Advanced non-squamous NSCLC with no actionable oncogenic driver in Spain: a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of data from the Thoracic Tumor Registry.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for the vast majority of all diagnosed lung cancers. According to their histology, most NSCLCs are considered non-squamous cell carcinoma (NSCC), and up to 85% of the latter may lack either one of the two main actionable oncogenic drivers (i.e., EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements). OBJECTIVE: Our analysis aimed to describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of Spanish patients suffering from NSCC with no actionable oncogenic driver in daily clinical practice. DESIGN: A retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive analysis. METHODS: We analyzed the records of all Spanish patients with advanced NSCC diagnosed between January 2011 and January 2020 and included in the Spanish Thoracic Tumor Registry database. We evaluated the presence of metastasis and molecular profiling at the time of diagnosis and treatments received. We also assessed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) according to first-line treatment. RESULTS: One thousand seven hundred ninety-seven Spanish patients with NSCC were included. They were mainly men (73.2%), smokers (current [44.4%] and former [44.4%]) and presented adenocarcinoma histology (97.6%). Most patients had at least one comorbidity (80.4%) and one metastatic site (96.8%), and a non-negligible number of those tested were PD-L1 positive (35.2%). Notably, the presence of liver metastasis indicated a shorter median OS and PFS than metastasis in other locations (p < 0.001). Chemotherapy was more often prescribed than immunotherapy as first-, second-, and third-line treatment in that period. In first-line, the OS rates were similar in patients receiving either regimen, but PFS rates significantly better in patients treated with immunotherapy (p = 0.026). Also, a high number of patients did not reach second- and third-line treatment, suggesting the failure of current early diagnostic measures and therapies. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of the most lethal tumor in Spain could highlight the strengths and the weaknesses of its clinical management and set the ground for further advances and research.

The S-REAL study: Spanish real-world data on unresectable stage III NSCLC patients treated with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: The S-REAL study aimed to assess the effectiveness of durvalumab as consolidation therapy after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in a real-world cohort of patients with locally advanced, unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) included in a Spanish early access program (EAP). METHODS: In this multicentre, observational, retrospective study we analysed data from patients treated in 39 Spanish hospitals, who started intravenous durvalumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) between September 2017 and December 2018. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included patient characterization and adverse events of special interest (AESI). RESULTS: A total of 244 patients were followed up for a median of 21.9 months [range 1.2-34.7]. Median duration of durvalumab was 45.5 weeks (11.4 months) [0-145]. Median PFS was 16.7 months (95% CI 12.2-25). No remarkable differences in PFS were observed between patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1% or < 1% (16.7 versus 15.6 months, respectively). However, PFS was higher in patients who had received prior concurrent CRT (cCRT) versus sequential CRT (sCRT) (20.6 versus 9.4 months). AESIs leading to durvalumab discontinuation were registered in 11.1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results are in line with prior published evidence and confirm the benefits of durvalumab in the treatment of LA-NSCLC patients in a real-world setting. We also observed a lower incidence of important treatment-associated toxicities, such as pneumonitis, compared with the pivotal phase III PACIFIC clinical study.

Identification of non-actionable mutations with prognostic and predictive value in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers and the leading cause of cancer death. Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients frequently harbor mutations that impact their survival outcomes. There are limited data regarding the prognostic and predictive significance of these mutations on survival outcomes in the real-world setting. METHODS: This observational retrospective study analyzed de-identified electronic medical records from the Flatiron Health Clinico-Genomic and FoundationCore® databases to identify patients with aNSCLC who initiated first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI; alone or in combination) or chemotherapy under routine care between 2016 and 2021. The primary objectives were to assess the prevalence of non-actionable mutations and to determine their association with overall survival (OS). Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and real-world response (rwR) were investigated as secondary exploratory outcomes. RESULTS: Based on an assessment of 185 non-actionable mutations in 2999 patients, the most prevalent mutations were TP53 (70%), KRAS (42%), CDKN2A/B (31%), and STK11 (21%). STK11, KEAP1, and CDKN2A/B mutations were significantly associated with lower rwR, shorter rwPFS and OS. KRAS mutations were clinically associated with shorter rwPFS in CIT-treated patients. Subgroup analysis revealed that fast progressors were significantly more likely to harbor STK11, KEAP1, and CDKN2A/B mutations. Accordingly, long-term survivors (LTS) showed a significantly lower prevalence of these mutations. CONCLUSION: Our results provide evidence on the prognostic value of STK11, KEAP1, and CDKN2A/B mutations in patients with aNSCLC. Further research is required to better understand the implications of these findings on patient management and future trial design and treatment selection.

Difficulties on the access to innovative targeted therapies for lung cancer in Spain.

PURPOSE: Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) conducted a review to analyze the barriers to access to innovative targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in clinical practice in Spain. METHODS: Review all relevant content published on websites of European Commission, European Medicines Agency, and Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Products regarding the authorization and access to oncology treatments. RESULTS: More than 20 targeted therapies are available to treat different molecular alterations in patients with NSCLC. European Commission has approved treatments for genomic alterations involving the following genes: ALK, RET, ROS1, EGFR, BRAF, NTRK, KRAS, MET. However, the availability of these therapies in Spain is not complete, as innovative treatments are not reimbursed or funded late, with only five of these alterations currently covered by National Health System. CONCLUSION: SLCG considers imperative to improve the access in Spain to innovative treatments for NSCLC to reduce inequity across European countries.

Combination of gefitinib and olaparib versus gefitinib alone in EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A multicenter, randomized phase II study (GOAL).

OBJECTIVES: Progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) varies in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) driven byEGFR mutations, suggesting that other genetic alterations may influence oncogene addiction. Low BRCA1 mRNA levels correlate with longer PFS in erlotinib-treated EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Since the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, olaparib, may attenuate and/or prevent BRCA1 expression, the addition of olaparib to gefitinib could improve outcome in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: GOAL was a multicenter, randomized phase IB/II study performed in two countries, Spain and Mexico. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, treatment-naïve, pathologically confirmed stage IV NSCLC, with centrally confirmed EGFR mutations and measurable disease. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive gefitinib 250 mg daily or gefitinib 250 mg daily plus olaparib 200 mg three times daily in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), response rate, safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Between September 2013, and July 2016, 182 patients underwent randomization, 91 received gefitinib and 91 received gefitinib plus olaparib. There were no differences in gender, age, smoking status, performance status, presence of bone and brain metastases or type ofEGFR mutation. Median PFS was 10.9 months (95 % CI 9.3-13.3) in the gefitinib arm and 12.8 months (95 % CI 9.1-14.7) in the gefitinib plus olaparib arm (HR 1.38, 95 % CI 1.00-1.92; p = 0.124). The most common adverse events were anemia, 78 % in gefitinib plus olaparib group, 38 % in gefitinib arm, diarrhea, 65 % and 60 %, and fatigue, 40 % and 32 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The gefitinib plus olaparib combination did not provide significant benefit over gefitinib alone. The combination's safety profile showed an increase in hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity, compared to gefitinib alone, however, no relevant adverse events were noted.

Are there any significant variations in the clinical or histological presentation of lymphoid pathologies over the course of time in Spain?

INTRODUCTION: Little data is available concerning variations in the clinical characteristics of lymphoid neoplasms at presentation. We decided to investigate whether any variations in these characteristics had occurred in Spain during the last few years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The GOTEL group database is an archive of all new lymphoma cases, regardless of their histological subtype, diagnosed in the hospitals within the group. An analysis was made of all the records between 1 January 1999 and 1 January 2009. Though the number of hospitals submitting data has changed over the course of time, data were provided by 26 hospitals from 16 Spanish provinces. RESULTS: A total of 3651 cases of lymphoma were recorded during this period. Grouped by clinical features, 42.8% (1561 patients) had low-grade lymphoma, 30.4% (1110 patients) intermediate-grade lymphoma and 15.2% (556 patients) Hodgkin's lymphoma; 208 patients had T lymphoma (5.7%), 111 patients high-grade lymphoma (3%) and 105 patients (2.9%) suffered lymphomas that were difficult to classify. A total of 6.3% of the diagnoses (231 patients) were made prior to 1999, 29.5% between 2000 and 2001, 25.7% between 2002 and 2003, 19.7% between 2004 and 2005, 11.2% between 2006 and 2007, and there were 200 entries from 2008 to the close of the study period, corresponding to 1.5% of the complete database. The median age at diagnosis was 60 (range 7-105 years), by percentiles: 25 corresponded to 44 years old, 50 to 60 years old and 75 to 71. Distribution by gender was 53.1% male and 46.9% female. An analysis was made of all the clinical variables collected, comparing their behaviour during the different diagnostic periods. The periods, gender, ECOG, stage, LDH, ß2 microglobulin, Hodgkin's or non- Hodgkin's type neoplasm, B lymphoma vs. Hodgkin's, NK or T, nodal or extra-nodal origin, median age at diagnosis and histological type by region of origin did not show any statistically significant differences in their distribution over the course of time. CONCLUSION: In our experience, there are no significant variations in clinical presentation or histological type in lymphomas diagnosed over the course of time in Spain.

SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in the Western world. FL constitutes the most frequent indolent lymphoma, well characterized by its clinical presentation related to nodal involvement and its morphologic and biologic features. It is often managed as an incurable disease. However, several active therapeutic approaches from the "wait and watch" strategy to the allogeneic transplantation are available for management of patients with FL and clearly have changed the natural history of this disease, achieving a long-term disease-free survival. Therapeutic decision is mostly conditioned by patient's characteristics, stage, histological grade, tumor burden, and risk-predicting factors. This article try to summarizes the diagnosis and treatment of this heterogeneous group of patients.

Low prevalence of Chlamydia psittaci in ocular adnexal lymphomas from Cuban patients.

Most ocular adnexal lymphomas (OAL) are extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphomas (EMZL) of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT)-type. Chronic antigen stimulation has been suggested to have a pathogenetic role in EMZL and Chlamydia psittaci chronic infection has been recently associated with the development of OAL in a series of patients from Italy. To assess this association, an evaluation of the presence of C. psittaci was made in a different OAL population. DNA samples were obtained from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections samples of 26 patients with OAL, 20 non-OAL and 20 benign ocular lesions, diagnosed and treated between 1998 and 2003 at National Institute of Oncology in Havana, Cuba. All samples were histologically reviewed by an expert pathologist. Fluorescence in situ hybrization (FISH) analysis of translocations involving MALT1 was performed. The presence of bacterial DNA was assessed with a multiplex touchdown enzyme time release polymerase chain reaction. DNA sequencing was performed to confirm suspicious bands. Seventy-three percent of the OAL cases were EMZL and 81% were in stage IE. FISH analysis was performed in 13 OAL cases and none of them evidenced MALT1 translocations. DNA of C. psittaci was detected in 11% of the 46 lymphomas: two orbital EMZL and three non-OAL. All 20 benign ocular lesions were negative for C. psittaci. The low prevalence of C. psittaci in OAL suggests geographical differences in the etiology of this entity. International studies are needed to clarify the role of C. psittaci in OALs.

Linfomas no hodgkinianos agresivos: ¿después del CHOP sólo el CHOP / Aggressive non-Hodgkins lymphomas: after the CHOP only the CHOP?

Los lactatos de deshidrogenasa agresivos incluyen a estos linfomas no hodgkianos difusos de células grandes B (incluida la variante del linfoma B primario del mediastino), los de células grandes anaplásicos T y nulos y los T periféricos. Un índice pronóstico internacional fue creado e incluye la edad, sus niveles séricos de lactato de deshidrogenasa performance status y la afectación extranodal. El esquema CHOP se considera la regla de oro de los LNH agresivos, tanto esta patología limitada como avanzada. Los pacientes con patología diseminada tienen índices de curabilidad menor de un 40 por ciento por lo que se ensayan múltiples estrategias terapéuticas para mejorar estos resultados, dentro de éstas se ha demostrado que es posible escalar la dosis de los fármacos pilares en el esquema CHOP, hasta aproximadamente el doble del estándar con una toxicidad aceptada y mejores respuestas(AU)

Linfomas no hodgkinianos agresivos: ¿Después del CHOP sólo el CHOP / Aggressive non-HodgkinÆs lymphomas. After the CHOP only the CHOP?

Los lactatos de deshidrogenasa agresivos incluyen a estos linfomas no hodgkianos difusos de células grandes B (incluida la variante del linfoma B primario del mediastino), los de células grandes anaplásicos T y nulos y los T periféricos. Un índice pronóstico internacional fue creado e incluye la edad, sus niveles séricos de lactato de deshidrogenasa performance status y la afectación extranodal. El esquema CHOP se considera la regla de oro de los LNH agresivos, tanto esta patología limitada como avanzada. Los pacientes con patología diseminada tienen índices de curabilidad menor de un 40 por ciento por lo que se ensayan múltiples estrategias terapéuticas para mejorar estos resultados, dentro de éstas se ha demostrado que es posible escalar la dosis de los fármacos pilares en el esquema CHOP, hasta aproximadamente el doble del estándar con una toxicidad aceptada y mejores respuestas