Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Hepatol ; 20: 100257, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32949786

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is a highly effective and well tolerated treatment for hepatitis C infection. Brazilian patients were not included in the original development studies for glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. This study aimed to assess safety and efficacy of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in treatment-naïve Brazilian adults without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: EXPEDITION-3 was a Phase 3, open-label, multicenter study in treatment-naïve Brazilian adults with hepatitis C infection genotype 1-6. Patients without cirrhosis (F2 or F3) or with compensated cirrhosis (F4) received 8 or 12 weeks of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, respectively. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of sustained virologic response at post-treatment Week 12. Secondary endpoints were on-treatment virologic failure and relapse rates. Baseline polymorphisms were assessed in NS3 and NS5A. Adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were monitored. RESULTS: 100 patients were enrolled, 75 received 8 weeks of treatment and 25 received 12 weeks; all patients completed treatment. Overall sustained virologic response at post-treatment Week 12 rate was high (98.0%; 98/100; 95% confidence interval: 93.0-99.4) and remained high regardless of baseline viral or host factors, including demographics, hepatitis C virus RNA levels, polymorphisms in NS3 and/or NS5A, genotype, and relevant comorbidities. 55% of patients reported ≥1 adverse event, the most common being headache (18.0%). Four patients reported serious adverse events; none were considered drug related or led to study drug discontinuation. No hepatic decompensations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was effective and well tolerated in treatment-naïve Brazilian patients with hepatitis C infection without cirrhosis and with compensated cirrhosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03219216.


Subject(s)
Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Hepatitis C, Chronic/virology , Pyrrolidines/therapeutic use , Quinoxalines/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Combinations , Female , Genotype , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sustained Virologic Response , Treatment Outcome
2.
Gastroenterology ; 147(2): 359-365.e1, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24818763

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The interferon-free regimen of ABT-450 (a protease inhibitor), ritonavir, ombitasvir (an NS5A inhibitor), dasabuvir (a non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitor), and ribavirin has shown efficacy in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b infection-the most prevalent subgenotype worldwide. We evaluated whether ribavirin is necessary for ABT-450, ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir to produce high rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) in these patients. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial of 179 patients with HCV genotype 1b infection, without cirrhosis, previously treated with peginterferon and ribavirin. Patients were assigned randomly (1:1) to groups given ABT-450, ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir, with ribavirin (group 1) or without (group 2) for 12 weeks. The primary end point was SVR 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12). We assessed the noninferiority of this regimen to the rate of response reported (64%) for a similar population treated with telaprevir, peginterferon, and ribavirin. RESULTS: Groups 1 and 2 each had high rates of SVR12, which were noninferior to the reported rate of response to the combination of telaprevir, peginterferon, and ribavirin (group 1: 96.6%; 95% confidence interval, 92.8%-100%; and group 2: 100%; 95% confidence interval, 95.9%-100%). The rate of response in group 2 was noninferior to that of group 1. No virologic failure occurred during the study. Two patients (1.1%) discontinued the study owing to adverse events, both in group 1. The most common adverse events in groups 1 and 2 were fatigue (31.9% vs 15.8%) and headache (24.2% vs 23.2%), respectively. Decreases in hemoglobin level to less than the lower limit of normal were more frequent in group 1 (42.0% vs 5.5% in group 2; P < .001), although only 2 patients had hemoglobin levels less than 10 g/dL. CONCLUSIONS: The interferon-free regimen of ABT-450, ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir, with or without ribavirin, produces a high rate of SVR12 in treatment-experienced patients with HCV genotype 1b infection. Both regimens are well tolerated, as shown by the low rate of discontinuations and generally mild adverse events. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01674725.


Subject(s)
Anilides/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Carbamates/therapeutic use , Hepacivirus/drug effects , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Macrocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , Ribavirin/therapeutic use , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Uracil/analogs & derivatives , 2-Naphthylamine , Adult , Aged , Anilides/adverse effects , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Biomarkers/blood , Carbamates/adverse effects , Cyclopropanes , Drug Therapy, Combination , Europe , Female , Genotype , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepacivirus/growth & development , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Humans , Lactams, Macrocyclic , Macrocyclic Compounds/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Proline/analogs & derivatives , Puerto Rico , RNA, Viral/blood , Ribavirin/adverse effects , Ritonavir/adverse effects , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States , Uracil/adverse effects , Uracil/therapeutic use , Valine , Viral Load
3.
Arq Gastroenterol ; 49(1): 56-63, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22481687

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Helicobacter pylori has been associated with worsening of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of H. pylori eradication in GERD patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial performing symptom evaluation, endoscopy, histology, manometry and esophageal pH testing on GERD patients. Patients infected with H. pylori were randomized to: 1) eradication treatment plus proton pump inhibitors treatment, or 2) proton pump inhibitors alone. Patients not infected constituted a negative control group. After 3 months, patients were re-evaluated by symptom assessment, endoscopy, histology and manometry. RESULTS: GERD treatment resulted in significantly higher lower esophageal sphincter pressure, as measured by mean expiratory pressure, in H. pylori negative patients. There was significantly lower proportion of hypotensive waves and significantly higher proportion of normotensive waves in non-eradicated patients. All symptom scores were significantly reduced in the post-treatment period compared to baseline, to values that were similar among the three groups, in the post-treatment period. In the post-treatment period, erosive esophagitis was significantly less frequent on those not eradicated. CONCLUSION: Manometric, clinical and endoscopic data showed no benefit in eradicating H. pylori in GERD. Our data supports the hypothesis that H. pylori eradication does not influence GERD.


Subject(s)
Gastritis/drug therapy , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Helicobacter pylori , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Esophageal pH Monitoring , Female , Gastritis/complications , Gastritis/microbiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Helicobacter Infections/complications , Humans , Male , Manometry , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL