ABSTRACT
Gene variants in LZTR1 are implicated to cause Noonan syndrome associated with a severe and early-onset hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Mechanistically, LZTR1 deficiency results in accumulation of RAS GTPases and, as a consequence, in RAS-MAPK signaling hyperactivity, thereby causing the Noonan syndrome-associated phenotype. Despite its epidemiological relevance, pharmacological as well as invasive therapies remain limited. Here, personalized CRISPR-Cas9 gene therapies might offer a novel alternative for a curative treatment in this patient cohort. In this study, by utilizing a patient-specific screening platform based on iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes from two Noonan syndrome patients, we evaluated different clinically translatable therapeutic approaches using small Cas9 orthologs targeting a deep-intronic LZTR1 variant to cure the disease-associated molecular pathology. Despite high editing efficiencies in cardiomyocyte cultures transduced with lentivirus or all-in-one adeno-associated viruses, we observed crucial differences in editing outcomes in proliferative iPSCs vs. non-proliferative cardiomyocytes. While editing in iPSCs rescued the phenotype, the same editing approaches did not robustly restore LZTR1 function in cardiomyocytes, indicating critical differences in the activity of DNA double-strand break repair mechanisms between proliferative and non-proliferative cell types and highlighting the importance of cell type-specific screens for testing CRISPR-Cas9 gene therapies.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Noonan syndrome (NS) is a multisystemic developmental disorder characterized by common, clinically variable symptoms, such as typical facial dysmorphisms, short stature, developmental delay, intellectual disability as well as cardiac hypertrophy. The underlying mechanism is a gain-of-function of the RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. However, our understanding of the pathophysiological alterations and mechanisms, especially of the associated cardiomyopathy, remains limited and effective therapeutic options are lacking. METHODS: Here, we present a family with two siblings displaying an autosomal recessive form of NS with massive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy as clinically the most prevalent symptom caused by biallelic mutations within the leucine zipper-like transcription regulator 1 (LZTR1). We generated induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes of the affected siblings and investigated the patient-specific cardiomyocytes on the molecular and functional level. RESULTS: Patients' induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes recapitulated the hypertrophic phenotype and uncovered a so-far-not-described causal link between LZTR1 dysfunction, RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling hyperactivity, hypertrophic gene response and cellular hypertrophy. Calcium channel blockade and MEK inhibition could prevent some of the disease characteristics, providing a molecular underpinning for the clinical use of these drugs in patients with NS, but might not be a sustainable therapeutic option. In a proof-of-concept approach, we explored a clinically translatable intronic CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) repair and demonstrated a rescue of the hypertrophic phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed the human cardiac pathogenesis in patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes from NS patients carrying biallelic variants in LZTR1 and identified a unique disease-specific proteome signature. In addition, we identified the intronic CRISPR repair as a personalized and in our view clinically translatable therapeutic strategy to treat NS-associated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
