ABSTRACT
AIMS: Literature data show that one third of patients discontinue antidepressant therapy within the first month of treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether paroxetine liquid solution 10 mg/ml may influence adherence inpatients receiving long-term treatment. METHODS: 71 subjects affected by mood disorders or panic disorder were monitored for six months. The study sample was divided into two groups: controls (n=33) maintained their own therapy with paroxetine tablets; 38 patients maintained the same dosage of paroxetine, but shifted to liquid formulation 10 mg/ml. Compliance and general wellness were evaluated with the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire (WhoQol). Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA). RESULTS: Significant differences were found in MARS scores: patients on oral solution 10 mg/ml showed an improvement of compliance month by month. In addition, age, formulation and quality of life had a significant impacton patient compliance. Significant correlations were found between MARS and quality of life. A specific paroxetine formulation could be a variable able to influence adherence to psychopharmacological treatment. The same consideration can be made for quality of life, sex and age that showed a trend towards improved adherence when compared with controls. Inparticular, the WhoQol subscale analysis of delta scores showed a significant difference in self-perception of quality of life inpatients treated with paroxetine either in tablet or drop formulation. DISCUSSION: Formulation in drops 10 mg/ml is equally effective to tablets, but it may allow patients having a higher cognition and control on drug assumption.
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/administration & dosage , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Mood Disorders/drug therapy , Paroxetine/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pharmaceutical Solutions , Tablets , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is an effective technique in the treatment of depression, specifically in drug-resistant patients. However, there is little data available on the influence of genetic variables on TMS response. METHODS: We analyzed the role of three genetic polymorphisms that affected the antidepressant response: serotonin transporter promoter region (SERTPR) polymorphism, 5-HT(1A) serotonergic receptor promoter region polymorphism (rs6295), and the coding region of COMT gene polymorphism (rs4680). Ninety patients with a major depressive drug-resistant episode due to a Major Depressive Disorder or to a Bipolar Disorder were included in our study. Patients underwent high frequency TMS, focused on the left prefrontal cortex, for 2 weeks. At study completion, the response rate was 45.5%. Effects of gene polymorphisms on clinical improvement were analyzed with an analysis of variance with each gene (SERTPR, 5-HT(1A) , and COMT) as factors and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression variation from baseline to the end of the treatment as a dependent variable. RESULTS: We found a significant model in which three factors were not significant (diagnosis, COMT, and SERTPR), whereas factor 5-HT(1A) showed a significant influence on the outcome, with patients with C/C genotype showing a greater improvement than G/G and C/G and no difference between G/G and C/G. CONCLUSION: According to our data, 5-HT(1A) polymorphism may play a role in influencing TMS response. The effect of COMT and SERTPR did not reach statistical significance. The analysis of these and other candidate genes in larger samples could help explain genetic influence on TMS response.
Subject(s)
Alleles , Bipolar Disorder/genetics , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Catechol O-Methyltransferase/genetics , Depressive Disorder, Major/genetics , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Polymorphism, Genetic/genetics , Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT1/genetics , Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Adult , Aged , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Open Reading Frames/genetics , Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Psychometrics , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The 5-HT2A receptor is a key modulator of the serotonin pathway. We previously observed a marginal association between 5-HT2A gene variants and antidepressant efficacy in Japanese and Italian population but in the opposite direction. In the present report, we hypothesize that discrepant findings on 5-HT2A gene variants could be due to both the effect of ethnicity and a possible specific effect on some symptom improvement. The sample comprised 203 patients affected by mood disorders and treated for major depression with paroxetine or fluvoxamine. The total depressive scores for all patients were analyzed in previous reports, but symptomatologic clusters were not examined previously. The 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) was administered to evaluate depressive symptoms at baseline and bi-weekly over 6 weeks of treatment. All patients were genotyped for the 5-HT2A T102C polymorphism. Compared with patients with the 5-HT2A T and C variants, in the Japanese sample T allele carriers showed selective and slower score reductions than C allele carriers in delusion and activity symptoms; on the other hand, in the Italian sample, C allele carriers showed a slower and selective score reduction compared with T allele carriers in Somatic anxiety, while they did not differ from other patients on the other scores. Despite the limitations of the small sample size and modest significance levels, these findings suggest that response to SSRIs is not a unitary phenomenon and discrepant findings across ethnic groups may be due to differential effects of gene variants.
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/genetics , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/genetics , White People/genetics , Adult , Asian People/genetics , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Female , Fluvoxamine/pharmacology , Fluvoxamine/therapeutic use , Gene Frequency , Genetic Variation , Genotype , Humans , Italy/ethnology , Male , Middle Aged , Paroxetine/pharmacology , Paroxetine/therapeutic use , Pharmacogenetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A/drug effects , Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A/genetics , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/metabolism , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
This review summarizes a scientific dialogue between representatives in non-pharmacological treatment options of affective disorders. Among the recently introduced somatic treatments for depression those with most evidenced efficacy will be discussed. The first part of this article presents current opinions about the clinical applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression. The second part explains the most relevant uses of chronobiology in mood disorders, while the last part deals with the main perspectives on brain imaging techniques in psychiatry. The aim was to bridge gaps between the research evidence and clinical decisions, and reach an agreement on several key points of chronobiological and brain stimulation techniques, as well as on relevant objectives for future research.
Subject(s)
Brain/pathology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Psychiatry/methods , Psychiatry/trends , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Diagnostic Imaging , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Mental Disorders/pathology , Mental Disorders/physiopathology , Mood Disorders/psychology , Periodicity , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonABSTRACT
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been extensively studied as a treatment for Major Depression. However, no data are available about the role of genetic variables on the response to this treatment. We analysed the role of two polymorphisms that influence the response to antidepressants: the polymorphisms of the serotonin transporter promoter region (SERTPR) and of the 5-HT(1A) serotonergic receptor promoter region (-1019C/G). Ninety-nine patients from two double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled TMS trials were enrolled. There was a significant influence (p=0.016) of the SERTPR polymorphism on treatment outcome, without differences between active and sham stimulation. Conversely, there was a significant (p=0.014) interaction between 5-HT(1A) genotype and type of stimulation: C/C patients showed a higher difference between active and sham stimulation, indicating that these patients benefited more by TMS than C/G and G/G subjects. Our sample has not the power to control for the possible influence of different medications on these results.
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depression/genetics , Depression/therapy , Polymorphism, Genetic , Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1A/genetics , Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Adult , Aged , Chi-Square Distribution , DNA Mutational Analysis , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
It is often stated that depressive phenomenology and prognosis differ between elderly and younger depressed patients, in the direction of more severe symptoms and a poorer outcome in elderly individuals. However, studies addressing the topic remain largely inconclusive, and it has been suggested that potential biases connected with age may have confounded previous assessments. In this work we evaluated a sample of 93 elderly depressed individuals (>60 years) and 186 younger patients. All patients were assessed with the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at intake and prospectively followed for 6 weeks during treatment with antidepressants. A number of clinical and demographic features were taken into account to investigate depressive phenomenology and outcome in late-life depression. We found that the high likelihood of medical disorders in elderly patients explained the more severe depressive symptomatology observed in this population. However, independently from physical problems, recovery was slightly slower in elderly compared with younger individuals. Finally, patients who developed their first lifetime episode late in life (>60 years) showed a form of symptomatology similar to that in elderly patients with an earlier onset, but they showed a more positive outcome. In conclusion, the present work suggests that depression in old age is similar to depression in other ages, except for a slightly slower response to pharmacotherapy. Minor health problems increase the severity of depression, but they do not interfere crucially with the efficacy of antidepressant treatment. Finally, late-onset depression is associated with a positive outcome.
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Cyclohexanols/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Female , Fluvoxamine/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Paroxetine/therapeutic use , Personality Inventory , Sertraline/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Venlafaxine HydrochlorideABSTRACT
Depressive symptoms have a large impact on cognitive test performance of mood disorder patients. After remission, some improvement of cognitive functioning has been observed, but also stable deficits have been reported both during depression and remission. In the present study, the authors aimed to investigate the cognitive functioning of mood disorder patients in relation to early symptomatic recovery, by comparing performances at the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) of responders and non-responders to the antidepressant treatment. The sample was composed of 51 hospitalized patients for a major depressive episode (major depressives/bipolars = 37/14). All patients were treated with fluvoxamine and evaluated at baseline and after 4 weeks using the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. All subjects were once assessed for their cognitive functioning with the WAIS-R, at the end of the fourth week of treatment. In the current sample, patients who showed a significant symptomatic remission after 4 weeks of treatment showed higher total WAIS-R scores and a lower incidence of cognitive impairment, compared to non-responders to treatment. No major differences could be observed on any particular subtest, but rather a global improving of scores in responders compared to non-responders to pharmacotherapy. Pre-treatment illness severity, that was significantly higher among non-responders, was significantly associated with patients' intelligence quotient scores. Despite a number of limitations, present data support a strong effect of depressive symptoms on patients WAIS-R performances and an early global improvement of cognitive functioning concurrent with symptomathology recovery during pharmacological treatment.
Subject(s)
Cognition/physiology , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Mood Disorders/drug therapy , Mood Disorders/psychology , Adult , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Pilot Projects , Psychomotor Performance , Sex Characteristics , Verbal Behavior , Wechsler ScalesABSTRACT
This 5-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated the efficacy and tolerability of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) directed to the left prefrontal cortex in drug-resistant depressed patients. Fifty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive 10 daily applications of either real or sham rTMS. Subjects assigned to receive active stimulation were divided into two further subgroups according to the intensity of stimulation: 80% vs. 100% of motor threshold (MT). At study completion, the response rates were 61.1% (n=11), 27.8% (n=5) and 6.2% (n=1) for the 100% MT group, 80% MT group and sham group, respectively. A significant difference (Pearson chi(2) test) was found between the 100% MT and sham groups, while the 80% MT group did not differ significantly from the sham group. Between the two active groups, a marginally significant difference was observed. Analysis of variance with repeated measures on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores revealed a significantly different decrease over time of depressive symptomatology among the three treatment groups. Treatment response appeared to be unrelated to the demographic and clinical characteristics recorded, and on the whole the technique was well tolerated. The results of this double-blind trial showed that rTMS may be a useful and safe adjunctive treatment for drug-resistant depressed patients.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Dominance, Cerebral/physiology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Adult , Aged , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major/physiopathology , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Resistance , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data , Prefrontal Cortex/physiopathology , Psychometrics , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Major depression is a common psychiatric disorder in the elderly population. The efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants is well established, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors appear to have a similar effectiveness along with advantages in terms of tolerability and safety. Given the lack of literature data regarding fluvoxamine in the treatment of depressed elderly patients, the aim of the present study was to compare its efficacy and tolerability with those of sertraline in a sample of elderly patients. METHODS: Under double-blind conditions, 93 hospitalized patients older than 59 years, who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for a major depressive episode, were randomly assigned to receive sertraline (150 mg daily) or fluvoxamine (200 mg daily) for 7 weeks. The clinical response was defined as a reduction on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score to 8 or below. RESULTS: At study completion, the response rates were 55.6% (25/45) and 71.8% (28/39) for sertraline and fluvoxamine, respectively. No significant difference in final response rates was found between the 2 treatment groups (P = 0.12). A repeated-measures analysis of variance on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores revealed a significantly different decrease of depressive symptoms between the 2 treatment groups, favoring fluvoxamine (P = 0.007). The overall safety profile of sertraline and fluvoxamine was favorable with no differences between the 2 drugs. CONCLUSION: The results of this double-blind trial show that sertraline and fluvoxamine may be effective compounds in the treatment of elderly depression with the latter showing some advantage in terms of speed of response. These findings warrant further replication in placebo-controlled studies.
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Fluvoxamine/therapeutic use , Sertraline/therapeutic use , Aged , Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/adverse effects , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Sertraline/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been mainly studied as adjunctive treatment for drug-resistant patients. We assessed the effectiveness of rTMS started concomitantly with antidepressant medications in non-drug-resistant major depressive disorder patients. We also evaluated if, among the 3 antidepressants administered, one had a better synergy with rTMS. METHOD: In this 5-week, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study, we recruited 99 inpatients suffering from a major depressive episode (DSM-IV criteria). They were randomly assigned to receive venlafaxine, sertraline, or escitalopram in combination with a 2-week period of sham or active 15-Hz rTMS on the left dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex. Data were gathered from February 2004 to June 2005. RESULTS: The active rTMS group showed a significantly faster reduction in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) scores compared with the sham group (p = .0029). The response and remission rates were significantly greater in the active rTMS group after the stimulation period (p = .002 and p = .003, respectively), but not at the endpoint. We found no significant difference in HAM-D score reduction among the 3 drugs administered, either in the active or in the sham group. CONCLUSION: These findings support the efficacy of rTMS in hastening the response to antidepressant drugs in patients with major depressive disorder. The effect of rTMS seems to be unaffected by the specific concomitantly administered drug.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Adult , Citalopram/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy , Cyclohexanols/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Placebos , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Sertraline/therapeutic use , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Venlafaxine HydrochlorideABSTRACT
We reported an independent association of the short variant of the serotonin transporter gene-linked polymorphic region (SERTPR) and tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH) genes with antidepressant response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). The aim of the present study was to confirm the effect of the SERTPR and TPH gene variants on the SSRIs antidepressant activity in a new sample of major and bipolar depressives. Two hundred and twenty one inpatients (major depressives = 128, bipolar disorder = 93) were treated with SSRIs (fluvoxamine or paroxetine) for 6 weeks; the severity of depressive symptoms was weekly assessed with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD). SERTPR and TPH variants were determined using PCR-based techniques, 220 subjects genotyped for SERTPR and 221 for TPH that were never included in previous studies. SERTPR*s/s variant association with a poor response to SSRI treatment was confirmed, even if with less significant P values (P = 0.034), independently from clinical variables; pooling the present sample with previous ones we observed a highly significant effect (P < 0.000001). TPH*A/A variants showed higher HAMD scores throughout the trial but with only a trend in the same direction of our previous study in terms of a worse response of A/A genotypes. Thus, the previous positive association was not fully replicated for TPH. The present independent replication confirms SERTPR variants as a liability factor for antidepressant efficacy while the TPH effect is not unequivocal.
Subject(s)
Membrane Glycoproteins/genetics , Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Mood Disorders/genetics , Nerve Tissue Proteins/genetics , Polymorphism, Genetic , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Tryptophan Hydroxylase/genetics , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Chi-Square Distribution , DNA/genetics , DNA/isolation & purification , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Fluvoxamine/therapeutic use , Gene Frequency , Genotype , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mood Disorders/drug therapy , Paroxetine/therapeutic use , Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The present study investigated possible genetic association between some polymorphisms possibly involved in antidepressant response and the occurrence of manic or hypo-manic switches during antidepressant treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 169 individuals with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder (BP) type I ( n=103) and II ( n=66), who presented at least one sudden manic or hypo-manic episode (according to DSM IV criteria) during antidepressant therapy, that occurred within a period of 3 weeks from the beginning of the treatment and without any interposed period of well being ("manic switch"). They were compared with a sex, age, and ethnicity-matched group of 247 subjects, randomly selected from our pool of bipolar subjects, who never showed switches. We then randomly selected from the whole sample ("switched" and "not switched") a sub-sample of patients not under mood stabiliser treatment at the time of the index episode (65 "switched" and 117 "not switched") and compared them with a sex, age and ethnicity matched group of 133 subjects, randomly selected from our pool of major depressed patients, who did not present manic switches. The functional polymorphism in the upstream regulatory region of the serotonin transporter (SERTPR), tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH), G-protein beta 3 subunit (Gbeta3), monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A), catechol- O-methyltransferase (COMT), serotonin receptor 2A (5-HT2A), dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) and dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene variants were analysed using PCR-based techniques. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of the genetic polymorphisms was not significantly different between switched and not-switched patients ( P>0.006-Bonferroni corrected). Moreover, no significant difference was found between switched and not switched sub-samples and the sample of major depressed subjects. Further studies are required to investigate other possible related genetic variants influencing the timing of manic-depressive cycle.
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Bipolar Disorder/genetics , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/chemically induced , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Case-Control Studies , Catechol O-Methyltransferase/genetics , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Heterotrimeric GTP-Binding Proteins/genetics , Humans , Male , Membrane Glycoproteins/genetics , Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Middle Aged , Nerve Tissue Proteins/genetics , Polymorphism, Genetic , RNA, Messenger/biosynthesis , Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A/genetics , Receptors, Dopamine D2/genetics , Receptors, Dopamine D4 , Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins , Tryptophan Hydroxylase/geneticsABSTRACT
Although it is well established that the diagnosis and treatment of depression in the elderly are major health care problems, the relative efficacy of antidepressant treatment in the elderly compared with younger adults has not been definitively established. In this study, we analyzed antidepressant response in 528 nondemented consecutive inpatients affected by a major depressive episode. The sample was divided based on a cut-off of 60 years (< or = 60 n = 354; mean age 46.6 +/- 10.4 years; > 60 n = 174; mean age 66.1 +/- 4.2 years); all the patients were treated with fluvoxamine for at least 6 weeks and they were assessed weekly by using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Fluvoxamine proved to be effective in our elderly sample, even if antidepressant response was lower in the elderly compared with that of younger subjects (chi2 = 6.27, P = 0.01). Moreover, when compared with younger subjects, the older ones showed significantly slower reduction of depressive symptoms (P = 0.0006). This difference between the 2 age groups was evident since the 2nd week of treatment, and it appeared to be independent of other clinical variables.
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Fluvoxamine/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychological Tests , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The present study investigated possible clinical differences between bipolar patients with and without manic or hypomanic switch during antidepressant (AD) treatment. The authors undertook a retrospective assessment of 169 individuals affected by bipolar disorder type I (BP I: n=96) and II (BP II: n=73) who experienced at least one manic or hypomanic episode following depression without any interposed normothymic period ("manic switch") during AD therapy. They were compared with a sex, age (+/-5 years), and ethnicity-matched group of 247 subjects, randomly selected from our pool of bipolar subjects who have never had manic switches. Only 2 of the 169 patients had had spontaneous switches before the AD-related one. Switched subjects were marginally older (t=-2.65, df=414, P=.008) compared to not switched and less frequently delusional (chi2=13.86, P=.0002). Polarity of the onset episode was more frequently depressive in switched patients (chi2=21.93, P=.00002), which had also less previous manic episodes than not switched (t=3.44, df=332, P=.0006). Those differences were more pronounced in the BP I subsample. Switched patients were more frequently BP I (chi2=29.66; P<.00001). Maintenance with mood stabilizers appears to be a strong protective factor; in fact, of the 124 individuals undertaking a mood stabilizer therapy, 21 had a switch and 103 had no switches (chi2=41.10, P<.000001). In conclusion, some clinical variables, such as the number of manic episodes, the presence of delusions, the polarity of onset episode, and the mood-stabilizing treatment, may be involved in AD-related switches. Further studies are required to investigate the causal relationships between those factors.
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Chi-Square Distribution , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cyclothymic Disorder/drug therapy , Cyclothymic Disorder/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds RatioABSTRACT
The aim of the present study was to test a possible effect of the G-protein beta3-subunit (Gbeta3) C825T gene variant on the antidepressant activity of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in a sample of major and bipolar depressives, with or without psychotic features. Four hundred and ninety inpatients were treated with fluvoxamine 300 mg/day (n=362) or paroxetine 40 mg/day (n=128) and either placebo or pindolol in a double-blind design for 6 weeks. The severity of depressive symptoms was weekly assessed with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Gbeta3 allelic variants were determined in each subject using a PCR-based technique. Subjects with Gbeta3 T/T variants showed better response to treatment (P=0.009) and this effect was independent from analyzed demographic and clinical variables. These results confirm preliminary reports and shed further light on the genetics of the response to antidepressant treatments.
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder/genetics , Genetic Variation/physiology , Heterotrimeric GTP-Binding Proteins/physiology , Protein Subunits/physiology , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Female , Genetic Variation/drug effects , Heterotrimeric GTP-Binding Proteins/genetics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polymorphism, Genetic/genetics , Protein Subunits/genetics , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacologyABSTRACT
The aim of the present study was to test a possible effect of the monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) and serotonin receptor 2A (5-HT-2A) gene variants on the antidepressant activity of fluvoxamine and paroxetine in a sample of major (n = 248) and bipolar (n = 195) depressives, with or without psychotic features. A total of 443 in-patients were treated with 300 mg fluvoxamine (n = 307) or 20-40 mg paroxetine (n = 136) for 6 wk. The severity of depressive symptoms was assessed weekly with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD). Allele variants were determined in each subject using a PCR-based technique. We observed a marginal association between 5-HT-2A variants and antidepressant response while MAOA genotypes were not associated. Possible stratification factors, such as sex, diagnosis, presence of psychotic features, HAMD scores at baseline, pindolol augmentation and SSRIs plasma levels did not significantly influence the observed results. The investigated MAOA and 5-HT-2A gene variants, therefore, do not seem to play a major role in SSRI antidepressant activity.