Influence of recurrent assessments during data collection on caregivers and young children for an agricultural livelihood intervention in Kenya: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to understand the influence of recurrent assessments on the behaviour of children and caregivers in a 2-year study of an agricultural livelihood intervention. DESIGN: This study used qualitative exit interviews from caregivers in the control arm of a large, cluster-randomised control trial, Shamba Maisha. SETTING: The study was conducted in Western Kenya and involved 12 health facilities between 2016 and 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 99 caregivers in the control arm who had a child that was 6-36 months in age at the start of the study. INTERVENTIONS: Intervention participants within Shamba Maisha received an irrigation pump, farming lessons and a microloan. Control participants received no intervention but were offered the intervention after completing the 2-year study. RESULTS: Despite receiving no formal benefits, control caregivers reported improved mental health and enhanced knowledge of their child's health compared with the beginning of the study and reported changes in the child's play and diet that they attributed to participation in study assessments. Caregivers in the control arm attributed their changed behaviour to recurrent questioning, instrumental support, interactions with study staff and increased health knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent assessments altered participant behaviour, which may have made inference of the intervention's impact more difficult. In designing future, such studies with intervention and control arms, a trade-off between the gains in statistical power provided by recurrent visits and the avoidance of alterations in participants' behaviour that could affect responses to assessments must be considered when deciding on the number of visits for assessment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT03170986; NCT02815579.

Understanding Commitment of Local Food Banks, Faith-Based Organizations, and Schools to Provide Nongovernment Food Programs.

Background: Nongovernment food assistance is typically provided to families by faith-based organizations, schools, and food banks. Community organizations appear to be strongly committed to these programs, but little is known about the basis for this commitment. Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the values and identities of community organizations to understand the reasons for their commitment to providing nongovernment food assistance. Methods: Thirty-three in-depth interviews were conducted with 36 leaders at faith-based organizations (19 participants), schools (14 participants), and a local food bank (3 participants) in South Carolina. Observations were made, and informational documents (e.g., flyers and pamphlets) were reviewed. Thematic coding using the constant comparative method was guided by the policy concepts of organizational perspectives, values, and identities. Results: Nongovernment food programs offered participants volunteering opportunities to become involved with community organizations, which in turn increased financial support for the sustainability of these programs. School participants regarded themselves as a mechanism through which food programs were provided because of their commitment to students and believed they have limited capacity to make proposals to influence the food programs. Seeking to improve the well-being of the community by ending hunger was not the primary value on which organizations focused; instead, it was the process of fulfilling other values (e.g., forming or maintaining relationships within the community), maintaining identity, and appealing to their participants that strengthened their commitment to nongovernment food programs. Conclusion: Nongovernment programs are meant to be a solution to food insecurity complementary to government programs. Commitment to nongovernment programs fulfills organizational identities, wants, and assumptions, but a consequence of commitment to food programs, derived from fulfilling other values, is that the roots of hunger in a community become obscured and alternative solutions are ignored or rejected.

Managing children during a radiological or nuclear emergency--Canadian perspectives.

Children have a higher chance of being contaminated by radioactive materials during a radiological or nuclear (RN) emergency. They are more sensitive to radiation health effects and suffer more significant psychosocial impacts than adults during emergency response. This paper presents a summary of recommendations on effective management of children during an RN emergency. These recommendations intend to be additional considerations for existing RN response protocols and procedures implemented at local, state/provincial, or national level.

Emergency preparedness--an early childhood educator's perspective.

As early childhood educators who participated in the discussion of optimal scene management involving children and families in the event of a radiological/nuclear event, the authors would suggest consideration be given to the formal preparation for evacuation of educators and families and how to ensure that families are provided factual and updated information.