Risk Factors Leading to Enucleation or Evisceration in Infectious Endophthalmitis.

Endophthalmitis treatment consists of intravitreal antibiotics injections and, in selected circumstances, pars plana vitrectomy. However, severe or refractory cases may require an enucleation or evisceration (ENEV). Our study seeks to identify risk factors leading to enucleation or evisceration in patients with infectious endophthalmitis. A retrospective chart review of subjects with a clinical diagnosis of infectious endophthalmitis was undertaken. The affected eyes were stratified into groups: those that underwent ENEV and those in which the eyeball was preserved (EP). The groups were compared using statistical analyses. In total, 69 eyes diagnosed with infectious endophthalmitis were included in the study. There was a higher frequency of exogenous infectious endophthalmitis in the ENEV group versus the EP group. Postsurgical infectious endophthalmitis was lower in the ENEV than in the EP group. A visual acuity of no light perception was more common in the ENEV compared to the EP group. Panophthalmitis was more frequent in the ENEV versus the EP group. Our findings suggest that eyes with endophthalmitis presenting with a visual acuity of no light perception, panophthalmitis, or exogenous etiology have a higher risk of requiring ENEV. In addition, eyes with a postsurgical etiology may be at a lower risk of requiring ENEV.

Contralateral Recurrences of Post-vaccination Multiple Evanescent White Dot Syndrome.

We report on a case of multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS) following the simultaneous administration of the human papillomavirus and meningococcal (conjugate) vaccines and two recurrences of MEWDS following the administration of the second dose of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine and the COVID-19 vaccine and COVID-19 viral infection. A 17-year-old Hispanic female presented with a one-week history of photopsia and blurred vision in her left eye following the simultaneous administration of the human papillomavirus and meningococcal (conjugate) vaccines. Upon a comprehensive examination, her best-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in the right eye and 20/100 in the left eye. A left fundus examination revealed multiple white dots in the macula and nasal periphery, consistent with a diagnosis of MEWDS. Ancillary testing, including fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography, and optical coherence tomography, supported the diagnosis. One month following her initial diagnosis, the patient's symptoms had resolved without any therapy, and a fundus examination revealed multiple relatively ill-defined brown-colored subretinal lesions in the nasal midperiphery, corresponding to the location of the previous MEWDS lesions. Subsequently, she received the second dose of the HPV vaccine and then developed a mild COVID-19 infection. Four months after the initial presentation, she received the first dose of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine, followed by the second dose a month later. Eight months following her initial presentation, she presented with photopsia in the right eye. Her visual acuity remained 20/20 in the right eye and improved to 20/20 in the left eye, and white dots were identified nasal to the disk and surrounding the peripapillary region; the contralateral MEWDS diagnosis was confirmed by the previously mentioned ancillary tests. At her one-month follow-up, she presented new onset photopsia of the right eye. Her visual acuity remained 20/20 in both eyes, and a fundus examination revealed white lesions suggestive of active MEWDS temporal to the macula and brown-colored spots nasal to the disk, suggestive of recovering MEWDS, nasally. The aforementioned testing confirmed the coexistence of new and resolving lesions; nonetheless, the patient's symptoms resolved without any therapy, and she received the third dose of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine 11 months after her initial presentation. Our case suggests that vaccines may serve as immunological triggers of MEWDS. Recurrent MEWDS may occur when an individual is exposed to a powerful immune challenge, such as receiving a wide array of vaccinations in a short period of time. We believe this case constitutes a previously undescribed finding of multiple relatively ill-defined brown-colored subretinal lesions present in late MEWDS.

Reactivation of Acute Retinal Necrosis following SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

PURPOSE: To report on a case of reactivation of acute retinal necrosis following SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: Observational case report. Observations. A 32-year-old female with a distant history of left retinal detachment secondary to necrotizing herpetic retinitis complained of right-eye vision loss, pain, redness, and photophobia. An ophthalmological examination revealed findings consistent with acute retinal necrosis of the right eye. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of the right vitreous was positive for herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2). A coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) screening test using reverse transcriptase- (RT-) PCR was positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. CONCLUSIONS: Our case suggests that COVID-19 may cause a latent HSV infection to reactivate, causing contralateral involvement in patients with a prior history of HSV-associated acute retinal necrosis.