Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 109(5): 322-327, mayo 2017. tab, ilus, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-162693

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is an alternative approach for the examination of the colon in patients who refuse colonoscopy or after incomplete colonoscopy (IC). We conducted a study to determine the frequency of complete colonoscopy after IC, the diagnostic yield of CCE, the therapeutic impact of lesions found in CCE, the level of colon cleanliness and the safety of the procedure. Methods: We performed a prospective, multicenter study involving ten Spanish hospitals. Consecutive outpatients aged ≥ 18 years with previous IC were invited to participate. The latest version of the CCE device, PillCam(TM) COLON 2 (CCE-2), was administered to all patients according to the protocol. Results: The study population comprised 96 patients. The most frequent cause of IC was the inability to move past a loop using standard maneuvers (75/96 patients, 78%). Complete visualization of the colon was obtained with CCE-2 in 69 patients (71.9%). Of the 27 patients in whom the CCE-2 did not reach the hemorrhoidal plexus, it passed the colonic segment explored with the previous colonoscopy in 20 cases; therefore, it could be inferred that a combined approach (CCE-2 plus colonoscopy) enabled complete visualization of the colonic mucosa in 92.7% of patients. CCE-2 revealed new lesions in 58 patients (60.4%). Polyps were the most frequent finding (41 patients; 42.7% of the total number of patients). In 43 of the 58 patients (44.8% of the total number of patients), the new lesions observed led to modification of therapy, which included a new colonoscopy for polyp resection or surgery in patients with colonic neoplasm. Conclusions: CCE-2 is a suitable diagnostic procedure that can lead to more frequent diagnosis of significant colonic lesions after IC (AU)


No disponible


Subject(s)
Adult , Middle Aged , Humans , Capsule Endoscopy/methods , Capsule Endoscopy/trends , Colonoscopy/methods , Colonic Polyps , Colonic Neoplasms , Midazolam/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Diverticulum , Propofol/therapeutic use
2.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 109(5): 322-327, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28229607

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is an alternative approach for the examination of the colon in patients who refuse colonoscopy or after incomplete colonoscopy (IC). We conducted a study to determine the frequency of complete colonoscopy after IC, the diagnostic yield of CCE, the therapeutic impact of lesions found in CCE, the level of colon cleanliness and the safety of the procedure. METHODS: We performed a prospective, multicenter study involving ten Spanish hospitals. Consecutive outpatients aged ≥ 18 years with previous IC were invited to participate. The latest version of the CCE device, PillCam™ COLON 2 (CCE-2), was administered to all patients according to the protocol. RESULTS: The study population comprised 96 patients. The most frequent cause of IC was the inability to move past a loop using standard maneuvers (75/96 patients, 78%). Complete visualization of the colon was obtained with CCE-2 in 69 patients (71.9%). Of the 27 patients in whom the CCE-2 did not reach the hemorrhoidal plexus, it passed the colonic segment explored with the previous colonoscopy in 20 cases; therefore, it could be inferred that a combined approach (CCE-2 plus colonoscopy) enabled complete visualization of the colonic mucosa in 92.7% of patients. CCE-2 revealed new lesions in 58 patients (60.4%). Polyps were the most frequent finding (41 patients; 42.7% of the total number of patients). In 43 of the 58 patients (44.8% of the total number of patients), the new lesions observed led to modification of therapy, which included a new colonoscopy for polyp resection or surgery in patients with colonic neoplasm. CONCLUSIONS: CCE-2 is a suitable diagnostic procedure that can lead to more frequent diagnosis of significant colonic lesions after IC.


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopy/instrumentation , Colon/diagnostic imaging , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Colonic Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Colonoscopy , Diverticulosis, Colonic/diagnostic imaging , Intestinal Mucosa/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Spain
3.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 106(2): 98-102, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24852735

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective but time-consuming treatment for early neoplasia that requires a high level of expertise. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and learning curve of gastric ESD with a hybrid knife with high pressure water jet and to compare with standard ESD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective non survival animal study comparing hybrid-knife and standard gastric ESD. Variables recorded were: Number of en-bloc ESD, number of ESD with all marks included (R0), size of specimens, time and speed of dissection and adverse events. Ten endoscopists performed a total of 50 gastric ESD (30 hybrid-knife and 20 standard). RESULTS: Forty-six (92 %) ESD were en-bloc and 25 (50 %) R0 (hybrid-knife: n = 13, 44 %; standard: n = 16, 80 %; p = 0.04). Hybrid-knife ESD was faster than standard (time: 44.6 +/- 21.4 minutes vs. 68.7 +/- 33.5 minutes; p = 0.009 and velocity: 20.8 +/- 9.2 mm(2)/min vs. 14.3 +/- 9.3 mm(2)/min (p = 0.079). Adverse events were not different. There was no change in speed with any of two techniques (hybrid-knife: From 20.33 +/- 15.68 to 28.18 +/- 20.07 mm(2)/min; p = 0.615 and standard: From 6.4 +/- 0.3 to 19.48 +/- 19.21 mm(2)/min; p = 0.607). The learning curve showed a significant improvement in R0 rate in the hybrid-knife group (from 30 % to 100 %). CONCLUSION: despite the initial performance of hybrid-knife ESD is worse than standard ESD, the learning curve with hybrid knife ESD is short and is associated with a rapid improvement. The introduction of new tools to facilitate ESD should be implemented with caution in order to avoid a negative impact on the results.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/instrumentation , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Surgical Instruments , Animals , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects , Learning Curve , Male , Swine
4.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 106(2): 98-102, feb. 2014.
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-122880

ABSTRACT

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective but time-consuming treatment for early neoplasia that requires a high level of expertise. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and learning curve of gastric ESD with a hybrid knife with highpressure water jet and to compare with standard ESD. Material and methods: We performed a prospective nonsurvival animal study comparing hybrid-knife and standard gastric ESD. Variables recorded were: Number of en-bloc ESD, number of ESD with all marks included (R0), size of specimens, time and speed of dissection and adverse events. Ten endoscopists performed atotal of 50 gastric ESD (30 hybrid-knife and 20 standard). Results: Forty-six (92 %) ESD were en-bloc and 25 (50 %) R0 (hybrid-knife: n = 13, 44 %; standard: n = 16, 80 %; p = 0.04).Hybrid-knife ESD was faster than standard (time: 44.6 ± 21.4 minutes vs. 68.7 ± 33.5 minutes; p = 0.009 and velocity: 20.8 ± 9.2 mm2/ min vs. 14.3 ± 9.3 mm2/min (p = 0.079). Adverse events were not different. There was no change in speed with any of two techniques (hybrid-knife: From 20.33 ± 15.68 to 28.18 ± 20.07 mm2/min; p= 0.615 and standard: From 6.4 ± 0.3 to 19.48 ± 19.21 mm2/min; p = 0.607). The learning curve showed a significant improvement in R0 rate in the hybrid-knife group (from 30 % to 100 %). Conclusion: despite the initial performance of hybrid-knife ESD is worse than standard ESD, the learning curve with hybridknife ESD is short and is associated with a rapid improvement. The introduction of new tools to facilitate ESD should be implemented with caution in order to avoid a negative impact on the results (AU)


No disponible


Subject(s)
Animals , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Dissection/instrumentation , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Disease Models, Animal
5.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 105(9): 544-552, oct. 2013. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-118713

ABSTRACT

La disección submucosa endoscópica (DSE) permite la resección curativa mediante endoscopia de lesiones malignas o premalignas superficiales digestivas en una sola pieza. Esta técnica, nacida hace algo más de 10 años en Japón, no ha experimentado una gran difusión en países occidentales por diferentes motivos. En este artículo se hace una revisión de las indicaciones y resultados de la DSE, así como una discusión de los motivos por los que todavía son escasos los centros en occidente que realizan esta técnica. Por último se hacen unas recomendaciones de formación en DSE en nuestro medio (AU)


Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows endoscopic, curative, en-bloc resection of superficial malignant or premalignant lesions. This procedure was conceived over 10 years ago in Japan, but has not experienced great expansion in Western countries for different reasons. This article reviews ESD indications and outcomes, and reflects on the reasons that prevent ESD from becoming common clinical practice in Western hospitals. Finally, recommendations on ESD training in our setting are made (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Dissection/methods , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms , Learning Curve , Early Diagnosis , Endoscopy/methods , Endoscopy , Endoscopy, Digestive System/methods , Adenocarcinoma/complications , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma , Gastrectomy/methods
6.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 105(9): 544-52, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24467499

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows endoscopic, curative, en-bloc resection of superficial malignant or premalignant lesions. This procedure was conceived over 10 years ago in Japan, but has not experienced great expansion in Western countries for different reasons. This article reviews ESD indications and outcomes, and reflects on the reasons that prevent ESD from becoming common clinical practice in Western hospitals. Finally, recommendations on ESD training in our setting are made.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Gastric Mucosa/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Diffusion of Innovation , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Spain , Treatment Outcome
7.
Surg Endosc ; 26(1): 222-9, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21858574

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic biliary stenting is a well-established palliative treatment in patients with unresectable malignant biliary strictures. Obstruction of uncovered self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) due to tumor ingrowth is the most frequent complication. Partially covered SEMS might increase stent patency but could favor complications related to stent covering, such as pancreatitis, cholecystitis, and migration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of partially covered SEMS in patients with an unresectable malignant biliary stricture. METHODS: Patients with malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction treated endoscopically with partially covered SEMS were included in this multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized study. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-nine patients were endoscopically treated with partially covered SEMS in 32 Spanish hospitals. Clinical success after deep cannulation was 96%. Early complications occurred in 4% (3 pancreatitis, 2 cholangitis, 1 hemorrhage, 1 perforation, and 1 cholecystitis). Late complications occurred in 19.5% (18 obstructions, 10 migrations, 6 cholangitis without obstruction, 3 acute cholecystitis, and 2 pancreatitis), with no tumor ingrowth in any case. Median stent patency was 138.9 ± 112.6 days. One-year actuarial probability of stent patency was 70% and that of nonmigration was 86%. Multivariate analysis showed adjuvant radio- or chemotherapy as the only independent predictive factor of stent patency and previous insertion of a biliary stent was the only predictive factor of migration. CONCLUSIONS: The partially covered SEMS was easily inserted, had a high clinical success rate, and prevented tumor ingrowth. The incidence of possible complications related to stent coverage, namely, migration, pancreatitis, and cholecystitis, was lower than in previously published series.


Subject(s)
Biliary Tract Neoplasms/surgery , Cholestasis, Extrahepatic/surgery , Stents , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biliary Tract Neoplasms/complications , Biliary Tract Neoplasms/mortality , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Cholestasis, Extrahepatic/etiology , Cholestasis, Extrahepatic/mortality , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Palliative Care/methods , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Failure/adverse effects
9.
Dig Dis Sci ; 47(6): 1224-9, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12064795

ABSTRACT

We present a case of a chronic hepatitis C with damage of bile ducts resembling primary biliary cirrhosis. The immunological profile (negative antimitochondrial antibodies and positive anti-nuclear antibody) was characteristic of the autoimmune cholangitis. One year of treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid returned the liver tests to the normal range but the liver lesions remained unchanged.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases/pathology , Cholangitis/pathology , Hepatitis C, Chronic/pathology , Liver/pathology , Cholagogues and Choleretics/therapeutic use , Female , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Humans , Middle Aged , Mitochondria, Liver/immunology , Ursodeoxycholic Acid/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL