Patient-reported outcomes in randomized clinical trials of systemic therapy for advanced soft tissue sarcomas in adults: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review evaluates reporting of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) within randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients. METHODS: A systematic literature search from January 2000 - August 2022 was conducted for phase II/III RCTs evaluating systemic treatments in adult patients with advanced STS. Quality of PRO reporting was assessed using the CONSORT PRO extension. RESULTS: Out of 7294 abstracts, 59 articles were included; comprising 43 RCTs. Only 15 RCTs (35%) included PROs, none as primary endpoints. Only 10 of these RCTs reported PROs, either in the primary (6/10) or secondary publication (1/10) or in both (3/10), with a median time interval of 23 months. The median CONSORT PRO adherence score was 5.5/14, with higher scores in publications focusing exclusively on PROs. CONCLUSION: These results highlight the need for improved and more consistent PRO reporting to inform patient care in the setting of advanced STS.

Referral patterns of GIST patients: data from a nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: This study compares the characteristics, referral and treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients treated in reference and non-reference centers in the Netherlands. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study on patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2019, utilises data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Database. Patients were categorized into two groups: patients diagnosed in or referred to reference centers and patients diagnosed in non-reference centers without referral. RESULTS: This study included 1,550 GIST patients with a median age of 67.0 in reference and 68.0 years in non-reference centers. Eighty-seven per cent of patients were diagnosed in non-reference centers, of which 36.5% (493/1,352) were referred to a reference center. Referral rates were higher for high-risk (62.2% [74/119]) and metastatic patients (67.2% [90/134]). Mutation analysis was performed in 96.9% and 87.6% of these cases in reference and in non-reference centers (p < 0.01), respectively. Systemic therapy was given in reference centers versus non-reference in 89.5% versus 82.0% (p < 0.01) of high-risk and in 94.1% versus 65.9% (p < 0.01) of metastatic patients, respectively. The proportion of positive resection margins and tumor rupture did not differ between reference and non-reference centers. Median OS was not reached. CONCLUSION: A substantial amount of metastatic GIST patients in non-reference centers did not receive systemic treatment. This might be due to valid reasons. However, optimisation of the referral strategy of GIST patients in the Netherlands could benefit patients. Further research is needed to explore reasons for not starting systemic treatment in metastatic GIST patients.

Individualized Dosing Patterns in the Treatment of Older Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Results of a Registry-Based Observational National Cohort Study Including 871 Patients.

BACKGROUND: While the effectiveness of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) seems similar in older patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) compared with younger patients, toxicities in older patients treated with TKIs more often lead to discontinuation of treatment. OBJECTIVE: To better understand the age-related pharmacology and pharmacodynamic differences in patients with GIST treated with TKIs, the primary aim of this study was to evaluate TKI dosing patterns in older patients with GIST, while the secondary aims were to evaluate differences in imatinib trough plasma concentrations between age groups and to compare the overall survival (OS) in patients with and without dose reductions in all treatment lines in a palliative setting. METHODS: Patients (18 years of age or older) with histologically proven GIST diagnosed between January 2009 and June 2021 and treated with one or more lines of TKIs were selected from the Dutch GIST Registry (DGR) database. Age groups were divided into younger patients (age <70 years) and older patients (age ≥70 years). All imatinib trough plasma concentrations of blood withdrawals taken from initiation of imatinib until a maximum of 1 year of treatment with imatinib were collected. Reasons for first adjustment of treatment were classified as adverse event, dose modification, progressive disease and other reasons. The next treatment steps after first adjustment of treatment were defined as dose escalation, dose reduction, dose interruption, or end of treatment. The association of dose reduction and OS was analyzed using the landmark approach. RESULTS: Overall, 871 patients were included in this study, including 577 younger patients and 294 older patients. Older patients more often had an adverse event as the reason for first adjustment of treatment with both imatinib (45.6%; p < 0.001) and sunitinib (58.6%; p = 0.224) compared with younger patients (19.5% and 42.7%, respectively). Adjustment of imatinib and sunitinib after starting on a standard dose because of an adverse event most often resulted in dose reduction in both age groups. Median trough plasma concentrations of all samples taken within the first year after initiation of imatinib were higher in older patients (1228 ng/mL, interquartile range [IQR] 959-1687) compared with younger patients (1035 ng/mL [IQR 773-1377]; p < 0.001). No significant differences were seen between OS in patients with or without dose reduction in all treatment lines (imatinib: p = 0.270; sunitinib: p = 0.547; and regorafenib: p = 0.784). CONCLUSION: Older patients showed higher imatinib trough plasma concentrations compared with younger patients and also had earlier and more often adverse events as the reason for first adjustment of treatment with imatinib followed by dose reduction. However, in a landmark analysis, patients with imatinib dose reductions had no poorer outcomes compared with patients not requiring a dose reduction.

Neoadjuvant Imatinib in Locally Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) is Effective and Safe: Results from a Prospective Single-Center Study with 108 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant imatinib is considered for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) when decreased tumor size provides less extensive surgery and higher R0 resection rates. This study evaluates the effectivity and safety of neoadjuvant imatinib for large or locally advanced GIST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From the prospective database of the Dutch GIST Consortium, all patients who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant imatinib at our center between 2009 and 2022 were selected. Independent and blinded assessment of surgical strategy was performed by two surgeons, based on anonymized computed tomography (CT) scans before and after neoadjuvant imatinib. RESULTS: Of 113 patients that received neoadjuvant imatinib, 108 (95%) [mean age 61.6, standard deviation (SD) 11.5, 54% male] underwent a GIST resection. Of all GISTs, 67% was localized in the stomach and 25% in the duodenum or small intestine. In 74% of the patients with GIST, a KIT exon 11 mutation was found. Decreased tumor size was seen in 95 (88%) patients. Having a KIT exon 11 mutation [odds ratio (OR) 5.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67-19.1, p < 0.01] or not having a mutation (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.89, p = 0.04) were positive and negative predictive values for partial response, respectively. In 55 (51%) patients, there was deescalation of surgical strategy after neoadjuvant imatinib. Surgical complications were documented in 16 (15%) patients (n = 8, grade II; n = 5, grade IIIa; n = 3, grade IIIb) and R0 resection was accomplished in 95 (89%) patients. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival were 80% and 91%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study shows that neoadjuvant imatinib is effective and safe for patients with large or locally advanced GIST.

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling and Therapeutic Implications for Patients with Advanced Cancers: The Experience of an Academic Hospital.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) can be used to detect tumor-specific genomic alterations. This retrospective single-center study aims to assess the application of an extensive NGS panel to identify actionable alterations and initiate matched targeted treatment for patients with advanced cancer. We analyzed genomic alterations in solid tumor biopsies from 464 patients with advanced cancer with the Foundation Medicine assay (FoundationOne®CDx). Therapeutic implications were determined using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Precision Oncology Knowledge Base (OncoKB) classification. The FoundationOne®CDx was successfully applied in 464/521 patients (89%). The most common altered genes were TP53 (61%), KRAS (20%), CDKN2A (20%), TERT (16%), and APC (16%). Among the 419 patients with successfully analyzed tumor mutational burden (TMB), 43 patients presented with a high TMB (≥10 mutations/megabase). Out of the 126 patients with an actionable target, 40 patients received matched treatment (32%) of which 17 were within a clinical trial. This study shows that the application of NGS is feasible in an academic center and increases the detection of actionable alterations and identification of patients eligible for targeted treatment or immunotherapy regardless of tumor histology. Strategies such as early referral for NGS, inclusion in clinical (basket) trials, and the development of new targeted drugs are necessary to improve the matched treatment rate.

Local recurrence in primary localised resected gastrointestinal stromal tumours: A registry observational national cohort study including 912 patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous literature showed a high risk of recurrence following surgical treatment in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). However, little is known about the patient- and treatment characteristics of local recurrences (LRs) in GIST patients. Therefore, this study aimed to better understand patterns of LR in surgically treated localised GIST and to describe treatment options based on our Dutch GIST Registry (DGR). METHODS: Data of primary surgically treated localised GIST between January 2009 until July 2021 were retrospectively retrieved from the DGR. RESULTS: Of 1452 patients registered in the DGR, 912 patients were included in this study. Only 3.8% (35/912) of patients developed LR, including 20 patients with LR only and 15 patients with simultaneous LR and distant metastases (DM). Median time to LR was 30 (interquartile range 8-53) months from date of surgery. Eleven percent (100/912) of patients developed only DM. A total of 2.3% (6/259) of patients treated with adjuvant treatment developed an LR during adjuvant therapy. Seventy percent of patients with LR only (14/20) were treated with surgery (85.7% R0), which was mostly combined with systemic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with primary surgically treated localised GIST have a limited risk of developing recurrence. Fifteen percent developed recurrence, of which one quarter developed an LR. Therefore, less intensified follow-up schedules could be considered, especially during treatment with adjuvant imatinib. In patients with LR only, potentially curative treatment strategies, including surgical (re-)resection, are often possible as treatment for LR.

Quality of life in oropharyngeal cancer: a structured review of the literature.

PURPOSE: To summarize the literature on quality of life (QoL) in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). METHODS: The PubMed database was searched using the inclusion criteria "oropharyngeal cancer," "quality of life," "human," and "English," the exclusion criterion "recurrent," and publication date between January 1, 2005 and October 26, 2015. RESULTS: The search yielded 98 articles of which 17 fulfilled all selection criteria. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) showed a better outcome for several QoL domains and was superior to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in some studies. At 12-month follow up, deterioration of QoL was seen in a smaller proportion of patients after surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (S&PORT) in comparison to CRT. For all treatment modalities, the most important worsening for several QoL domains was seen at 3 months. Stage III/IV patients experienced a greater deterioration of QoL scores for most scores. No consistent results were reported for the correlation between xerostomia assessed with QoL questionnaires and objective swallowing function assessed with modified barium swallow videofluoroscopy. CONCLUSION: The different tools used for the assessment of patient-reported QoL and objective measurement of functional outcome make it difficult to evaluate the effect of different treatment modalities. In general, we can conclude that a non-surgical approach is associated with worse QoL scores. IMRT minimizes radiation to the surrounding tissue and therefore has a better outcome in several QoL domains in comparison to conventional RT.