Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol ; 103(12): 1217-21, 1996 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8968239

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To estimate and compare the costs of surgical and medical treatment of miscarriage to the National Health Service. DESIGN: A patient-centred, partially randomised trial. SETTING: A teaching hospital in Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred and thirty-seven women with a proven first trimester miscarriage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The cost per patient of surgical and medical management of miscarriage plus the extra cost per patient of introducing medical management of miscarriage under three different scenarios are calculated. RESULTS: The average cost of surgical treatment was Pounds 397 compared with Pounds 347 for medical treatment. Sensitivity analysis showed that the extra cost of introducing the medical management of miscarriage ranged from a cost saving of Pounds 71 per patient to an additional cost of Pounds 47 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed that it may be possible to generate cost savings by introducing medical methods in the management of early miscarriage. However, the savings assume that costs associated with theatre use can be fully realised.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous/economics , Abortion, Induced/economics , Abortion, Induced/methods , Abortion, Spontaneous/metabolism , Cost Savings , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Patient-Centered Care , Pregnancy , Scotland
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL