Distraction osteogenesis in combined sequential use of external fixation and nailing (lengthening and then nailing): An experimental study in rabbits.

Limb lengthening relies on the process of distraction osteogenesis. The active periosteal bone formation has been detected in clinical practice with a lengthening and then nail (LATN) technique but has not been confirmed by experimental studies to date. The aim of this study is to compare the tissue regeneration of the distraction regenerate during tibial lengthening in rabbits using a LATN technique. This study was performed on 54 mature rabbits of the Soviet Chinchilla breed, which were divided into three groups of 18 animals. In group 1 (control), the tibia was lengthened in an external fixator. In group 2, the LATN technique was modeled and in group 3, lengthening over nail (LON) was modeled. The total duration of the experiment was 45 days. On the 10th, 15th, 20th, 30th, and 45th day X-ray, computed tomography and morphological studies were performed. In the experimental groups (2 and 3), a more pronounced periosteal bone formation in the area of regenerate was noted when compared to group 1. In group 2 (LATN), wide cortical plates were formed from the intermediate and periosteal areas. In this group, the maximum densitometric density values were noted. Endosteal bone formation was preserved in all groups. The LON and LATN techniques, when compared with the classical Ilizarov lengthening, do not demonstrate any deficiency in the tissue regeneration of the bone tissue at the regenerate sites. The most powerful bone structures are formed with the sequential use of the external fixation and nailing (LATN).

Core psychosocial issues for children and adolescents in the context of limb lengthening and reconstruction surgery treatment.

PURPOSE: Addressing the psychosocial needs of adolescents can improve surgical outcomes. The aim of this retrospective comparative study was to understand the core psychosocial factors that shaped the experiences of adolescents who underwent multiple limb lengthening/reconstruction surgeries (LLRS). METHODS: A novel 62-question survey was developed and administered to 31 patients from the study institution. Data was obtained using a self-report inventory assessing medical care, communication/connection to doctor, peer relations, physical space, self-esteem, counselling/clergy, physical/emotional support, school issues and concerns about future. This survey and demographic questions were administered to young adults (now aged 18 to 30 years) who underwent LLRS treatment between the ages of 11 to 20 years. RESULTS: Psychosocial needs were determined to be within the categories of body image/self-esteem, subjective perception of treatment, patient-physician relationship, role of parents, peer interactions, academic performance and hospital experience. Patients valued parental involvement while also wanting their surgeon to speak directly to them. They preferred to be in private rooms on the paediatric floor and to not socialize while in the hospital. They were indifferent to keeping up with friends, speaking to a counsellor and having their surgeon inquire about their emotions. They expressed concern about pain, carrying out activities and the financial impact of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent LLRS patients value focused psychosocial support from their surgeon and caregivers. This perceived level of support influences their ability to cope with their condition. These findings helped us understand the psychological issues and preferences of adolescents who underwent LLRS and can assist orthopaedic surgeons in providing holistic care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Intramedullary Nails Perform Poorly in Long-Bone Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Carbon-fiber-reinforced (CFR) polymer has produced great excitement in the orthopedic community as a material that will reduce bone healing times and provide improved image quality. Osteotomy stabilized with an intramedullary (IM) nail has become a common technique to address post-traumatic malalignment of the lower extremity. PURPOSES/QUESTIONS: The following questions were asked: (1) Did CFR polymer nails provide a rapid healing time after long bone osteotomy, shortening, or fracture? (2) Did the CFR polymer nails produce unexpected complications? METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted in patients who received CFR polymer IM nails for various indications, from April 2016 to January 2017 in a deformity and trauma practice, ï»¿using patient charts and radiographs. The primary outcomes were time to union and incidence of complications including nonunion, hardware failure, neurovascular injury, venous thromboembolism, and infection. RESULTS: Twelve patients who received CFR polymer IM nails in 16 limbs for various indications were included in our analysis. Patients were followed for an average of 16.9 months. Eleven limbs underwent realignment and were corrected an average of 23° through a diaphyseal osteotomy. Three limbs underwent limb-shortening surgery, an average of 25 mm, through an open, excisional osteotomy of the femoral diaphysis. Two diaphyseal, closed tibia fractures underwent routine IM nailing. The average time to union was 107.6 days, which included all limbs that united (11/16, 69%). Nonunion occurred in 5/16 (31%) of limbs. Complications recorded included nonunion and hardware failure, most of which resulted in unplanned surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the CFR polymer IM nail was associated with loss of fixation and nonunion after surgeries that have traditionally healed uneventfully. The increased elasticity of the CFR polymer allows for more motion at the osteotomy/fracture interface than the stiffer titanium counterparts, exposing long-bone osteotomies to delayed union and nonunion, a finding seen with CFR polymer plates. The overwhelmingly poor early results of this device applied to a long-bone deformity practice have led these authors to abandon the use of this implant.

Humeral Lengthening with the PRECICE Magnetic Lengthening Nail.

BACKGROUND: Different types of external fixators have been used for humeral lengthening with successful outcomes reported in literature. Motorized intramedullary (IM) lengthening nails have been developed as an alternative to external fixators for long bone lengthening in the lower extremity. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This case series reports on using the new technology of IM lengthening nails for humeral lengthening. We assessed the radiological healing and functional outcomes after using the PRECICE IM nail for humeral lengthening. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included a total of six humeri in five patients (mean age was 20 years) that underwent lengthening with the magnetic IM PRECICE nail in two centers in the USA. The etiology was humeral growth arrest post-bone cyst (two segments), post-septic growth arrest (two segments), and multiple hereditary exostosis (bilateral segments in one patient). The outcomes measured were the length achieved, distraction index (DI; the length achieved in mm divided by the duration of lengthening in days), consolidation index (CI; number of days from surgery until consolidation divided by the length of the regenerate in cm), complications encountered, and functional outcomes (shoulder and elbow range of motion, the upper extremity functional index (UEFI), and QuickDASH functional scores). RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 1.8 years (0.9 to 2.4 years). All segments achieved the goal of lengthening; the mean was 5.1 cm (4.5 to 5.8 cm). Mean DI was 0.7 mm/day (0.5 to 0.8). Mean CI was 36 days/cm (25 to 45 days/cm). No complications were observed. At the last follow-up, all patients maintained their preoperative range of motion (ROM) except one patient had reduced shoulder ROM. QuickDASH score and upper extremity functional index showed postoperative improvement compared to the preoperative scores. CONCLUSION: IM lengthening nails can provide successful and safe humeral lengthening. Specifically, the PRECICE nail has accurate control over the lengthening process.

Simultaneous treatment of tibial bone and soft-tissue defects with the Ilizarov method.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential for limb salvage using the Ilizarov method to simultaneously treat bone and soft-tissue defects of the leg without flap coverage. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Level I trauma centers at 4 academic university medical centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five patients with bone and soft-tissue defects associated with tibial fractures and nonunions. The average soft-tissue and bone defect after debridement was 10.1 (range, 2-25) cm and 6 (range, 2-14) cm respectively. Patients were not candidates for flap coverage and the treatment was a preamputation limb salvage undertaking in all cases. INTERVENTION: Ilizarov and Taylor Spatial Frames used to gradually close the bone and soft-tissue defects simultaneously by using monofocal shortening or bifocal or trifocal bone transport. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Bone union, soft-tissue closure, resolution or prevention of infection, restoration of leg length equality, alignment, limb salvage. RESULTS: The average time of compression and distraction was 19.7 (range, 5-70) weeks, and time to soft-tissue closure was 14.7 (range, 3-41) weeks. Bony union occurred in 24 patients (96%). The average time in the frame was 43.2 (range, 10-82) weeks. Lengthening at another site was performed in 15 patients. The average amount of bone lengthening was 5.6 (range, 2-11) cm. Final leg length discrepancy (LLD) averaged 1.2 (range, 0-5) cm. Use of the trifocal approach resulted in less time in the frame for treatment of large bone and soft-tissue defects. There were no recurrences of osteomyelitis at the nonunion site. All wounds were closed. There were no amputations. All limbs were salvaged. CONCLUSIONS: The Ilizarov method can be successfully used to reconstruct the leg with tibial bone loss and an accompanying soft-tissue defect. This limb salvage method can be used in patients who are not believed to be candidates for flap coverage. One also may consider using this technique to avoid the need for a flap. Gradual closure of the defect is accomplished resulting in bony union and soft-tissue closure. Lengthening can be performed at another site. A trifocal approach should be considered for large defects (>6 cm). Advances in technique and frame design should help prevent residual deformity.