Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Environ Sci Health B ; 57(3): 165-175, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35175180

ABSTRACT

Urine is one of the biological matrices most used for detecting human contamination, as it is representative and easily obtained via noninvasive sampling. This study proposes a fast, accurate, and ecological method based on liquid-liquid microextraction with low-temperature partition (µLLE/LTP). It was validated to determine nine pesticides (lindane, alachlor, aldrin, chlorpyrifos, dieldrin, endrin, DDT, bifenthrin, and permethrin) in human urine, in association with gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The technique was optimized through a factorial design. The best conditions for the simultaneous extraction of the analytes comprised the addition of 600 µL of water and 600 µL of acetonitrile (extracting solvent) to a 500-µL urine sample, followed by vortexing for 60 s. By freezing the samples for 4 h, it was possible to extract the pesticides and perform the extract clean-up simultaneously. The parameters selectivity, linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), precision, and accuracy were used to appraise the performance of the method. Good values of selectivity and linearity (R2 > 0.990), LOQ (0.39-1.02 µg L-1), accuracy (88-119% recovery), and precision (%CV ≤ 15%) were obtained. The µLLE/LTP-GC-MS method was applied to authentic urine samples collected from volunteers in Southeast Brazil.


Subject(s)
Chlorpyrifos , Liquid Phase Microextraction , Pesticide Residues , Pesticides , Chlorpyrifos/analysis , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/methods , Humans , Pesticide Residues/analysis , Pesticides/analysis
2.
J Environ Sci Health B ; 52(12): 850-857, 2017 Dec 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28956709

ABSTRACT

This study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of several household practices (washing with water or acidic, alkaline, and oxidizing solutions, and peeling) in minimizing pesticide residue contamination of tomatoes, as well as the impact on the quality of the treated fruit. Tests were performed using two systemic fungicides (azoxystrobin and difenoconazole) and one contact fungicide (chlorothalonil). Solid-liquid extraction with low temperature partition (SLE/LTP) and liquid-liquid extraction with low temperature partition (LLE/LTP) were used to prepare the samples for pesticides determination by gas chromatography. Washing the tomatoes with water removed approximately 44% of chlorothalonil, 26% of difenoconazole, and 17% of azoxystrobin. Sodium bicarbonate (5%) and acetic acid (5%) solutions were more efficient, removing between 32 and 83% of the residues, while peeling removed from 68 to 88% of the pesticides. The washing solutions altered some fruit quality parameters, including acidity and chroma, and also caused weight loss. Acetic acid (0.15 and 5%) and hypochlorite (1%) solutions had the greatest effect on these parameters.


Subject(s)
Food Contamination/prevention & control , Food Handling/methods , Pesticide Residues/analysis , Pesticide Residues/isolation & purification , Solanum lycopersicum/chemistry , Chromatography, Gas , Dioxolanes/isolation & purification , Fungicides, Industrial/analysis , Fungicides, Industrial/isolation & purification , Liquid-Liquid Extraction , Nitriles/isolation & purification , Pyrimidines/isolation & purification , Strobilurins/isolation & purification , Triazoles/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL