Response to Biologic Therapy in Skin of Colour Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis and Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review.

There has been a call to action to enhance representation of non-white individuals in dermatology clinical trials. Investigations in differential response to treatment across populations are limited, particularly in conditions of commonality, impact, distinct presentation, and diagnosis in non-white participants, such as atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. This systematic review summarized and identified if biologic treatment outcomes in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and psoriasis varied in skin of colour (SOC) participants in phase 3 trials. MEDLINE, COCHRANE, and EMBASE databases were used to conduct the search following PROSPERO registration. Following screening of 3209 articles, 11 studies were collected with 1781 SOC participants with a mean age of 40.99 ± 6.3 years (range: 30.6-51.6 years). Male participants accounted for 76.9% (n = 1370/1781) of the sample, and Chinese, Japanese, Taiwanese, and Korean participants accounted for 64.3%, 24.2%, 4.5%, and 3.4% of participants, respectively. Participants with atopic dermatitis were treated with dupilumab (n = 216/388) and participants with psoriasis were treated with adalimumab (n = 313/1393), bimekizumab (n = 62/1393), ixekizumab (n = 13/1393), secukinumab (n = 117/1393), and ustekinumab (n = 289/1393). No significant SOC population-based outcomes were found across treatment groups. However, differences in baseline characteristics or comorbidities were found, suggesting race or ethnic background should be considered when treatment is prescribed in psoriasis or atopic dermatitis. Although no significant SOC participant differential response to treatment were found, large-scale randomized controlled trials investigating comparable treatment outcomes and stratifying results by SOC population in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis are warranted to confirm these findings.

Immigration Status and Sex Differences in Primary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Retrospective Study of 5 Million Adults.

Background We evaluated whether immigration status modified the association between sex and the quality of primary cardiovascular disease prevention in Ontario, Canada. Methods and Results We used a population-based administrative database-derived cohort of community-dwelling adults (aged ≥40 years) without prior cardiovascular disease residing in Ontario on January 1, 2011. In the preceding 3 years, we evaluated screening for hyperlipidemia and diabetes in those not previously diagnosed; diabetes control (HbA1c <7%); and medication use to control hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or diabetes in those with previous diagnosis. We calculated the absolute prevalence difference (APD) between women and men for each metric stratified by immigration status and then determined the difference-in-differences for immigrants compared with long-term residents. Our sample included 5.3 million adults (19% immigrants), with receipt of each metric ranging from 55% to 90%. Among immigrants, women were more likely than men to be screened for hyperlipidemia (APD, 10.8%; 95% CI, 10.5-11.2) and diabetes (APD, 11.5%; 95% CI, 11.1-11.8) and to be treated with medications for hypertension (APD, 3.5%; 95% CI, 2.4-4.5), diabetes (APD, 2.1%; 95% CI, 0.7-3.6) and hyperlipidemia (APD, 1.8%; 95% CI, 0.5-3.1). Among long-term residents, findings were similar except poorer medication use for diabetes (APD, -2.8%; 95% CI, -3.4 to -2.2) and hyperlipidemia (APD, -3.5%; 95% CI, -4.0 to -3.0]) in women compared with men. Conclusions The overall quality of primary preventive care can be improved for all adults, and future research should evaluate the impact of observed equal or better care in women than men, irrespective of immigration status, on cardiovascular disease incidence.

Focused ultrasound as a novel strategy for noninvasive gene delivery to retinal Müller glia.

Müller glia are specialized retinal cells with stem cell properties in fish and frogs but not in mammals. Current efforts to develop gene therapies to activate mammalian Müller glia for retinal repair will require safe and effective delivery strategies for recombinant adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), vectors of choice for clinical translation. Intravitreal and subretinal injections are currently used for AAV gene delivery in the eye, but less invasive methods efficiently targeting Müller glia have yet to be developed. Methods: As gene delivery strategies have been more extensively studied in the brain, to validate our vectors, we initially compared the glial tropism of AAV-PHP.eB, an AAV9 that crosses the blood-brain and blood-retinal barriers, for its ability to drive fluorescent protein expression in glial cells in both the brain and retina. We then tested the glial transduction of AAV2/8-GFAP-mCherry, a virus that does not cross blood-brain and blood-retinal barriers, for its effectiveness in transducing Müller glia in murine retinal explants ex vivo. For in vivo assays we used larger rat eyes, performing invasive intravitreal injections, and non-invasive intravenous delivery using focused ultrasound (FUS) (pressure amplitude: 0.360 - 0.84 MPa) and microbubbles (Definity, 0.2 ml/kg). Results: We showed that AAV-PHP.eB carrying a ubiquitous promoter (CAG) and green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter, readily crossed the blood-brain and blood-retinal barriers after intravenous delivery in mice. However, murine Müller glia did not express GFP, suggesting that they were not transduced by AAV-PHP.eB. We thus tested an AAV2/8 variant, which was selected based on its safety record in multiple clinical trials, adding a glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) promoter and mCherry (red fluorescent protein) reporter. We confirmed the glial specificity of AAV2/8-GFAP-mCherry, showing effective expression of mCherry in astrocytes after intracranial injection in the mouse brain, and of Müller glia in murine retinal explants. For in vivo experiments we switched to rats because of their larger size, injecting AAV2/8-GFAP-mCherry intravitreally, an invasive procedure, demonstrating passage across the inner limiting membrane, leading to Müller glia transduction. We then tested an alternative non-invasive delivery approach targeting a different barrier - the inner blood-retinal-barrier, applying focused ultrasound (FUS) to the retina after intravenous injection of AAV2/8 and microbubbles in rats, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for FUS targeting. FUS permeabilized the rat blood-retinal-barrier and allowed the passage of macromolecules to the retina (Evans blue, IgG, IgM), with minimal extravasation of platelets and red blood cells. Intravenous injection of microbubbles and AAV2/8-GFAP-mCherry followed by FUS resulted in mCherry expression in rat Müller glia. However, systemic delivery of AAV2/8 also had off-target effects, transducing several murine peripheral organs, particularly the liver. Conclusions: Retinal permeabilisation via FUS in the presence of microbubbles is effective for delivering AAV2/8 across the inner blood-retinal-barrier, targeting Müller glia, which is less invasive than intravitreal injections that bypass the inner limiting membrane. However, implementing FUS in the clinic will require a comprehensive consideration of any off-target tropism of the AAV in peripheral organs, combined ideally, with the development of Müller glia-specific promoters.