ABSTRACT
In recent years, the prevalence of infertility has increased, and appears to affect approximately one in six couples. Some of them must perform assisted reproductive techniques (ART) in order to achieve pregnancy. As a result, growing interest has arisen about predictive factors of pregnancy and live birth with and without ART. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) is a glycoprotein discovered in the 1950s in male embryonic sexual differentiation. Later, in 1984, its role in folliculogenesis was reported: secreted by granulosa cells, this hormone is involved in the regulation of the recruitment of primordial follicles and in follicular growth. AMH assays were developed for women in 1990s, and the serum AMH level has rapidly become a crucial element in managing women's fertility. Based mainly on its ability to be a quantitative but indirect marker of ovarian reserve, the serum AMH assay is widely used in reproductive medicine and ART. This review summarizes current knowledge of the AMH assessment in the field of reproductive medicine. We focus on the role of AMH level to predict spontaneous pregnancy occurrence, ART outcomes, and fertility preservation outcomes.
Subject(s)
Anti-Mullerian Hormone , Biomarkers , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Anti-Mullerian Hormone/blood , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Biomarkers/blood , Ovarian Reserve/physiology , Fertilization/physiology , Male , Treatment Outcome , Fertility Preservation/methods , Infertility, Female/blood , Infertility, Female/therapy , Pregnancy RateSubject(s)
Reproductive Medicine , Reproductive Medicine/education , Humans , France , Curriculum , Education, Medical/methodsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: A high prevalence of increased DHEAS (dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate) levels (about a third of cases) has been reported in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). This excess of adrenal androgens remains a mystery in this ovarian pathology. It is well known that DHEAS production correlates negatively with age, and study populations of women with PCOS are generally young. To avoid this bias, a study was carried out on a large population of women with PCOS and control women, using normal DHEAS values for each age group, to better assess prevalence and better understand the link between PCOS and DHEAS. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the Lille University Hospital. A total of 1223 patients with PCOS according to the Rotterdam criteria and 517 control women were included. DHEAS elevation was diagnosed according to the standards of the Lille University Hospital Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, based on patient age. The prevalence of increased serum DHEAS levels was calculated in each population and according to PCOS phenotype. Correlations were assessed between serum DHEAS levels and clinical, hormonal, and metabolic markers, with adjustment for age. RESULTS: Prevalence of increased DHEAS was significantly higher in the PCOS group than in the control group (8.1 vs. 4.3%; OR=1.98 (95%CI: 1.23-3.19), P=0.005, and OR=1.07 (95%CI: 1.05-1.09), P=0.014 without and with adjustment for BMI respectively), and in phenotypes A and C than in controls (OR=2.88 (95%CI: 1.76 to 4.72), P<0.001 and OR=2.81 (95%CI: 1.39 to 5.67), P=0.004 respectively), but not in phenotype D. A correlation was found between DHEAS level and total testosteronemia (r=0.34, P<0.001), androstenedione (r=0.24, P<0.001), 17 hydroxyprogesteronemia (r=0.22, P<0.001) and age (r=0.25, P<0.001). No correlations were found with AMH, LH or FSH, and a very weak positive correlation was found with BMI (r=0.15; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Using age-dependent norms, DHEAS elevation was found in only 8.1% of women with PCOS (11% in the case of phenotypes A and C) versus 4.3% in controls and women with phenotype D. DHEAS levels correlated only with other androgens, and not (or only minimally) with other ovarian, pituitary or metabolic markers. DHEAS assay therefore appears to be of no interest for positive diagnosis or understanding of the pathophysiology of PCOS, except in case of very high testosterone levels.
Subject(s)
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome , Female , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Androgens , TestosteroneABSTRACT
RESEARCH QUESTION: Does colorectal endometriosis surgery prior to IVF ± intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) impact cumulative live birth rates? DESIGN: This retrospective, monocentric study (Lille University Hospital) was conducted between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2018. Two groups of patients from the JFIV database were included: a group undergoing IVF±ICSI alone (120 patients, 215 oocyte retrievals), and a group undergoing surgery and then IVF±ICSI (69 patients, 109 oocyte retrievals). The mode of management was decided after a multidisciplinary team meeting. Different criteria such as age (cut-off 35 years), anti-Müllerian hormone concentration (cut off 2 ng/ml), imaging results and the patient's symptomatology were considered: the most symptomatic patients underwent surgery prior to IVF±ICSI. The cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates obtained after four IVF attempts were estimated and compared between the two groups using competing risk survival methods. RESULTS: The cumulative live birth rates after four IVF attempts in the two groups were not statistically significantly different (50.8% in the IVF±ICSI group versus 52.2% in the surgery followed by IVF±ICSI group, Pâ¯=â¯0.43). The results for the cumulative clinical pregnancy rates were the same (56.7% in the IVF±ICSI group versus 58% in the surgery followed by IVF±ICSI group, Pâ¯=â¯0.47). CONCLUSION: The study shows that cumulative live birth and pregnancy rates were similar in infertile patients with colorectal endometriosis who underwent IVF±ICSI either with or without prior colorectal endometriosis surgery.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Endometriosis , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Male , Adult , Birth Rate , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/methods , Endometriosis/complications , Endometriosis/surgery , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Retrospective Studies , Semen , Pregnancy Rate , Live BirthABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To update the 2010 CNGOF clinical practice guidelines for the first-line management of infertile couples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five major themes (first-line assessment of the infertile woman, first-line assessment of the infertile man, prevention of exposure to environmental factors, initial management using ovulation induction regimens, first-line reproductive surgery) were identified, enabling 28 questions to be formulated using the Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) format. Each question was addressed by a working group that had carried out a systematic review of the literature since 2010, and followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) methodology to assess the quality of the scientific data on which the recommendations were based. These recommendations were then validated during a national review by 40 national experts. RESULTS: The fertility work-up is recommended to be prescribed according to the woman's age: after one year of infertility before the age of 35 and after 6months after the age of 35. A couple's initial infertility work-up includes a single 3D ultrasound scan with antral follicle count, assessment of tubal permeability by hysterography or HyFOSy, anti-Mullerian hormone assay prior to assisted reproduction, and vaginal swabbing for vaginosis. If the 3D ultrasound is normal, hysterosonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy are not recommended as first-line procedures. Chlamydia trachomatis serology does not have the necessary performance to predict tubal patency. Post-coital testing is no longer recommended. In men, spermogram, spermocytogram and spermoculture are recommended as first-line tests. If the spermogram is normal, it is not recommended to check the spermogram. If the spermogram is abnormal, an examination by an andrologist, an ultrasound scan of the testicles and hormonal test are recommended. Based on the data in the literature, we are unable to recommend a BMI threshold for women that would contraindicate medical management of infertility. A well-balanced Mediterranean-style diet, physical activity and the cessation of smoking and cannabis are recommended for infertile couples. For fertility concern, it is recommended to limit alcohol consumption to less than 5 glasses a week. If the infertility work-up reveals no abnormalities, ovulation induction is not recommended for normo-ovulatory women. If intrauterine insemination is indicated based on an abnormal infertility work-up, gonadotropin stimulation and ovulation monitoring are recommended to avoid multiple pregnancies. If the infertility work-up reveals no abnormality, laparoscopy is probably recommended before the age of 30 to increase natural pregnancy rates. In the case of hydrosalpinx, surgical management is recommended prior to ART, with either salpingotomy or salpingectomy depending on the tubal score. It is recommended to operate on polyps>10mm, myomas 0, 1, 2 and synechiae prior to ART. The data in the literature do not allow us to systematically recommend asymptomatic uterine septa and isthmoceles as first-line surgery. CONCLUSION: Based on strong agreement between experts, we have been able to formulate updated recommendations in 28 areas concerning the initial management of infertile couples.