Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 40
Filter
1.
J Surg Oncol ; 124(4): 679-686, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34120344

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to evaluate functional and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing abdominal wall soft tissue tumors (AWSTT) surgery. METHODS: All consecutive patients that underwent surgery for malignant and intermediate AWSTT from 1999 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were identified, 20 (22%) operated on for a desmoid tumor and 72 (78%) for a soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Fifty-two patients (57%) had in toto resection of the abdominal wall (from the skin to the peritoneum) and 9 (10%) required simultaneous visceral resection. The closure was direct in 28 patients (30%) and requiring a mesh, a flap or a combination of the two in respectively 42, 16, and 6 patients (47%, 17%, 6%). The postoperative complications rate was 26%. Thirteen patients (14%) developed an incisional hernia after a median delay of 27 months. After a median follow-up of 40 months, out of the 72 patients operated on for STS, 7 (10%) developed local recurrence and 11 (15%) distant recurrence. The median recurrence-free and overall survivals were 61 and 116, months respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Management of AWSTT requires extensive surgery but allows good local control with an acceptable rate of incisional hernia.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Neoplasms/surgery , Hospitals, High-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/mortality , Sarcoma/surgery , Abdominal Neoplasms/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Sarcoma/pathology , Survival Rate , Young Adult
2.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 116(2): 135-142, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33950808

ABSTRACT

Bachground: Robotic breast surgery is an emergent procedure with encouraging preliminary results. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and the safety of robotic nipple sparing mastectomy (RNSM) with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction (IPBR). Methods: This is a prospective study including from December 2015 to January 2020 all RNSM surgeries with IPBR, in patients with moderate ptosis and A B or C cup. The primary endpoint was the rate of major necrosis. Secondary endpoints were conversion rate, postoperative complications (infections, hematoma, implant exposure), aesthetic results and quality of life. Results: 79 patients underwent 138 RNSM with IPBR. The average follow-up was 28 months. 2 procedures required conversion. Two cases of major necrosis occurred (1.4%). 9 surgical site infections were observed (6.5%), 4 infections could be treated with implant replacement. Unfortunately, 5 others resulted in implant loss. 4 other implant losses occurred: 2 due to major necrosis, and 2 due to periprosthetic capsula. In total, 9 implants were lost (6.5%). Esthetical results were mostly very satisfying and quality of life was not affected by the mastectomy. Conclusions: RSNM with IPBR was associated with low rates of major necrosis. It is a safe and reproducible procedure that allows breast reconstruction without visible scar.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammaplasty , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Mastectomy , Nipples/surgery , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Surg Oncol ; 123(4): 815-822, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33524172

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: During the worldwide pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), oncological procedures considered to be urgent could not be delayed, and a specific procedure was required to continue surgical activity. The objective was to assess the efficacy of our preoperative screening algorithm. METHODS: This observational retrospective study was performed between the 25th of March and the 12th of May 2020 in a comprehensive cancer center in France. Patients undergoing elective oncologic surgery were tested by preoperative nasopharyngeal reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) that could be associated with a chest computerized tomography (CT) scan. RESULTS: Of the 510 screening tests (in 477 patients), only 5% (15/477) were positive for COVID-19 in 24 patients (18 RT-PCR+ and 7 CT scan+/RT-PCR-). Four patients were ultimately false positives based on the CT scan. In total, only 4.2% (20/477) of the patients were COVID-19+. The positivity rate decreased with time after the containment measures were implemented (from 7.4% to 0.8%). In the COVID-19+ group, 20% of the patients had postoperative pulmonary complications, whereas this was the case for 5% of the patients in the COVID-19 group. CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining secure surgical activity is achievable and paramount in oncology care, even during the COVID-19 pandemic, with appropriate screening based on preoperative RT-PCR.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , COVID-19/diagnosis , Infection Control/organization & administration , Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Cancer Care Facilities , Female , France , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/pathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Preoperative Care , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Young Adult
4.
Clin Cancer Res ; 26(23): 6277-6283, 2020 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32873570

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF) are locally aggressive neoplasms, with a need for effective systemic treatment in case of progression to avoid the short- and long-term complications of local treatments. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of adult patients with DF treated with oral vinorelbine (90 mg once weekly) at Gustave Roussy Cancer Institute (Villejuif, Paris, France). Only patients with documented progressive disease according to RECIST v1.1 for more than 3 months (±2 weeks) before treatment initiation were included. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2019, 90 out of 438 patients with DF were eligible for this analysis. Vinorelbine was given alone in 56 patients (62%), or concomitantly with endocrine therapy in 34 patients, for a median duration of 6.7 months. A partial response was observed in 29% and stable disease in another 57%. With a median follow-up of 52.4 months, the median time to treatment failure (TTF) was not reached. Progression-free rates at 6 and 12 months were 88.7% and 77.5%, respectively. Concomitant endocrine therapy was associated with longer TTF in women [HR, 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-4.37; P = 0.03). Among 64 patients with documented CTNNB1 mutational status, p.S45F or p.S45P mutations were associated with longer TTF compared with p.T41A or wild-type tumors (HR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.23-6.27; P = 0.04). Toxicity profile was favorable, without grade 3-4 toxicity, except for one grade 3 neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: Oral vinorelbine is an effective, affordable, and well-tolerated regimen in patients with advanced, progressive DF. Prolonged activity was observed in patients with tumors harboring CTNNB1 p.S45F or p.S45P mutations.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/administration & dosage , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Fibromatosis, Aggressive/mortality , Mutation , Vinorelbine/administration & dosage , beta Catenin/genetics , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Fibromatosis, Aggressive/drug therapy , Fibromatosis, Aggressive/genetics , Fibromatosis, Aggressive/pathology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Young Adult
5.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1252: 189-193, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32816281

ABSTRACT

Breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies in women of childbearing age. One of the surgeries performed in the management of the disease is mastectomy , which might negatively affect body image and quality of life, and breast reconstruction is seen as a remedy to this problem. However, for the women who are interested in having children after treatment of breast cancer, the debate is whether they can have a successful pregnancy and delivery after breast reconstruction.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mammaplasty , Pregnancy/physiology , Child , Female , Humans , Mastectomy , Pregnancy Outcome , Quality of Life
6.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 176(2): 329-335, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31016642

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Desmoid tumors (DTs) are rare tumors that originate from myofibroblastic tissue. Recently, initial wait and see was recommended (ESMO guidelines Ann Oncol 2017) in the most frequent locations. This study investigates the outcome of breast desmoid tumor (BDT) according to the initial strategy. METHOD: Data from all consecutive patients treated from a BDT in four referral centers were collected. Only intra-mammary desmoid tumors were included. A pathological review and a molecular analysis (CTNNB1 gene mutation) were performed (National re-reading network of sarcomas-RRePS). Patients were grouped according to initial strategy: surgery group (SG) and active surveillance group (ASG). RESULTS: A total of 63 patients (61 women, 2 men) met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 50 years (16-86). CTNNB1 mutation was found in 61% (n = 36). SG included 46 patients (73%) (41 partial mastectomies, 2 mastectomies, and 3 mastectomies associated to parietectomies). Surgical margins were positive in 15 patients (33.3%). Median follow-up of SG was 24.9 (0.5-209) months; and 4 patients (8.7%) developed recurrence. ASG included 17 patients (27%). Their median follow-up was 42.2 (0-214) months, and 15 patients (88.2%) did not require any additional treatment. Six patients (35%) had a spontaneous regression, 9 patients (52%) were stable, and 2 patients presented a significant progression that was treated by partial mastectomy. CONCLUSION: This study supports an initial nonsurgical approach to BDTs followed by surgery based on tumor growth in select cases, which is consistent with current ESMO recommendations.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms, Male/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Fibromatosis, Aggressive/pathology , beta Catenin/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast Neoplasms, Male/genetics , Breast Neoplasms, Male/surgery , Female , Fibromatosis, Aggressive/genetics , Fibromatosis, Aggressive/surgery , Humans , Male , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Mutation , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Watchful Waiting , Young Adult
7.
J Clin Oncol ; 37(11): 885-892, 2019 04 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30811290

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We evaluated the addition of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to standard radiologic evaluation on the re-intervention rate in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) undergoing breast-conserving surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with biopsy-proven DCIS corresponding to a unifocal microcalcification cluster or a mass less than 30 mm were randomly assigned to undergo MRI or standard evaluation. The primary end point was the re-intervention rate for positive or close margins (< 2 mm) in the 6 months after randomization ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01112254). RESULTS: A total of 360 patients from 10 hospitals in France were included in the study. Of the 352 analyzable patients, 178 were randomly assigned to the MRI arm, and 174 were assigned to the control arm. In the intent-to-treat analysis, 82 of 345 patients with the assessable end point were reoperated for positive or close margins within 6 months, resulting in a re-intervention rate of 20% (35 of 173) in the MRI arm and 27% (47 of 172) in the control arm. The absolute difference of 7% (95% CI, -2% to 16%) corresponded to a relative reduction of 26% (stratified odds ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.1; P = .13). When considering only the per-protocol population with an assessable end point, the difference was 9% (stratified odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.0; P = .05). Total mastectomy rates were 18% (31 of 176) in the MRI arm and 17% (30 of 173) in the control arm (stratified P = .93). For 100 lesions seen on MRI, nonmass-like enhancement was more predominant (82%) than mass enhancement (20%). Nevertheless, no specific morphologic and kinetic parameters for DCIS were identified. CONCLUSION: The study did not show sufficient surgical improvement with the use of preoperative MRI to be clinically relevant in DCIS staging. However, this could be reconsidered with the improvement of new MRI sequences and new modalities in magnetic resonance techniques.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Margins of Excision , Mastectomy, Segmental , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Female , France , Humans , Mastectomy, Segmental/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasm, Residual , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Reoperation , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Burden
8.
Breast J ; 24(6): 1006-1009, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30298539

ABSTRACT

We compared the performance of near-infrared imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) with the radioisotope (ISO) method to detect sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in breast cancer, to analyze predictive factors for negative ICG identification. The study included 122 patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using the combined ISO and ICG technique for primary breast cancer. We assessed the putative association between pathologic/clinical variables and ICG failure to detect SLNs. The ISO identification rate was 96.7% and ICG identification 81.9%. Overweight patients or presence of macrometastasis in SLNB were associated with the risk of ICG failing to detect SLNs (P = 0.02).


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis/diagnostic imaging , Sentinel Lymph Node/diagnostic imaging , Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Axilla/pathology , Contrast Media , Female , Humans , Indocyanine Green , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Middle Aged , Overweight , Sentinel Lymph Node/pathology , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods
9.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 25(9): 2579-2586, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29959612

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy (RNSM) could be a significant advancement in the treatment of breast cancers and prophylaxis because the mastectomy is performed without leaving any scar on the breast. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and the safety of RNSM with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction (IPBR). METHODS: In this prospective study, RNSM with IPBR was offered to patients with breast cup size A, B or C and ptosis grade ≤ 2. In case of oncologic surgery, RNSM was proposed only if the tumor was located more than 2 cm away from the nipple-areola complex (NAC) and if postoperative radiation was not indicated. In case of prophylactic surgery, RNSM was proposed only if a high-risk genetic mutation had been identified. The primary endpoint was the rate of skin or NAC necrosis. The rate of conversion to open technique, the duration of the procedure, and postoperative complications were also analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-three RNSM with IPBR were performed in 33 patients. There were no cases of mastectomy skin flap or NAC necrosis. We had to convert to an open technique in one case (1.6%). Three infections occurred (4.8%), one leading to implant loss (1.6%). No other major complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data attest to the feasibility, the reproducibility, and the safety of this approach. However, long-term data are needed to confirm the oncological safety and the esthetic stability of the result. Trial registration identifier NCT02673268.


Subject(s)
Mammaplasty/methods , Nipples/pathology , Prophylactic Mastectomy/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Adult , Conversion to Open Surgery , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Infections/etiology , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Necrosis/etiology , Nipples/surgery , Organ Sparing Treatments/adverse effects , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Prophylactic Mastectomy/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Surgical Flaps/adverse effects , Time Factors , Young Adult
10.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 142(3): 624-627, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29879007

ABSTRACT

Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy could be a significant advancement in the treatment and prophylaxis of selected breast cancers. Motion-scaling, high-resolution, three-dimensional optics; tremor elimination; and instruments with enhanced precision with 7 degrees of freedom have allowed surgeons to overcome the limitations experienced with the endoscopic approach in breast surgery. Advantages of this procedure, in comparison with the open technique, are a shorter and more acceptable scar located in the lateral thoracic region, and greater respect for the vascularization of the mastectomy skin flap, because there is no incision on the breast and no retractors are used. The authors recently received approval from both the French health authorities and the ethics committee to carry out a clinical trial in their institution to assess feasibility, reproducibility, and safety of robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction. The aims of this article are to describe the surgical technique they have developed, and to share, through a video, the clinical experience gained from over 60 procedures performed so far.


Subject(s)
Breast Implantation/methods , Mastectomy, Subcutaneous/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Female , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care
13.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater ; 78: 427-432, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29223731

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The biocompatibility of the polysiloxane breast implant has been studied moderately. The aging of these implants due to lipid penetration and the release of polymerization impurities, such as Platine or octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (named D4), has already been documented. Since these studies, manufacturing procedures have been improved; thus, the security of breast implants has also improved. Although polymerization and the choice of monomer influence the shell properties, few studies have compared these together in breast implants. Our study compares the permeability and mechanical resistance of 3 breast expander shells after in vivo and in vitro aging. RESULTS: In vitro, all tested shells quickly sorbed linear molecules, such as fatty acids, and released siloxane impurities. The penetration of a molecule with steric hindrance, such as cholesterol, is slower. Allergan shells have the highest rates of molecule sorption and siloxane release. In vivo, after implantation, Allergan shells lost their initial mechanical properties over time. This observation was not found for mentor shells. For all brands, many biological molecules penetrate the shells, among which cholesterol and fatty acids are always present. DISCUSSION: The aging of polysiloxane shells depends on the sorption of many biological molecules and the release of siloxane impurities. The siloxanes are impurities and / or degradation products that are due to aging. Moreover, according to our results, the shells act as matrices that separate molecules according to their chemical and physical properties. CONCLUSION: Not all polysiloxane expander shells have the same properties during aging. The manufacturing procedures and the choice of siloxane monomers are the two most probative factors that explain the observed differences.


Subject(s)
Breast Implants , Materials Testing , Mechanical Phenomena , Permeability , Solvents/chemistry , Time Factors
14.
Clin Plast Surg ; 45(1): 33-45, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29080658

ABSTRACT

Breast cancer surgical treatment nowadays includes oncoplastic surgery. It is a reliable oncologic surgical treatment, which also prevents functional and aesthetic sequelae, thus improving the patient's quality of life and satisfaction. Numerous techniques have been described, with different levels of complexity and technicality. Their indications differ depending on the global breast volume and the degree of ptosis, on the tumor volume compared with the breast volume, and on the tumor location. This article describes the authors' many years of experience of breast cancer treatment using oncoplastic surgery. They also established a decision-making guide, whose implementation enables treatment of every patient.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mammaplasty , Mastectomy, Segmental , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Esthetics , Female , Humans , Patient Selection , Quality of Life
15.
Breast J ; 24(3): 373-376, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29251382

ABSTRACT

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is increasingly popular for the treatment of selected breast cancers and prophylactic mastectomy. Surgical scarring and esthetic outcomes are important patient-related cosmetic considerations. Today, the concept of minimally invasive surgery has become popular, especially using robotic surgery. The authors report the first case of NSM using the latest version of the da Vinci Xi surgical system (Xi). The final incision used to remove the entire mammary gland was located behind the axillary line. In this position, hidden by the arm of the patient, the incision was not visible and was compatible with immediate breast reconstruction.


Subject(s)
Mastectomy, Subcutaneous/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Mastectomy, Subcutaneous/instrumentation , Middle Aged , Nipples , Prophylactic Mastectomy/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation
16.
Clin Breast Cancer ; 17(4): 293-297, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28161131

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymphadenectomy for primary breast cancer produces a non-negligible rate of postoperative lymphorrhea, prolonged hospital stays, and multiple seroma punctures. We evaluated the impact of low-thrombin fibrin sealant glue on surgical wounds in patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of 149 patients who underwent axillary lymphadenectomy for primary breast cancer between January 2014 and December 2015. Data were obtained from 2 successive prospective studies. The hospital stay length and morbidity (seromas, punctures) were compared between 2 groups: patients who had padding sutures and low-thrombin fibrin sealant glue without drainage (n = 49) and patients with drainage alone (n = 100). Hospital costs were assessed from the hospital perspective. RESULTS: The mean hospital stay length was shorter in the fibrin sealant group (2.6 vs. 4.7 days; P < .001). Seroma magnitude and punctures were similar in patients treated with fibrin sealant compared with patients with drainage alone. The rate of needle aspiration for seroma was similar irrespective of whether or not a drain or fibrin sealant was used (30.6% vs. 33.0%, P = .77). CONCLUSION: Low-thrombin fibrin sealant glue does not significantly reduce the amount of fluid produced in the axilla after breast surgery; however, its systematic use may help reduce hospital stays and costs.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Fibrin Tissue Adhesive/therapeutic use , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Lymph Node Excision/adverse effects , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Mastectomy/adverse effects , Seroma/prevention & control , Thrombin/therapeutic use , Axilla , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Drainage , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hemostatics/therapeutic use , Humans , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Seroma/etiology
17.
Eur J Cancer ; 66: 131-7, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27569041

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Rapid diagnosis is a key issue in modern oncology, for which one-stop breast clinics are a model. We aimed to assess the diagnosis accuracy and procedure costs of a large-scale one-stop breast clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 10,602 individuals with suspect breast lesions attended the Gustave Roussy's regional one-stop breast clinic between 2004 and 2012. The multidisciplinary clinic uses multimodal imaging together with ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration for masses and ultrasonography-guided and stereotactic biopsies as needed. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by comparing one-stop diagnosis to the consolidated diagnosis obtained after surgery or biopsy or long-term monitoring. The medical cost per patient of the care pathway was assessed from patient-level data collected prospectively. RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of the patients had masses, while 31% had micro-calcifications or other non-mass lesions. In 75% of the cases (87% of masses), an exact diagnosis could be given on the same day. In the base-case analysis (i.e. considering only benign and malignant lesions at one-stop and at consolidated diagnoses), the sensitivity of the one-stop clinic was 98.4%, specificity 99.8%, positive and negative predictive values 99.7% and 99.0%. In the sensitivity analysis (reclassification of suspect, atypical and undetermined lesions), diagnostic sensitivity varied from 90.3% to 98.5% and specificity varied from 94.3% to 99.8%. The mean medical cost per patient of one-stop diagnostic procedure was €420. CONCLUSIONS: One-stop breast clinic can provide timely and cost-efficient delivery of highly accurate diagnoses and serve as models of care for multiple settings, including rapid screening-linked diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/economics , Breast Neoplasms, Male/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms, Male/economics , Cancer Care Facilities/economics , Cancer Care Facilities/standards , Costs and Cost Analysis , Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Early Detection of Cancer/standards , Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Point-of-Care Systems/economics , Point-of-Care Systems/standards , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
18.
Breast Care (Basel) ; 11(2): 128-32, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27239175

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We aimed at examining the potential benefits of blue dye in sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in comparison with its proven drawbacks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 2007, 203 T1 primary breast carcinomas had been operated on in our institute. The patients had undergone a lumpectomy and SNB. Sentinel node (SN) detection was exclusively isotopic (ISO) in 77 patients and performed with blue dye combined with a radioactive isotope (COMBI) in 126 patients. We compared the number of SNs and the rate of SN positivity in both groups. RESULTS: The detection rate was 99% in both groups: 76/77 in the ISO group and 125/126 in the COMBI group. The mean number of SNs was 2.14 and 1.91 in the ISO group and the COMBI group, respectively (difference not significant (NS)). SN positivity was found in 26.1% and 24.6% in the ISO group and the COMBI group, respectively (NS). Only 1 SN had been removed in 26% of the patients in the ISO group versus 45.2% of the patients in the COMBI group (p = 0.004). No significant differences were observed in the tumor characteristics. CONCLUSION: The systematic use of patent blue dye combined with isotopic detection does not appear to increase the overall performance of the SNB technique in this retrospective study.

19.
Int J Breast Cancer ; 2015: 519497, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26543648

ABSTRACT

Background. In March 2010, ANSM (Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Medicament), the French Medical Regulatory Authority, withdrew Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) breast implants from the market due to the use of non-medical-grade silicone gel. The aim of this study was to compare the removal rate (and reasons thereof) of breast implants produced by different manufacturers before the ANSM alert. Materials and Methods. From October 2006 to January 2010, 652 women received 944 implants after breast cancer surgery at the Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Center, Paris (France). The complications and removal rates of the different implant brands used (PIP, Allergan, and Pérouse) were evaluated and compared. Results. PIP implants represented 50.6% of the used implants, Allergan 33.4%, and Pérouse 16%. The main reasons for implant removal were patient dissatisfaction due to aesthetic problems (43.2%), infection (22.2%), and capsular contracture (13.6%). Two years after implantation, 82% of Pérouse implants, 79% of PIP, and 79% of Allergan were still in situ. There was no difference in removal rate among implant brands. Conclusion. Before the ANSM alert concerning the higher rupture rate of PIP breast implants, our implant removal rate did not predict PIP implant failure related to the use of nonapproved silicone gel.

20.
Anticancer Res ; 35(7): 4229-34, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26124383

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oncoplastic surgery (OPS) consists of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) that allows for oncologically safe breast conservation and breast remodeling, thus reducing postoperative deformities. The purpose of the present study was to identify factors determining the risk of re-excision and complications after OPS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent OPS between 2009 and 2013, regardless of whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered. Clinical and pathological factors were evaluated. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to build regression trees for the prediction of re-excision. RESULTS: Amongst the 129 patients treated by OPS procedures, 30.3% required re-excision. Predictive factors for re-excision were: being overweight (p=0.02), the presence of microcalcifications on mammography (p=0.003), and tumor multifocality (p=0.03). The RPA identified five terminal nodes based on microcalcifications on mammography, being overweight and the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ. Another model included minimal invasive margins (p<0.001), being overweight (p=0.02) and the presence of microcalcifications (p=0.01) on mammography yielded a model with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.875. CONCLUSION: Microcalcifications, tumor multifocality and being overweight were the factors identified as predictors of re-excision after OPS. These factors can serve as decisional tools before surgery.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast/surgery , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery , Female , Humans , Mammography/methods , Mastectomy, Segmental/methods , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Reoperation/methods , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...