Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
MicroPubl Biol ; 20222022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36035776

ABSTRACT

A complex series of interconnected events during meiotic prophase creates the physical connections between homologous chromosomes essential to ensure their proper partitioning during the first meiotic division. HIM-19 is an important factor that regulates meiotic prophase progression in C. elegans , but its molecular function(s) and localization have remained unclear. We show here that tagged HIM-19 expressed from its endogenous locus exhibits dynamic localization in germ cell nuclei that support its proposed role as a regulator of the CHK-2 protein kinase.

2.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(33)2021 08 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34389685

ABSTRACT

Meiotic recombination plays dual roles in the evolution and stable inheritance of genomes: Recombination promotes genetic diversity by reassorting variants, and it establishes temporary connections between pairs of homologous chromosomes that ensure their future segregation. Meiotic recombination is initiated by generation of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) by the conserved topoisomerase-like protein Spo11. Despite strong conservation of Spo11 across eukaryotic kingdoms, auxiliary complexes that interact with Spo11 complexes to promote DSB formation are poorly conserved. Here, we identify DSB-3 as a DSB-promoting protein in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans Mutants lacking DSB-3 are proficient for homolog pairing and synapsis but fail to form crossovers. Lack of crossovers in dsb-3 mutants reflects a requirement for DSB-3 in meiotic DSB formation. DSB-3 concentrates in meiotic nuclei with timing similar to DSB-1 and DSB-2 (predicted homologs of yeast/mammalian Rec114/REC114), and DSB-1, DSB-2, and DSB-3 are interdependent for this localization. Bioinformatics analysis and interactions among the DSB proteins support the identity of DSB-3 as a homolog of MEI4 in conserved DSB-promoting complexes. This identification is reinforced by colocalization of pairwise combinations of DSB-1, DSB-2, and DSB-3 foci in structured illumination microscopy images of spread nuclei. However, unlike yeast Rec114, DSB-1 can interact directly with SPO-11, and in contrast to mouse REC114 and MEI4, DSB-1, DSB-2, and DSB-3 are not concentrated predominantly at meiotic chromosome axes. We speculate that variations in the meiotic program that have coevolved with distinct reproductive strategies in diverse organisms may contribute to and/or enable diversification of essential components of the meiotic machinery.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/chemistry , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Caenorhabditis elegans/physiology , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , Meiosis/physiology , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Computational Biology , Genetic Engineering , Genome , Oocytes/radiation effects
3.
PLoS Biol ; 18(8): e3000817, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32813728

ABSTRACT

During meiosis, chromosomes adopt a specialized organization involving assembly of a cohesin-based axis along their lengths, with DNA loops emanating from this axis. We applied novel, quantitative, and widely applicable cytogenetic strategies to elucidate the molecular bases of this organization using Caenorhabditis elegans. Analyses of wild-type (WT) chromosomes and de novo circular minichromosomes revealed that meiosis-specific HORMA-domain proteins assemble into cohorts in defined numbers and co-organize the axis together with 2 functionally distinct cohesin complexes (REC-8 and COH-3/4) in defined stoichiometry. We further found that REC-8 cohesins, which load during S phase and mediate sister-chromatid cohesion, usually occur as individual complexes, supporting a model wherein sister cohesion is mediated locally by a single cohesin ring. REC-8 complexes are interspersed in an alternating pattern with cohorts of axis-organizing COH-3/4 complexes (averaging 3 per cohort), which are insufficient to confer cohesion but can bind to individual chromatids, suggesting a mechanism to enable formation of asymmetric sister-chromatid loops. Indeed, immunofluorescence/fluorescence in situ hybridization (immuno-FISH) assays demonstrate frequent asymmetry in genomic content between the loops formed on sister chromatids. We discuss how features of chromosome axis/loop architecture inferred from our data can help to explain enigmatic, yet essential, aspects of the meiotic program.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Chromatids/ultrastructure , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/genetics , Chromosomes/ultrastructure , Meiosis , Synaptonemal Complex/ultrastructure , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolism , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Chromatids/metabolism , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , Chromosome Segregation , Chromosomes/metabolism , Cytogenetic Analysis , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , S Phase/genetics , Synaptonemal Complex/metabolism , Cohesins
4.
Genetics ; 213(1): 79-96, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31345995

ABSTRACT

Proper partitioning of homologous chromosomes during meiosis relies on the coordinated execution of multiple interconnected events: Homologs must locate, recognize, and align with their correct pairing partners. Further, homolog pairing must be coupled to assembly of the synaptonemal complex (SC), a meiosis-specific tripartite structure that maintains stable associations between the axes of aligned homologs and regulates formation of crossovers between their DNA molecules to create linkages that enable their segregation. Here, we identify HAL-3 (Homolog Alignment 3) as an important player in coordinating these key events during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. HAL-3, and the previously identified HAL-2, are interacting and interdependent components of a protein complex that localizes to the nucleoplasm of germ cells. hal-3 (or hal-2) mutants exhibit multiple meiotic prophase defects including failure to establish homolog pairing, inappropriate loading of SC subunits onto unpaired chromosome axes, and premature loss of synapsis checkpoint protein PCH-2. Further, loss of hal function results in misregulation of the subcellular localization and activity of Polo-like kinases (PLK-1 and PLK-2), which dynamically localize to different defined subnuclear sites during wild-type prophase progression to regulate distinct cellular events. Moreover, loss of PLK-2 activity partially restores tripartite SC structure in a hal mutant background, suggesting that the defect in pairwise SC assembly in hal mutants reflects inappropriate PLK activity. Together, our data support a model in which the nucleoplasmic HAL-2/HAL-3 protein complex constrains both localization and activity of meiotic Polo-like kinases, thereby preventing premature interaction with stage-inappropriate targets.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Meiosis , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Mutation , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Protein Binding , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Synaptonemal Complex/genetics , Synaptonemal Complex/metabolism
5.
MicroPubl Biol ; 20192019 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32550442
6.
MicroPubl Biol ; 20192019 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32550460
7.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 115(19): E4443-E4452, 2018 05 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29686104

ABSTRACT

Faithful inheritance of genetic information through sexual reproduction relies on the formation of crossovers between homologous chromosomes during meiosis, which, in turn, relies on the formation and repair of numerous double-strand breaks (DSBs). As DSBs pose a potential threat to the genome, mechanisms that ensure timely and error-free DSB repair are crucial for successful meiosis. Here, we identify NBS-1, the Caenorhabditis elegans ortholog of the NBS1 (mutated in Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome) subunit of the conserved MRE11-RAD50-NBS1/Xrs2 (MRN) complex, as a key mediator of DSB repair via homologous recombination (HR) during meiosis. Loss of nbs-1 leads to severely reduced loading of recombinase RAD-51, ssDNA binding protein RPA, and pro-crossover factor COSA-1 during meiotic prophase progression; aggregated and fragmented chromosomes at the end of meiotic prophase; and 100% progeny lethality. These phenotypes reflect a role for NBS-1 in processing of meiotic DSBs for HR that is shared with its interacting partners MRE-11-RAD-50 and COM-1 (ortholog of Com1/Sae2/CtIP). Unexpectedly, in contrast to MRE-11 and RAD-50, NBS-1 is not required for meiotic DSB formation. Meiotic defects of the nbs-1 mutant are partially suppressed by abrogation of the nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway, indicating a role for NBS-1 in antagonizing NHEJ during meiosis. Our data further reveal that NBS-1 and COM-1 play distinct roles in promoting HR and antagonizing NHEJ. We propose a model in which different components of the MRN-C complex work together to couple meiotic DSB formation with efficient and timely engagement of HR, thereby ensuring crossover formation and restoration of genome integrity before the meiotic divisions.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , DNA End-Joining Repair , Embryo, Nonmammalian/metabolism , Homologous Recombination , Meiosis , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/embryology , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Embryo, Nonmammalian/cytology
8.
PLoS Genet ; 13(3): e1006670, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28339470

ABSTRACT

During meiotic prophase, a structure called the synaptonemal complex (SC) assembles at the interface between aligned pairs of homologous chromosomes, and crossover recombination events occur between their DNA molecules. Here we investigate the inter-relationships between these two hallmark features of the meiotic program in the nematode C. elegans, revealing dynamic properties of the SC that are modulated by recombination. We demonstrate that the SC incorporates new subunits and switches from a more highly dynamic/labile state to a more stable state as germ cells progress through the pachytene stage of meiotic prophase. We further show that the more dynamic state of the SC is prolonged in mutants where meiotic recombination is impaired. Moreover, in meiotic mutants where recombination intermediates are present in limiting numbers, SC central region subunits become preferentially stabilized on the subset of chromosome pairs that harbor a site where pro-crossover factors COSA-1 and MutSγ are concentrated. Polo-like kinase PLK-2 becomes preferentially localized to the SCs of chromosome pairs harboring recombination sites prior to the enrichment of SC central region proteins on such chromosomes, and PLK-2 is required for this enrichment to occur. Further, late pachytene nuclei in a plk-2 mutant exhibit the more highly dynamic SC state. Together our data demonstrate that crossover recombination events elicit chromosome-autonomous stabilizing effects on the SC and implicate PLK-2 in this process. We discuss how this recombination-triggered modulation of SC state might contribute to regulatory mechanisms that operate during meiosis to ensure the formation of crossovers while at the same time limiting their numbers.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Meiosis/genetics , Recombination, Genetic , Synaptonemal Complex/genetics , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolism , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Crossing Over, Genetic , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching , Kinetics , Meiotic Prophase I/genetics , Microscopy, Confocal , Mutation , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Synaptonemal Complex/metabolism
9.
Genetics ; 205(1): 125-137, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27838630

ABSTRACT

In eukaryotic cells, the organization of genomic DNA into chromatin regulates many biological processes, from the control of gene expression to the regulation of chromosome segregation. The proper maintenance of this structure upon cell division is therefore of prime importance during development for the maintenance of cell identity and genome stability. The chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF-1) is involved in the assembly of H3-H4 histone dimers on newly synthesized DNA and in the maintenance of a higher order structure, the heterochromatin, through an interaction of its large subunit with the heterochromatin protein HP1a. We identify here a conserved domain in the large subunit of the CAF-1 complex required for its interaction with HP1a in the Drosophila fruit fly. Functional analysis reveals that this domain is dispensable for viability but participates in two processes involving heterochromatin: position-effect variegation and long range chromosomal interactions during meiotic prophase. Importantly, the identification in the large subunit of CAF-1 of a domain required for its interaction with HP1 allows the separation of its functions in heterochromatin-related processes from its function in the assembly of H3-H4 dimers onto newly synthesized DNA.


Subject(s)
Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Retinoblastoma-Binding Protein 4/metabolism , Animals , Chromatin/genetics , Chromatin/metabolism , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , DNA Replication , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster , Female , Histones/genetics , Histones/metabolism , Male , Protein Binding , Retinoblastoma-Binding Protein 4/genetics
10.
Genetics ; 201(4): 1363-79, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26500263

ABSTRACT

Meiotic chromosome segregation requires pairwise association between homologs, stabilized by the synaptonemal complex (SC). Here, we investigate factors contributing to pairwise synapsis by investigating meiosis in polyploid worms. We devised a strategy, based on transient inhibition of cohesin function, to generate polyploid derivatives of virtually any Caenorhabditis elegans strain. We exploited this strategy to investigate the contribution of recombination to pairwise synapsis in tetraploid and triploid worms. In otherwise wild-type polyploids, chromosomes first sort into homolog groups, then multipartner interactions mature into exclusive pairwise associations. Pairwise synapsis associations still form in recombination-deficient tetraploids, confirming a propensity for synapsis to occur in a strictly pairwise manner. However, the transition from multipartner to pairwise association was perturbed in recombination-deficient triploids, implying a role for recombination in promoting this transition when three partners compete for synapsis. To evaluate the basis of synapsis partner preference, we generated polyploid worms heterozygous for normal sequence and rearranged chromosomes sharing the same pairing center (PC). Tetraploid worms had no detectable preference for identical partners, indicating that PC-adjacent homology drives partner choice in this context. In contrast, triploid worms exhibited a clear preference for identical partners, indicating that homology outside the PC region can influence partner choice. Together, our findings, suggest a two-phase model for C. elegans synapsis: an early phase, in which initial synapsis interactions are driven primarily by recombination-independent assessment of homology near PCs and by a propensity for pairwise SC assembly, and a later phase in which mature synaptic interactions are promoted by recombination.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Chromosome Pairing , Meiosis , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/physiology , Cell Cycle Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Cell Cycle Proteins/physiology , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/antagonists & inhibitors , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/physiology , Chromosome Segregation , Female , Karyotype , Male , Models, Genetic , Tetraploidy , Cohesins
11.
Genetics ; 198(1): 193-207, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25053665

ABSTRACT

Meiotic recombination is initiated by the programmed induction of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs), lesions that pose a potential threat to the genome. A subset of the DSBs induced during meiotic prophase become designated to be repaired by a pathway that specifically yields interhomolog crossovers (COs), which mature into chiasmata that temporarily connect the homologs to ensure their proper segregation at meiosis I. The remaining DSBs must be repaired by other mechanisms to restore genomic integrity prior to the meiotic divisions. Here we show that HIM-6, the Caenorhabditis elegans ortholog of the RecQ family DNA helicase BLM, functions in both of these processes. We show that him-6 mutants are competent to load the MutSγ complex at multiple potential CO sites, to generate intermediates that fulfill the requirements of monitoring mechanisms that enable meiotic progression, and to accomplish and robustly regulate CO designation. However, recombination events at a subset of CO-designated sites fail to mature into COs and chiasmata, indicating a pro-CO role for HIM-6/BLM that manifests itself late in the CO pathway. Moreover, we find that in addition to promoting COs, HIM-6 plays a role in eliminating and/or preventing the formation of persistent MutSγ-independent associations between homologous chromosomes. We propose that HIM-6/BLM enforces biased outcomes of recombination events to ensure that both (a) CO-designated recombination intermediates are reliably resolved as COs and (b) other recombination intermediates reliably mature into noncrossovers in a timely manner.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/enzymology , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Meiosis/genetics
12.
PLoS Genet ; 9(12): e1003963, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24339786

ABSTRACT

Reduction in ploidy to generate haploid gametes during sexual reproduction is accomplished by the specialized cell division program of meiosis. Pairing between homologous chromosomes and assembly of the synaptonemal complex at their interface (synapsis) represent intermediate steps in the meiotic program that are essential to form crossover recombination-based linkages between homologs, which in turn enable segregation of the homologs to opposite poles at the meiosis I division. Here, we challenge the mechanisms of pairing and synapsis during C. elegans meiosis by disrupting the normal 1:1 correspondence between homologs through karyotype manipulation. Using a combination of cytological tools, including S-phase labeling to specifically identify X chromosome territories in highly synchronous cohorts of nuclei and 3D rendering to visualize meiotic chromosome structures and organization, our analysis of trisomic (triplo-X) and polyploid meiosis provides insight into the principles governing pairing and synapsis and how the meiotic program is "wired" to maximize successful sexual reproduction. We show that chromosomes sort into homologous groups regardless of chromosome number, then preferentially achieve pairwise synapsis during a period of active chromosome mobilization. Further, comparisons of synapsis configurations in triplo-X germ cells that are proficient or defective for initiating recombination suggest a role for recombination in restricting chromosomal interactions to a pairwise state. Increased numbers of homologs prolong markers of the chromosome mobilization phase and/or boost germline apoptosis, consistent with triggering quality control mechanisms that promote resolution of synapsis problems and/or cull meiocytes containing synapsis defects. However, we also uncover evidence for the existence of mechanisms that "mask" defects, thus allowing resumption of prophase progression and survival of germ cells despite some asynapsis. We propose that coupling of saturable masking mechanisms with stringent quality controls maximizes meiotic success by making progression and survival dependent on achieving a level of synapsis sufficient for crossover formation without requiring perfect synapsis.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Pairing/genetics , Chromosome Segregation/genetics , Meiosis/genetics , Animals , Apoptosis/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Karyotype , Recombination, Genetic , Synaptonemal Complex/genetics , X Chromosome/genetics
13.
Curr Biol ; 23(21): 2135-9, 2013 Nov 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24139736

ABSTRACT

The early Drosophila embryo is an ideal model to understand the transcriptional regulation of well-defined patterns of gene expression in a developing organism. In this system, snapshots of transcription measurements obtained by RNA FISH on fixed samples cannot provide the temporal resolution needed to distinguish spatial heterogeneity from inherent noise. Here, we used the MS2-MCP system to visualize in living embryos nascent transcripts expressed from the canonical hunchback (hb) promoter under the control of Bicoid (Bcd). The hb-MS2 reporter is expressed as synchronously as endogenous hb in the anterior half of the embryo, but unlike hb it is also active in the posterior, though more heterogeneously and more transiently than in the anterior. The length and intensity of active transcription periods in the anterior are strongly reduced in absence of Bcd, whereas posterior ones are mostly Bcd independent. This posterior noisy signal decreases progressively through nuclear divisions, so that the MS2 reporter expression mimics the known anterior hb pattern at cellularization. We propose that the establishment of the hb pattern relies on Bcd-dependent lengthening of transcriptional activity periods in the anterior and may require two distinct repression mechanisms in the posterior.


Subject(s)
DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Trans-Activators/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified/embryology , Animals, Genetically Modified/genetics , Animals, Genetically Modified/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Embryo, Nonmammalian/embryology , Embryo, Nonmammalian/metabolism , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Microscopy, Confocal , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Trans-Activators/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Videotape Recording
14.
Development ; 137(16): 2795-804, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20663819

ABSTRACT

It is widely accepted that morphogenetic gradients determine cell identity by concentration-dependent activation of target genes. How precise is each step in the gene expression process that acts downstream of morphogens, however, remains unclear. The Bicoid morphogen is a transcription factor directly activating its target genes and provides thus a simple system to address this issue in a quantitative manner. Recent studies indicate that the Bicoid gradient is precisely established in Drosophila embryos after eight nuclear divisions (cycle 9) and that target protein expression is specified five divisions later (cycle 14), with a precision that corresponds to a relative difference of Bicoid concentration of 10%. To understand how such precision was achieved, we directly analyzed nascent transcripts of the hunchback target gene at their site of synthesis. Most anterior nuclei in cycle 11 interphasic embryos exhibit efficient biallelic transcription of hunchback and this synchronous expression is specified within a 10% difference of Bicoid concentration. The fast diffusion of Bcd-EGFP (7.7 mum(2)/s) that we captured by fluorescent correlation spectroscopy in the nucleus is consistent with this robust expression at cycle 11. However, given the interruption of transcription during mitosis, it remains too slow to be consistent with precise de novo reading of Bicoid concentration at each interphase, suggesting the existence of a memorization process that recalls this information from earlier cycles. The two anterior maternal morphogens, Bicoid and Hunchback, contribute differently to this early response: whereas Bicoid provides dose-dependent positional information along the axis, maternal Hunchback is required for the synchrony of the response and is therefore likely to be involved in this memorization process.


Subject(s)
DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Trans-Activators/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic , Zygote/metabolism , Animals , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Trans-Activators/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...