Different Genetic Signatures of Small-Cell Lung Cancer Characterize Anti-GABAB R and Anti-Hu Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes.

OBJECTIVE: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the malignancy most frequently associated with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) and can trigger different antibody responses against intracellular (Hu) or neuronal surface (GABAB R) antigens. Our aim was to clarify whether the genomic and transcriptomic features of SCLC are different in patients with anti-GABAB R or anti-Hu PNS compared with SCLC without PNS. METHODS: A total of 76 SCLC tumor samples were collected: 34 anti-Hu, 14 anti-GABAB R, and 28 SCLC without PNS. The study consisted of 4 steps: (1) pathological confirmation; (2) next generation sequencing using a panel of 98 genes, including those encoding the autoantibodies targets ELAVL1-4, GABBR1-2, and KCTD16; (3) genome-wide copy number variation (CNV); and (4) whole-transcriptome RNA sequencing. RESULTS: CNV analysis revealed that patients with anti-GABAB R PNS commonly have a gain in chromosome 5q, which contains KCTD16, whereas anti-Hu and control patients often harbor a loss. No significantly different number of mutations regarding any onconeural genes was observed. Conversely, the transcriptomic profile of SCLC was different, and the differentially expressed genes allowed effective clustering of the samples into 3 groups, reflecting the antibody-based classification, with an overexpression of KCTD16 specific to anti-GABAB R PNS. Pathway analysis revealed that tumors of patients with anti-GABAB R encephalitis were enriched in B-cell signatures, as opposed to those of patients with anti-Hu, in which T-cell- and interferon-γ-related signatures were overexpressed. INTERPRETATION: SCLC genetic and transcriptomic features differentiate anti-GABAB R, anti-Hu, and non-PNS tumors. The role of KCTD16 appears to be pivotal in the tumor immune tolerance breakdown of anti-GABAB R PNS. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:1102-1115.

Prognostic Value of Persistent CSF Antibodies at 12 Months in Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Anti-NMDA receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is defined by the presence of antibodies (Abs) targeting the NMDAR in the CSF. This study aimed to determine the prognostic value of persistent CSF NMDAR-Abs during follow-up. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis in the French Reference Center for Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Autoimmune Encephalitis and for whom CSF samples were obtained at diagnosis and >4 months of follow-up to evaluate CSF NMDAR-Ab persistence. Because patients were tested for CSF NMDAR-Abs at different time points, samples were stratified into different periods of follow-up (i.e., 12 months was considered for the 9- to 16-month follow-up period). RESULTS: Among the 501 patients diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis between January 2007 and June 2020, 89 (17%) were tested between 4 and 120 months for CSF NMDAR-Abs after clinical improvement and included in the study (75/89 women, 84%; median age 20 years, interquartile range [IQR] 16-26). During follow-up, 21 of 89 (23%) patients had a relapse after a median time of 29 months (IQR 18-47), and 20 of 89 (22%) had a poor outcome (mRS ≥3) after a median last follow-up of 36 months (IQR 19-64). Most patients (69/89, 77%) were tested at the 12-month follow-up period, and 42 of 69 (60%) of them had persistent CSF NMDAR-Abs. When comparing patients with persistent or absent CSF NMDAR-Abs at 12 months, poor outcome at the last follow-up was more frequent in the former (38% vs 8%, p = 0.01), who had relapses more often (23% vs 7%), which also appeared earlier in the course of the disease (90% during the following 4 years of follow-up vs 20%), although no significant difference was observed at long-term follow-up (p = 0.15). In addition, patients with persistent CSF NMDAR-Abs at 12 months had higher titers of CSF NMDAR-Abs at diagnosis. DISCUSSION: In this study, patients with persistent CSF NMDAR-Abs at 12 months were more likely to have subsequent relapses and a poor long-term outcome. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution because of the variability in the time of sampling of this study. Future prospective studies are required to validate these results in larger cohorts.