Complicaciones posquirúrgicas en un programa de cribado poblacional de cáncer colorrectal: incidencia y factores asociados / Surgical complications in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program: Incidence and associated factors

Introducción: Los programas de cribado de cáncer colorrectal (CCR) producen riesgos, entre ellos los derivados de las cirugías colorrectales. El objetivo de este análisis es evaluar las complicaciones asociadas a la cirugía. Pacientes y métodos: Análisis retrospectivo de los pacientes que requirieron cirugía colorrectal dentro del programa poblacional de cribado de CCR de Galicia (mayo de 2013-junio de 2019). Analizamos la indicación de la cirugía y la tasa de complicaciones intrahospitalarias (levesI-II, gravesIII-V, clasificación Clavien-Dindo) y al alta. Determinamos mediante un análisis multivariante las variables asociadas a su aparición. Resultados: En el periodo analizado, 1.092 pacientes fueron intervenidos (lesión benigna 16,5%, CCR pT1 18,2%, resto CCR 64,6%), por vía laparoscópica en el 69,8% de los casos. Se detectaron complicaciones intrahospitalarias en el 19,2% de los pacientes (leves: 13,4%; graves: 5,9%; fallecimientos: 0,2%) y al alta en 159 (14,6%) pacientes. El sexo masculino se asoció a las complicaciones intrahospitalarias (OR: 2,0; IC95%: 1,3-3,0). Las variables asociadas a las complicaciones graves fueron: sexo masculino (OR: 2,6; IC95%: 1,2-5,5), hospital terciario (OR: 0,5; IC95%: 0,2-0,9) y ECOGI (OR: 0,2; IC95%: 0,05-0,6). Los factores asociados a las complicaciones tras el alta fueron edad ≥60años (OR: 1,5; IC95%: 1,0-2,3), la ubicación rectal (OR: 1,6; IC95%: 1,1-2,3) y complicaciones intrahospitalarias (OR: 2,2; IC95%: 1,5-3,2). Conclusiones: La cirugía es la principal causa de morbimortalidad asociada a un programa de cribado de CCR. Estos resultados deben ser tenidos en cuenta en la toma de decisiones en lesiones candidatas a resección endoscópica.(AU)

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs produce risks, including those derived from colorectal surgeries. The objective of this analysis is to evaluate the complications associated with the surgery. Patients and methods: Retrospective analysis including patients who required colorectal surgery within the population-based CRC screening program in Galicia (May 2013-June 2019). We analyzed the indication for surgery and the rate of in-hospital (mildI-II, severeIII-V, Clavien-Dindo classification) and at discharge complications. We performed a multivariate analysis to determine the variables independently associated. Results: In the analyzed period, 1092 patients underwent surgery (benign lesion 16.5%, pT1 CRC 18.2%, rest of CRC 64.6%) laparoscopic approach in 69.8% of the cases. In-hospital complications were detected in 19.2% of patients (mild: 13.4%; severe: 5.9%; deaths: 0.2%) and at discharge in 159 (14.6%) patients. Male sex was associated with in-hospital complications (OR: 2.0; 95%CI: 1.3-3.0). The variables associated with severe complications were: male sex (OR: 2.6; 95%CI: 1.2-5.5), tertiary hospital (OR: 0.5; 95%CI: 0.2-0.9) and ECOGI (OR: 0.2; 95%CI: 0.05-0.6). The factors associated with complications after discharge were age ≥60years (OR: 1.5; 95%CI: 1.0-2.3), rectal location (OR: 1.6; 95%CI: 1.1-2.3) and in-hospital complications (OR: 2.2; 95%CI: 1.5-3.2). Conclusions: Surgery is the main cause of morbidity and mortality associated with a CRC screening program. These results must be taken into account in the decision making of lesions that are candidates for endoscopic resection.(AU)

Factors associated with lesion detection in colonoscopy among different indications.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Different factors may influence colonoscopy performance measures. We aimed to analyze procedure- and endoscopist-related factors associated with detection of colorectal lesions and whether these factors have a similar influence in the context of different colonoscopy indications: positive fecal immunochemical test (+FIT) and post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopies. METHODS: This multicenter cross-sectional study included adults aged 40-80 years. Endoscopists (N = 96) who had performed ≥50 examinations were assessed for physician-related factors. Adenoma detection rate (ADR), adenomas per colonoscopy rate (APCR), advanced ADR, serrated polyp detection (SDR), and serrated polyps per colonoscopy rate (SPPCR) were calculated. RESULTS: We included 12,932 procedures, with 4810 carried out after a positive FIT and 1967 for surveillance. Of the 96 endoscopists evaluated, 43.8% were women, and the mean age was 41.9 years. The ADR, advanced ADR, and SDR were 39.7%, 17.7%, and 12.8%, respectively. Adenoma detection rate was higher in colonoscopies after a +FIT (50.3%) with a more than doubled advanced ADR compared to non-FIT procedures (27.6% vs. 13.0%) and similar results in serrated lesions (14.7% vs. 13.5%). Among all the detection indicators analyzed, withdrawal time was the only factor independently related to improvement (p < 0.001). Regarding FIT-positive and surveillance procedures, for both indications, withdrawal time was also the only factor associated with a higher detection of adenomas and serrated polyps (p < 0.001). Endoscopist-related factors (i.e., weekly hours dedicated to endoscopy, annual colonoscopy volume and lifetime number of colonoscopies performed) had also impact on lesion detection (APCR, advanced ADR and SPPCR). CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal time was the factor most commonly associated with improved detection of colonic lesions globally and in endoscopies for + FIT and post-polypectomy surveillance. Physician-related factors may help to address strategies to support training and service provision. Our results can be used for establishing future benchmarking and quality improvement in different colonoscopy indications.

Surgical complications in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program: Incidence and associated factors. / Complicaciones posquirúrgicas en un programa de cribado poblacional de cáncer colorrectal: incidencia y factores asociados.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs produce risks, including those derived from colorectal surgeries. The objective of this analysis is to evaluate the complications associated with the surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis including patients who required colorectal surgery within the population-based CRC screening program in Galicia (May 2013-June 2019). We analyzed the indication for surgery and the rate of in-hospital (mildI-II, severeIII-V, Clavien-Dindo classification) and at discharge complications. We performed a multivariate analysis to determine the variables independently associated. RESULTS: In the analyzed period, 1092 patients underwent surgery (benign lesion 16.5%, pT1 CRC 18.2%, rest of CRC 64.6%) laparoscopic approach in 69.8% of the cases. In-hospital complications were detected in 19.2% of patients (mild: 13.4%; severe: 5.9%; deaths: 0.2%) and at discharge in 159 (14.6%) patients. Male sex was associated with in-hospital complications (OR: 2.0; 95%CI: 1.3-3.0). The variables associated with severe complications were: male sex (OR: 2.6; 95%CI: 1.2-5.5), tertiary hospital (OR: 0.5; 95%CI: 0.2-0.9) and ECOGI (OR: 0.2; 95%CI: 0.05-0.6). The factors associated with complications after discharge were age ≥60years (OR: 1.5; 95%CI: 1.0-2.3), rectal location (OR: 1.6; 95%CI: 1.1-2.3) and in-hospital complications (OR: 2.2; 95%CI: 1.5-3.2). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is the main cause of morbidity and mortality associated with a CRC screening program. These results must be taken into account in the decision making of lesions that are candidates for endoscopic resection.

Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Polyps One Year After Excision of High-Risk Adenomas.

BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple or large adenomas are considered to be high-risk for metachronous colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the risks of detecting colorectal cancer, advanced adenoma, and advanced serrated polyps at 1-year surveillance colonoscopy in patients with >5 adenomas or adenomas >20 mm. DESIGN: Descriptive, retrospective, multicentric, cohort study. We calculated the absolute risk of developing colorectal cancer, advanced adenomas, and advanced serrated polyps at the 1-year surveillance colonoscopy. Potential risk factors for advanced neoplasia at follow-up were evaluated with univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. SETTINGS: This study included data from a multicenter cohort colorectal cancer screening program, conducted from January 2014 to December 2015, based on fecal immunochemical tests in Spain. PATIENTS: We included 2119 participants with at least 1 adenoma ≥20 mm or ≥5 adenomas of any size. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We calculated the absolute risk of developing colorectal cancer, advanced adenomas, and advanced serrated polyps at the 1-year surveillance colonoscopy. Potential risk factors for advanced neoplasia at follow-up were evaluated with univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: At 1 year, participants displayed 6 colorectal cancers (0.3%), 228 advanced adenomas (10.5%), and 58 advanced serrated polyps (2.7%). The adjusted analysis identified 2 factors associated with advanced neoplasia: >5 adenomas (odds ratio 1.53; 95% CI: 1.15-2.03; p = 0.004) and polyps in a proximal location (OR 1.52; 95% CI: 1.15-2.02; p = 0.004). LIMITATIONS: First, the sample size was relatively small compared to other studies with similar aims. Another limitation was the lack of a comparison group, which could have provided more practical results in terms of surveillance recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The colorectal cancer detection rate at a 1-year colonoscopy surveillance was low among patients classified at high risk of advanced neoplasia. The risk factors for advanced neoplasia were ≥5 adenomas and proximal polyps at baseline. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B820 . RIESGO DE CNCER COLORRECTAL Y DE PLIPOS AVANZADOS UN AO DESPUS DE LA RESECCIN DE ADENOMAS DE ALTO RIESGO: ANTECEDENTES:Los pacientes con adenomas múltiples o grandes se consideran de alto riesgo para desarrollar cáncer colorrectal metacrónico.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los riesgos de detectar cáncer colorrectal, adenoma avanzado y pólipos serrados avanzados en la colonoscopia de seguimiento al año, en pacientes con un número mayor o igual a 5 adenomas o adenomas de 20 mm o más.DISEÑO:Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, multicéntrico, de cohortes. Calculamos el riesgo absoluto de desarrollar cáncer colorrectal, adenomas avanzados y pólipos serrados avanzados en la colonoscopia de vigilancia al año. Los factores de riesgo potenciales para el desarrollo de una neoplasia avanzada en el seguimiento, fueron evaluados mediante un análisis de regresión logística univariable y multivariable.AJUSTES:Este estudio incluyó datos de un programa de cribado de cáncer colorrectal de cohorte multicéntrico, realizado entre enero de 2014 y diciembre de 2015, con base en pruebas inmunoquímicas de materia fecal, en España.PACIENTES:Incluimos 2119 participantes con al menos un adenoma ≥20 mm o con cinco o más adenomas de cualquier tamaño.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Calculamos el riesgo absoluto de desarrollar cáncer colorrectal, adenomas avanzados y pólipos serrados avanzados en la colonoscopia de vigilancia al año. Los potenciales factores de riesgo para desarrollar una neoplasia avanzada en el seguimiento, se evaluaron mediante un análisis de regresión logística univariable y multivariable.RESULTADOS:Al año se encontraron en los pacientes participantes, 6 cánceres colorrectales (0,3%), 228 adenomas avanzados (10,5%) y 58 pólipos serrados avanzados (2,7%). Mediante el análisis ajustado se identificaron dos factores asociados con el desarrollo de neoplasia avanzada: un número igual o mayor a 5 adenomas (razón de probabilidades 1,53; IC del 95%: 1,15-2,03; p = 0,004) y la presencia de pólipos en una ubicación proximal (razón de probabilidades 1,52; IC del 95%: 1,15-2,02; p = 0,004).LIMITACIONES:Primero, el tamaño de la muestra fue relativamente pequeño en comparación con otros estudios con objetivos similares. Otra limitación fue la falta de un grupo comparativo, que podría haber proporcionado resultados más prácticos, en términos de recomendaciones de vigilancia.CONCLUSIÓNES:La tasa de detección de cáncer colorrectal mediante una colonoscopia de vigilancia al año, fue baja entre los pacientes clasificados como de alto riesgo de neoplasia avanzada. Los factores de riesgo para desarrollar una neoplasia avanzada fueron; un número igual o mayor a 5 adenomas y la presencia de pólipos proximales en la colonoscopia inicial de base. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B820 . ( Traducción-Eduardo Londoño-Schimmer ).

Polyprev: Randomized, Multicenter, Controlled Trial Comparing Fecal Immunochemical Test with Endoscopic Surveillance after Advanced Adenoma Resection in Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs: A Study Protocol.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs have been implemented to reduce the burden of the disease. When an advanced colonic lesion is detected, clinical practice guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance with different intervals between explorations. Endoscopic surveillance is producing a considerable increase in the number of colonoscopies, with a limited effect on the CRC incidence. Instead, participation in CRC screening programs based on the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) could be a non-inferior alternative to endoscopic surveillance to reduce 10-year CRC incidence. Based on this hypothesis, we have designed a multicenter and randomized clinical trial within the Spanish population CRC screening programs to compare FIT surveillance with endoscopic surveillance. We will include individuals aged from 50 to 65 years with complete colonoscopy and advanced lesions resected within the CRC screening programs. Patients will be randomly allocated to perform an annual FIT and colonoscopy if fecal hemoglobin concentration is ≥10 µg/g, or to perform endoscopic surveillance. On the basis of the non-superior CRC incidence, we will recruit 1894 patients in each arm. The main endpoint is 10-year CRC incidence and the secondary endpoints are diagnostic yield, participation, adverse effects, mortality and cost-effectiveness. Our results may modify the clinical practice after advanced colonic resection in CRC screening programs.

Overtreatment in nonmalignant lesions detected in a colorectal cancer screening program: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Although colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs reduce CRC incidence and mortality, they are associated with risks in healthy subjects. However, the risk of overtreatment and overdiagnosis has not been determined yet. The aim of this study was to report the surgery rates in patients with nonmalignant lesions detected within the first round of a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) based CRC screening program and the factors associated with it. METHODS: We included in this analysis all patients with nonmalignant lesions detected between May 2013 and June 2019 in the Galician (Spain) CRC screening program. We calculated surgery rate according to demographic variables, the risk classification according to the colonoscopy findings (European guidelines for quality assurance), the endoscopist's adenoma detection rate (ADR) classified into quartiles and the hospital's complexity level. We determined which variables were independently associated with surgery rate and expressed the association as Odds Ratio and its 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: We included 15,707 patients in the analysis with high (19.9%), intermediate (26.9%) low risk (23.3%) adenomas and normal colonoscopy (29.9%) detected in the analyzed period. Colorectal surgery was performed in 162 patients (1.03, 95% CI 0.87-1.19), due to colonoscopy complications (0.02, 95% CI 0.00-0.05) and resection of colorectal benign lesions (1.00, 95% CI 0.85-1.16). Median hospital stay was 6 days with 17.3% patients developing minor complications, 7.4% major complications and one death. After discharge, complications developed in 18.4% patients. In benign lesions, an endoscopic resection was performed in 25.4% and a residual premalignant lesion was detected in 89.9%. The variables independently associated with surgery in the multivariable analysis were age (≥60 years = 1.57, 95% CI 1.11-2.23), sex (female = 2.10, 95% CI 1.52-2.91), the European guidelines classification (high risk = 67.94, 95% CI 24.87-185.59; intermediate risk = 5.63, 95% CI 1.89-16.80; low risk = 1.43; 95% CI 0.36-5.75), the endoscopist's ADR (Q4 = 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.68; Q3 = 0.44, 95% CI 0.27-0.71; Q2 = 0.71, 95% CI 0.44-1.14) and the hospital (tertiary = 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.79). CONCLUSIONS: In a CRC screening program, the surgery rate and the associated complications in patients with nonmalignant lesions are low, and related to age, sex, endoscopic findings, endoscopist's ADR and the hospital's complexity.

Resumption of endoscopy in the Galician colorectal cancer screening programme after the COVID-19 lock down: patient safety results.

The COVID-19 pandemic meant that the population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs had to be suspended. Modifications were made to the organization in order to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission. We report the experience of the Galician CRC screening program and patient safety results. Endoscopy was suspended between 13/03/2020 and 11/05/2020. After resumption, a total of 3,310 colonoscopies were performed (1,702 positive fecal occult blood tests and 1,608 endoscopy monitoring) and no SARS-CoV-2 infections were detected in the subsequent two weeks. Thus, resumption of activity associated with population screening was safe.

pT1 Colorectal Cancer Detected in a Colorectal Cancer Mass Screening Program: Treatment and Factors Associated with Residual and Extraluminal Disease.

The aim of this study is to describe the treatment of pT1 colorectal cancer (CRC) in a mass screening program, the surgery-related complications and the factors associated with residual disease after endoscopic resection and extraluminal disease after surgery. We included in this retrospective analysis all the pT1 CRC detected in the Galician CRC screening program between May 2013 and June 2019. We determined which variables were independently associated with the outcomes of the study through a multivariable logistic regression analysis. We included 370-354 pT1 N0(X), 16 pT1N1- out of the 971 CRC detected; 277 (74.9%) were resected endoscopically and 162 (43.8%) were not referred to surgery. There were surgical complications in 30.7% and 16.3% of the patients during hospitalization and after discharge. Residual disease was detected in 12 (4.3%) after endoscopic resection and extraluminal disease in 18 (8.6%) patients after surgery. The variables independently associated with initial endoscopic resection were a pedunculated morphology (OR 33.1, 95% CI 4.3-254), a diameter ≥ 20 mm (OR 3.94, 95% CI 1.39-11.18) and a Site-Morphology-Size-Access score < 9 (OR 428, 95% CI 42-4263). The variables related with surgery rescue were a piecemeal resection (OR 4.48, 95% CI 1.48-13.6), an infiltrated/nonevaluable resection border (OR 7.44, 95% CI 2.12-26.0), a non-well-differentiated histology (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.07-20.0), vascular infiltration (OR 8.24, 95% CI 2.72-25.0) and a Haggitt 4 infiltration of the submucosa (OR 5.68, 95% CI 2.62-12.3). Residual disease after endoscopic resection was associated with an infiltrated/nonevaluable resection border (OR 34.9, 95% CI 4.08-298), a non-well-differentiated histology (OR 6.67, 95% CI 1.05-50.0), and the vascular infiltration of the submucosa (OR 7.61, 95% CI 1.55-37.4). The variables related with extraluminal disease after surgical resection were no endoscopic resection (OR 4.34, 95% CI 1.26-14.28), a non-well-differentiated histology (OR 4.35, 95% CI 1.39-14.29) and the lymphatic infiltration of the submucosa (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.32-17.8). In a CRC screening program, although most of pT1 CRC are candidates for endoscopic treatment, surgery is a safe procedure. We have defined some easy to evaluate variables that can be used in the decision-making process.

Variation in Colonoscopy Performance Measures According to Procedure Indication.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Most fulfillment and benchmarking information for colonoscopy quality indicators has been obtained from studies of primary screening colonoscopies. We analyzed differences in the fulfillment of colonoscopy quality indicators based on the indication for endoscopy. METHODS: We performed an observational, multicenter, cross-sectional study of 14,867 patients who underwent endoscopy procedures for gastrointestinal symptoms (40.3%), a positive result from a fecal immunochemical test (36.0%), postpolypectomy surveillance (15.3%), or primary screening (8.4%), from February 2016 through December 2017 at 14 centers in Spain. We evaluated rates of adequate colon cleansing, cecal intubation, adenoma detection, and colorectal cancer detection, among others. We used findings from primary screening colonoscopies as the reference standard. RESULTS: Fewer than 90% of patients had adequate bowel preparation; 83.1% of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms had adequate bowel preparation (odds ratio [OR] compared with patients with primary screening colonoscopies, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49-0.78) and 85.3% of patients receiving postpolypectomy surveillance had adequate bowel preparation (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.91). The cecal intubation rate was also lower in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms (93.1%) (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22-0.52). The adenoma detection rate was higher in patients with a positive result from a fecal immunochemical test (46.4%) (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.71-2.35) and in patients undergoing postpolypectomy surveillance (48.2%) (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.20-1.67). The highest proportion of patients with colorectal cancer was in the gastrointestinal symptom group (5.1%) (OR, 5.24; 95% CI, 2.30-11.93) and the lowest was in patients undergoing surveillance (0.8%) (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.32-2.14). CONCLUSIONS: Fulfillment of colonoscopy performance measures varies substantially by indication. Policies addressing performance measures beyond colonoscopy screening procedures should be developed. Benchmarking recommendations could be adjusted according to colonoscopy indication.

Guía de práctica clínica. Diagnóstico y prevención del cáncer colorrectal. Actualización 2018 / Clinical practice guideline. Diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer. 2018 Update

Este documento actualiza las recomendaciones realizadas por la Sociedad Española de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria y la Asociación Española de Gastroenterología para el diagnóstico y la prevención del cáncer colorrectal (CCR). Para establecer la calidad de la evidencia y los niveles de recomendación de las intervenciones se ha utilizado la metodología basada en el sistema GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Este documento establece intervalos de demora óptimos en función de los síntomas y el test de SOH inmunológico (SOHi) y recomienda reducir las barreras para la confirmación diagnóstica en los pacientes con síntomas. En cuanto al cribado en población de riesgo medio, se proponen estrategias para conseguir la implantación universal del cribado poblacional basado en SOHi bienal e incrementar la participación de la población diana, incluyendo la implicación de atención primaria. Esta guía de práctica clínica recomienda el cribado universal del síndrome de Lynch mediante la inmunohistoquímica de las proteínas reparadoras o la inestabilidad de microsatélites en los CCR incidentes y el uso de paneles de genes en los pacientes con poliposis adenomatosas. También actualiza las estrategias para reducir la incidencia y la mortalidad tanto de CCR como de otros tumores asociados a los síndromes hereditarios. En cuanto al CCR familiar no hereditario y la vigilancia tras resección de CCR, adenomas y lesiones serradas, se establecen recomendaciones en función del riesgo atribuible y la reducción del riesgo de la intervención propuesta. Finalmente, en el documento se incluyen recomendaciones respecto a los intervalos de vigilancia en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal y la actitud ante la displasia

This document updates the recommendations made by the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine and the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology for the diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). In order to evaluate the quality of the evidence and determine the recommendation levels of the interventions, we used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. This document establishes optimal delay intervals based on symptoms and the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and recommends reducing the barriers for diagnostic confirmation in symptomatic subjects. With regard to CRC screening in the average-risk population, we propose strategies to achieve the universal implementation of organised CRC screening programmes based on biennial FIT and to increase the participation of the target population, including the involvement of Primary Healthcare. This Clinical Practice Guideline recommends universal screening for Lynch syndrome with mismatch repair proteins immunohistochemistry or microsatellite instability in incident CRCs and the use of gene panels in patients with adenomatous polyposis. It also updates the strategies to reduce the incidence and mortality of both CRC and other tumours associated with hereditary syndromes. Regarding non-hereditary familial CRC and surveillance after resection of adenomas, serrated lesions or CRC, we established the recommendations based on the attributable risk and the risk reduction of the proposed intervention. Finally, the document includes recommendations regarding surveillance intervals in inflammatory bowel disease and the attitude towards dysplasia

Clinical practice guideline. Diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer. 2018 Update. / Guía de práctica clínica. Diagnóstico y prevención del cáncer colorrectal. Actualización 2018.

This document updates the recommendations made by the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine and the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology for the diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). In order to evaluate the quality of the evidence and determine the recommendation levels of the interventions, we used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. This document establishes optimal delay intervals based on symptoms and the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and recommends reducing the barriers for diagnostic confirmation in symptomatic subjects. With regard to CRC screening in the average-risk population, we propose strategies to achieve the universal implementation of organised CRC screening programmes based on biennial FIT and to increase the participation of the target population, including the involvement of Primary Healthcare. This Clinical Practice Guideline recommends universal screening for Lynch syndrome with mismatch repair proteins immunohistochemistry or microsatellite instability in incident CRCs and the use of gene panels in patients with adenomatous polyposis. It also updates the strategies to reduce the incidence and mortality of both CRC and other tumours associated with hereditary syndromes. Regarding non-hereditary familial CRC and surveillance after resection of adenomas, serrated lesions or CRC, we established the recommendations based on the attributable risk and the risk reduction of the proposed intervention. Finally, the document includes recommendations regarding surveillance intervals in inflammatory bowel disease and the attitude towards dysplasia.

Guía de práctica clínica. Diagnóstico y prevención del cáncer colorrectal. Actualización 2018 / Clinical practice guideline. Diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer. 2018 Update

[{"text": "Este documento actualiza las recomendaciones realizadas por la Sociedad Española de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria y la Asociación Española de Gastroenterología para el diagnóstico y la prevención del cáncer colorrectal (CCR). Para establecer la calidad de la evidencia y los niveles de recomendación de las intervenciones se ha utilizado la metodología basada en el sistema GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Este documento establece intervalos de demora óptimos en función de los síntomas y el test de SOH inmunológico (SOHi) y recomienda reducir las barreras para la confirmación diagnóstica en los pacientes con síntomas. En cuanto al cribado en población de riesgo medio, se proponen estrategias para conseguir la implantación universal del cribado poblacional basado en SOHi bienal e incrementar la participación de la población diana, incluyendo la implicación de atención primaria. Esta guía de práctica clínica recomienda el cribado universal del síndrome de Lynch mediante la inmunohistoquímica de las proteínas reparadoras o la inestabilidad de microsatélites en los CCR incidentes y el uso de paneles de genes en los pacientes con poliposis adenomatosas. También actualiza las estrategias para reducir la incidencia y la mortalidad tanto de CCR como de otros tumores asociados a los síndromes hereditarios. En cuanto al CCR familiar no hereditario y la vigilancia tras resección de CCR, adenomas y lesiones serradas, se establecen recomendaciones en función del riesgo atribuible y la reducción del riesgo de la intervención propuesta. Finalmente, en el documento se incluyen recomendaciones respecto a los intervalos de vigilancia en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal y la actitud ante la displasia.", "_i": "es"}, {"text": "This document updates the recommendations made by the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine and the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology for the diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). In order to evaluate the quality of the evidence and determine the recommendation levels of the interventions, we used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. This document establishes optimal delay intervals based on symptoms and the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and recommends reducing the barriers for diagnostic confirmation in symptomatic subjects. With regard to CRC screening in the average-risk population, we propose strategies to achieve the universal implementation of organised CRC screening programmes based on biennial FIT and to increase the participation of the target population, including the involvement of Primary Healthcare. This Clinical Practice Guideline recommends universal screening for Lynch syndrome with mismatch repair proteins immunohistochemistry or microsatellite instability in incident CRCs and the use of gene panels in patients with adenomatous polyposis. It also updates the strategies to reduce the incidence and mortality of both CRC and other tumours associated with hereditary syndromes. Regarding non-hereditary familial CRC and surveillance after resection of adenomas, serrated lesions or CRC, we established the recommendations based on the attributable risk and the risk reduction of the proposed intervention. Finally, the document includes recommendations regarding surveillance intervals in inflammatory bowel disease and the attitude towards dysplasia.", "_i": "en"}]

Effect of diagnostic delay on survival in patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Disparate and contradictory results make studies necessary to investigate in more depth the relationship between diagnostic delay and survival in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. The aim of this study is to analyse the relationship between the interval from first symptom to diagnosis (SDI) and survival in CRC. METHODS: Retrospective study of n = 942 CRC patients. SDI was calculated as the time from the diagnosis of cancer and the first symptoms of CRC. Cox regression was used to estimate five-year mortality hazard ratios as a function of SDI, adjusting for age and gender. SDI was modelled according to SDI quartiles and as a continuous variable using penalized splines. RESULTS: Median SDI was 3.4 months. SDI was not associated with stage at diagnosis (Stage I = 3.6 months, Stage II-III = 3.4, Stage IV = 3.2; p = 0.728). Shorter SDIs corresponded to patients with abdominal pain (2.8 months), and longer SDIs to patients with muchorrhage (5.2 months) and rectal tenesmus (4.4 months). Adjusting for age and gender, in rectum cancers, patients within the first SDI quartile had lower survival (p = 0.003), while in colon cancer no significant differences were found (p = 0.282). These results do not change after adjusting for TNM stage. The splines regression analysis revealed that, for rectum cancer, 5-year mortality progressively increases for SDIs lower than the median (3.7 months) and decreases as the delay increases until approximately 8 months. In colon cancer, no significant relationship was found between SDI and survival. CONCLUSIONS: Short diagnostic intervals are significantly associated with higher mortality in rectal but not in colon cancers, even though a borderline significant effect is also observed in colon cancer. Longer diagnostic intervals seemed not to be associated with poorer survival. Other factors than diagnostic delay should be taken into account to explain this "waiting-time paradox".

Characteristics and pattern of recurrence after curative surgery in oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Recurrence in oesophageal cancer continues to remain high after curative surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the presence of recurrence after curative surgery during follow-up, and the associated variables. METHODS: A retrospective and prospective follow-up study in patients with an anatomical-pathological diagnosis of oesophageal cancer who underwent curative surgery (n = 57) in the health district of A Coruña (Spain) during the period 2003-2008. The calculation of recurrence-free survival was made using a competing risks survival analysis. RESULTS: Out of the 57 patients included in the study, 87.7% were men with a mean age of 61.4 ± 10.3 years. The median follow-up period was 18.5 months, during which 28 recurrences were detected (50.9%). Patients with dysphagia on diagnosis of the disease, as well as patients in stages III-IV, have a higher probability of recurrence during the follow-up period. The median disease-free interval was 8.5 months. After one year of follow up, 57.1% of the recurrences were diagnosed and 82.1% after 2 years of followup. The median post-recurrence survival rate was 4.7 months. After adjusting for a multivariate regression model, the variable with an independent effect for predicting recurrence is the TNM classification (HR = 8.49). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the recurrences will be developed during the 2 years after surgery, with a very poor prognosis. The predictor variable for recurrence is the TMN classification.

Characteristics and pattern of recurrence after curative surgery in oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Recurrence in oesophageal cancer continues to remain high after curative surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the presence of recurrence after curative surgery during follow-up, and the associated variables. METHODS: A retrospective and prospective follow-up study in patients with an anatomical-pathological diagnosis of oesophageal cancer who underwent curative surgery (n = 57) in the health district of A Coruña (Spain) during the period 2003-2008. The calculation of recurrence-free survival was made using a competing risks survival analysis. RESULTS: Out of the 57 patients included in the study, 87.7% were men with a mean age of 61.4 ± 10.3 years. The median follow-up period was 18.5 months, during which 28 recurrences were detected (50.9%). Patients with dysphagia on diagnosis of the disease, as well as patients in stages III-IV, have a higher probability of recurrence during the follow-up period. The median disease-free interval was 8.5 months. After one year of follow up, 57.1% of the recurrences were diagnosed and 82.1% after 2 years of followup. The median post-recurrence survival rate was 4.7 months. After adjusting for a multivariate regression model, the variable with an independent effect for predicting recurrence is the TNM classification (HR = 8.49). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the recurrences will be developed during the 2 years after surgery, with a very poor prognosis. The predictor variable for recurrence is the TMN classification

No disponible

Inactividad física en Galicia: tendencia e impacto de cambios en la definición / Physical inactivity in Galicia (Spain): trends and the impact of changes in the definition

Objetivo: El objetivo de este trabajo fue estimar la prevalencia de la inactividad física en Galicia en el tiempo libre en 2007-2011, así como el impacto que supone en ella el considerar otras actividades cotidianas. Métodos: Estudios transversales en mayores de 15 años (n=19235). La actividad física se caracterizó mediante el cuestionario Minnesota. En el año 2011 se estimó la inactividad física considerando otras actividades cotidianas. Resultados:Entre 2007 y 2011, la prevalencia de inactividad física en el tiempo libre en Galicia fue estable (p=0,249), próxima al 50%, y más alta en las mujeres y en la población que trabaja o estudia. La inactividad física disminuyó (47% a 16%) cuando se tuvieron en cuenta las actividades cotidianas. Conclusiones: La prevalencia de inactividad física fue alta y estable en los años estudiados. Tener en cuenta otras actividades de la vida cotidiana hizo disminuir de forma importante esta prevalencia (AU)

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of physical inactivity during leisure time in Galicia (Spain) between 2007 and 2011 and to assess the impact of including non-leisure time activities in the definition of physical inactivity. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the population aged 16 years and older (n=19,235). Physical activity was assessed by the Minnesota Questionnaire. In 2011, inactivity was estimated by including daily activities. Results: Between 2007 and 2011, the prevalence of inactivity in Galicia remained stable (p=0.249) and close to 50%. This prevalence was higher among women and those who worked or were in education. Inactivity decreased from 47% to 16% when non-leisure time activities were included in the definition. Conclusions: Between 2007 and 2011 in Galicia, the prevalence of inactivity remained high and stable. This prevalence was significantly decreased when non-leisure time activities were included in the definition (AU)

Clinical-pathological characteristics and prognosis of a cohort of oesophageal cancer patients: a competing risks survival analysis.

BACKGROUND: To determine the clinical course, follow-up strategies, and survival of oesophageal cancer patients using a competing risks survival analysis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective and prospective follow-up study. The study included 180 patients with a pathological diagnosis of oesophageal cancer in A Coruña, Spain, between 2003 and 2008. The Kaplan-Meier methodology and competing risks survival analysis were used to calculate the specific survival rate. The study was approved by the Ethics Review Board (code 2011/372, CEIC Galicia). RESULTS: The specific survival rate at the first, third, and fifth years was 40.2%, 18.1%, and 12.4%, respectively. Using the Kaplan-Meier methodology, the survival rate was slightly higher after the third year of follow-up. In the multivariate analysis, poor prognosis factors were female sex (hazard ratio [HR] 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-3.03), Charlson's comorbidity index (HR 1.17; 95% CI, 1.02-1.33), and stage IV tumours (HR 1.70; 95% CI, 1.11-2.59). The probability of dying decreased with surgical and oncological treatment (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy) (HR 0.23; 95% CI, 0.12-0.45). The number of hospital consultations per year during the follow-up period, from diagnosis to the appearance of a new event (local recurrences, newly appeared metastasis, and newly appeared neoplasias) did not affect the probability of survival (HR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.92-1.15). CONCLUSIONS: The Kaplan-Meier methodology overestimates the survival rate in comparison to competing risks analysis. The variables associated with a poor prognosis are female sex, Charlson's comorbidity score and extensive tumour invasion. Type of follow-up strategy employed after diagnosis does not affect the prognosis of the disease.

[Physical inactivity in Galicia (Spain): trends and the impact of changes in the definition]. / Inactividad física en Galicia: tendencia e impacto de cambios en la definición.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of physical inactivity during leisure time in Galicia (Spain) between 2007 and 2011 and to assess the impact of including non-leisure time activities in the definition of physical inactivity. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the population aged 16 years and older (n=19,235). Physical activity was assessed by the Minnesota Questionnaire. In 2011, inactivity was estimated by including daily activities. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2011, the prevalence of inactivity in Galicia remained stable (p=0.249) and close to 50%. This prevalence was higher among women and those who worked or were in education. Inactivity decreased from 47% to 16% when non-leisure time activities were included in the definition. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2007 and 2011 in Galicia, the prevalence of inactivity remained high and stable. This prevalence was significantly decreased when non-leisure time activities were included in the definition.