ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR mCRC) benefit from immunotherapy. Interpretation of the single-arm immunotherapy trials is complicated by insignificant survival data during systemic non-immunotherapy. We present survival data on a large, comprehensive cohort of dMMR mCRC patients, treated with or without systemic non-immunotherapy. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty-one dMMR mCRC patients (n = 54 from three prospective Phase 3 CAIRO trials; n = 227 from the Netherlands Cancer Registry). Overall survival was analysed from diagnosis of mCRC (OS), from initiation of first-line (OS1) and second-line (OS2) systemic treatment. Cox regression analysis examined prognostic factors. As comparison for OS 2746 MMR proficient mCRC patients were identified. RESULTS: Of 281 dMMR patients, 62% received first-line and 26% second-line treatment. Median OS was 16.0 months (13.8-19.6) with antitumour therapy and 2.5 months (1.8-3.5) in untreated patients. OS1 was 12.8 months (10.7-15.2) and OS2 6.2 months (5.4-8.9) in treated dMMR patients. Treated dMMR patients had a 7.6-month shorter median OS than pMMR patients. CONCLUSION: Available data from immunotherapy trials lack a control arm with standard systemic treatment. Given the poor outcome compared to the immunotherapy results, our data strongly suggest a survival benefit of immunotherapy in dMMR mCRC patients.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Microsatellite Instability , Adult , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , DNA Mismatch Repair , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bleomycin is used in the treatment of different cancers, but possible side effects of interstitial pneumonitis and fibrosis are associated with increased concentrations of oxygen. Therefore, clinicians are reluctant to declare young people fit for scuba diving after bleomycin treatment, because scuba divers might be exposed to high partial pressures of oxygen. METHODS: Based on a survey, 16 patients treated with bleomycin for either testicular/germ cell cancer or Hodgkin's disease were evaluated according to an algorithm to assess their fitness to dive. The algorithm is based on a review of the literature related to oncology, anesthesiology, and diving medicine. RESULTS: According to our protocol, 12 of the 16 patients were fit for scuba diving. However, the two groups of cancer patients showed considerable difference with regard to fitness for diving, i.e., 10 of 11 patients with testicular/germ cell cancer compared with 2 of 5 patients with Hodgkin's disease. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm can be used by physicians and diving organizations to assess fitness for scuba diving after bleomycin treatment. However, patients with Hodgkin's disease treated with a combination of bleomycin and radiation may be at higher risk of radiation-induced pulmonary problems and are therefore more likely to be unfit for scuba diving.
