Male , Papillomavirus Vaccines/economics , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Rural Population , United States , Urban Population , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/economics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Vaccination/economics , Vaccination/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...