ABSTRACT
Emergent ventral hernia repair (eVHR) is associated with significant morbidity, yet there is no consensus regarding optimal surgical approach. We hypothesized that eVHR with synthetic mesh would have a higher readmission rate compared to primary eVHR or biologic mesh repair. Retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) was conducted for patient entries between 2016 and 2018. Adult patients who underwent eVHR were included. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and surgical techniques were compared between readmitted and non-readmitted patients. Predictors of readmission were assessed using multivariate analysis with propensity weighting for various eVHR techniques. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay and readmission diagnoses. 43,819 patients underwent eVHR; of the 22,732 with 6 months of follow-up, 6382 (28.1%) were readmitted. The majority of readmissions occurred within the first 30 days (51.8%). Over half of the readmissions were related to surgical complications (50.6%), the most common being superficial surgical site infection (30.1%) and bowel obstruction/ileus (12.2%). In the multivariate analysis, predictors of 30-day readmission included use of synthetic mesh (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00-1.14), biologic mesh (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06-1.49), and need for concomitant large bowel resection (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.30-1.65). eVHR is associated with high rates of readmission. Primary repair had favorable odds for readmission and lower risk of surgical complications compared to synthetic and biologic mesh repairs. Synthetic repair had lower odds of readmission than biologic repair. Given the inherent limitations of the NRD, further institutional prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.
Subject(s)
Biological Products , Hernia, Ventral , Incisional Hernia , Adult , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Patient Readmission , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Hernia, Ventral/surgery , Incisional Hernia/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Surgical Mesh , Treatment Outcome , RecurrenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a disorder of the preterm newborn characterized by neurovascular disruption in the immature retina that may cause visual impairment and blindness. OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinical screening tool for early postnatal prediction of ROP in preterm newborns based on risk information available within the first 48 h of postnatal life. METHODS: Using data submitted to the Vermont Oxford Network (VON) between 1995 and 2015, we created logistic regression models based on infants born <28 completed weeks gestational age. We developed a model with 60% of the data and identified birth weight, gestational age, respiratory distress syndrome, non-Hispanic ethnicity, and multiple gestation as predictors of ROP. We tested the model in the remaining 40%, performed tenfold cross-validation, and tested the score in ELGAN study data. RESULTS: Of the 1,052 newborns in the VON database, 627 recorded an ROP status. Forty percent had no ROP, 40% had mild ROP (stages 1 and 2), and 20% had severe ROP (stages 3-5). We created a weighted score to predict any ROP based on the multivariable regression model. A cutoff score of 5 had the best sensitivity (95%, 95% CI 93-97), while maintaining a strong positive predictive value (63%, 95% CI 57-68). When applied to the ELGAN data, sensitivity was lower (72%, 95% CI 69-75), but PPV was higher (80%, 95% CI 77-83). CONCLUSIONS: STEP-ROP is a promising screening tool. It is easy to calculate, does not rely on extensive postnatal data collection, and can be calculated early after birth. Early ROP screening may help physicians limit patient exposure to additional risk factors, and may be useful for risk stratification in clinical trials aimed at reducing ROP.