ABSTRACT
PredictProtein is a meta-service for sequence analysis that has been predicting structural and functional features of proteins since 1992. Queried with a protein sequence it returns: multiple sequence alignments, predicted aspects of structure (secondary structure, solvent accessibility, transmembrane helices (TMSEG) and strands, coiled-coil regions, disulfide bonds and disordered regions) and function. The service incorporates analysis methods for the identification of functional regions (ConSurf), homology-based inference of Gene Ontology terms (metastudent), comprehensive subcellular localization prediction (LocTree3), protein-protein binding sites (ISIS2), protein-polynucleotide binding sites (SomeNA) and predictions of the effect of point mutations (non-synonymous SNPs) on protein function (SNAP2). Our goal has always been to develop a system optimized to meet the demands of experimentalists not highly experienced in bioinformatics. To this end, the PredictProtein results are presented as both text and a series of intuitive, interactive and visually appealing figures. The web server and sources are available at http://ppopen.rostlab.org.
Subject(s)
Protein Conformation , Software , Amino Acid Substitution , Binding Sites , Gene Ontology , Internet , Intrinsically Disordered Proteins/chemistry , Membrane Proteins/chemistry , Mutation , Protein Interaction Mapping , Proteins/analysis , Proteins/genetics , Proteins/metabolism , Sequence Alignment , Sequence Analysis, Protein , Sequence Homology, Amino AcidABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Any method that de novo predicts protein function should do better than random. More challenging, it also ought to outperform simple homology-based inference. METHODS: Here, we describe a few methods that predict protein function exclusively through homology. Together, they set the bar or lower limit for future improvements. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: During the development of these methods, we faced two surprises. Firstly, our most successful implementation for the baseline ranked very high at CAFA1. In fact, our best combination of homology-based methods fared only slightly worse than the top-of-the-line prediction method from the Jones group. Secondly, although the concept of homology-based inference is simple, this work revealed that the precise details of the implementation are crucial: not only did the methods span from top to bottom performers at CAFA, but also the reasons for these differences were unexpected. In this work, we also propose a new rigorous measure to compare predicted and experimental annotations. It puts more emphasis on the details of protein function than the other measures employed by CAFA and may best reflect the expectations of users. Clearly, the definition of proper goals remains one major objective for CAFA.
