Fracture resistance of structurally compromised root filled bovine teeth restored with accessory glass fibre posts.

AIM: To evaluate the mechanical behaviour of structurally compromised root filled bovine roots after restoration with accessory glass fibre posts. METHODOLOGY: Fifty roots of bovine teeth received conventional post preparations with a cervical diameter of 3.5 mm. The roots were assigned to five groups (n = 10): group MP - cast metal post, group GP - glass fibre post and group AGP - glass fibre post plus accessory glass fibre posts. In groups GP-R and AGP-R (similar to groups GP and AGP), 2 mm of coronal tooth structure were left intact. All groups were subjected to an elastic limit assay and tested in an universal machine for fracture resistance. Repeated measures anova were performed to examine differences in fracture resistance; fracture modes were analysed by Fischer's exact test. RESULTS: The mean fracture resistance values (kgf) were 61.8 (MP), 63.1 (GP), 55.5 (AGP), 56 (GP-R) and (53.1) AGP-R. No statistically significant difference was found between groups. The Fisher's exact test indicated significant differences (P < 0.05) in the fracture mode amongst groups MP, GP and AGP, indicating 100%, 50% and 10% of catastrophic fractures, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of accessory glass fibre posts affected the fracture mode favorably: 90% of fractures in group AGP were in the coronal third.

"No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives--a microtensile bond strength and morphological study.

PURPOSE: To compare the adhesive capability of the new adhesive Prompt L-Pop (ESPE) with that of two total-etch adhesive systems-EBS Multi (ESPE) and Prime&Bond NT (Dentsply). METHODS: Extracted human molars were bonded and prepared for microtensile dentin bond strength (microTBS) testing using Prompt L-Pop, EBS Multi, and Prime&Bond NT combined with Pertac II (composite) or Hytac Aplitip (compomer). Prompt L-Pop was applied using five different protocols: (1) as an "all-in-one" self-conditioning adhesive, as per manufacturer's instructions (LP); (2) as a self-etching primer combined with a separate bonding resin (LP/self-etch 2-step); (3) as a classical primer used upon etching dentin with phosphoric acid, followed by a bonding resin (LP/total-etch 3-step); (4) as a multi-application "all-in-one" self-conditioning adhesive (LP/multi-coat) to leave a visibly glossy dentin surface; and (5) as a filled adhesive, upon adding quartz fillers to its composition (LP/filled). After 24h of storage in water at 37 degrees C the microTBS were measured in an Instron machine. Corresponding interfaces of the same specimens were micromorphologically analyzed using SEM and TEM. RESULTS: When used with a composite resin, LP/filled and LP/multi-coat resulted in significantly higher microTBS than LP. The addition of an extra adhesive bonding resin (LP/self-etch 2-step) had no effect on bond strength. The use of Prompt L-Pop as a primer of a fourth-generation adhesive (LP/total-etch 3-step) replacing the EBS Multi primer, resulted in lower bond strengths than those of the original EBS Multi. LP/multi-coat showed similar microTBS to Prime&Bond NT (P&BNT). When used with a compomer, LP exhibited higher bond strengths than when used with the resin composite and was as effective as the experimental groups LP/filled and LP/multi-coat and the control group P&BNT. The SEM evaluation showed an inconsistent hybrid layer for the LP specimens, whereas in both the LP/filled and LP/multi-coat specimens a hybrid layer was clearly evident. Under the TEM all groups displayed dentin hybridization with dissolved smear plugs in the specimens that had been conditioned with Prompt L-Pop without a separate etching step. In many tubules of specimens conditioned with LP (as per manufacturer's instructions), fillers of the resin composite were present within the dentinal tubules. CONCLUSIONS: When combined with a resin composite, Prompt L-Pop resulted in statistically lower bond strengths when applied in one layer than when applied in multiple layers. Prompt L-Pop also resulted in higher bond strengths when used with a polyacid-modified composite resin than with a composite resin. When applied in multiple coats, Prompt L-Pop results in bond strengths that are not statistically different from those of Prime&Bond NT, a total-etch adhesive.

Effect of calcium removal on dentin bond strengths.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the microtensile bond strengths (mu TBS) of 3 dental adhesives when applied to dentin decalcified with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The null hypothesis tested was that the removal of calcium from dentin would not influence the bond strengths. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Eighteen extracted human molars were cut in 2 equal halves. One half served as the control, having no EDTA treatment, while the other half was assigned to 1 of 3 periods (1 hour, 24 hours, or 100 hours) of decalcification with buffered 0.5 mol/L EDTA. Middle dentin was bonded with 1 of 3 dentin adhesive groups: a self-etching primer, Clearfil SE Bond (SE); an acetone-based total-etch adhesive, Prime&Bond NT (NT); and an ethanol- and water-based total-etch adhesive, Single Bond (SB). The specimens were restored with Z-250 resin composite and sectioned in 0.9 +/- 0.2 mm2 sticks that were tested in tensile mode. RESULTS: For each adhesive, the control group (not decalcified) resulted in statistically higher bond strengths than the treatment groups. For specimens that were not decalcified, SE and SB had statistically similar bond strengths, but both resulted in statistically higher bond strengths than NT. For specimens decalcified for 1 hour, SE resulted in statistically higher bond strengths than either SB or NT, which were ranked in the same statistical group. SE was the only dentin adhesive to result in measurable mu TBS after decalcification with EDTA for 24 hours, while SB/24 hour and NT/24 hour specimens debonded spontaneously prior to testing. All the specimens treated with EDTA for 100 hours debonded prior to testing. CONCLUSION: Three conclusions were drawn: (1) All 3 adhesive systems included in this project bonded significantly better to calcified than to decalcified dentin, regardless of their composition; (2) The self-etching primer-based adhesive ranked consistently equal to or better than the 2 total-etch-based adhesives, regardless of the EDTA decalcification time; and (3) Removal of calcium may be more detrimental for adhesives that rely on dentin acid etching than for adhesives based on self-etching primers.

Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine enamel and dentin bond strengths of a nonrinsing "all-in-one" adhesive and of a nonrinsing conditioner combined with a 1-bottle adhesive. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Specimens were obtained from 240 bovine teeth ground to expose enamel or dentin surfaces. Ten enamel and 10 dentin specimens were randomly assigned to each of 12 different combinations of adhesive system (Prompt L-Pop; no etch + Prime & Bond NT; NRC + Prime & Bond NT; 36% phosphoric acid + Prime & Bond NT; no etch + Prime & Bond 2.1; 36% phosphoric acid + Prime & Bond 2.1) and restorative material (resin composite; polyacid-modified resin composite ["compomer"]). After the application of the adhesive system, a No. 5 gelatin capsule filled with the restorative material was seated against the enamel or dentin surface. After 24 hours in distilled water at 37 degrees C, the specimens were thermocycled and the shear bond strengths were measured. RESULTS: For resin composite, etching with phosphoric acid resulted in the highest bond strengths to enamel. For compomer, the highest enamel bond strengths were achieved with both phosphoric acid and Prompt L-Pop. Treating dentin with Prime & Bond NT without etching provided the highest mean bond strength for composite. For compomer, treating dentin with Prime & Bond NT resulted in the highest mean bond strengths, regardless of the conditioner. CONCLUSION: Compomer and resin composite exhibited statistically similar bond strengths. Bond strengths to dentin were significantly lower than those to enamel.

Effect of conditioner and restorative resin on enamel bond strengths.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of three enamel conditioners and four restorative materials on enamel shear bond strengths. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 120 bovine incisors were polished to 600-grit and randomly assigned to three enamel adhesive systems (n=40): Syntac Single Component with phosphoric acid etching (PA-SSC), Syntac Single Component without phosphoric acid etching (SSC), and Experimental Prompt L-Pop (LPI), a self-etching adhesive. The specimens were restored with one of four resin restorative materials (n=10): (1) Compoglass F, a high-viscosity compomer; (2) Compoglass Flow, a low-viscosity compomer; (3) Tetric Ceram, a high-viscosity resin-based composite (RBC); and (4) Tetric Flow, a low-viscosity RBC. After thermocycling, shear tests were carried out with an Instron Universal Testing Machine. Mean enamel bond strengths were analyzed with ANOVA and Duncan post hoc test at P < or = 0.05. RESULTS: PA-SSC resulted in higher mean bond strengths than LP1, but the difference was not statistically significant. Both PA-SSC and LP1 resulted in statistically higher mean bond strengths than SSC at P < or = 0.0001. The lowest mean bond strengths of all the groups were obtained when SSC was used with an RBC (Tetric Ceram or Tetric Flow). SSC and PA-SSC resulted in statistically higher mean bond strengths when used with a compomer than when used with an RBC, regardless of the viscosity. Although recommended to be used only with compomers, LP1 resulted in statistically similar enamel bond strengths when used with the composite of corresponding viscosity (Tetric Ceram vs. Compoglass F; Tetric Flow vs. Compoglass Flow). LP1, however, resulted in higher enamel bond strengths when combined with Tetric Ceram than when combined with Tetric Flow. When the results were pooled for "viscosity", high-viscosity restorative materials resulted in higher bond strengths than low-viscosity materials at P < or = 0.041. When the data were pooled for "restorative material", compomers resulted in higher bond strengths than composites at P < or = 0.0001.

New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion.

The acid-etch-technique has provided an ideal surface for bonding to enamel by using 30-40% phosphoric acid. The resulting etch pattern is characterized by the profuse formation of microporosities which allow the penetration of monomers into those porosities to form resin tags that provide micromechanical retention. Successful attempts of bonding to dentin in a similar fashion have been reported more recently. Due to the specific properties of dentin, such as its tubular structure and its intrinsic wetness, bonding to dentin has not yet reached the ideal characteristics. In spite of the existing deficiencies in dentin adhesion, the increasing demand for esthetic restorations has generated intensive research on new esthetic materials with special focus on amalgam alternatives. The bonding mechanism of recent dentin bonding agents is based on the penetration of ambiphilic molecules into acid-etched dentin to form a lacework of dentin collagen and polymerized monomers. Dentin adhesive systems that contain a multitude of different bottles of different colors and shapes belong to the past. Because clinicians are increasingly eager to try new materials, the actual tendency calls for simplification of the bonding procedure e.g. one-bottle adhesive systems and all-in-one no-bottle materials. In spite of simpler materials, a separate etching step is still needed for one-bottle systems. Nevertheless, manufacturers of these simplified one-bottle materials recommend their use to bond polyacid-modified composites (compomers) without a separate etching step. The most recent addition to the group of simplified adhesives is the all-in-one no-bottle adhesives; one of these all-in-one systems, Prompt L-Pop (ESPE) has resulted in very promising laboratory results when used on enamel. In spite of the uncertainty about the capacity of all-in-one adhesives to etch enamel adequately in vivo, scanning electron microscopy studies have resulted in an enamel-etching pattern morphologically similar to that corresponding to phosphoric acid-etched enamel. While all-in-one adhesive systems have been reported to result in very satisfactory dentin bond strengths, results from other laboratories suggest that bonding to dentin with all-in-one adhesive systems will need to be somewhat improved. Clinical studies, which are the ultimate test for the acceptance of dentin adhesives, are now underway in several centers. Six-month data showed a very good clinical performance for this ultra-simplified all-in-one adhesive system.

Shear bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives to oil-contaminated enamel.

PURPOSE: To evaluate resin bond strength to enamel contaminated with handpiece oil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bovine teeth were randomly assigned to six groups of 20 teeth each for treatment with one of six different bonding systems (five one-bottle and one multibottle). For each system, 10 enamel specimens were contaminated with handpiece oil before acid-etching and 10 were contaminated after acid-etching. The enamel was etched for 15 seconds using 35% phosphoric acid. Following adhesive application, composite resin was bonded using a gelatin capsule technique. Shear bond strengths from the two contaminated groups were compared to bond strengths to uncontaminated enamel obtained from a previous study that was performed by the same group of investigators, using the same facility, materials, and methods. RESULTS: Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the factor "surface contamination" did not have a significant effect on bond strength (p > .542). The type of adhesive and the interaction of adhesive and surface contamination were significant (p < .0001 and p < .003, respectively). When oil was applied before etching, mean bond strengths ranged from 18.0 +/- 4.8 MPa for OptiBond SOLO (Kerr Corp., Orange, California) to 25.3 +/- 5.6 MPa for Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Den-Mat Corp., Santa Maria, California). With oil applied after etching, bond strengths ranged from 18.4 +/- 8.0 MPa for Tenure Quik with Fluoride to 27.4 +/- 5.4 MPa for Single Bond (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, Minnesota). For the same adhesive, comparing uncontaminated and "oil-before-etch" contaminated groups, the only statistically significant difference in bond strengths was for OptiBond SOLO: 21.8 +/- 4.0 MPa (uncontaminated) versus 18.0 +/- 4.8 MPa (oil before etch). Comparing uncontaminated and "oil-after-etch" groups, the only statistically significant difference was for Tenure: 24.5 +/- 5.7 MPa (uncontaminated) and 18.4 +/- 8.0 MPa (oil after etch).

Effects of different re-wetting techniques on dentin shear bond strengths.

PURPOSE: For contemporary hydrophilic resin adhesive systems, bonding to dentin is improved if the substrate is maintained in a hydrated state following acid-etching. The purpose of this study was to compare the dentin shear bond strengths of two single-bottle adhesives (one acetone-based and one ethanol-based) applied under different etched-dentin conditions: dry, wet, or dry and re-wetted with different solutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bovine incisors (N = 120) were mounted in acrylic, polished to 600-grit, and randomly assigned to 12 groups (n = 10). Dentin was etched for 15 seconds using 35% phosphoric acid, rinsed, and either blot-dried, air-dried, or air-dried and re-wetted with different solutions (distilled water, Gluma Desensitizer, Aqua-Prep, and 5% glutaraldehyde in water). Two adhesives (Single Bond and Prime & Bond NT) were applied to each of the surface conditions following manufacturers' instructions. After adhesive application and curing, composite was applied in a No. 5 gelatin capsule and light-cured. Specimens were loaded in shear, using an Instron at 5 mm per minute. Shear bond strengths were calculated by dividing the failure load by the bonded surface area. Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a post hoc Tukey test. RESULTS: Mean shear bond strengths ranged from 12.5 to 26.6 MPa for Single Bond and from 5.6 to 14.7 MPa for Prime & Bond NT. Significant differences were found in both groups of materials (p < .001). The three highest mean bond strengths were obtained (in order) on dentin that was re-wetted with Gluma Desensitizer, re-wetted with Aqua-Prep, or never dried. Differences between these surface conditions were not statistically significant for either material.