Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Respir Care ; 67(1): 24-33, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34702768

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has become the preferable modality of respiratory support for spontaneously breathing premature infants in the neonatal ICU (NICU). Whereas NIV support contributes to the prevention of long-term respiratory sequelae from mechanical ventilation, the nasal interfaces used are well known for placing patients at risk for development of NIV device-related pressure injuries (PIs). After implementing clinical practice guidelines promoting the use of sealing NIV interfaces for respiratory support in a level IV NICU, an increase in the frequency of stage 2 or worse and deep tissue injury (DTI) PI was observed. We hypothesized that the implementation of a multifaceted skin care bundle (SCB) would reduce the incidence of NIV device-related PI. METHODS: Quality improvement methodology was used to evaluate the impact of implementing an SCB for patients supported with NIV via a nasal interface. Incidence rate of stage 2 or worse and DTI PI was reported per 100 NIV days over 4 distinct time periods: (1) pre-NIV guideline, (2) post-NIV guideline, (3) post SCB, and (4) sustainability phase. Incidence comparisons were made using one-sided P values from the Farrington-Manning test of equal risks with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: The NICU experienced a notable rise in NIV device-related PI after implementation of NIV guidelines (0.01 vs 0.34 per 100 NIV days; P = .01). After application of an SCB, a decrease in NIV device-related skin PI was achieved (0.34 vs 0.07 per 100 NIV days; P = .04), representing a 79% reduction. CONCLUSIONS: A collaborative and multidisciplinary team approach was used to promote engagement with clinical staff to address a preventable harm. The implementation of a multifaceted PI prevention bundle contributed to reducing harm while permitting the continued use of appropriate respiratory support to a highly vulnerable patient population in the NICU.


Subject(s)
Noninvasive Ventilation , Pressure Ulcer , Respiratory Insufficiency , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Noninvasive Ventilation/adverse effects , Noninvasive Ventilation/methods , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control , Nose , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology
2.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 6(2): e394, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33718749

ABSTRACT

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is a functional self-limiting condition in neonates. When pathologic, it is called GER disease (GERD). There are wide variations in the management of signs, symptoms, and complications associated with GERD in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Evidence does not support an empiric trial of GERD medications as a diagnostic tool or therapy in premature infants. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team developed evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for GERD management. Process improvement included developing a GERD management algorithm, electronic order sets, and education for all providers. Multiple plan-do-study-act cycles done. RESULTS: Implementation of standardized GERD management guideline, decreased the overall use of antireflux medications from baseline, 15.1%-6.8% [χ2 (1, N = 1259) = 12.98, P < 0.001]. There was elimination of GERD medication use in preterm from baseline of 19.3% [χ2 (1, N = 220) = 12.18, P < 0.001]. The most frequently used GERD medication was lansoprazole, with an incorrect initial dosing rate of 55.0% that deceased to zero [χ2 (1, N = 33) = 10.73, P = 0.001]. Appropriate testing with PH probe with 24-hour multichannel impedance was observed (17.1%-28.0%) identifying patients with correct GERD diagnosis [χ2 (1, N = 101) = 1.41, P = 0.236]. Length of stay for GERD patient's improved from a median of 89-53 days. CONCLUSION: Standardizing clinical management leads to best practices for GERD management with appropriate diagnostic testing, eliminating incorrect medication dosing, and improved patient safety with value-based outcomes.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...