Broad Epitope Coverage of Therapeutic Multi-Antibody Combinations Targeting SARS-CoV-2 Boosts In Vivo Protection and Neutralization Potency to Corner an Immune-Evading Virus.

Therapeutic antibodies (Abs) which act on a broader range of epitopes may provide more durable protection against the genetic drift of a target, typical of viruses or tumors. When these Abs exist concurrently on the targeted antigen, several mechanisms of action (MoAs) can be engaged, boosting therapeutic potency. This study selected combinations of four and five Abs with non- or partially overlapping epitopes to the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein, on or outside the crucial receptor binding domain (RBD), to offer resilience to emerging variants and trigger multiple MoAs. The combinations were derived from a pool of unique-sequence scFv Ab fragments retrieved from two SARS-CoV-2-naïve human phage display libraries. Following recombinant expression to full-length human IgG1 candidates, a biolayer interferometric analysis mapped epitopes to bins and confirmed that up to four Abs from across the bins can exist simultaneously on the spike glycoprotein trimer. Not all the bins of Abs interfered with the spike protein binding to angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in competitive binding assays, nor neutralized the pseudovirus or authentic virus in vitro, but when combined in vivo, their inclusion resulted in a much stronger viral clearance in the lungs of intranasally challenged hamsters, compared to that of those treated with mono ACE2 blockers. In addition, the Ab mixtures activated in vitro reporter cells expressing Fc-gamma receptors (FcγRs) involved in antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and phagocytosis (ADCP). The best four-Ab combination neutralized seventeen variants of concern from Wuhan-Hu1 to Omicron BA.4/BA.5 in vitro.

The gut microbiota composition has no predictive value for the endotoxin-induced immune response or development of endotoxin tolerance in humans invivo.

BACKGROUND: It is largely unknown whether the gut microbiome regulates immune responses in humans. We determined relationships between the microbiota composition and immunological phenotypes in 108 healthy volunteers, using 16S sequencing, an ex vivo monocyte challenge model, and an in vivo challenge model of systemic inflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). RESULTS: Significant associations were observed between the microbiota composition and ex vivo monocytic cytokine responses induced by several stimuli, most notably IL-10 production induced by Pam3Cys, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans, although the explained variance was rather low (0.3-4.8%). Furthermore, a number of pairwise correlations between Blautia, Bacteroides and Prevotella genera and cytokine production induced by these stimuli were identified. LPS administration induced a profound transient in vivo inflammatory response. A second LPS challenge one week after the first resulted in a severely blunted response, reflecting endotoxin tolerance. However, no significant relationships between microbiota composition and in vivo parameters of inflammation or tolerance were found (explained variance ranging from 0.4 to 1.5%, ns). CONCLUSIONS: The gut microbiota composition explains a limited degree of variance in ex vivo monocytic cytokine responses to several pathogenic stimuli, but no relationships with the LPS-induced in vivo immune response or tolerance was observed.

Ex vivo and in vitro Monocyte Responses Do Not Reflect in vivo Immune Responses and Tolerance.

Cytokine production by ex vivo (EV)-stimulated leukocytes is commonly used to gauge immune function and frequently proposed to guide immunomodulatory therapy. However, whether EV cytokine production capacity accurately reflects the in vivo (IV) immune status is largely unknown. We investigated relationships between EV monocyte cytokine responses and IV cytokine responses in a large cohort of healthy volunteers using a highly standardized IV model of short-lived LPS-induced systemic inflammation, which captures hallmarks of both hyperinflammation and immunological tolerance. Therefore, 110 healthy volunteers were intravenously challenged with 1 ng/kg LPS twice: on day 0 to determine the extent of the IV (hyper)inflammatory response and on day 7 to determine the degree of IV endotoxin tolerance. Baseline EV monocyte cytokine production capacity was assessed prior to LPS administration. Short-term and long-term EV tolerance was assessed in monocytes isolated 4 h and 7 days after LPS administration, respectively. No robust correlations were observed between baseline EV cytokine production capacity and IV cytokine responses following LPS administration. However, highly robust inverse correlations were observed between IV cytokine responses and EV cytokine responses of monocytes isolated 4 h after IV LPS administration. No correlations between IV and EV tolerance were found. In conclusion, attenuated EV cytokine production capacity reflects ongoing IV inflammation rather than immune suppression. Results of EV assays should be interpreted with caution at the risk of improper use of immuno-stimulatory drugs.