ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Music has served as an auxiliary analgesic in perioperative settings. This study evaluates the impact of intraoperative music added to routine pain control measures during first trimester surgical abortion. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed data from 101 women randomized to undergo abortion with routine pain control measures only (ibuprofen and paracervical block) or with the addition of intraoperative music via headphones. The primary outcome was the change in preoperative and postoperative pain scores on a 100-mm visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes included change in anxiety and vital signs, and satisfaction. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The magnitude of increase in pain scores was greater in the intervention than in the control group (+51.0 mm versus +39.3 mm, p=.045). Overall pain control was rated as good or very good by 70% of the intervention and 75% of the control group (p=.65). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative music added to routine pain control measures increases pain reported during abortion.
Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Obstetrical/methods , Music Therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Perioperative Care/methods , Vacuum Curettage/adverse effects , Abortion, Induced/psychology , Academic Medical Centers , Adolescent , Adult , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Anxiety/prevention & control , Combined Modality Therapy , Family Planning Services , Female , Humans , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , New York City , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Patient Satisfaction , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Vacuum Curettage/psychology , Vital Signs/drug effects , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare intrauterine device (IUD) use at 6 months in women randomized to receive an intrauterine copper contraceptive 1 week compared with 1 month after medical abortion. METHODS: We recruited women undergoing medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol and choosing the copper IUD for contraception. We randomly assigned participants to "immediate" insertion 1 week after mifepristone or "delayed" insertion 4-6 weeks later. We followed rates of IUD insertion, 6-month utilization, expulsion, removal, and pregnancy. Participants recorded bleeding in a diary for 4 weeks. RESULTS: We randomized 156 participants. We inserted an IUD in 97% of participants in the immediate group and 76% in the delayed group (P<.001). At 6 months, 69% of participants in the immediate group used the IUD compared with 60% in the delayed group (P=.24). Expulsion rates were comparable; 12% (8 of 69) in the immediate group compared with 11% (7 of 65) in the delayed group. Removals occurred in 14% (10 of 69) of immediate and 8% (5 of 65) of delayed group participants (P=.21). Four pregnancies occurred in delayed group participants who did not return for IUD insertion (P=.09). The immediate and delayed groups reported a median of 20 and 19 bleeding or spotting days, respectively (P=.15). We detected no cases of serious infection, uterine perforation, or hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: Immediate insertion increased uptake of the IUD without increasing expulsions or bleeding. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, www.clinialtrials.gov, . LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Intrauterine Devices, Copper , Adult , Female , Humans , Intrauterine Device Expulsion , Intrauterine Devices, Copper/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Pain Measurement , Patient Compliance , Postoperative Care , Pregnancy , Time Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the addition of structured contraceptive counseling to usual care on choice, initiation, and continuation of very effective contraception after uterine aspiration. METHODS: We conducted a RCT of a version of the WHO Decision-Making Tool for Family Planning Clients and Providers with women having a procedure for a spontaneous or induced abortion. Our intervention provided structured, standardized counseling. We randomized women to usual care or usual care with structured counseling. Our outcomes included choosing a very effective contraceptive method and 3 months continuation. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of all participants chose a very effective method. Women in the intervention group were no more likely to choose a very effective method (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.44, 1.26) or to initiate their method compared to the usual care group (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.31, 1.34). In multivariate models, structured counseling was not associated with using a very effective method at 3 months (AOR 1.06, 95% CI 0.53, 2.14). CONCLUSION: In this setting, structured counseling had little impact on contraceptive method choice, initiation, or continuation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Adding structured counseling did not increase the proportion choosing or initiating very effective contraception in a practice setting where physicians already provide individualized counseling.