Factors Influencing Career Choice of Allergy and Immunology Fellows-in-Training: A Work Group Report of the AAAAI Program Directors Assembly Executive Committee.

BACKGROUND: As the burden of allergic and immunologic disease continues to increase, there is increased demand for a larger Allergy and Immunology (AI) subspecialty workforce. The field must prioritize the expansion of our workforce and the recruitment of exceptional and diverse trainees to ensure the vitality of the specialty. Although the AI fellowship match has traditionally been competitive, recent trends in fellowship applications have demonstrated fewer applicants per fellowship position. This trend has made recruitment a priority on the agenda of the national AI societies. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate key factors influencing the decision to choose the field of AI by querying fellows-in-training. METHODS: A survey was created and distributed yearly to fellows-in-training from 2017 to 2021 to identify factors influencing a career choice in AI. RESULTS: Approximately 59% of respondents rotated with AI in residency and 35% in both medical school and residency. Most respondents reported having a mentor in the field before fellowship, and many had their first exposures to AI during medical school (40%) or residency (32%). Most respondents decided to pursue AI during residency. The most common factors that influenced the decision to pursue AI were work/life balance, clinical aspects of the field, mentorship, and research opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the decision to pursue a career in AI often occurs during residency training and is motivated primarily by work/life balance, clinical aspects of the field, and clinician mentorship. Our survey results could provide guidance to AI training programs on strategies to recruit exceptional and diverse trainees.

Evaluation of association of anti-PEG antibodies with anaphylaxis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism for anaphylaxis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination has been widely debated; understanding this serious adverse event is important for future vaccines of similar design. A mechanism proposed is type I hypersensitivity (i.e., IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation) to polyethylene glycol (PEG). Using an assay that, uniquely, had been previously assessed in patients with anaphylaxis to PEG, our objective was to compare anti-PEG IgE in serum from mRNA COVID-19 vaccine anaphylaxis case-patients and persons vaccinated without allergic reactions. Secondarily, we compared anti-PEG IgG and IgM to assess alternative mechanisms. METHODS: Selected anaphylaxis case-patients reported to U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System December 14, 2020-March 25, 2021 were invited to provide a serum sample. mRNA COVID-19 vaccine study participants with residual serum and no allergic reaction post-vaccination ("controls") were frequency matched to cases 3:1 on vaccine and dose number, sex and 10-year age category. Anti-PEG IgE was measured using a dual cytometric bead assay (DCBA). Anti-PEG IgG and IgM were measured using two different assays: DCBA and a PEGylated-polystyrene bead assay. Laboratorians were blinded to case/control status. RESULTS: All 20 case-patients were women; 17 had anaphylaxis after dose 1, 3 after dose 2. Thirteen (65 %) were hospitalized and 7 (35 %) were intubated. Time from vaccination to serum collection was longer for case-patients vs controls (post-dose 1: median 105 vs 21 days). Among Moderna recipients, anti-PEG IgE was detected in 1 of 10 (10 %) case-patients vs 8 of 30 (27 %) controls (p = 0.40); among Pfizer-BioNTech recipients, it was detected in 0 of 10 case-patients (0 %) vs 1 of 30 (3 %) controls (p >n 0.99). Anti-PEG IgE quantitative signals followed this same pattern. Neither anti-PEG IgG nor IgM was associated with case status with both assay formats. CONCLUSION: Our results support that anti-PEG IgE is not a predominant mechanism for anaphylaxis post-mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.

Distinct Characteristics and Chronology of Amoxicillin-Associated Reactions in Pediatric Acute Care Settings.

BACKGROUND: Amoxicillin-associated reactions (AARs) in children presenting as rashes are common, and recent data suggest that >90% tolerate amoxicillin on re-exposure. However, additional data would help pediatricians and allergists gain confidence in referring and testing children who experienced systemic symptoms perceived as "worrisome," thus leading to urgent medical evaluations. By characterizing the entire spectrum of AAR symptoms in pediatric patients presenting to emergency department (ED)/urgent care (UC) settings, we sought to increase our diagnostic acumen to guide subsequent allergy evaluations. OBJECTIVE: To fully characterize clinical features of rash and systemic symptoms in children presenting to the ED/UC with AARs. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of children seen in the ED/UC from July 1, 2015, to June 30, 2017, was conducted. Clinical features, chronology, and seasonality were detailed, and cases were classified into 3 previously described AAR phenotypes: maculopapular exanthem (MPE), urticaria, and serum sickness-like reactions (SSLRs), if they experienced joint symptoms. RESULTS: Children (n = 668; median age: 1.8 years) presented to the ED/UC with urticaria (44%), MPE (36%), and SSLRs (11%) typically on days 7 to 10 of amoxicillin. Although children with SSLRs were more frequently treated with corticosteroids (28%, P < .0001) and exhibited higher rates of "worrisome" features (fever, angioedema, or gastrointestinal symptoms; 73%, P < .0001), delayed-onset systemic symptoms were identified frequently in all 3 groups. ED/UC reutilization was unexpectedly high with 66 children (10%) returning to the ED/UC for re-evaluation. CONCLUSION: "Worrisome" symptoms are common in children presenting to the ED/UC with AARs. Future studies are needed to determine the impact on subsequent referral and allergy testing.

Predictors of Acute Care Reutilization in Pediatric Patients With Amoxicillin-Associated Reactions.

BACKGROUND: Amoxicillin-associated reactions (AARs) contribute to substantial health care utilization, with a reutilization rate of 10% in pediatric emergency department (ED) and urgent care (UC) settings. OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of ED/UC reutilization by examining patients' clinical features and providers' management of AARs. METHODS: Through a retrospective chart review of 668 patients presenting with AARs over 2 years to the pediatric ED/UC, we examined clinical features associated with ED/UC reutilization, including rash phenotype, systemic symptoms (fever, angioedema, joint involvement, gastrointestinal symptoms), and providers' management (pharmacologic treatment and counseling). We then constructed a statistical model to predict ED/UC reutilization using stepwise backward model selection. RESULTS: ED/UC reutilizers were more likely to be male (P = .008) and have fever (P = .0001), angioedema (P < .0001), joint involvement (P < .0001), and gastrointestinal symptoms (P = .0001) during their AAR course. Rash phenotypes differed between groups (P < .0001), as ED/UC reutilizers more frequently exhibited urticaria. However, there were no differences in clinical management between groups, including pharmacologic recommendations, at the initial ED/UC encounter. In addition, our statistical model identified younger patients <2 years of age as more likely to reutilize ED/UC resources if providers did not document specific return precautions (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-7.7). CONCLUSION: Recognition of clinical features and treatment gaps associated with ED/UC reutilization will guide interventions to optimize care in children presenting with AARs, such as improved anticipatory guidance and early allergy consultation. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether these interventions will reduce ED/UC reutilization and facilitate timely allergy testing.

Anaphylaxis knowledge gaps and future research priorities: A consensus report.

BACKGROUND: Despite a better understanding of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of patients with anaphylaxis, there remain knowledge gaps. Enumerating and prioritizing these gaps would allow limited scientific resources to be directed more effectively. OBJECTIVE: We sought to systematically describe and appraise anaphylaxis knowledge gaps and future research priorities based on their potential impact and feasibility. METHODS: We convened a 25-member multidisciplinary panel of anaphylaxis experts. Panelists formulated knowledge gaps/research priority statements in an anonymous electronic survey. Four anaphylaxis themed writing groups were formed to refine statements: (1) Population Science, (2) Basic and Translational Sciences, (3) Emergency Department Care/Acute Management, and (4) Long-Term Management Strategies and Prevention. Revised statements were incorporated into an anonymous electronic survey, and panelists were asked to rate the impact and feasibility of addressing statements on a continuous 0 to 100 scale. RESULTS: The panel generated 98 statements across the 4 anaphylaxis themes: Population Science (29), Basic and Translational Sciences (27), Emergency Department Care/Acute Management (24), and Long-Term Management Strategies and Prevention (18). Median scores for impact and feasibility ranged from 50.0 to 95.0 and from 40.0 to 90.0, respectively. Key statements based on median rating for impact/feasibility included the need to refine anaphylaxis diagnostic criteria, identify reliable diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic anaphylaxis bioassays, develop clinical prediction models to standardize postanaphylaxis observation periods and hospitalization criteria, and determine immunotherapy best practices. CONCLUSIONS: We identified and systematically appraised anaphylaxis knowledge gaps and future research priorities. This study reinforces the need to harmonize scientific pursuits to optimize the outcomes of patients with and at risk of anaphylaxis.

Respiratory Infections in Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency.

Recurrent and life-threatening respiratory infections are nearly universal in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDD). Early recognition, aggressive treatment, and prophylaxis with antimicrobials and immunoglobulin replacement have been the mainstays of management and will be reviewed here with an emphasis on respiratory infections. Genetic discoveries have allowed direct translation of research to clinical practice, improving our understanding of clinical patterns of pathogen susceptibilities and guiding prophylaxis. The recent identification of inborn errors in type I interferon signaling as a basis for life-threatening viral infections in otherwise healthy individuals suggests another targetable pathway for treatment and/or prophylaxis. The future of PIDD diagnosis will certainly involve early genetic identification by newborn screening before onset of infections, with early treatment offering the potential of preventing disease complications such as chronic lung changes. Gene editing approaches offer tremendous therapeutic potential, with rapidly emerging delivery systems. Antiviral therapies are desperately needed, and specific cellular therapies show promise in patients requiring hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The introduction of approved therapies for clinical use in PIDD is limited by the difficulty of studying outcomes in rare patients/conditions with conventional clinical trials.

COVID-19 mRNA vaccine allergy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A known history of a severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any component of the vaccine is the only contraindication to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination. It is important for pediatricians to understand the likelihood of an allergic reaction to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, including its excipients. RECENT FINDINGS: Episodes concerning for anaphylaxis were immediately reported following early administration of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to adults. Although allergic type symptoms were reported equally in recipients of placebos and test vaccines in phase 3 clinical trials, post-authorization prospective studies state that 0.2-2% of vaccine recipients have experienced allergic reactions. Subsequent allergy testing of affected individuals has focused largely on evaluation of allergic sensitization to a novel vaccine excipient, polyethylene glycol (PEG). PEG is a polymer incorporated in numerous pharmaceutical products because of its favorable, inert properties. The results of allergy testing in adults to date indicate that IgE mediated anaphylaxis to PEG allergy is rarely identified after COVID-19 mRNA vaccine reactions. Numerous individuals with presumed anaphylaxis have tolerated a second vaccine after evaluation and testing by an allergist, suggesting either misdiagnosis or a novel immune mechanism. SUMMARY: Confirmed anaphylactic reactions to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are rare, likely due to a lack of preexisting IgE against the vaccine components, including PEG.

Potential mechanisms of anaphylaxis to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.

Anaphylaxis to vaccines is historically a rare event. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic drove the need for rapid vaccine production applying a novel antigen delivery system: messenger RNA vaccines packaged in lipid nanoparticles. Unexpectedly, public vaccine administration led to a small number of severe allergic reactions, with resultant substantial public concern, especially within atopic individuals. We reviewed the constituents of the messenger RNA lipid nanoparticle vaccine and considered several contributors to these reactions: (1) contact system activation by nucleic acid, (2) complement recognition of the vaccine-activating allergic effector cells, (3) preexisting antibody recognition of polyethylene glycol, a lipid nanoparticle surface hydrophilic polymer, and (4) direct mast cell activation, coupled with potential genetic or environmental predispositions to hypersensitivity. Unfortunately, measurement of anti-polyethylene glycol antibodies in vitro is not clinically available, and the predictive value of skin testing to polyethylene glycol components as a coronavirus disease 2019 messenger RNA vaccine-specific anaphylaxis marker is unknown. Even less is known regarding the applicability of vaccine use for testing (in vitro/vivo) to ascertain pathogenesis or predict reactivity risk. Expedient and thorough research-based evaluation of patients who have suffered anaphylactic vaccine reactions and prospective clinical trials in putative at-risk individuals are needed to address these concerns during a public health crisis.

Severity grading system for acute allergic reactions: A multidisciplinary Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: There is no widely adopted severity grading system for acute allergic reactions, including anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions, thus limiting the ability to optimize and standardize management practices and advance research. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a severity grading system for acute allergic reactions for use in clinical care and research. METHODS: From May to September 2020, we convened a 21-member multidisciplinary panel of allergy and emergency care experts; 9 members formed a writing group to critically appraise and assess the strengths and limitations of prior severity grading systems and develop the structure and content for an optimal severity grading system. The entire study panel then revised the grading system and sought consensus by utilizing Delphi methodology. RESULTS: The writing group recommended that an optimal grading system encompass the severity of acute allergic reactions on a continuum from mild allergic reactions to anaphylactic shock. Additionally, the severity grading system must be able to discriminate between clinically important differences in reaction severity to be relevant in research while also being intuitive and straightforward to apply in clinical care. Consensus was reached for all elements of the proposed severity grading system. CONCLUSION: We developed a consensus severity grading system for acute allergic reactions, including anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions. Successful international validation, refinement, dissemination, and application of the grading system will improve communication among providers and patients about the severity of allergic reactions and will help advance future research.

Persistent, refractory, and biphasic anaphylaxis: A multidisciplinary Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: The use of inconsistent definitions for anaphylaxis outcomes limits our understanding of the natural history and epidemiology of anaphylaxis, hindering clinical practice and research efforts. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to develop consensus definitions for clinically relevant anaphylaxis outcomes by utilizing a multidisciplinary group of clinical and research experts in anaphylaxis. METHODS: Using Delphi methodology, we developed agenda topics and drafted questions to review during monthly conference calls. Through online surveys, a 19-member panel consisting of experts in allergy and/or immunology and emergency medicine rated their level of agreement with the appropriateness of statements on a scale of 1 to 9. A median value of 1.0 to 3.4 was considered inappropriate, a median value of 3.5 to 6.9 was considered uncertain, and a median value of 7.0 to 9.0 was considered appropriate. A disagreement index was then calculated, with values less than 1.0 categorized as "consensus reached." If consensus was not reached after the initial survey, subsequent surveys incorporating the aggregate de-identified responses from prior surveys were sent to panel members. This process was repeated until consensus was reached or 4 survey rounds had been completed, after which the question was categorized as "no consensus reached." RESULTS: The panel developed outcome definitions for persistent, refractory, and biphasic anaphylaxis, as well as for persistent and biphasic nonanaphylactic reactions. There was also consensus among panel members regarding the need to develop an anaphylaxis severity grading system. CONCLUSION: Dissemination and application of these definitions in clinical care and research will help standardize the terminology used to describe anaphylaxis outcomes and serve as the foundation for future research, including research aimed at development of an anaphylaxis severity grading system.

Frequency and spectrum of disease-causing variants in 1892 patients with suspected genetic HLH disorders.

This article explores the distribution and mutation spectrum of potential disease-causing genetic variants in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)-associated genes observed in a large tertiary clinical referral laboratory. Samples from 1892 patients submitted for HLH genetic analysis were studied between September 2013 and June 2018 using a targeted next-generation sequencing panel approach. Patients ranged in age from 1 day to 78 years. Analysis included 15 genes associated with HLH. A potentially causal genetic finding was observed in 227 (12.0%) samples in this cohort. A total of 197 patients (10.4%) had a definite genetic diagnosis. Patients with pathogenic variants in familial HLH genes tended to be diagnosed significantly younger compared with other genes. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the PRF1 gene were the most frequent. However, mutations in genes associated with degranulation defects (STXBP2, UNC13D, RAB27A, LYST, and STX11) were more common than previously appreciated and collectively represented >50% of cases. X-linked conditions (XIAP, SH2D1A, and MAGT1) accounted for 17.8% of the 197 cases. Pathogenic variants in the SLC7A7 gene were the least encountered. These results describe the largest cohort of genetic variation associated with suspected HLH in North America. Merely 10.4% of patients were identified with a clearly genetic cause by this diagnostic approach; other possible etiologies of HLH should be investigated. These results suggest that careful thought should be given regarding whether patients have a clinical phenotype most consistent with HLH vs other clinical and disease phenotypes. The gene panel identified known pathogenic and novel variants in 10 HLH-associated genes.

Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis: Clinical Presentations and Diagnosis.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is an overwhelming clinical syndrome associated with extreme immune activation. Familial HLH is caused by autosomal-recessive inheritance of gene mutations that cripple lymphocyte cytotoxicity. X-linked lymphoproliferative diseases and mutations in Nod-like receptor caspase activation and recruitment domain containing protein 4 (NLRC4) also feature HLH as a predominant manifestation. In addition, "secondary" HLH may occur in immunocompromized patients or in individuals with previously intact immune responses in the context of strong immunologic triggers such as EBV infection, malignancy, rheumatologic disease, and drug hypersensitivity. Regardless of the etiology, HLH is often fatal unless recognized and treated aggressively. Research over the last 20 years has led to many advances in diagnosis and treatment. Rapid testing strategies designed to quickly screen for immune activation and cytotoxic lymphocyte dysfunction are now clinically available and genetic panels/testing algorithms may accelerate a genetic diagnosis. Immunosuppressive treatment protocols have been refined, and experience is gaining with alternative and salvage approaches. However, these advances improve the outcome of patients only when the diagnosis of HLH is made. Ongoing education is needed to ensure medical providers can appropriately recognize and diagnose HLH. This Grand Rounds Review will summarize the clinical and diagnostic features of HLH and highlight known genetic causes.

Live cell evaluation of granzyme delivery and death receptor signaling in tumor cells targeted by human natural killer cells.

Growing interest in natural killer (NK) cell-based therapy for treating human cancer has made it imperative to develop new tools to measure early events in cell death. We recently demonstrated that protease-cleavable luciferase biosensors detect granzyme B and pro-apoptotic caspase activation within minutes of target cell recognition by murine cytotoxic lymphocytes. Here we report successful adaptation of the biosensor technology to assess perforin-dependent and -independent induction of death pathways in tumor cells recognized by human NK cell lines and primary cells. Cell-cell signaling via both Fc receptors and NK-activating receptors led to measurable luciferase signal within 15 minutes. In addition to the previously described aspartase-cleavable biosensors, we report development of granzyme A and granzyme K biosensors, for which no other functional reporters are available. The strength of signaling for granzyme biosensors was dependent on perforin expression in IL-2-activated NK effectors. Perforin-independent induction of apoptotic caspases was mediated by death receptor ligation and was detectable after 45 minutes of conjugation. Evidence of both FasL and TRAIL-mediated signaling was seen after engagement of Jurkat cells by perforin-deficient human cytotoxic lymphocytes. Although K562 cells have been reported to be insensitive to TRAIL, robust activation of pro-apoptotic caspases by NK cell-derived TRAIL was detectable in K562 cells. These studies highlight the sensitivity of protease-cleaved luciferase biosensors to measure previously undetectable events in live cells in real time. Further development of caspase and granzyme biosensors will allow interrogation of additional features of granzyme activity in live cells including localization, timing, and specificity.

Perforin gene transfer into hematopoietic stem cells improves immune dysregulation in murine models of perforin deficiency.

Defects in perforin lead to the failure of T and NK cell cytotoxicity, hypercytokinemia, and the immune dysregulatory condition known as familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (FHL). The only curative treatment is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation which carries substantial risks. We used lentiviral vectors (LV) expressing the human perforin gene, under the transcriptional control of the ubiquitous phosphoglycerate kinase promoter or a lineage-specific perforin promoter, to correct the defect in different murine models. Following LV-mediated gene transfer into progenitor cells from perforin-deficient mice, we observed perforin expression in mature T and NK cells, and there was no evidence of progenitor cell toxicity when transplanted into irradiated recipients. The resulting perforin-reconstituted NK cells showed partial recovery of cytotoxicity, and we observed full recovery of cytotoxicity in polyclonal CD8(+) T cells. Furthermore, reconstituted T cells with defined antigen specificity displayed normal cytotoxic function against peptide-loaded targets. Reconstituted CD8(+) lymphoblasts had reduced interferon-γ secretion following stimulation in vitro, suggesting restoration of normal immune regulation. Finally, upon viral challenge, mice with >30% engraftment of gene-modified cells exhibited reduction of cytokine hypersecretion and cytopenias. This study demonstrates the potential of hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy as a curative treatment for perforin-deficient FHL.

Real-time detection of CTL function reveals distinct patterns of caspase activation mediated by Fas versus granzyme B.

Activation of caspase-mediated apoptosis is reported to be a hallmark of both granzyme B- and Fas-mediated pathways of killing by CTLs; however, the kinetics of caspase activation remain undefined owing to an inability to monitor target cell-specific apoptosis in real time. We have overcome this limitation by developing a novel biosensor assay that detects continuous, protease-specific activity in target cells. Biosensors were engineered from a circularly permuted luciferase, linked internally by either caspase 3/7 or granzyme B/caspase 8 cleavage sites, thus allowing activation upon proteolytic cleavage by the respective proteases. Coincubation of murine CTLs with target cells expressing either type of biosensor led to a robust luminescent signal within minutes of cell contact. The signal was modulated by the strength of TCR signaling, the ratio of CTL/target cells, and the type of biosensor used. Additionally, the luciferase signal at 30 min correlated with target cell death, as measured by a (51)Cr-release assay. The rate of caspase 3/7 biosensor activation was unexpectedly rapid following granzyme B- compared with Fas-mediated signal induction in murine CTLs; the latter appeared gradually after a 90-min delay in perforin- or granzyme B-deficient CTLs. Remarkably, the Fas-dependent, caspase 3/7 biosensor signal induced by perforin-deficient human CTLs was also detectable after a 90-min delay when measured by redirected killing. Thus, we have used a novel, real-time assay to demonstrate the distinct pattern of caspase activation induced by granzyme B versus Fas in human and murine CTLs.

Elevated Granzyme B in Cytotoxic Lymphocytes is a Signature of Immune Activation in Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis.

Patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) exhibit immune hyper-activation as a consequence of genetic defects in secretory granule proteins of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and natural killer (NK) cells. Murine models of HLH demonstrate significant activation of CTL as central to the disease pathogenesis, but evaluation of CTL and NK activation in children with HLH or inflammatory conditions is not well described. CD8 T cells only express granzyme B (GrB) following stimulation and differentiation into CTL; therefore, we reasoned that GrB expression may serve as a signature of CTL activation. It is unknown whether human NK cells are similarly activated in vivo, as marked by increased granule proteins. Perforin and GrB levels are measured in both CTL and NK cells by flow cytometry to diagnose perforin deficiency. We retrospectively compared GrB expression in blood samples from 130 children with clinically suspected and/or genetically defined HLH to age-matched controls. As predicted, CD8 expressing GrB cells were increased in HLH, regardless of genetic etiology. Remarkably, the GrB protein content also increased in NK cells in patients with HLH and decreased following immunosuppressive therapy. This suggests that in vivo activation of NK cells occurs in hyper-inflammatory conditions. We conclude that increased detection of GrB in CTL and NK are an immune signature for lymphocyte activation in HLH, irrespective of genetic subtype and may also be a useful measure of immune activation in other related conditions.

Hypomorphic mutations in PRF1, MUNC13-4, and STXBP2 are associated with adult-onset familial HLH.

Familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare primary immunodeficiency disorder characterized by defects in cell-mediated cytotoxicity that results in fever, hepatosplenomegaly, and cytopenias. Familial HLH is well recognized in children but rarely diagnosed in adults. We conducted a retrospective review of genetic and immunologic test results in patients who developed HLH in adulthood. Included in our study were 1531 patients with a clinical diagnosis of HLH; 175 patients were 18 years or older. Missense and splice-site sequence variants in PRF1, MUNC13-4, and STXBP2 were found in 25 (14%) of the adult patients. The A91V-PRF1 genotype was found in 12 of these patients (48%). The preponderance of hypomorphic mutations in familial HLH-causing genes correlates with the later-onset clinical symptoms and the more indolent course in adult patients. We conclude that late-onset familial HLH occurs more commonly than was suspected previously.

Gene expression profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from children with active hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.

Familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (FHL) is a rare, genetically heterogeneous autosomal recessive immune disorder that results when the critical regulatory pathways that mediate immune defense mechanisms and the natural termination of immune/inflammatory responses are disrupted or overwhelmed. To advance the understanding of FHL, we performed gene expression profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 11 children with untreated FHL. Total RNA was isolated and gene expression levels were determined using microarray analysis. Comparisons between patients with FHL and normal pediatric controls (n = 30) identified 915 down-regulated and 550 up-regulated genes with more than or equal to 2.5-fold difference in expression (P ≤ .05). The expression of genes associated with natural killer cell functions, innate and adaptive immune responses, proapoptotic proteins, and B- and T-cell differentiation were down-regulated in patients with FHL. Genes associated with the canonical pathways of interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-10 IL-1, IL-8, TREM1, LXR/RXR activation, and PPAR signaling and genes encoding of antiapoptotic proteins were overexpressed in patients with FHL. This first study of genome-wide expression profiling in children with FHL demonstrates the complexity of gene expression patterns, which underlie the immunobiology of FHL.