Antibacterial activity of menadione alone and in combination with oxacillin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its impact on biofilms.

Introduction. Antibiotic resistance is a major threat to public health, particularly with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) being a leading cause of antimicrobial resistance. To combat this problem, drug repurposing offers a promising solution for the discovery of new antibacterial agents.Hypothesis. Menadione exhibits antibacterial activity against methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains, both alone and in combination with oxacillin. Its primary mechanism of action involves inducing oxidative stress.Methodology. Sensitivity assays were performed using broth microdilution. The interaction between menadione, oxacillin, and antioxidants was assessed using checkerboard technique. Mechanism of action was evaluated using flow cytometry, fluorescence microscopy, and in silico analysis.Aim. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial potential of menadione against planktonic and biofilm forms of methicillin-sensitive and resistant S. aureus strains. It also examined its role as a modulator of oxacillin activity and investigated the mechanism of action involved in its activity.Results. Menadione showed antibacterial activity against planktonic cells at concentrations ranging from 2 to 32 µg ml-1, with bacteriostatic action. When combined with oxacillin, it exhibited an additive and synergistic effect against the tested strains. Menadione also demonstrated antibiofilm activity at subinhibitory concentrations and effectively combated biofilms with reduced sensitivity to oxacillin alone. Its mechanism of action involves the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and DNA damage. It also showed interactions with important targets, such as DNA gyrase and dehydroesqualene synthase. The presence of ascorbic acid reversed its effects.Conclusion. Menadione exhibited antibacterial and antibiofilm activity against MRSA strains, suggesting its potential as an adjunct in the treatment of S. aureus infections. The main mechanism of action involves the production of ROS, which subsequently leads to DNA damage. Additionally, the activity of menadione can be complemented by its interaction with important virulence targets.

Antifungal activity of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors against Cryptococcus spp. and their possible mechanism of action.

Fungal infections caused by Cryptococcus spp. pose a threat to health, especially in immunocompromised individuals. The available arsenal of drugs against cryptococcosis is limited, due to their toxicity and/or lack of accessibility in low-income countries, requiring more therapeutic alternatives. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), through drug repositioning, are a promising alternative to broaden the range of new antifungals against Cryptococcus spp. This study evaluates the antifungal activity of three SSRIs, sertraline, paroxetine, and fluoxetine, against Cryptococcus spp. strains, as well as assesses their possible mechanism of action. Seven strains of Cryptococcus spp. were used. Sensitivity to SSRIs, fluconazole, and itraconazole was evaluated using the broth microdilution assay. The interactions resulting from combinations of SSRIs and azoles were investigated using the checkerboard assay. The possible action mechanism of SSRIs against Cryptococcus spp. was evaluated through flow cytometry assays. The SSRIs exhibited in vitro antifungal activity against Cryptococcus spp. strains, with minimum inhibitory concentrations ranging from 2 to 32 µg/mL, and had synergistic and additive interactions with azoles. The mechanism of action of SSRIs against Cryptococcus spp. involved damage to the mitochondrial membrane and increasing the production of reactive oxygen species, resulting in loss of cellular viability and apoptotic cell death. Fluoxetine also was able to cause significant damage to yeast DNA. These findings demonstrate the in vitro antifungal potential of SSRIs against Cryptococcus spp. strains.

Antifungal activity of etomidate against growing biofilms of fluconazole-resistant Candida spp. strains, binding to mannoproteins and molecular docking with the ALS3 protein.

This study evaluated the effect of etomidate against biofilms of Candida spp. and analysed through molecular docking the interaction of this drug with ALS3, an important protein for fungal adhesion. Three fluconazole-resistant fungi were used: Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis. Growing biofilms were exposed to etomidate at 31.25-500 µg ml-1. Then, an ALS3 adhesive protein from C. albicans was analysed through a molecular mapping technique, composed of a sequence of algorithms to perform molecular mapping simulation based on classic force field theory. Etomidate showed antifungal activity against growing biofilms of resistant C. albicans, C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis at all concentrations used in the study. The etomidate coupling analysis revealed three interactions with the residues of interest compared to hepta-threonine, which remained at the ALS3 site. In addition, etomidate decreased the expression of mannoproteins on the surface of C. albicans. These results revealed that etomidate inhibited the growth of biofilms.

Etomidate is devoid of genotoxicty and mutagenicity in human lymphocytes and in the Salmonella typhimurium/microsomal activation test.

No carcinogenesis or mutagenesis studies have been carried out with etomidate. The current study showed that etomidate has weak cytotoxic potential after 48 h exposure in human lymphocytes and has no hemolytic activity. The weak cytotoxicity seems to be related with redox imbalance of etomidate (40.9 and 81.9 µM) treated lymphocytes. At both etomidate concentrations, a slight decrease of the levels of GSH intracellular content and a significant increase in the amount of carbonylated proteins were observed after 48 h. The contribution of oxidative stress to genetic toxicity was only perceived when the enzyme Fpg was applied in the comet assay. Etomidate (40.9 and 81.9 µM) is a weak generator of oxidative DNA damage in lymphocytes. These damages to DNA probably were repaired, since no DNA strand breaks were detected in the standard alkaline comet assay (in the presence or absence of hepatic S9 microsomal fraction) without Fpg. Also, no micronucleated lymphocytes or carrying chromosomal aberrations were observed. Finally, etomidate (2046.8 and 4093.5 µM) was not mutagenic in the Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay, which used four Salmonella typhimurium strains (TA97a, TA98, TA100, and TA102) to detect frameshift and base-substitution mutations. In summary, etomidate is a weak oxidative DNA damaging anesthetic and is devoid of mutagenic properties in eukaryotic and prokaryotic models.