Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Surgery ; 175(5): 1352-1357, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38413304

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To decrease surgical site infections after appendectomy for acute appendicitis, preoperative broad-spectrum antibiotics are often used in clinical practice. However, this treatment strategy has come under scrutiny because of increasing rates of antibiotic-resistant infections. METHODS: The aim of this multisite quality improvement project was to decrease the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis with piperacillin-tazobactam without increasing the rate of surgical site infections. Our quality improvement intervention had 2 distinct components: (1) updating electronic health record orders to encourage preoperative administration of narrow-spectrum antibiotics and (2) educating surgeons and emergency department clinicians about selecting appropriate antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were compared 6 months before and after implementation of the quality improvement intervention. RESULTS: A total of 352 laparoscopic appendectomies were performed during the 6-month preintervention period, and 369 were performed during the 6-month postintervention period. The preintervention period and postintervention period groups had similar baseline demographics, vital signs, and laboratory test values. The rate of preoperative piperacillin-tazobactam administration significantly decreased after the intervention (51.4% preintervention period vs 20.1% postintervention period, P < .001). The rate of surgical site infections was similar in both groups (superficial surgical site infections = 1.4% preintervention period vs 0.8% postintervention period, P = .50; deep surgical site infections = 1.1% preintervention period vs 0.0% postintervention period, P = .06; and organ space surgical site infections = 3.1% preintervention period vs 3.0% postintervention period, P > .99). Rates of 30-day readmission, reoperation, and Clostridioides difficile infection also did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Our quality improvement intervention successfully decreased piperacillin-tazobactam administration without increasing the rate of surgical site infections in patients with acute appendicitis.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Appendicitis/drug therapy , Appendicitis/surgery , Quality Improvement , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Appendectomy/adverse effects , Acute Disease
2.
WMJ ; 122(4): 280-283, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37768770

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Amiodarone is the most effective and commonly used antiarrhythmic medication. Given its risk of toxicity, routine monitoring is recommended but is challenging to ensure in clinical practice. METHODS: We created an intelligent application, built within our electronic health record, that identified every living patient with an active outpatient prescription by a clinician in our health system. The application was designed to identify patients with lapses in recommended monitoring and facilitate scheduling of overdue testing. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with overdue monitoring tests decreased with use of the application, with greatest improvement in pulmonary function testing. DISCUSSION: Implementing a program to monitor and mitigate adverse reactions to amiodarone by using programable features of an electronic health record is feasible.


Subject(s)
Amiodarone , Humans , Amiodarone/adverse effects , Pharmacovigilance , Electronic Health Records , Drug Monitoring , Retrospective Studies , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/adverse effects
3.
Genet Med ; 19(5): 513-520, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27657678

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) has become a convenient method to help people to understand their genetic makeup. Owing in part to concerns regarding confidentiality, privacy, and secondary use of data, professional and government bodies created guidelines to promote transparency among these companies. Using a comprehensive and systematic approach, this study assessed DTC-GT company compliance with international transparency guidelines. METHODS: A framework analysis was performed on 30 DTC-GT health and/or ancestry websites identified using a US-based online search strategy during the summer of 2015. A codebook was developed from a synthesis of relevant guidelines from seven DTC-GT guideline documents and applied to each website. RESULTS: Although most companies met guidelines related to transparency regarding security protocols, storage procedures, and third-party disclosures, few met guidelines regarding sharing risks from data disclosures. Additionally, few companies disclosed how long data would be kept for services or research. Use of data for research was frequently mentioned only in privacy policies and terms of service documents, and only two-thirds of companies required an additional consent to use consumer data for health-related research. CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that DTC-GT companies do not consistently meet international transparency guidelines related to confidentiality, privacy, and secondary use of data.Genet Med advance online publication 22 September 2016.


Subject(s)
Direct-To-Consumer Screening and Testing/ethics , Confidentiality , Direct-To-Consumer Screening and Testing/organization & administration , Disclosure , Genetic Privacy , Genetic Testing , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Informed Consent , Internet
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL