Clinical practice guideline on the use of single-operator cholangioscopy in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary stricture and the treatment of difficult biliary stones.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC) offer a diagnostic and therapeutic alternative with an improved optical resolution over conventional techniques; however, there are no standardized clinical practice guidelines for this technology. This evidence-based guideline from the Colombian Association of Digestive Endoscopy (ACED) intends to support patients, clinicians, and others in decisions about using in adults the SOC compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), to diagnose indeterminate biliary stricture and to manage difficult biliary stones. METHODS: ACED created a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. Universidad de los Andes and the Colombia Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Network supported the guideline-development process, updating and performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The GRADE approach was used, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks. RESULTS: The panel agreed on one recommendation for adult patients with indeterminate biliary strictures and one for adult patients with difficult biliary stones when comparing SOC versus ERCP. CONCLUSION: For adult patients with indeterminate biliary strictures, the panel made a conditional recommendation for SOC with stricture pattern characterization over ERCP with brushing and/or biopsy for sensitivity, specificity, and procedure success rate outcomes. For the adult patients with difficult biliary stones the panel made conditional recommendation for SOC over ERCP with large-balloon dilation of papilla. Additional research is required on economic estimations of SOC and knowledge translation evaluations to implement SOC intervention in local contexts.

Enfermedad hepática congestiva, las repercusiones hepáticas de un corazón enfermo / Congestive liver disease, the hepatic consequences of a diseased heart

La hepatopatía congestiva comprende el espectro de manifestaciones a nivel del hígado, con injuria inducida como consecuencia de la congestión venosa hepática por una alteración en el flujo venoso del tracto de salida hepático. La etiología más frecuente es la falla cardiaca derecha, que por aumento de la presión venosa central, lleva retrógradamente al aumento de la presión venosa hepática, disminución del flujo hepático y disminución de la saturación de oxígeno, con congestión a nivel sinusoidal y particular compromiso de los hepatocitos de la zona 3. Generalmente tiene una presentación subclínica en cuanto a manifestaciones hepáticas que son enmascaradas por los signos y síntomas de falla cardiaca. El diagnóstico comprende la suma de hallazgos serológicos, imagenológicos e histológicos, luego de una exclusión de otras patologías con posible injuria hepática. El tratamiento se basa en el manejo de la falla cardiaca de base, y el pronóstico a su vez, queda supeditado a la fase de la enfermedad cardiaca de base. Se realizó una búsqueda de la literatura con el fin de construir una revisión de esta entidad, con conceptos actualizados a partir de la evidencia reciente.

Congestive liver disease comprises the spectrum of manifestations secondary to liver injury as a consequence of hepatic venous congestion due to a disturbance in the hepatic venous outflow. The most frequent cause is right heart failure, which, due to an increase in central venous pressure, leads retrogradely to an increase in hepatic venous pressure, a decrease in liver inflow and a decrease in oxygen saturation, with sinusoidal congestion and characteristic compromise of zone 3 hepatocytes. Its presentation is usually subclinical in terms of liver manifestations, masked by the signs and symptoms of heart failure. The diagnosis includes the sum of serological, imaging and histological findings, after exclusion of other entities involving liver injury. Treatment is based on the management of the underlying heart failure and the prognosis is as well dependent on the stage of the underlying heart disease. A literature search was carried out in order to create a review of this entity with updated concepts based on recent evidence.

Calidad de la visión en endoscopia en tiempos de pandemia: ¿Influyen los EPP en la calidad visual durante la endoscopia digestiva? / Quality of vision in endoscopy in the midst of a pandemic: Does PPE influence quality of vision during gastrointestinal endoscopy?

Introducción: En tiempos de la pandemia por el virus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), los profesionales de la salud, y específicamente los gastroenterólogos, hemos tenido la necesidad de usar elementos de protección personal (EPP) para disminuir el contacto con microgotas y aerosoles durante la realización de endoscopia digestiva. Objetivo: Evaluar el impacto del uso de dos modalidades de elementos de protección personal en la calidad de la visión durante la endoscopia digestiva. Métodos: Estudio piloto observacional de corte transversal en gastroenterólogos, a quienes se les realiza examen oftalmológico de agudeza y calidad visual al utilizar dos modalidades de EPP: modalidad #1: respirador N95 3M 1860 verde + monogafas 3M + pantalla protectora; modalidad #2: pieza facial de cara completa 3M 6800 con filtros 3M 7093C NIOSH HF/P100. Resultados: Al evaluar los parámetros de agudeza y calidad visual al usar los EPP que se utilizan rutinariamente en el ejercicio de la endoscopia digestiva durante la pandemia, se identifica que con el uso de la modalidad #1 hay una disminución de hasta el 37% en la agudeza visual y de 25% en la visualización del color y de 75% en la sensibilidad al contraste en endoscopistas digestivos desde los primeros minutos de la colocación, lo cual empeora en el tiempo hasta 75, 60 y 100%, respectivamente, durante el procedimiento. En el caso de la modalidad #2, no hay deterioro en la calidad de la visión. Conclusiones: Las diferentes modalidades de EPP utilizadas durante la endoscopia digestiva podrían tener repercusión en la calidad de los estudios endoscópicos realizados durante la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).(AU)

Introduction: In the midst of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19) pandemic, health professionals, specifically gastroenterologists, have had to use personal protective equipment (PPE) to reduce contact with droplets and aerosols generated during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Objective: To evaluate the impact of the use of two types of PPE on quality of vision during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods: A cross-sectional observational pilot study in gastroenterologists who undergo an ophthalmological examination of visual acuity and quality of vision when using two types of PPE. Type #1: 3M N95 1860 green respirator + 3M mono safety glasses + protective screen. Type #2: 3M 6800 full facepiece + 3M NIOSH 7093C HF/P100 filters. Results: Visual acuity and quality of vison parameters while using the PPE that is routinely used when performing gastrointestinal endoscopy during the pandemic were evaluated. It was found that Modality #1 was associated with decreases of up to 37% in visual acuity, 25% in colour visualisation and 75% in contrast sensitivity among digestive endoscopists within minutes of placement. These figures worsened over the course of the procedure, rising to 75%, 60% and 100%, respectively. Modality #2 was not associated with any deterioration in quality of vision. Conclusions: The different PPE modalities used during gastrointestinal endoscopy could have an impact on the quality of endoscopy studies performed during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic.(AU)

Quality of vision in endoscopy in the midst of a pandemic: Does PPE influence quality of vision during gastrointestinal endoscopy? / Calidad de la visión en endoscopia en tiempos de pandemia: ¿Influyen los EPP en la calidad visual durante la endoscopia digestiva?

INTRODUCTION: In the midst of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19) pandemic, health professionals, specifically gastroenterologists, have had to use personal protective equipment (PPE) to reduce contact with droplets and aerosols generated during gastrointestinal endoscopy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the use of two types of PPE on quality of vision during gastrointestinal endoscopy. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational pilot study in gastroenterologists who undergo an ophthalmological examination of visual acuity and quality of vision when using two types of PPE. Type #1: 3M N95 1860 green respirator + 3M mono safety glasses + protective screen. Type #2: 3M 6800 full facepiece + 3M NIOSH 7093C HF/P100 filters. RESULTS: Visual acuity and quality of vison parameters while using the PPE that is routinely used when performing gastrointestinal endoscopy during the pandemic were evaluated. It was found that Modality #1 was associated with decreases of up to 37% in visual acuity, 25% in colour visualisation and 75% in contrast sensitivity among digestive endoscopists within minutes of placement. These figures worsened over the course of the procedure, rising to 75%, 60% and 100%, respectively. Modality #2 was not associated with any deterioration in quality of vision. CONCLUSIONS: The different PPE modalities used during gastrointestinal endoscopy could have an impact on the quality of endoscopy studies performed during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic.

[Intestinal malrotation in adults diagnosed after presentation of post polypectomy syndrome in the cecum: report of a case]. / Malrotación intestinal en el adulto diagnosticado posterior a presentación del síndrome pospolipectomía en ciego: reporte de un caso.

Intestinal malrotation is a congenital anomaly of intestinal rotation and fixation, diagnosed infrequently in adulthood. We report the presence of intestinal malrotation in a previously asymptomatic adult patient with changes in bowel habit in the last 6 months after a colonoscopy is performed with evidence of a polyp in the cecum, after resection presenting acute abdominal pain in the left iliac fossa that allows imaging to confirm the diagnostic.

Malrotación intestinal en el adulto diagnosticado posterior a presentación del síndrome pospolipectomía en ciego: reporte de un caso / Intestinal malrotation in adults diagnosed after presentation of post polypectomy syndrome in the cecum: report of a case

RESUMEN La malrotación intestinal es una anomalía congénita de la rotación y fijación intestinal, diagnosticada de forma infrecuente en la edad adulta. Se presenta un caso de malrotación intestinal en un paciente adulto previamente asintomático con cambios en el hábito intestinal en los últimos 6 meses al que se le realiza una colonoscopia ambulatoria con la evidencia de un pólipo en el ciego, posterior a su resección presenta dolor abdominal agudo en fosa ilíaca izquierda que permite la realización de estudios imagenológicos que confirman el diagnóstico.

ABSTRACT Intestinal malrotation is a congenital anomaly of intestinal rotation and fixation, diagnosed infrequently in adulthood. We report the presence of intestinal malrotation in a previously asymptomatic adult patient with changes in bowel habit in the last 6 months after a colonoscopy is performed with evidence of a polyp in the cecum, after resection presenting acute abdominal pain in the left iliac fossa that allows imaging to confirm the diagnostic.