Patients and Families as Partners in Patient-Oriented Research: How Should They Be Compensated?

Patient and family engagement has become a widely accepted approach in health care research. We recognize that research conducted in partnership with people with relevant lived experience can substantially improve the quality of that research and lead to meaningful outcomes. Despite the benefits of patient-researcher collaboration, research teams sometimes face challenges in answering the questions of how patient and family research partners should be compensated, due to the limited guidance and lack of infrastructure for acknowledging partner contributions. In this paper, we present some of the resources that might help teams to navigate conversations about compensation with their patient and family partners and report how existing resources can be leveraged to compensate patient and family partners fairly and appropriately. We also present some of our first-hand experiences with patient and family compensation and offer suggestions for research leaders, agencies, and organizations so that the health care stakeholders can collectively move toward more equitable recognition of patient and family partners in research.

Christy Brown's 'My Left Foot': An insider's insights into growing up with cerebral palsy.

IMPORTANCE: The field of childhood disability has undergone a sea-change in the past two decades. Remarkably, 70 years ago, the ideas now taking root were expressed with poignant clarity by Ireland's Christy Brown, providing lessons that were there to be learned, illustrating why 'My Left Foot' remains a singular contribution to the literature about child development and disability. OBJECTIVE OF THIS ESSAY: The World Health Organization's 2001 reconsideration of 'disability' (the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health or ICF) has spawned considerable uptake and adaptation of contemporary concepts, notably with the 'F-Words for Childhood Disability' (now the 'F-words for Child Development'). Published in 1954, Christy Brown's ground-breaking poetic autobiography 'My Left Foot' resonates today with messages that bring the ICF to life vividly and memorably. REVIEW: The author, a developmental paediatrician, has refracted the themes of 'My Left Foot' through an ICF lens to illustrate that concepts now considered modern have long been in plain sight, but sadly ignored. Christy Brown's first-person narrative animates ideas and messages for all who work in the field of childhood disability. FINDINGS: This essay is a personal reflection that draws together both contemporary 21st century concepts and ideas from the time that Christy Brown was a young author reporting his perspectives and perceptions on living with 'disability'. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The lessons Christy Brown generously shared 70 years ago should be heeded today. In the context of modern thinking and action regarding 'childhood disability', we need an approach to all we do that sees and respects children with 'disabilities' as whole people, that situates them in the context of family and community, that identifies and promotes their strengths and aspirations within both the health professional community and the community at large and enables them to 'become' and to 'belong'.

Being physically active with epilepsy: Insights from young people and their parents.

INTRODUCTION: Researchers have called for innovative tailored interventions to address specific challenges to physical activity (PA) engagement for young people with epilepsy (YPE). Working with YPE and their parents, this study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to adoption and maintenance of PA among YPE prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Ten YPE (all female) and their 13 caregivers, and five additional caregivers to males (N = 18; 72% mothers), completed virtual focus group sessions prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Trained Child Life specialists asked questions about barriers and facilitators of PA engagement experienced by YWE, which included a specific focus on the impact of epilepsy. RESULTS: Thematic analysis of the data identified both epilepsy-specific and generic themes that impact PA participation among YPE. These included: (i) epilepsy experience/impact and accommodation; (ii) safety precautions; (iii) concern about seizures; (iv) social connections and acceptance; (v) parent and family support; (vi) intrapersonal self-regulation and motivation; (vii) health benefits; and (viii) key factors in common with all youth. CONCLUSION: This study provides valuable insight into diverse social-ecological health factors that impact PA participation among YPE from two key stakeholder perspectives (YPE and their caregivers). By understanding these lived experiences, providers can better tailor individual support for YPE and their families to foster and maintain a healthy active lifestyle.

Patient perspectives in pediatric neurology: a critical shift in the paradigm of outcome measurement.

This review explores children's self-reported outcome measurements in pediatric neurology. We examine the following questions: (1) What is meant by patient-reported health, functioning, and quality of life outcomes? (2) How can patients express whether the interventions they receive do more good than harm? (3) Why and how should pediatric neurology patients help determine the outcomes of interest? (4) What tools and recommendations are available to evaluate the outcomes of interest? Applying patients' perspectives across the processes of evaluation of medical interventions has become an important expectation. These developments, consistent with current healthcare goals, coincide with the evolution of pediatric neurology into a sophisticated diagnostic-interventional field that aims to prolong survival, decrease impairments and symptoms, and improve patients' well-being - the recognized essential endpoints of interest in all medicine.

Parenting a Child with a Neurodevelopmental Disorder.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Traditional thinking and focus in 'childhood disability' have been on the child with the impairment - with the imperative to make the right diagnosis and find the right treatments. The implicit if not direct expectation was that interventions should aim to 'fix' the problems. Professionals have led the processes of investigation and management planning, with parents expected to 'comply' with professionals' recommendations. Much less attention has been paid to parents' perspectives or their wellbeing. RECENT FINDINGS: In the past two decades, we have seen a sea change in our conceptualizations of childhood disability. The WHO's framework for health (the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (aka ICF)) and CanChild's 'F-words for Child Development' inform modern thinking and action. We now recognize the family as the unit of interest, with parents' voices an essential element of all aspects of management. The goals of intervention are built around the F-words ideas of function, family, fun, friendships, fitness and future. SUMMARY: There has been world-wide uptake of the F-words concepts, with increasing evidence of the impact of these ideas on parents and professionals alike. There are important implications of these developments on the structure, processes and content of services for children with neurodevelopmental disorders, their families and the services designed to support them.

Let's not go back to 'normal'! lessons from COVID-19 for professionals working in childhood disability.

PURPOSE: The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic has changed almost all aspects of our lives, and the field of childhood disability is no exception. METHODS: This article is based on an invited lecture by the first author at a conference-the eHealth Summit ("Pediatric Rehabilitation in a Digital Space")-organized by the other authors and their colleagues in May 2020. RESULTS: The first author offers his own experiences and perspectives, supplemented by comments and observations contributed by many of the 9000+ attendees at this talk, as curated by the second and third authors. The basic messages are that while life for families of children with developmental disabilities, and for service providers who work with them, is significantly altered, many important lessons are being learned. CONCLUSIONS: The comments from participants support the currency of the ideas that were presented, and encourage childhood disability professionals to reflect on what we are learning, so that we can seize the opportunities they afford to do things differently-and we believe better-moving forward.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONIdeas generated by colleagues and parents suggest that there may be alternatives to "business as usual" in childhood disability services after the COVID pandemic is over.People are recognizing opportunities, and benefits, to offering services virtually, including being able to see children in their natural environments, saving parents time, money and hassles to attend clinics in person, and perhaps increasing the availability of services.Many issues remain to be investigated systematically, including, among others, what services (assessments and interventions) require hands-on connections, what payment structures can accommodate new models of services, how professionals can work together in a virtual world, and what families will want.Regardless of the final answers to these issues, we believe that we should not simply "go back to normal"; rather, we should expand the range, nature and locations of our services for children with developmental disabilities and their families.

Quality of life in adolescents with epilepsy, cerebral palsy, and population norms.

AIM: To compare: (1) self- and proxy-reported quality of life (QoL) in adolescents with epilepsy, cerebral palsy (CP), both epilepsy and CP, and a representative general population sample; and (2) parental stress between parents of adolescents with epilepsy, CP, or both epilepsy and CP. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional observational study with 496 adolescents with epilepsy, 699 with CP, 192 with both CP and epilepsy, and 15 396 from the general population, assessed with the KIDSCREEN-52 and Parenting Stress Index (PSI). RESULTS: All KIDSCREEN-52 domains showed statistically significant differences across groups. The epilepsy population showed clinically better scores for 'school environment' than the general population (Cohen's d=0.62). Parents scored adolescents with CP lower than adolescents with epilepsy or general populations on 'physical health' (d=0.57, d=0.55) and 'social-support and peers' (d=0.82, d=0.91). Parents of adolescents with CP scored them lower than parents of the epilepsy group on 'autonomy' (d=0.62). Parents of adolescents with epilepsy scored them lower on 'mood and emotions' (d=0.52) and 'social acceptance' (d=0.66) than the general population. PSI scores were better for parents of adolescents with CP than for parents of adolescents with epilepsy (d=2.12, d=2.70, d=3.35, d=1.67). INTERPRETATION: Adolescents with epilepsy or CP self-report equal or better QoL than the general adolescent population, which should comfort families and allow clinicians to address parental concerns. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Adolescents with epilepsy, with or without cerebral palsy (CP), self-reported better school environment than adolescents in the general population. Proxy quality of life (QoL) results showed clinically important differences across groups in 6 out of 10 domains of the KIDSCREEN-52. Proxy-reported results showed poorer QoL scores for adolescents with epilepsy or CP than the general population. Parental stress level was lower in parents of children with CP or both CP and epilepsy, than in those with only epilepsy.

Promoting capacities for future adult roles and healthy living using a lifecourse health development approach.

Purposes: First, to describe how young adults with cerebral palsy (CP) experience lifecourse health development, and second, to create key messages for pediatric health service providers to promote children's capacities for future adult roles and healthy adult living.Methods: Interpretive description qualitative design. Participants were a purposive sample of 23 young adults with CP, 25-33 years of age, who varied in functional abilities, education, living, and work situations. Three experienced interviewers conducted 50-60 min interviews. Transcripts were analyzed to identify themes. Subsequently, a one-day meeting was held with an advisory group to inform our interpretive description of key messages.Results: Four themes emerged from the interviews: personal lifecourse, contexts for healthy living, health development through everyday experiences, and healthy living as an adaptive process. Key messages for service providers are: (a) address healthy living across the lifecourse, (b) focus on contexts of healthy living, (c) focus on everyday experiences and experiential learning, and (d) pay attention to the timing of opportunities and experiences.Conclusion: The findings provide first steps toward adoption of an approach to lifecourse health development for individuals with CP that emphasizes physical, mental, and emotional wellbeing and goals for desired social participation over the lifecourse.Implications for rehabilitationYoung adults with cerebral palsy experience lifecourse health development as a personal ongoing and dynamic process occurring in many contexts.Individuals with cerebral palsy continually adjust to changing contexts (adaptive process).Everyday experiences and experiential learning enable individuals with cerebral palsy to develop capacities for current and future healthy living including social participation."Timing" of opportunities and experiences is important for health development.

Parents' attendance, participation and engagement in children's developmental rehabilitation services: Part 1. Contextualizing the journey to child health and happiness.

Purpose: A family-centered approach to developmental rehabilitation services emphasizes that children grow and develop in their family environment, and that parents are an integral part of therapy. The purpose of this study was to develop a theory of how parents attend, participate and engage in their child's developmental rehabilitation services.Methods: A constructivist grounded theory study was conducted. Recruitment was done at a single children's treatment center in Ontario, Canada and data collection included parent and clinician interviews, policy collection and child-health record review. Grounded theory methods of constant comparison and theoretical sampling were applied. Credibility was enhanced through reflexivity, triangulation, and peer debriefing.Results and conclusions: The results show that in order to understand how parents engage in therapy, we must understand the conditions related to family health and service complexity that affect parent engagement. This contextual understanding may increase service providers' sensitivity to the conditions that affect engagement as they join families on their journey towards child health and happiness.Implications for rehabilitationService providers can understand the ease or difficulty that parents may experience in attending, participating and engaging in their child's therapy if they ask about (i) who is a part of the family, (ii) the health of all family members, and (iii) the number of services and professionals that are involved with the familyAsking parents about their own mental health and ensuring they are connected with appropriate resources may help them to attend, participate and engage in their child's rehabilitation service.When families are involved with multiple services and professionals, they may benefit from support with service navigation and a collaborative interprofessional approach to care.

A grounded theory of parents' attendance, participation and engagement in children's developmental rehabilitation services: Part 2. The journey to child health and happiness.

Purpose: Parents' attendance, participation and engagement are thought to be critical components of children's rehabilitation services; however, these elements of therapy are typically under-investigated. The purpose of this study was to develop a substantive theory of parents' attendance, participation and engagement in children's rehabilitation services.Methods: A constructivist grounded theory study was conducted. Data collection included interviews with parents (n = 20) and clinicians (n = 4), policies regarding discharge, and child-health records. Data was analyzed using constant comparison, coding and memoing. To promote credibility, authors engaged in reflexivity, peer debriefing, member checking, triangulation and recorded an audit trail.Results and conclusions: The Phoenix Theory of Attendance, Participation and Engagement was developed. This theory is described metaphorically as a journey to child health and happiness that has six components including: parent's feelings, skills, knowledge, logistics, values and beliefs and parent's relationship with the professional. The child, parent, service provider, and organizational factors that impact engagement are described. Service providers, policy makers, organizational leaders and researchers can use this information to promote engagement in children's developmental rehabilitation services.

Mobility and self-care trajectories for individuals with cerebral palsy (aged 1-21 years): a joint longitudinal analysis of cohort data from the Netherlands and Canada.

BACKGROUND: A good understanding of developmental trajectories is crucial for making prognoses, planning interventions, and monitoring progress in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Our study aimed to describe developmental trajectories of mobility and self-care capability in a large sample of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy from the Netherlands and Canada. METHODS: We did longitudinal data analyses of cohorts from the Netherlands (Pediatric Rehabilitation Research in the Netherlands; PERRIN) and Ontario, Canada (Adolescent Study of Quality of Life, Mobility, and Exercise; ASQME). All participants had a confirmed diagnosis of cerebral palsy and ranged in age from 1 year to 17 years at baseline, and were recruited from rehabilitation centres and university medical centres. Individuals diagnosed with additional conditions affecting motor function other than cerebral palsy (eg, spina bifida or muscle diseases) were excluded. After baseline assessment, up to three follow-up assessments were done at 1 year intervals. The whole spectrum of severity of cerebral palsy was represented in terms of motor function, using the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). Mobility and self-care capability were assessed with the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). We applied non-linear mixed-effects modelling to estimate limits, rates, and variations of development. FINDINGS: For both projects, recruitment took place between 2002 and 2007. The combined dataset included 551 individuals with cerebral palsy (321 individuals from the PERRIN programme and 230 from ASQME), aged 1 year to 17 years at baseline, with longitudinal data available for up to 4 years. On the basis of a total of 1754 PEDI observations, we created developmental curves for ages 1-21 years. Both for mobility and self-care, limits and rates of development differed among individuals across GMFCS levels, resulting in distinct curves. For individuals classified as being in GMFCS level I, the estimated mean limit for mobility and self-care were both higher than 90 (95·6, 95% CI 94·5-96·7 for mobility and 91·8, 90·1-93·4 for self-care), indicating capability for most if not all items on the PEDI. By comparison, the estimated mean limits for children in levels II-V varied from 83·0 (80·3-85·7) to 23·6 (20·7-26·4), with increasing limitations in mobility and self-care capability for higher GMFCS levels. Individuals with lower GMFCS levels (ie, less severe cerebral palsy) showed higher developmental limits that were reached during a longer period of development. However, among individuals within the same GMFCS level, we found substantial interindividual variation in development for mobility, and even more so for self-care. INTERPRETATION: Prognosis for mobility and self-care capability can largely be based on developmental trajectories for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy grouped by GMFCS level. The interindividual variation in development within GMFCS levels indicates that, in addition to GMFCS level, other contextual factors need to be considered when discussing prognosis and management. Using the curves for individuals with cerebral palsy aged 1 year to 21 years, we illustrate how this new knowledge can be applied in paediatric practice. FUNDING: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Can behavioral strategies increase physical activity and influence depressive symptoms and quality of life among children with epilepsy? Results of a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: This study examined whether increasing physical activity (PA) through 6 months of behavioral counseling positively influenced depressive symptoms and quality of life (QoL) over 12 months among children with epilepsy (CWE). METHODS: A longitudinal multisite randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted with 8-14-year-old children with active epilepsy. Participants wore a pedometer to track daily PA and completed 3 measures at 4 time points to examine depressive symptoms and QoL. Stratified by site and activity level, participants were randomized to an intervention or control group. The 6-month intervention included 11 behavioral counseling sessions targeting self-regulation of PA. To assess the associations among PA, depression scores, and QoL, primary analysis involved mixed-effects models. RESULTS: We recruited 122 CWE, of whom 115 were randomized (Mage = 11 ±â€¯2; 50% female) and included in the analysis. The intervention did not increase PA in the treatment compared with the control group. No differences were found between groups over time during the subsequent 6 months, where PA decreased among all participants. Results did not show differences between the groups and over time for measures of depressive symptoms and QoL. SIGNIFICANCE: The intervention did not improve or sustain PA levels over 12 months. Both groups demonstrated declines in PA over one year, but there were no changes in depression scores or QoL. As most participants were already nearly reaching the Canadian average of step counts of children their age, with a baseline daily step count of over 9000, there may be a challenge for further increasing PA over a longer period.

Changes in Caregiver Health in the Years Surrounding the Birth of a Child With Health Problems: Administrative Data From British Columbia.

BACKGROUND: Caregivers of children with health problems (CHPs; usually mothers) experience more physical and psychological health problems than those of children without health problems (non-CHPs). Primarily cross-sectional and survey-driven, this literature has not yet explored whether these health differences existed before the birth of the CHPs, or are exacerbated postbirth. METHODS: Using linked administrative health data on all mother-child dyads for children born in the year 2000 in British Columbia, Canada, we examined maternal health before, during, and after the birth of CHPs, and compared it between mothers of CHPs and non-CHPs with piecewise growth curve modeling. RESULTS: Compared with mothers of non-CHPs, mothers of CHPs had more physician visits (8.09 vs. 11.07), more medication types (1.81 vs. 2.60), and were more likely to be diagnosed with selected health conditions (30.9% vs. 42.5%) 4 years before the birth of the child. Over the 7-year postbirth period, the health of the 2 groups of mothers further diverged: while mothers of CHPs showed increases on physician visits and types of medication, mothers of non-CHPs did not experience any changes in physician visits and had less steep increases for types of medication. CONCLUSIONS: Health issues associated with having a child with a health problem may begin well before the birth of the child, but also appear to be exacerbated postbirth. The health challenges of caregivers of CHPs may be multifactorial, involving both preexisting conditions and the stresses associated with caring for a child with health problems.

Using Canadian administrative health data to examine the health of caregivers of children with and without health problems: A demonstration of feasibility.

INTRODUCTION: Caregivers of children with health problems experience poorer health than the caregivers of healthy children. To date, population-based studies on this issue have primarily used survey data. OBJECTIVES: We demonstrate that administrative health data may be used to study these issues, and explore how non-categorical indicators of child health in administrative data can enable population-level study of caregiver health. METHODS: Dyads from Population Data British Columbia (BC) databases, encompassing nearly all mothers in BC with children aged 6-10 years in 2006, were grouped using a non-categorical definition based on diagnoses and service use. Regression models examined whether four maternal health outcomes varied according to indicators of child health. RESULTS: 162,847 mother-child dyads were grouped according to the following indicators: Child High Service Use (18%) vs. Not (82%), Diagnosis of Major and/or Chronic Condition (12%) vs. Not (88%), and Both High Service Use and Diagnosis (5%) vs. Neither (75%). For all maternal health and service use outcomes (number of physician visits, chronic condition, mood or anxiety disorder, hospitalization), differences were demonstrated by child health indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Mothers of children with health problems had poorer health themselves, as indicated by administrative data groupings. This work not only demonstrates the research potential of using routinely collected health administrative data to study caregiver and child health, but also the importance of addressing maternal health when treating children with health problems.

Patient-reported quality of life and biopsychosocial health outcomes in pediatric epilepsy: An update for healthcare providers.

In the 21st century, clinicians are expected to listen to, and understand their patients' views about, their conditions and the effects that these conditions have on their functioning, values, life goals, and welfare. The goals of this review are as follows: (i) to inform, update, and guide clinicians caring for children with epilepsy about developments in the content and new methods of research on patient-reported outcomes, quality of life, and functioning; and (ii) to discuss the value of using these concepts to explore the impact of diverse interventions that are implemented in daily practice. Drawing on the literature and our program of research over the past two decades, we focus on our current understanding of a variety of health concepts and recently acquired knowledge about their significance for the lives of patients and their families. We discuss the advantages of measuring patient-reported outcomes that tell us what is important to patients. We advise on what characteristics to look for when choosing a patient-reported measure, and the relevance of these considerations. In addition, we address gaps in research knowledge and the causes of confusion that have limited their use in our daily clinical practice.

Child- and parent-reported quality of life trajectories in children with epilepsy: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the developmental trajectories of quality of life (QoL) in a large cohort of children with epilepsy, and to assess the relative contribution of clinical, psychosocial, and sociodemographic variables on QoL trajectories. METHODS: Five assessments during a 28-month prospective cohort study were used to model trajectories of QoL. Participants were recruited with their parents from six Canadian tertiary centers. A convenience sample of 506 children aged 8-14 years with epilepsy and without intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorder were enrolled. A total of 894 children were eligible and 330 refused participation. Participating children were, on average, 11.4 years of age, and 49% were female. Nearly one third (32%) had partial seizures. At baseline, 479 and 503 child- and parent-reported questionnaires were completed. In total, 354 children (74%) and 366 parents (73%) completed the 28-month follow-up. QoL was measured using the child- and parent-reported version of the Childhood Epilepsy QoL scale (CHEQOL-25). RESULTS: Child-reported QoL was fitted best by a six-class model and parent-reported QoL by a five-class model. In both models, trajectories remained either stable or improved over 28 months. Of these children, 62% rated their QoL as high or moderately high, defined as at least one standard deviation above the average CHEQOL-25 score. Greater family, classmate, and peer social support, fewer symptoms of child and parent depression, and higher receptive vocabulary were identified as the most robust predictors of better QoL (all p < 0.001). SIGNIFICANCE: Most children with epilepsy and their parents reported relatively good QoL in this first joint self- and proxy-reported trajectory study. Findings confirm the heterogeneous QoL outcomes for children with epilepsy and the primary importance of psychosocial factors rather than seizure and AED-specific factors in influencing QoL. These predictors that are potentially amenable to change should now be the focus of specific intervention studies.

Reflections on Ethics and Humanity in Pediatric Neurology: the Value of Recognizing Ethical Issues in Common Clinical Practice.

Our goals in this reflection are to (i) identify the ethical dimensions inherent in any clinical encounter and (ii) bring to the forefront of our pediatric neurology practice the myriad of opportunities to explore and learn from these ethical questions. We highlight specifically Beauchamp and Childress's principles of biomedical ethics. We use the terms ethics in common clinical practice and an ethical lens to remind people of the ubiquity of ethical situations and the usefulness of using existing ethical principles to analyze and resolve difficult situations in clinical practice. We start with a few common situations with which many of us tend to struggle. We describe what we understand as ethics and how and why developments in technology, novel potential interventions, policies, and societal perspectives challenge us to think about and debate ethical issues. Individual patients are not a singular population; each patient has their own unique life situations, culture, goals, and expectations that need to be considered with a good dose of humanity and humility. We believe that using an ethical lens-by which we mean making an explicit effort to identify and consider these issues openly-will help us to achieve this goal in practice, education, and research.