Tibial pilon fractures treated with a periarticular external fixator: Retrospective study of 47 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Tibial pilon fractures are a treatment challenge, since there is no true gold standard treatment, and because of potential skin complications. Periarticular external fixation (PAEF) appears to produce good results, but the outcomes with the TL-HEX Trauma™ (Orthofix®, Verona, Italy) have not yet been evaluated. We performed a study with the following objectives: 1) evaluate time to union and union rate; 2) determine clinical and radiological results; 3) detect complications. HYPOTHESIS: PAEF will produce comparable fracture union to other external fixator techniques for tibial pilon fractures. METHODS: A single center, retrospective study, was done between June 2016 and December 2018. Patients who had a tibial pilon fracture operated with a PAEF were included if they had a minimum of 12 months' follow-up. Forty-seven patients were included; the mean follow-up was 2.45 years (1.2-3.7). The primary endpoint was the time to union and union rate at the final assessment. The secondary endpoints were the joint range of motion, residual pain (VAS), functional scores (AOFAS and SF12) and complication rate. RESULTS: The union rate was 70% (33/47) and the mean time to union was 201±79 days (89-369). The range of motion was significantly reduced relative to the contralateral side. Twenty patients had residual pain that averaged 2.9 (1-6) on the VAS. The mean AOFAS score was 74 points (51-95). Twenty patients (43%) suffered at least one complication. DISCUSSION: While a PAEF helps to avoid skin complications, in our study, it was associated with a lower union rate and longer time to union than in other published studies. This difference is likely due to a higher rate of open fractures and high-energy trauma in our study, different protocol for return to weightbearing and a different external fixator than other studies. This is the first study reporting the results of the TL-HEX Trauma in this indication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.

Medium-term evaluation of leg lengthening by ISKD® intramedullary nail in 28 patients: Should we still use this lengthening system?

INTRODUCTION: Lower-limb lengthening presently uses intramedullary nailing. There are motorized systems and mechanical systems, each with their specific complications. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of ISKD® mechanical nails (Orthofix Inc., Texas, USA) on 3D EOS® imaging, and also complications and functional impact. HYPOTHESIS: The study hypothesis was that nail lengthening is effective but should no longer use the ISKD® system, due to the high rate of specific complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective study included 28 patients (14 female, 14 male) undergoing limb-lengthening by ISKD® nail between 2005 and 2018. Mean age was 29 years. Twenty-four procedures were femoral and 4 tibial. Lengthening and consolidation parameters and residual discrepancy were measured on 3D EOS® imaging. Complications and functional scores were collated. RESULTS: Twenty-eight ISKD® nails were implanted in 28 patients. Mean follow-up was 75 months. Planned lengthening was achieved in 78.5% of cases, for a mean lengthening of 34.5mm. Mean lengthening and consolidation indices were respectively 0.94mm/day and 105 days/cm. Length discrepancy showed significant correction, with improvement in functional scores (p<0.01). The overall complications rate was 67.9%, 76% of which were specific to the ISKD® nail. DISCUSSION: The present study confirmed that nail lengthening is an indication of choice in lower-limb length discrepancy, but that the ISKD® system should no longer be used, due to an excessive rate of specific complications. Complications are due to deficient control of lengthening rate, not found with new-generation motorized nails, which show much fewer complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study without control group.

Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: Can leg length be satisfactorily controlled via anterior approach without a traction table? Evaluation in 56 patients with EOS 3D.

BACKGROUND: Leg length discrepancy (LLD) occurs in about 25% of cases after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and adversely affects function if greater than 10mm. When using the direct anterior approach (DAA), limb length control is considered easier with a standard operating table than with a traction table. However, this assumption has not been confirmed. More specifically, no studies have used EOS imaging, which is currently the reference for assessing limb length. The objectives of this retrospective study were: (1) to use EOS imaging to determine whether THA via the DAA on a standard table allowed satisfactory limb length control; (2) whether LLD was associated with other parameters such as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), or side; and (3) to compare clinical score values between patients with and without LLD. HYPOTHESIS: The DAA without a traction table allows satisfactory limb length control as assessed using 3D EOS imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective descriptive study included 56 patients who underwent primary THA via the DAA between March 2013 and June 2014. LLD was measured on pre- and post-operative EOS images, using sterEOS™ 3D software. Age, gender, BMI, and side of THA were collected. The 12-item Short Form score, Harris Hip Score, and Postel-Merle d'Aubigné score were determined to look for radio-clinical correlations. RESULTS: Of the 56 patients, 15 (26.8%) had an LLD >10mm before THA and 12 (21.4%) after THA. Limb length equality was restored in 7 patients with 1 with a shorter and 1 with a longer limb before THA. In 5 patients with equal limb length before THA, the operated limb was lengthened after THA, by a mean of 8.92mm (range, 5.8-10.8mm). Thus, in all, 5/56 (8.9%) patients experienced a detrimental change in limb length due to the surgery. No statistically significant differences were found between patients with and without LLD regarding age, gender, BMI, side, or clinical scores. DISCUSSION: Although the frequency of LLD after THA in our study was consistent with earlier reports, our results show that good limb length control can be obtained via the DAA with a standard operating table. Thus, 7 of the 11 patients with a shorter limb and 1 of 4 with a longer limb before THA had equal limb lengths after THA, and only 8.9% of patients experienced a detrimental increase in limb length after THA. The DAA without a traction table allows satisfactory intra-operative limb length control based on visualisation of anatomical landmarks (antero-superior iliac spines and medial malleoli). This technique is therefore valuable for limiting the risk of LLD. When combined with 3D EOS planning, it may increase the accuracy of limb length adjustment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study with no control group.

Contribution of a multiplex serological test for the preoperative diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication of orthopaedic surgery. Preoperative diagnosis, although sometimes difficult, is key to choose the relevant treatment. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study aimed at evaluating the diagnostic performance of a multiplex serological test for the pre-operative diagnosis of PJI. Blood samples were collected between 1 July 2016 and 31 July 2017 among patients referred for suspected PJI that occurred at least six weeks prior. Infection diagnosis was confirmed using intraoperative bacteriological cultures during prosthetic exchange. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included, with a median age of 73 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 66-81) and 40 (56%) were male. Twenty-six patients had aseptic loosening and 45 patients had PJI. Among the latter, median time since the last surgery was 96 weeks (IQR: 20-324). Intraoperative cultures found Staphylococcus spp, Streptococcus spp or both in 39, 5 and 1 patients, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 81.8, 95.4, 97.3 and 72.4%, respectively, for all patients and 87.5, 93.5, 94.6 and 85.3%, respectively, for staphylococcal infections. Patients with false negative (FN) results had a significantly lower blood lymphocyte count (p = .045). CONCLUSIONS: Multiplex serological test performed well among patients with chronic staphylococcal prosthetic infection. This approach could contribute to PJI diagnosis especially in patients for whom the pre-operative analysis of joint fluid is not informative.

Complete fracture of the lamina of the sixth cervical vertebra with hemiplegia: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: We report the rare case of a 27-year-old man who presented a right sided complete hemiplegia after a neck trauma due to a road traffic accident. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography revealed a complete fracture of the C6 lamina including a partial fracture of the right articular process with complete rotation of the fragment into the spinal canal with a major compression of the right side of the cord. The patient was operated urgently and underwent posterior approach for C6 arch removal followed by a C6C7 anterior fusion as T2 weighted magnetic resonance imaging revealed a completely torn C6C7 disc with a hematoma under the posterior longitudinal ligament associated with an increased cord signal. Patient could walk normally 6 weeks after the accident. At 2 years follow-up, he recovered full sensation of his right body but had a residual intrinsic muscle weakness in his right hand. CONCLUSION: This is the first paper, in the literature, to describe a complete laminar fracture at the cervical spine level with hemiplegia. Early surgical intervention probably provides the better neurological outcome.