ABSTRACT
Adherence of healthcare workers (HCWs) to influenza vaccination is far from optimal despite its being the most effective intervention for preventing influenza. In order to evaluate factors associated with influenza vaccination acceptance among Mexican HCWs during the 2017-2018 influenza season, a multicenter cross-sectional study spanning public and private hospitals was conducted. Participants were consecutively invited to answer a self-administered questionnaire. A total of 1513 out of 1553 questionnaires were evaluated. The median age of the participants was 32 (26-44) years and 65.8% were women. Nurses and physicians comprised 53.0% of the surveyed population. Total self-reported adherence to influenza vaccination among HCWs during the 2017-2018 season was 63.5% and varied across participating hospitals (P < 0.001). Factors positively associated with influenza vaccination were incremental doses of influenza vaccine received within the last 5 years (aOR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.78-2.10), City 3 (aOR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.19-2.20) and City 1 (aOR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.02-1.91), whereas factors negatively associated were lack of a previous dose of influenza vaccine (aOR = 0.03, 95% CI = 0.01-0.08) and unawareness of the vaccination campaign (aOR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.44-0.72). Lack of information and poor communication were barriers identified by both vaccinated and unvaccinated personnel. This study concluded that adherence to influenza vaccination in Mexican HCWs is suboptimal and that the factors associated with receipt of influenza vaccine are similar to those reported in other studies.
Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Surveys and Questionnaires , VaccinationABSTRACT
El infarto esplénico es una entidad rara en la edad pediátrica que, cuando se encuentra, se asocia a otros factores predisponentes, como enfermedades oncológicas, hematológicas o infecciosas. Su presentación es asintomática o sintomática con dolor abdominal, fiebre y esplenomegalia. No existe consenso sobre cuál es la mejor opción de tratamiento, y se decide, en la mayoría de los casos, un manejo conservador o quirúrgico de acuerdo con las características individuales del paciente. Se presenta el caso de un paciente escolar que acude por un cuadro de dolor abdominal agudo y fiebre con diagnóstico de infarto esplénico masivo sin etiología aparente que fue manejado de manera conservadora, con evolución favorable. Es importante considerar este padecimiento como causa de dolor abdominal asociado a esplenomegalia y destacar la relevancia de esta presentación de caso, ya que se presenta sin relación con enfermedades subyacentes.
Splenic infarction is a rare entity in the paediatric age that, when found, is associated with other predisposing factors such as oncological, haematological or infectious diseases. It is whether asymptomatic or symptomatic with abdominal pain, fever and splenomegaly. There is no consensus on which is the best treatment option, in most cases deciding conservative or surgical management according to individual patient characteristics. We present the case of a patient with acute abdominal pain and fever with a diagnosis of massive splenic infarction without apparent aetiology that was managed conservatively with favourable evolution. It is important to consider this condition as a cause of abdominal pain associated with splenomegaly.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Child , Splenic Infarction/diagnosis , Splenomegaly , Pediatrics , Splenic Infarction/drug therapy , Abdominal Pain , FeverABSTRACT
Splenic infarction is a rare entity in the paediatric age that, when found, is associated with other predisposing factors such as oncological, haematological or infectious diseases. It is whether asymptomatic or symptomatic with abdominal pain, fever and splenomegaly. There is no consensus on which is the best treatment option, in most cases deciding conservative or surgical management according to individual patient characteristics. We present the case of a patient with acute abdominal pain and fever with a diagnosis of massive splenic infarction without apparent aetiology that was managed conservatively with favourable evolution. It is important to consider this condition as a cause of abdominal pain associated with splenomegaly.
El infarto esplénico es una entidad rara en la edad pediátrica que, cuando se encuentra, se asocia a otros factores predisponentes, como enfermedades oncológicas, hematológicas o infecciosas. Su presentación es asintomática o sintomática con dolor abdominal, fiebre y esplenomegalia. No existe consenso sobre cuál es la mejor opción de tratamiento, y se decide, en la mayoría de los casos, un manejo conservador o quirúrgico de acuerdo con las características individuales del paciente. Se presenta el caso de un paciente escolar que acude por un cuadro de dolor abdominal agudo y fiebre con diagnóstico de infarto esplénico masivo sin etiología aparente que fue manejado de manera conservadora, con evolución favorable. Es importante considerar este padecimiento como causa de dolor abdominal asociado a esplenomegalia y destacar la relevancia de esta presentación de caso, ya que se presenta sin relación con enfermedades subyacentes.