Etiology of Drug-Induced Edema: A Review of Dihydropyridine, Thiazolidinedione, and Other Medications Causing Edema.

Edema is an accumulation of fluid in the body's tissues that affects millions of Americans yearly. It can affect multiple body parts, for example, the brain or eyes, but often occurs in the periphery, including the feet and legs. Medications, such as dihydropyridine and thiazolidinediones (TZDs), can be the etiology of edema. Edema can develop in association with problems in the vasculature or lymphatic flow. In recent years, a better understanding of these drug-induced mechanisms has been appreciated. Specifically, dihydropyridines can increase hydrostatic pressure and cause selective pre-capillary vessel vasodilation. TZDs can cause edema through increased vascular permeability and increased hydrostatic pressure. Specifically, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) stimulation increases vascular endothelial permeability, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion, renal sodium, and fluid retention. Other drugs that can cause edema include neuropathic pain agents, dopamine agonists, antipsychotics, nitrates, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAIDS), steroids, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and insulin. There are various clinical presentations of edema. Since multiple mechanisms can induce edema, it is important to understand the basic mechanisms and pathophysiology of drug-induced edema. Edema can even become fatal. For example, angioedema can occur from ACE inhibitor therapy. In this regard, it is considered a medical emergency when there is laryngeal involvement. This review aims to thoroughly appreciate the multiple causes of drug-induced edema and the ways it can be treated or prevented.

Topical Medications for Atopic Dermatitis and Effects on Increasing Lymphoma Risks.

Atopic dermatitis is an immune-mediated skin condition that causes relapsing, pruritic skin lesions. Flares of this disease are often treated with topical corticosteroids; however, the use of these drugs can cause unwanted side effects, such as cutaneous atrophy and impaired wound healing. To minimize these common side effects, severe forms of this disease have been treated with topical calcineurin inhibitors, which previously had no known long-term side effects. Recently, there has been debate on the immunosuppressive effects of these drugs and whether chronic use could result in non-melanoma skin cancer. Systemic absorption of topical calcineurin inhibitors is extremely limited compared to oral formulation, although it is directly proportional to the total body surface area applied with medication. Patients with atopic dermatitis can have an increased risk of lymphoma, so it is hard to distinguish the causative factor, e.g., severe atopic dermatitis or being treated with calcineurin inhibitors. While inconclusive, the Food and Drug Administration recently issued a black box warning, and currently, topical calcineurin inhibitors are considered a second-line treatment. The present investigation reviews the findings of multiple studies conducted to determine if there is a link between the usage of topical calcineurin inhibitors and lymphoma.

Cebranopadol for the Treatment of Chronic Pain.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Regardless of the etiology, if pain persists chronically, it can detrimentally impact multiple aspects of a patient's well-being. Both physical and psychological effects are significant in many chronic pain patients. In this regard, psychological consequences can alter a patient's quality of life, functionality, and social functioning. Opioids have been the long-established gold standard for acute pain treatment in settings such as the postoperative period. An alternative to opioids in pain management has been highly sought after. Through a non-selective mechanism, cebranopadol is a first-in-class oral drug which combines agonism of the mu and nociceptin opioid peptide (NOP) receptors to provide improved analgesia, while reducing the occurrence of many typically opioid side effects. This manuscript is a narrative review of the possible use of cebranopadol in pain management. RECENT FINDINGS: In pre-clinical studies, cebranopadol was similar to morphine in its pain control efficacy. In a phase IIa trial, cebranopadol was superior to placebo in reducing pain. In a randomized clinical trial, cebranopadol was superior to morphine. Another study concluded that cebranopadol had a lower misuse potential when compared to hydromorphone. In summary, cebranopadol offers new opportunities in treating chronic moderate to severe pain, while also countering risks of addiction. Additional studies are warranted to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of cebranopadol. In this regard, cebranopadol could prove to be a promising alternative to current pain treatment options.

Helicobacter Pylori: A Review of Current Treatment Options in Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: When prescribing antibiotics, infection eradication rates, local resistance rates, and cost should be among the most essential considerations. Helicobacter pylori is among the most common infections worldwide, and it can lead to burdensome sequela for the patient and the healthcare system, without appropriate treatment. Due to constantly fluctuating resistance rates, regimens must be constantly assessed to ensure effectiveness. METHODS: This was a narrative review. The sources for this review are as follows: searching on PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, and ScienceDirect; using keywords: Helicobacter pylori, Treatment Options, Clinical Practice. RESULTS: Multiple antibiotics are prescribed as part of the regimen to thwart high resistance rates. This can lead to unwanted adverse reactions and adherence issues, due to the amount and timing of medication administration, which also may contribute to resistance. Single-capsule combination capsules have reached the market to ease this concern, but brand-only may be problematic for patient affordability. Due to the previously mentioned factors, effectiveness and affordability must be equally considered. CONCLUSIONS: This review will utilize guidelines to discuss current treatment options and give cost considerations to elicit the most effective regimen for the patient.