Posaconazole prophylaxis--impact on incidence of invasive fungal disease and antifungal treatment in haematological patients.

Since two large-scale, randomised studies on posaconazole prophylaxis have demonstrated a clear benefit for patients at high risk for contracting invasive fungal disease (IFD), posaconazole prophylaxis has been adopted as standard of care for this patient collective. Several years on from implementation at our institution, we wanted to evaluate its impact on the incidence and use of empirical antifungal therapy in a real-life setting. We analysed retrospectively incidence and severity of IFD in high-risk patients with prophylaxis, using a historical cohort as comparator. A total of 200 patients had either received the extended spectrum triazole posaconazole in prophylactic dosage of 200 mg tid or empirical antifungal therapy. Disease events were analysed by application of the revised EORTC/MSG definitions for IFD. Before posaconazole prophylaxis, we recorded 57/100 cases of IFD which was reduced to 28/100 with prophylaxis. The empirical use of antifungal drugs was reduced to 41% from 91% in the non-prophylaxis cohort. Furthermore, we observed a shift in the categorisation of IFD according to EORTC/MSG criteria. Our data suggest that posaconazole was effective in reducing the rate and probability of invasive fungal disease in high-risk patients.

Classification of invasive fungal disease in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia.

Invasive fungal diseases (IFD) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Their incidence has risen dramatically in recent years. The diagnosis of IFDs remains difficult, even if the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/Mycosis Study Group (MSG) criteria are applied for study purposes to classify the likelihood of these infections. These criteria have been developed for clinical trials, and their relevance in clinical settings outside a clinical trial remains unknown. We evaluated the impact of the EORTC/MSG criteria and a modification thereof for clinical purposes in patients with AML. We retro-spectively analysed 100 AML patients for the occurrence of IFD. First, EORTC/MSG criteria were applied to classify the patients. Second, a modified version of these criteria already used in clinical trials was used to re-classify the patients. Fifty-seven patients developed an invasive fungal infection. Following the original criteria, 43% were classified as 'possible' IFD, whereas 7% each were classified as 'probable' and 'proven' IFD. After application of the modified criteria, only 9% of the patients remained 'possible' IFD, whereas 41% were 'probable'. The occurrence of 'proven' cases was not altered by the modification and thus remained 7%. The application of modified criteria for the classification of IFD in AML patients leads to a considerable shift from 'possible' IFD (according to conventional EORTC criteria) towards 'probable' IFD. Nevertheless, neither the old EORTC criteria nor their modification was designed for use in clinical practice. As this study underscores the uncertainty in the diagnosis of IFD, the need for a clinically applicable classification is obvious.