ABSTRACT
Background: This study evaluates whether there are ethnic differences in time to surgery in women with early-stage (1-3a) breast cancer in four NZ urban regions between 2000 and 2020 pre- and post- Faster Cancer Treatment (FCT) implementation, which was introduced to address inequities in cancer outcomes. Methods: This retrospective analysis used Te Rehita Mate Utaetae (Breast Cancer Foundation National Register), a prospectively maintained database of breast cancers from 2000 to 2020. Women with stage 3b, 3c, metastatic or bilateral cancers were excluded. Logistic regression models evaluated ethnic differences in time to surgery (≤31/>31 days as per FCT plan) with sequential adjustment for potential contributing factors (demographic, mode of diagnosis, tumour, treatment facility type and treatment). Subgroup analyses by pre- and post-FCT implementation date were undertaken. Findings: Of the 16,365 women included, 74.1% were NZ European (NZE), 10.2% were Maori, 6.1% were Pacific, and 9.2% were Asian. Wahine Maori (Maori women) and Pacific women were more likely to experience delays in surgery >31 days, compared to NZE (maximally adjusted OR: 1.18; 95% CI:1.05, 1.33 and OR:1.42; 95% CI:1.22, 1.65, respectively)-deprivation and treatment facility type contributed most to this. Wahine Maori experienced delay in the public system only. The associations did not differ between the pre- and post- FCT periods. Interpretation: Ethnic inequities exist with respect to time to surgery for women with early-stage breast cancer and these differences persist after FCT implementation. Funding: LB is supported by the Richard Stewart scholarship, the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons and Oxford Population Health.
Subject(s)
Pacific Island People , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Waiting Lists , Humans , Ethnicity , New Zealand/epidemiology , Maori PeopleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are more accurate than conventional imaging (CI) for breast cancer staging. How adding CEM and MRI to CI might change the surgical plan is understudied. METHODS: Surgical plans (breast conserving surgery (BCS), wider BCS, BCS with diagnostic excision (>1BCS), mastectomy) were devised by mock-MDT (radiologist, surgeon and pathology reports) according to disease extent on CI, CI + CEM and CI + MRI. Differences in the mock-MDT's surgical plans following the addition of CEM or MRI were investigated. Using pre-defined criteria, the appropriateness of the modified plans was assessed by comparing estimated disease extent on imaging with final pathology. Surgery performed was recorded from patient records. RESULTS: Contrast imaging modified mock-MDT plans for 20 of 61(32.8%) breasts. The addition of CEM changed the plan in 16/20 (80%) and MRI in 17/20 breasts (85%). Identical changes were proposed by both CEM and MRI in 13/20 (65%) breasts. The modified surgical plan based on CI + CEM was possibly appropriate for 6/16 (37.5%), and CI + MRI in 9/17, (52.9%) breasts. The surgery performed was concordant with the mock-MDT plan for all 10 patients where the plans could be compared (BCS 1, >1 BCS 2 and mastectomy 7). CONCLUSION: Adding CEM or MRI to CI changed mock-MDT plans in up to one third of women, but not all were appropriate. Changing surgical plans following addition of contrast imaging to CI without biopsy confirmation could lead to over or under-treatment.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mastectomy , Female , Humans , Mastectomy/methods , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mammography/methods , Mastectomy, Segmental/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Breast/diagnostic imaging , Breast/surgery , Breast/pathologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This review aims to identify and summarise the literature pertaining to the implementation of affirmative action programmes (AAP) for selection of ethnic minorities and Indigenous peoples into selective specialist medical and surgical training programmes. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies reporting on the background, implementation and results of AAP for ethnic minorities and Indigenous peoples into medical and surgical training. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were queried from inception through to 1 February 2020. All included studies were subjected to inductive thematic analysis in order to systematically collate study findings. Articles were read through several times in an iterative manner to allow the identification of themes across the included studies. The themes were cross-compared among the authors to establish their interconnectedness. RESULTS: Forty-five articles described AAP pertaining to ethnic minorities in the United States of America (African-Americans and Hispanic Americans), women and ethnic minorities, Indigenous peoples (New Zealand Maori) and people with low socio-economic status. Four themes were identified. These included the need for social responsiveness in clinical training organisations, justification and criticism of AAP, how clinical training agencies should participate in AAP and what constitutes an effective AAP for specialist medical and surgical training. CONCLUSIONS: Affirmative action programmes have been effective at increasing numbers of ethnic minority medical school graduates but have not been used for specialist medical or surgical training selection. AAP achieve the best results when they are associated with a comprehensive programme of candidate preparation, support and mentorship beginning prior to application, and support and mentorship extending through training and subsequently into the post-training period as an independent professional. The overall aim of any AAP in medical or surgical training must be graduation of significant numbers of minority and Indigenous trainees into successful practice with appointment to faculty member and leadership positions.
Subject(s)
Ethnicity , Minority Groups , Female , Humans , Leadership , Public Policy , Schools, Medical , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This investigation was undertaken to define the factors determining the optimal and most productive relationship among indigenous communities, surgeons, and providers of surgical services. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies reporting on the experience of indigenous communities with surgeons, medical practitioners, and the providers of surgical and other health services. The databases searched were MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, including all literature available until the search date of April 3, 2019. The reference lists of all included articles and related review articles were searched manually to identify further relevant studies. An inductive approach was used to identify common themes. RESULTS: Thirty-three publications discussed the experiences of New Zealand Maori (n = 2), Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders (n = 20), North American First Nation (n = 10), and Indigenous Latin Americans (n = 1). Across all indigenous peoples, 6 themes emerged: accessible health services, community participation and community governance, continuous quality improvement, a culturally appropriate and clinically skilled workforce, a flexible approach to care, and holistic healthcare. CONCLUSION: To provide medical and surgical services in indigenous communities successfully requires a diverse range of skills and core technical and academic competencies. Many skills lie within the definition of professionalism and advocacy as well as the ability to undertake and operationalize community consultation and empowerment. If surgical services serving Indigenous communities are to be successful in addressing health disparity, specific training in these skills will need to be developed and made available.
Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Services Needs and Demand , Health Services, Indigenous/organization & administration , Healthcare Disparities/organization & administration , Specialties, Surgical/organization & administration , Clinical Competence , Community Participation , Culturally Competent Care/organization & administration , Global Health , Humans , Indigenous Peoples , Latin America/ethnology , New Zealand/ethnology , North America/ethnology , Quality Improvement , Surgeons , Workforce/organization & administrationABSTRACT
An accurate intraoperative identification of malignant tissue is a challenge in the surgical management of breast cancer. Imaging techniques that help address this challenge could contribute to more complete and accurate tumor excision, and thereby help reduce the current high reexcision rates without resorting to the removal of excess healthy tissue. Optical coherence microelastography (OCME) is a three-dimensional, high-resolution imaging technique that is sensitive to microscale variations of the mechanical properties of tissue. As the tumor modifies the mechanical properties of breast tissue, OCME has the potential to identify, on the microscale, involved regions of fresh, unstained tissue. OCME is based on the use of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to measure tissue deformation in response to applied mechanical compression. In this feasibility study on 58 ex vivo samples from patients undergoing mastectomy or wide local excision, we demonstrate the performance of OCME as a means to visualize tissue microarchitecture in benign and malignant human breast tissues. Through a comparison with corresponding histology and OCT images, OCME is shown to enable ready visualization of features such as ducts, lobules, microcysts, blood vessels, and arterioles and to identify invasive tumor through distinctive patterns in OCME images, often with enhanced contrast compared with OCT. These results lay the foundation for future intraoperative studies. Cancer Res; 75(16); 3236-45. ©2015 AACR.