ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Previous work using adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) imaging has shown photoreceptor disruption to be a common finding in head and ocular trauma patients. Here an expanded trauma population was examined using a novel imaging technique, split-detector AOSLO, to assess remnant cone structure in areas with significant disruption on confocal AOSLO imaging and to follow photoreceptor changes longitudinally. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Eight eyes from seven subjects with head and/or ocular trauma underwent imaging with spectral domain optical coherence tomography, confocal AOSLO and split-detector AOSLO to assess foveal and parafoveal photoreceptor structure. RESULTS: Confocal AOSLO imaging revealed hyporeflective foveal regions in two of eight eyes. Split-detector imaging within the hyporeflective confocal areas showed both remnant and absent inner-segment structure. Both of these eyes were imaged longitudinally and showed variation of the photoreceptor mosaic over time. Four other eyes demonstrated subclinical regions of abnormal waveguiding photoreceptors on multimodal AOSLO imagery but were otherwise normal. Two eyes demonstrated normal foveal cone packing without disruption. CONCLUSION: Multimodal imaging can detect subtle photoreceptor abnormalities not necessarily detected by conventional clinical imaging. The addition of split-detector AOSLO revealed the variable condition of inner segments within confocal photoreceptor disruption, confirming the usefulness of dual-modality AOSLO imaging in assessing photoreceptor structure and integrity. Longitudinal imaging demonstrated the dynamic nature of the photoreceptor mosaic after trauma. Multimodal imaging with dual-modality AOSLO improves understanding of visual symptoms and photoreceptor structure changes in patients with head and ocular trauma.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare images of photoreceptor layer disruptions obtained with optical coherence tomography (OCT) and adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) in a variety of pathologic states. METHODS: Five subjects with photoreceptor ellipsoid zone disruption as per OCT and clinical diagnoses of closed-globe blunt ocular trauma (n = 2), macular telangiectasia type 2 (n = 1), blue-cone monochromacy (n = 1), or cone-rod dystrophy (n = 1) were included. Images were acquired within and around photoreceptor lesions using spectral domain OCT, confocal AOSLO, and split-detector AOSLO. RESULTS: There were substantial differences in the extent and appearance of the photoreceptor mosaic as revealed by confocal AOSLO, split-detector AOSLO, and spectral domain OCT en face view of the ellipsoid zone. CONCLUSION: Clinically available spectral domain OCT, viewed en face or as B-scan, may lead to misinterpretation of photoreceptor anatomy in a variety of diseases and injuries. This was demonstrated using split-detector AOSLO to reveal substantial populations of photoreceptors in areas of no, low, or ambiguous ellipsoid zone reflectivity with en face OCT and confocal AOSLO. Although it is unclear if these photoreceptors are functional, their presence offers hope for therapeutic strategies aimed at preserving or restoring photoreceptor function.
Subject(s)
Color Vision Defects/diagnosis , Eye Injuries/diagnosis , Photoreceptor Cells, Vertebrate/pathology , Retinal Telangiectasis/diagnosis , Retinitis Pigmentosa/diagnosis , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ophthalmoscopy , Retina/injuries , Scotoma/diagnosis , Visual Acuity/physiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate outer retinal structural abnormalities in patients with visual deficits after closed-globe blunt ocular trauma. METHODS: Nine subjects with visual complaints after closed-globe blunt ocular trauma were examined between 1 month after trauma and 6 years after trauma. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography was used to assess the outer retinal architecture, whereas adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy was used to analyze the photoreceptor mosaic integrity. RESULTS: Visual deficits ranged from central scotomas to decreased visual acuity. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography defects included focal foveal photoreceptor lesions, variable attenuation of the interdigitation zone, and mottling of the outer segment band, with one subject having normal outer retinal structure. Adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy revealed disruption of the photoreceptor mosaic in all subjects, variably manifesting as foveal focal discontinuities, perifoveal hyporeflective cones, and paracentral regions of selective cone loss. CONCLUSION: We observe persistent outer retinal disruption in subjects with visual complaints after closed-globe blunt ocular trauma, albeit to a variable degree. Adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy imaging allows the assessment of photoreceptor structure at a level of detail not resolvable using spectral domain optical coherence tomography or other current clinical imaging tools. Multimodal imaging seems to be useful in revealing the cause of visual complaints in patients after closed-globe blunt ocular trauma. Future studies are needed to better understand how photoreceptor structure changes longitudinally in response to various traumas.
