Late Pleistocene stickleback environmental genomes reveal the chronology of freshwater adaptation.

Directly observing the chronology and tempo of adaptation in response to ecological change is rarely possible in natural ecosystems. Sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) has been shown to be a tractable source of genome-scale data of long-dead organisms1,2,3 and to thereby potentially provide an understanding of the evolutionary histories of past populations.4,5 To date, time series of ecosystem biodiversity have been reconstructed from sedaDNA, typically using DNA metabarcoding or shotgun sequence data generated from less than 1 g of sediment.6,7 Here, we maximize sequence coverage by extracting DNA from ∼50× more sediment per sample than the majority of previous studies1,2,3 to achieve genotype resolution. From a time series of Late Pleistocene sediments spanning from a marine to freshwater ecosystem, we compare adaptive genotypes reconstructed from the environmental genomes of three-spined stickleback at key time points of this transition. We find a staggered temporal dynamic in which freshwater alleles at known loci of large effect in marine-freshwater divergence of three-spined stickleback (e.g., EDA)8 were already established during the brackish phase of the formation of the isolation basin. However, marine alleles were still detected across the majority of marine-freshwater divergence-associated loci, even after the complete isolation of the lake from marine ingression. Our retrospective approach to studying adaptation from environmental genomes of three-spined sticklebacks at the end of the last glacial period complements contemporary experimental approaches9,10,11 and highlights the untapped potential for retrospective "evolve and resequence" natural experiments using sedaDNA.

Ancient and modern stickleback genomes reveal the demographic constraints on adaptation.

Adaptation is typically studied by comparing modern populations with contrasting environments. Individuals persisting in the ancestral habitat are typically used to represent the ancestral founding population; however, it has been questioned whether these individuals are good proxies for the actual ancestors.1 To address this, we applied a paleogenomics approach2 to directly access the ancestral genepool: partially sequencing the genomes of two 11- to 13,000-year-old stickleback recovered from the transitionary layer between marine and freshwater sediments of two Norwegian isolation lakes3 and comparing them with 30 modern stickleback genomes from the same lakes and adjacent marine fjord, in addition to a global dataset of 20 genomes.4 The ancient stickleback shared genome-wide ancestry with the modern fjord population, whereas modern lake populations have lost substantial ancestral variation following founder effects, and subsequent drift and selection. Freshwater-adaptive alleles found in one ancient stickleback genome have not risen to high frequency in the present-day population from the same lake. Comparison to the global dataset suggested incomplete adaptation to freshwater in our modern lake populations. Our findings reveal the impact of population bottlenecks in constraining adaptation due to reduced efficacy of selection on standing variation present in founder populations.