ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether the application of basic life support (BLS) in patients who have experienced cardiac arrest and are subsequently referred to as uncontrolled asystole donors has any influence on the achievement of organs for subsequent transplantation. METHODS: Demographic data, BLS, cause of death, emergency response times, and organ donations were collected. The analysis of quantitative variables following normal distribution is shown as mean (SD), and Student t distribution was used for comparison purposes. The analysis of variables that did not follow the normal distribution is shown as median (IQR), and Wilcoxon test was applied for comparison purposes. RESULTS: A total of 91 cases of possible uncontrolled donor transfers were analyzed. Basic life support was provided to 61 patients (67.7%), whereas no BLS was provided to 27 patients (23.3%). Of the group that received BLS, 39 (73.6%) were effective donors compared with the non-BLS group, in which 22 (62.9%) were effective donors (P = .28). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find an association between performing BLS compared with non-BLS and organ donation.
Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Heart Arrest , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Humans , Advanced Cardiac Life Support , Tissue Donors , DeathABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The organ and tissue donation interview is a vital step in obtaining the donation. Therefore, it is important to obtain as much information as possible regarding the relatives of the potential donor prior to this interview and know if there is a health care professional among the relatives who may act as an interlocutor. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess the influence that relatives who are health care professionals may have if present at the interview for the organ and tissue donation request. METHODS: This is a descriptive study of all the organ donations from 1996 to 2019. Variables of the interview record form were completed by the Regional Transplant Coordination Office. Quantitative variables are expressed as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range), and qualitative variables are expressed in percentage. The χ2 test was used for inferential statistics. RESULTS: Health care professionals were present as interlocutors in 8.4% of the total interviews conducted (9279). Organ donation was accepted in 86% of these interviews, while the relative who was a health care professional gave a 93.8% (729) positive response to the donation. Having a health care professional as an interlocutor favors the acceptance of the donation (odds ratio 9.325, 95% confidence interval: 5.054-17.205; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Health care professionals have a very positive attitude toward donation. This attitude positively impacts other relatives' acceptance of the donation.
Subject(s)
Family/psychology , Health Personnel/psychology , Organ Transplantation/psychology , Professional Role/psychology , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Tissue Donors/psychologyABSTRACT
No disponible
