Efficacy and safety of rucaparib in previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma from a phase 2, open-label trial (ATLAS).

BACKGROUND: ATLAS evaluated the efficacy and safety of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients with previously treated locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). METHODS: Patients with UC were enrolled independent of tumor homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status and received rucaparib 600 mg BID. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (RECIST v1.1) in the intent-to-treat and HRD-positive (loss of genome-wide heterozygosity ≥10%) populations. Key secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Disease control rate (DCR) was defined post-hoc as the proportion of patients with a confirmed complete or partial response (PR), or stable disease lasting ≥16 weeks. RESULTS: Of 97 enrolled patients, 20 (20.6%) were HRD-positive, 30 (30.9%) HRD-negative, and 47 (48.5%) HRD-indeterminate. Among 95 evaluable patients, there were no confirmed responses. However, reductions in the sum of target lesions were observed, including 6 (6.3%) patients with unconfirmed PR. DCR was 11.6%; median PFS was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.6-1.9). No relationship was observed between HRD status and efficacy endpoints. Median treatment duration was 1.8 months (range, 0.1-10.1). Most frequent any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events were asthenia/fatigue (57.7%), nausea (42.3%), and anemia (36.1%). Of 64 patients with data from tumor tissue samples, 10 (15.6%) had a deleterious alteration in a DNA damage repair pathway gene, including four with a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 alteration. CONCLUSIONS: Rucaparib did not show significant activity in unselected patients with advanced UC regardless of HRD status. The safety profile was consistent with that observed in patients with ovarian or prostate cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03397394). Date of registration: 12 January 2018. This trial was registered in EudraCT (2017-004166-10).

Selection and monitoring of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer for treatment with radium-223

Despite the improvement provided by androgenic suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer, most of tumors develop resistance to castration. However, new therapies have demonstrated an increase in patient survival such as radium-223 (Ra-223), an alpha emitter and calcium mimetic with the capability of targeting osteoblastic metastatic lesions. According to results of the ALSYMPCA phase III trial, Ra-223 has demonstrated its activity by improving symptoms and survival of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), symptomatic bone metastases, and no known visceral metastatic disease, without interfering with subsequent treatments. This review examines the key evidence to establish the best patient selection criteria to use Ra-223, how to assess the response to treatment, treatment-related toxicity, and follow-up, but also current research regarding imaging techniques and biomarkers to assess the efficacy of Ra-223. Finally, we briefly describe the clinical trials that are currently ongoing with Ra-223

No disponible

Selection and monitoring of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer for treatment with radium-223.

Despite the improvement provided by androgenic suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer, most of tumors develop resistance to castration. However, new therapies have demonstrated an increase in patient survival such as radium-223 (Ra-223), an alpha emitter and calcium mimetic with the capability of targeting osteoblastic metastatic lesions. According to results of the ALSYMPCA phase III trial, Ra-223 has demonstrated its activity by improving symptoms and survival of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), symptomatic bone metastases, and no known visceral metastatic disease, without interfering with subsequent treatments. This review examines the key evidence to establish the best patient selection criteria to use Ra-223, how to assess the response to treatment, treatment-related toxicity, and follow-up, but also current research regarding imaging techniques and biomarkers to assess the efficacy of Ra-223. Finally, we briefly describe the clinical trials that are currently ongoing with Ra-223.

Antitumour activity of enzalutamide (MDV3100) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) pre-treated with docetaxel and abiraterone.

BACKGROUND: The new generation anti-androgen enzalutamide and the potent CYP17 inhibitor abiraterone have both demonstrated survival benefits in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) progressing after docetaxel. Preliminary data on the antitumour activity of abiraterone after enzalutamide have suggested limited activity. The antitumour activity and safety of enzalutamide after abiraterone in metastatic CRPC patients is still unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients treated with docetaxel and abiraterone prior to enzalutamide to investigate the activity and safety of enzalutamide in a more advanced setting. Prostate specific antigen (PSA), radiological and clinical assessments were analysed. RESULTS: 39 patients with metastatic CRPC were identified for this analysis (median age 70years, range: 54-85years). Overall 16 patients (41%) had a confirmed PSA decline of at least 30%. Confirmed PSA declines of ⩾50% and ⩾90% were achieved in 5/39 (12.8%) and 1/39 (2.5%) respectively. Of the 15 patients who responded to abiraterone, two (13.3%) also had a confirmed ⩾50% PSA decline on subsequent enzalutamide. Among the 22 abiraterone-refractory patients, two (9%) achieved a confirmed ⩾50% PSA decline on enzalutamide. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary case series data suggest limited activity of enzalutamide in the post-docetaxel and post-abiraterone patient population.