Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arthroscopy ; 40(3): 666-671, 2024 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37419223

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the superior to inferior glenoid height as a reliable reference in best-fit circle creation for glenoid anatomy. METHODS: The morphology of the native glenoid was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients without shoulder instability. Using T1 sagittal MRI images, 2 reviewers independently estimated glenoid size using the two-thirds technique and the "best-fit circle" technique at 2 different times. A Student t-test was used to determine significant difference between the two methodologies. Inter- and intra-rater reliability were calculated using interclass and intraclass coefficients. RESULTS: This study included 112 patients. Using the results of glenoid height and "best-fit circle" diameter, the diameter of the "best-fit circle" was found to intersect the glenoid line at 67.8% of the glenoid height on average. We found no significant difference between the 2 measures of glenoid diameter (27.6 vs 27.9, P = .456). The interclass and intraclass coefficients for the two-third method were 0.85 and 0.88, respectively. The interclass and intraclass coefficients for the perfect circle methods were 0.84 and 0.73, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We determined that the diameter of a circle placed on the inferior glenoid using the "best-fit circle" technique corresponds to 67.8% of the glenoid height. Additionally, we found that constructing a perfect circle using a diameter equal to two-thirds the height of the glenoid may improve intraclass reliability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective cohort study.


Subject(s)
Joint Instability , Shoulder Joint , Humans , Shoulder , Shoulder Joint/diagnostic imaging , Shoulder Joint/pathology , Joint Instability/diagnostic imaging , Joint Instability/pathology , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
2.
J Knee Surg ; 32(2): 134-137, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30609440

ABSTRACT

Osteoarthritis is a particularly burdensome and career-limiting condition for military service members. The daily demands of military service place the service members at a baseline increased risk of developing primary OA as well as increased risk of acute knee injuries that further predispose to developing posttraumatic OA. There are multiple treatment options available for primary and posttraumatic OA from osteotomy to arthroplasty.


Subject(s)
Military Personnel , Occupational Diseases/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Cartilage Diseases/complications , Cartilage Diseases/surgery , Humans , Occupational Diseases/complications , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/complications , Osteoarthritis, Knee/etiology , Osteotomy , Return to Work
3.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 27(1): 112-117, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29100710

ABSTRACT

HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the functional and surgical outcomes following lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction for posterolateral rotatory instability in an athletic population. METHODS: All US military service members who underwent LUCL reconstruction between 2008 and 2013 were identified. A retrospective chart review was performed, and the prospective Mayo Elbow Performance Score and QuickDASH (short version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire) score were obtained. The primary outcomes were return to preinjury activity and resolution of symptoms. RESULTS: We identified 23 patients with a mean age of 31.6 ± 7.2 years (range, 19-46 years), and 87% were men. A history of instability and/or dislocation was reported by 11 patients (48%), and 8 patients (35%) had undergone prior elbow surgery. At final follow-up of 4.6 ± 1.8 years (range, 2.2-7.6 years), all patients demonstrated significant decreases in pain (average pain score, 4 vs 1.34) with resolution of instability and achieved a functional arc of motion. After surgical reconstruction, 83% were able to return to prior activity, whereas 4 patients (17%) underwent medical separation, including 3 with elbow disability precluding continued service (13%). Overall 83% of patients reported good to excellent outcomes by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and 96% of patients reported no significant disability by the QuickDASH disability evaluation. Postoperatively, 4 patients (17%) experienced complications, with 3 (13%) requiring reoperation. CONCLUSION: Although the diagnosis and surgical management of isolated LUCL injury are relatively infrequent, LUCL reconstruction for posterolateral rotatory instability offers a reliable return to preinjury level of function among active individuals with intense upper extremity demands. However, although function reliably improves, the rate of perioperative complications is greater than 15%.


Subject(s)
Elbow Joint , Joint Instability/surgery , Military Personnel , Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Range of Motion, Articular , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...