Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Emerg Radiol ; 29(2): 377-382, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35022861

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Ingestion of a toothbrush is an unusual event but may occur either accident or by intent. Radiological examinations play a crucial role in determining the exact location of the object within the gastrointestinal tract and in planning for its removal by endoscopic or surgical intervention. METHODS: Medical and radiological records of 8 patients who had swallowed the broken heads or entire toothbrush were retrospectively reviewed. This series included 4 men and 4 women, ranging in age from 21 to 57 years (mean: 34 years). RESULTS: Radiographs and computed tomography of the abdomen demonstrated the ingested toothbrushes within the stomach in 3, lodged in the duodenum in 1, and entrapped in various parts of the colon in 4 patients. They were removed by laparotomy in 3, laparoscopy in 2, colonoscopy in 2, and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in 1 patient. There were no perforations or associated complications, and all patients had uneventful recoveries. CONCLUSIONS: Ingested toothbrushes can be easily identified on radiological studies because of the radiopaque wires holding the nylon bristles. The plastic parts of it, however, are only visible on computed tomography. All cases would require endoscopic or surgical removal of the retained toothbrushes because spontaneous passage per rectum does not occur.


Subject(s)
Foreign Bodies , Laparoscopy , Accidents , Adult , Eating , Female , Foreign Bodies/complications , Foreign Bodies/diagnostic imaging , Foreign Bodies/surgery , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 44(1): 54-64, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29951900

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to assess the reader agreement and accuracy of eight ultrasound imaging features for classifying hepatic steatosis in adults with known or suspected hepatic steatosis. METHODS: This was an IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant prospective study of adult patients with known or suspected hepatic steatosis. All patients signed written informed consent. Ultrasound images (Siemens S3000, 6C1HD, and 4C1 transducers) were acquired by experienced sonographers following a standard protocol. Eight readers independently graded eight features and their overall impression of hepatic steatosis on ordinal scales using an electronic case report form. Duplicated images from the 6C1HD transducer were read twice to assess intra-reader agreement. Intra-reader, inter-transducer, and inter-reader agreement were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Features with the highest intra-reader agreement were selected as predictors for dichotomized histological steatosis using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis, and the accuracy of the decision rule was compared to the accuracy of the radiologists' overall impression. RESULTS: 45 patients (18 males, 27 females; mean age 56 ± 12 years) scanned from September 2015 to July 2016 were included. Mean intra-reader ICCs ranged from 0.430 to 0.777, inter-transducer ICCs ranged from 0.228 to 0.640, and inter-reader ICCs ranged from 0.014 to 0.561. The CART decision rule selected only large hepatic vein blurring and achieved similar accuracy to the overall impression (74% to 75% and 68% to 72%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Large hepatic vein blurring, liver-kidney contrast, and overall impression provided the highest reader agreement. Large hepatic vein blurring may provide the highest classification accuracy for dichotomized grading of hepatic steatosis.


Subject(s)
Fatty Liver/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results
4.
Ultrasound Q ; 26(2): 83-99, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20498564

ABSTRACT

Doppler ultrasound is routinely used in the clinical setting to evaluate blood flow in many major vessels of the body. Spectral Doppler is used to display the normal and abnormal signature waveforms that are unique to each vessel. It is important for the sonographer and the radiologist to recognize both what is normal and what is abnormal in a spectral Doppler display. In this review, we briefly explain the physics behind Doppler ultrasound and some of the most common mathematical equations applied in a routine clinical examination. We also describe and demonstrate normal versus abnormal spectral Doppler signature waveforms of vessels in the neck, abdomen, pelvis, and fetus.


Subject(s)
Blood Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Abdomen/blood supply , Abdomen/diagnostic imaging , Aorta, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Blood Flow Velocity/physiology , Carotid Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Kidney/blood supply , Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Male , Mesenteric Artery, Superior/diagnostic imaging , Pelvis/blood supply , Pelvis/diagnostic imaging , Regional Blood Flow/physiology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Uterus/blood supply , Uterus/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...