Rare Presentation of Papillary Carcinoma Within a Sentinel Lymph Node in a Patient With Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast: A Challenging but Useful Case Report Discussion Regarding Displacement or True Metastasis?

Papillary carcinoma of the breast is a rare histologic subtype of invasive breast cancer. In contrast, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a noninvasive, nonobligate precursor to invasive mammary carcinoma, confined within the terminal duct lobular unit of the breast and surrounded by an intact myoepithelial cell layer at the stromal/epithelial interface. We present an unusual case in which a patient with only DCIS of the breast exhibited papillary carcinoma within a sentinel lymph node, leading to questions about the origin of the lymph node lesion-whether it represents a true metastasis or iatrogenic displacement during diagnostic procedures. This case underscores the diagnostic challenges and clinical implications associated with such rare presentations.

Breast cancer in a transgender woman undergoing gender-affirming exogenous hormone therapy.

Gender-affirming hormone therapy may be utilized by transgender women hoping to induce feminizing changes and suppress the effects of endogenous testosterone. It is well established that exogenous hormone use increases risk of breast cancer in cisgender women; however, a link in the transgender population is less clear. Our case presents a transgender woman undergoing gender-affirming exogenous hormone therapy who subsequently developed breast cancer. We review the available literature regarding risks of exogenous hormone therapy with regards to breast cancer development. Additionally, we present current societal guidelines and recommendations for screening in this population.

Downstream imaging following abnormal molecular breast imaging, lessons learned and suggestions for success.

OBJECTIVES: Molecular breast imaging (MBI) is a supplemental screening modality that assists in detection of breast cancer. Objectives were to investigate how abnormal MBI findings were further evaluated on subsequent imaging studies and assess outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective single-institution review included patients who underwent supplemental screening MBI between October 2018 and October 2021, utilizing 300 MBq (8 mCi) 99mTc-sestamibi as radiotracer. Patients with abnormal MBI were assessed for subsequent imaging, biopsies, or surgeries performed. Outcome metrics included recall rate, cancer detection rate, and positive predictive values for recall (PPV1) and biopsy (PPV3); 95% confidence intervals calculated via Wilson score interval. All tests were two-sided; p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Total of 716 MBI exams performed, 93 of which were read as abnormal with ultimate detection of 11 malignancies. Recall rate was 13.0%, cancer detection rate was 15.4/1000 (invasive: 11.2/1000), PPV1 was 11.8%, and PPV3 was 27.5%. Of 11 malignancies, 7 (63.6%) were not visible on concurrent or most recent mammogram. Initial subsequent imaging study detected a correlate for mass uptake in 20/22 (90.9%) cases compared to 42/70 (60.0%) for nonmass uptake (p < 0.007), with correlates for nonmass uptake seen on ultrasound or mammogram in only 5/19 (26.3%). MRI was utilized in 63 (8.8%) cases overall. CONCLUSION: Screening MBI afforded a high cancer detection rate, yet lower detection of nonmass uptake on subsequent ultrasound/mammography resulted in increased usage of MRI compared to prior reports. As utilization of MBI increases, more reported experiences are needed to establish best practices and understand effects of implementation.

Limiting Screening Mammography Recalls for Vaccine-Induced Adenopathy, a Single Institution Experience.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Reported incidence of vaccine-induced adenopathy varies widely, with higher estimates in early reports and small series. Objective was to evaluate a large sample of vaccinated patients undergoing screening mammography, to determine callback rates associated with vaccine-induced adenopathy and their outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-institution retrospective review of patients who received at least 1 dose of a COVID-19 vaccine prior to presentation for screening mammography from January 15 through May 31, 2021. Patient-related vaccination information (dose, brand, arm, date) was obtained by mammography technologists and available for interpreting radiologists. Patients recalled for axillary adenopathy were included; other causes for recall were excluded. Follow-up imaging and outcomes were tracked. Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Fisher exact test, multivariable logistic regression modeling, and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were utilized. All tests were two-sided; p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Total of 2304 vaccinated patients underwent screening mammography; 24 (1.0%) recalled for ipsilateral adenopathy. There was no significant difference in presence of adenopathy associated with patient age, dose, or brand of vaccine. Presence of adenopathy significantly decreased as days from vaccination increased (p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve suggested 28.5 days as the best cutoff point to distinguish presence or absence of adenopathy on mammogram. Of 24 callbacks, 13 (54.2%) had benign results, 2 (8.3%) are still undergoing surveillance, and 9 (37.5%) are overdue for subsequent follow-ups. No cases resulted in biopsy or malignancy. CONCLUSION: Low recall rates related to vaccine-induced adenopathy are achievable and can limit unnecessary workups, improve access, and promote flexible timing of vaccinations and screening exams.

The Dense Breast Clinic: Initial Experience of a Patient-Centered Breast Imaging Clinic.

OBJECTIVE: Establish a radiologist-run consultation clinic to review breast density and supplemental screening exams (SSEs) directly with patients in response to breast density reporting laws. METHODS: Breast radiologists opened and staffed a clinic for formal patient consultations regarding breast density and SSEs. An IRB-approved questionnaire assessed patient knowledge of breast density, SSEs, and encounter satisfaction. Comparative statistical analyses were performed on knowledge-based questions. RESULTS: From February 2019 to February 2021, 294 reimbursable consultations were performed with 215 patients completing pre- and post-consultation questionnaires (survey response rate, 73%). Median patient age was 58 years (range, 34-86 years) and 9% (19/210) had a personal history of breast cancer. An increase in patient knowledge of breast density and SSEs was observed as follows: breast density categories (9% correct pre-consultation (20/215), 86% correct post-consultation (185/215), P < 0.001), dense breast effects on cancer risk (39% correct pre-consultation (83/215), 84% post-consultation (180/215)), mammogram sensitivity (90% correct pre-consultation (193/215), 94% post-consultation (201/215)), and increased cancer detection with SSEs (82% correct pre-consultation (177/215), 95% post-consultation (205/215)) (P < 0.001). Post-consultation, 96% (200/209) were satisfied with the usefulness of information, 89% (186/209) strongly agreed they had sufficient knowledge of SSEs, and 81% (167/205) agreed they would like future opportunities to meet with a breast radiologist. CONCLUSION: A consultation clinic staffed by breast radiologists focused on breast density and supplemental breast cancer screening can provide personalized patient counseling, engage patients in shared decision making, assist referring clinicians, and support high quality patient-centered care.

Abbreviated Molecular Breast Imaging: Feasibility and Future Considerations.

OBJECTIVE: Molecular breast imaging (MBI) is a supplemental screening modality consistently demonstrating incremental cancer detection over mammography alone; however, its lengthy duration may limit widespread utilization. The study purpose was to assess feasibility of an abbreviated MBI protocol, providing readers with mediolateral oblique (MLO) projections only and assessing performance in lesion detection and localization. METHODS: Retrospective IRB-exempt blinded reader study administered to 5 fellowship-trained breast imaging radiologists. Independent reads performed for 124 screening MBI cases, half abnormal and half negative/normal. Readers determined whether an abnormality was present, side of abnormality, and location of abnormality (medial/lateral). Abnormal cases had confirmatory biopsy or surgical pathology; normal cases had imaging follow-up ensuring true negative results. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated to assess performance. A false negative result indicated that a reader failed to detect abnormal uptake; a false positive result indicated a reader incorrectly called an abnormality for a negative case. Tests for association included chi-square, Fisher-exact, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Mean reader performance for detecting abnormal uptake: sensitivity 96.8%, specificity 98.7%, PPV 98.8%, and NPV 96.9%. Accuracy in localizing lesions to the medial or lateral breast was 100%. There were no associations in reader performance with reader experience, reader technique, lesion morphology, or lesion pathology. Median lesion size was 1.0 cm (range: 0.4-8.0 cm). All readers correctly identified 97.7% (42/43) of lesions with malignant or elevated risk pathology. CONCLUSION: An abbreviated MBI protocol (MLO images only) maintained high accuracy in lesion detection and localization.

Understanding malignant transformation of endometriosis: imaging features with pathologic correlation.

PURPOSE: Transformation of benign endometriosis to endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinoma (EAOC) is rare; however, women with endometriosis are four times more likely to develop EAOC which can present 20 years earlier than de novo ovarian cancer. Presenting symptoms are often vague and the radiologist's role in recognizing EAOC is critical for early detection and treatment. Histopathologic evaluation remains the mainstay for definitive diagnosis. METHODS: Using a case-based approach, this article will review the sonographic, CT, and MRI features of EAOC with an emphasis on MRI. Histopathologic correlation of benign and malignant endometriosis will be reviewed. RESULTS: Multiple factors contribute to the malignant transformation of endometriosis including genetic alterations, hormonal influences, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Malignancy most often occurs in ovarian endometriomas with less common sites involving the rectovaginal septum, rectosigmoid colon, and abdominal wall scars. The most common pathologic subtypes are endometrioid adenocarcinoma and clear cell carcinoma. MRI is the most specific imaging modality for evaluating EAOC. Key MR features include solid enhancing nodules (accentuated by subtraction imaging), nodular septations, loss of T2 shading within the endometrioma, and diffusion restriction. CONCLUSIONS: EAOC is a distinct disease that affects women with benign endometriosis at younger ages than classic ovarian cancer. Understanding the imaging features of malignant transformation of endometriosis is essential for early diagnosis and timely definitive treatment.

Characteristics and Management of Male Breast Parenchymal Cysts.

OBJECTIVE: Parenchymal breast cysts are considered to be rare in men and are sparsely described in the literature. The purpose of this study was to review our institution's experience with male breast cysts in an effort to improve overall understanding and management of this rare entity. METHODS: An institutional review board-exempt retrospective study was performed. Radiology reports for males who underwent mammogram and/or breast ultrasound at any of our institution's primary or satellite locations from January 1995 to January 2020 were screened to find males with breast cysts. If cysts were reported and images were available, case review was performed to confirm parenchymal breast cyst(s) and patient characteristics were collated. RESULTS: Of 5425 male cases presenting for breast imaging, 19 (0.4%) cases of male breast cysts were confirmed, with a mean patient age of 41.6 years (range: 2-81 years). The most common indication leading to cyst discovery was a palpable lump, corresponding to the site of the cyst in 5 (26.3%) patients and near the site where cyst(s) were ultimately discovered in 7 (36.8%) patients. There were 8 (42.1%) instances of cysts without concurrent gynecomastia. Three (15.8%) men underwent needle sampling. There were no cases of atypia or malignancy on needle biopsy or on subsequent clinical follow-up, with median clinical follow-up of 70.3 months (range: 3.3-259.4 months). CONCLUSION: Male breast parenchymal cysts are rare, but their prevalence is likely underestimated. If detected incidentally or upon targeted evaluation, biopsy may be averted if classic benign cyst features are identified.

Patient-Awareness Survey: Do Breast Implants Affect the Acquisition and Accuracy of Screening Mammography?

OBJECTIVE: Breast implant augmentation is the most common cosmetic surgical procedure performed in the United States. The purpose of this study was to determine if patients with breast augmentation surgery are aware of the effect of breast implants on the mammographic detection of cancer. METHODS: An institutional review board exempt patient awareness survey was distributed at a single breast imaging facility to women undergoing screening mammography. Comparative statistical analyses were performed between patients with and without breast implants. RESULTS: The respondents were divided into three groups: no prior breast surgery (74%; 524/711), breast surgery with implants (21%; 152/711), and breast surgery without implants (5%; 35/711). Patients with breast implants were more aware that implants decrease the amount of breast tissue seen on a mammogram (75%; 105/141) and that implants result in the need for more mammogram views (70%; 103/147), as compared with patients with no surgery (46%; 221/484 and 31%; 147/478, respectively) (P < 0.001). More women with breast implants reported learning from breast imaging staff rather than from their surgeon that implants decrease the amount of breast tissue seen on a mammogram (46%; 49/106 vs. 38%; 40/106). Of 137 respondents, 35% (n = 48) reported that the effect of implants on their mammogram was discussed preoperatively. Of those who did not recall a preoperative discussion, 42% (16/38) indicated this knowledge would have factored into their decision to get breast implants. CONCLUSION: This study highlights an opportunity for providers to engage in more education and shared decision-making with patients considering breast augmentation surgery to ensure preoperative counseling includes discussion of the effect of implants on mammography.

Religious and Spiritual Beliefs of Physicians.

The aim of this study is to describe religious and spiritual beliefs of physicians and examine their influence on the decision to pursue medicine and daily medical practice. An anonymous survey was e-mailed to physicians at a large, multidisciplinary tertiary referral center with satellite clinics. Data were collected from January 2014 through February 2014. There were 2097 respondents (69.1 % men), and number of practicing years ranged from ≤1 to ≥30. Primary care physicians or medical specialists represented 74.1 %, 23.6 % were in surgical specialties, and 2.3 % were psychiatrists. The majority of physicians believe in God (65.2 %), and 51.2 % reported themselves as religious, 24.8 % spiritual, 12.4 % agnostic, and 11.6 % atheist. This self-designation was largely independent of specialty except for psychiatrists, who were more likely report agnosticism (P = 0.003). In total, 29.0 % reported that religious or spiritual beliefs influenced their decision to become a physician. Frequent prayer was reported by 44.7 % of physicians, but only 20.7 % reported having prayed with patients. Most physicians consider themselves religious or spiritual, but the rates of agnosticism and atheism are higher than the general population. Psychiatrists are the least religious group. Despite the influence of religion on physicians' lives and medical practice, the majority have not incorporated prayer into patient encounters.

Detection of transplant renal artery stenosis: determining normal velocities at the renal artery anastomosis.

PURPOSE: Renal artery anastomosis peak systolic velocity (RAA PSV) exceeding 250 cm/s and a ratio of the renal artery to the adjacent external iliac artery (RAA:EIA) exceeding 1.8 historically suggest significant transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS). However, the range of RAA PSV in transplants without TRAS has not been established. METHODS: A retrospective review of renal transplants at a single institution over 5 years was performed identifying patients without graft dysfunction, failure, or refractory hypertension. RAA PSV obtained during interval postoperative sonograms was recorded. RESULTS: Of 1141 patients, 844 met the inclusion criteria. Mean RAA PSV for 377 patients evaluated within 2 days of transplant measured 195 cm/s; RAA PSV exceeded 250 cm/s in 97 patients (26%). Mean RAA PSV for 820 patients evaluated 1-month post-transplant measured 206 cm/s; RAA PSV exceeded 250 cm/s in 224 patients (27%). Mean RAA PSV for 785 patients evaluated 4-month post-transplant measured 203 cm/s; RAA PSV exceeded 250 cm/s in 201 patients (26%). Mean RAA PSV for 766 patients evaluated 1-year post-transplant measured 189 cm/s; RAA PSV exceeded 250 cm/s in 141 patients (18%). At each of the given time points, 24%-34% of normal patients had RAA-to-EIA ratios greater than 1.8. CONCLUSION: Approximately, 26% of patients without TRAS have RAA PSV > 250 cm/s in the first 9 months, and 18% do at 1 year. Similar findings also occurred with regards to the RAA-to-EIA ratio threshold of 1.8. In isolation, a PSV over 250 cm/s or 1.8 ratio threshold for suspicion of TRAS will lead to a large number of false-positive assessments.

Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography: A Single-Institution Experience of the First 208 Cases.

Contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is the only imaging modality that provides both (a) a high-resolution, low-energy image comparable to that of digital mammography and (b) a contrast-enhanced image similar to that of magnetic resonance imaging. We report the initial 208 CEDM examinations performed for various clinical indications and provide illustrative case examples. Given its success in recent studies and our experience of CEDM primarily as a diagnostic adjunct, CEDM can potentially improve breast cancer detection by combining the low-cost conclusions of screening mammography with the high sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging.

Portomesenteric venous thrombosis following major colon and rectal surgery: incidence and risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Portomesenteric venous thrombosis (PMVT) is an uncommon complication of abdominal surgery. The objective of this study was to assess PMVT risk factor profiles and patient outcomes after colorectal surgery. METHODS: A single center retrospective review of patients undergoing colorectal surgery was performed (2007-2012). PMVT was defined as thrombus within the portal, splenic, or superior mesenteric vein on computed tomography (CT). Inferior mesenteric vein thrombosis was excluded. Independent samples t test was used to compare data variables between PMVT and non-PMVT patients. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess PMVT risk factors. RESULTS: There were 1,224 patients included (mean age 62 years, male = 566). Elective bowel resection was performed for colon carcinoma (n = 302), rectal carcinoma (n = 112), ulcerative colitis (n = 125), Crohn's disease (n = 78), polyps (n = 117), and diverticulitis (n = 215). Patients undergoing gynecological resections and emergent laparotomies were included (n = 275). Thirty-six patients (3%) were diagnosed with PMVT by CT: 17/36 on initial presentation and 19/36 by expert radiologist review. Patients with PMVT were younger (53 vs. 62 years, p = 0.001) with higher BMI (30.5 vs. 26.7, p < 0.001) and thrombocytosis (464 vs. 306, p < 0.001) compared to patients without PMVT. Univariate logistic regression identified younger age (p < 0.001), obesity (p < 0.001), ulcerative colitis (p < 0.001), thrombocytosis, (p < 0.001) and proctocolectomy as significant predictors of PMVT. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression identified that obesity (p < 0.001), thrombocytosis, (p < 0.001) and restorative proctocolectomy (p = 0.001) were still significant predictors. No patients in the PMVT group suffered bowel infarction and no related mortalities occurred. Thirty-day readmission rates were higher in the PMVT group (53% vs. 17%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2), thrombocytosis, and restorative proctocolectomy were significant predictors of PMVT. Initial diagnostic studies showed a PMVT rate of 1.4%; however, after expert focused radiologic review, the actual rate was 3%. Thus, the diagnosis of PMVT is difficult and readmission after colorectal surgery should prompt its consideration.

Have the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial results influenced the number of lymph nodes removed during sentinel lymph node dissection?

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial results have the potential to bias the number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) surgeons remove and axillary lymph node dissections (ALNDs) performed. METHODS: A single-institution prospectively collected database was queried for T1 to T2 clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. RESULTS: A total of 923 patients underwent breast conserving therapy with SLN biopsy. The mean number of SLNs retrieved before the trial's presentation (June 2010) was 2.7 compared with 2.6 after (P = .19). The mean number of SLNs retrieved before the trial's publication (February 2011) was 2.7 compared with 2.5 after (P = .10). Overall, the rate of completion ALND in patients with SLN macrometastases decreased from after presentation (84% to 63%; P < .01) and publication (83% to 62%; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the number of SLNs harvested after either the Z0011 trial presentation or publication; however, surgeons should be aware of the potential for bias. The trial appears to influence practice management with fewer completion ALNDs performed after its release.

Surgeon bias in sentinel lymph node dissection: Do tumor characteristics influence decision making?

BACKGROUND: Determining sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in breast cancer staging involves subjective interpretation by the surgeon. We hypothesized patient and tumor characteristics influence number of SLNs harvested. METHODS: A single-institution, prospectively collected database was queried for breast cancer patients undergoing SLN surgery (2002-2013) and mean SLN counts were compared. RESULTS: There were 2394 SLN biopsies. Mean number of SLNs per patient for the entire cohort was 2.6. Mean number of SLNs removed was greater for patients ≤50 years (2.9 versus 2.6; p < 0.0001). Fewer SLNs were removed with tumors ≤1 cm (2.5 versus 2.6; p = 0.002). Patients with grades 2 or 3 tumors had more SLNs removed than grade 1 (2.6 versus 2.5; p = 0.03). Receipt of neoadjuvant therapy was associated with more SLNs removed (3.0 versus 2.6; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Number of SLNs removed varies based on risk factors for SLN metastasis or false-negative SLN biopsy.