QRS-T angle: is it a specific parameter associated with sudden cardiac death in type 2 diabetes? Results from the SURDIAGENE and the Mini-Finland prospective cohorts.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Type 2 diabetes is associated with a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD), but the risk of dying from another cause (non-SCD) is proportionally even higher. The aim of the study was to identify easily available ECG-derived features associated with SCD, while considering the competing risk of dying from non-SCD causes. METHODS: In the SURDIAGENE (Survie, Diabete de type 2 et Genetique) French prospective cohort of individuals with type 2 diabetes, 15 baseline ECG parameters were interpreted among 1362 participants (mean age 65 years; HbA1c 62±17 mmol/mol [7.8±1.5%]; 58% male). Competing risk models assessed the prognostic value of clinical and ECG parameters for SCD after adjusting for age, sex, history of myocardial infarction, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), HbA1c and eGFR. The prospective Mini-Finland cohort study was used to externally validate our findings. RESULTS: During median follow-up of 7.4 years, 494 deaths occurred including 94 SCDs. After adjustment, frontal QRS-T angle ≥90° (sub-distribution HR [sHR] 1.68 [95% CI 1.04, 2.69], p=0.032) and NT-proBNP level (sHR 1.26 [95% CI 1.06, 1.50] per 1 log, p=0.009) were significantly associated with a higher risk of SCD. Nevertheless, frontal QRS-T angle was the only marker not to be associated with causes of death other than SCD (sHR 1.08 [95% CI 0.84, 1.39], p=0.553 ). These findings were replicated in the Mini-Finland study subset of participants with diabetes (sHR 2.22 [95% CI 1.05, 4.71], p=0.04 for SCD and no association for other causes of death). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: QRS-T angle was specifically associated with SCD risk and not with other causes of death, opening an avenue for refining SCD risk stratification in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Impact of peri-procedural management of direct oral anticoagulants on pocket haematoma after cardiac electronic device implantation: the StimAOD multicentre prospective study.

AIMS: The study aims to investigate the impact of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) management on the incidence of pocket haematoma in patients undergoing pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive patients receiving DOAC and undergoing cardiac electronic device implantation were included in a large multicentre prospective observational study (NCT03879473). The primary endpoint was clinically relevant haematoma within 30 days after implantation. Overall, 789 patients were enrolled [median age 80 (IQR 72-85) years old, 36.4% women, median CHA2DS2-VASc score 4 (IQR 0-8)], of which 632 (80.1%) received a pacemaker implantation. Antiplatelet therapy was combined with DOAC in 146 patients (18.5%). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were interrupted 52 (IQR 37-62) h before the procedure and resumed 31 (IQR 21-47) h later. Ninety-six percent of the patients had at least 12 h DOAC interruption before the procedure, and 78% had at least 12 h DOAC interruption after the procedure. Overall, anticoagulation was interrupted for 72 (IQR 48-96) h. Pre- or post-procedural heparin bridging was used in 8.2% and 3.9%, respectively. Timing of DOAC interruption of resumption was not associated with clinically relevant haematoma. Clinically relevant haematoma occurred in 26 patients (3.3%), and thromboembolic events occurred in 5 patients (0.6%). CONCLUSION: In this large real-life registry where most patients had DOAC interruption, clinically relevant haematoma was rare. Despite DOAC interruption and high CHA2DS2-VASc score, thromboembolic events occurred seldomly, highlighting that bleeding exceeds thromboembolic risk in this peri-procedural period. Future research is needed to identify risk factors for clinically relevant haematoma and meaningfully guide clinicians in optimizing DOAC management.

Prevalence and risk factors of cardiac thrombus prior to ventricular tachycardia catheter ablation in structural heart disease.

AIMS: Assess prevalence, risk factors, and management of patients with intra-cardiac thrombus referred for scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive VT ablation referrals between January 2015 and December 2019 were reviewed (n = 618). Patients referred for de novo, scar-related VT ablation who underwent pre-procedure cardiac computed tomography (cCT) were included. We included 401 patients [61 ± 14 years; 364 male; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 40 ± 13%]; 45 patients (11%) had cardiac thrombi on cCT at 49 sites [29 LV; eight left atrial appendage (LAA); eight right ventricle (RV); four right atrial appendage]. Nine patients had pulmonary emboli. Overall predictors of cardiac thrombus included LV aneurysm [odds ratio (OR): 6.6, 95%, confidence interval (CI): 3.1-14.3], LVEF < 40% (OR: 3.3, CI: 1.5-7.3), altered RV ejection fraction (OR: 2.3, CI: 1.1-4.6), and electrical storm (OR: 2.9, CI: 1.4-6.1). Thrombus location-specific analysis identified LV aneurysm (OR: 10.9, CI: 4.3-27.7) and LVEF < 40% (OR: 9.6, CI: 2.6-35.8) as predictors of LV thrombus and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (OR: 10.6, CI: 1.2-98.4) as a predictor for RV thrombus. Left atrial appendage thrombi exclusively occurred in patients with atrial fibrillation. Ventricular tachycardia ablation was finally performed in 363 including 7 (16%) patients with thrombus but refractory electrical storm. These seven patients had tailored ablation with no embolic complications. Only one (0.3%) ablation-related embolic event occurred in the entire cohort. CONCLUSION: Cardiac thrombus can be identified in 11% of patients referred for scar-related VT ablation. These findings underscore the importance of systematic thrombus screening to minimize embolic risk.

Does Aortic Valve Calcium Score Still Predict Death, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Conductive Disturbances after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with New-Generation Prostheses?

BACKGROUND: The development of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has led to an improvement in morbidity-mortality in the treatment of severe aortic stenosis in patients at high surgical risk. However, the procedure is not free from life-threatening cardiovascular outcomes and conductive disturbances. The objective of our study was to analyze the prognostic impact of aortic valve calcium score on the occurrence of complications following the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who have benefited from TAVR with the implantation of new-generation Sapien 3 and Evolut R aortic valve prostheses between January 2017 and July 2018 with the prior realization of a cardiac computed tomography with measurement of the aortic valve calcium score were retrospectively analyzed. Primary endpoint was a composite of death, stroke, and myocardial infarction within a period of 1 month after TAVR. Relation between valvular calcium and conductive disturbances was secondarily analyzed over the same period, and occurrences of high-degree atrioventricular block (paroxysmal or permanent), new-onset left bundle branch block, and the need for permanent or transient cardiac stimulation were associated with the secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Overall, 144 patients were included. The aortic valve calcium score was not significantly higher in patients who reached the primary endpoint (2936 ± 1235 vs. 3051 ± 1440, P = 0.93). Among the 106 patients analyzed after excluding subjects with a prior pacemaker or left bundle branch block, aortic valvular calcium score was not statistically associated with the occurrence of conduction disturbances (3210 ± 1436 vs. 2948 ± 1223, P = 0.31). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the measurement of aortic valve calcium score has no prognostic value regarding mortality, cardiovascular events, or conductive disturbances after TAVR using the new generation of valves.

Hypnosis Versus Placebo During Atrial Flutter Ablation: The PAINLESS Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the superiority of hypnosis versus placebo on pain perception and morphine consumption during typical atrial flutter (AFL) ablation. BACKGROUND: AFL ablation commonly requires intravenous opioid for analgesia, which can be associated with adverse outcomes. Hypnosis is an alternative technique with rising interest, but robust data in electrophysiological procedures are lacking. METHODS: This single center, randomized controlled trial compared hypnosis and placebo during AFl ablation. In addition to the randomized intervention, all patients were treated according to the institution's standard of care analgesia protocol (administration of 1 mg of intravenous morphine in case of self-reported pain ≥5 on an 11-point numeric rating scale or on demand). The primary endpoint was perceived pain quantified by patients using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: Between October 2017 and September 2019, 113 patients (mean age 70 ± 12 years, 21% women) were randomized to hypnosis (n = 56) or placebo (n = 57). Mean pain score was 4.0 ± 2.2 in the hypnosis group versus 5.5 ± 1.8 in the placebo group (p < 0.001). Pain perception, assessed every 5 min during the whole procedure, was consistently lower in the hypnosis group. Patients' sedation scores were also better in the hypnosis group than in the placebo group (8.3 ± 2.2 vs. 5.4 ± 2.5; p < 0.001). Finally, morphine requirements were significantly lower in the hypnosis group (1.3 ± 1.3 mg) compared with the placebo group (3.6 ± 1.8 mg; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this first randomized trial, hypnosis during AFL ablation was superior to placebo for alleviating pain and reducing morphine consumption.

Prognostic value of Charlson Comorbidity Index in the elderly with a cardioverter defibrillator implantation.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are often underrepresented in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) trials, and ICD implantation in patients ≥75 years consequently remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate mortality, appropriate ICD therapy rates and survival gain in an elderly population after risk stratification according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). METHODS: This monocentric retrospective study included elderly ICD patients ≥75 years. They were subdivided according to their CCI score into 3 categories (0-1, 2-3 or ≥4 points). Elderly patients were matched 1:2 with younger control ICD patients on gender, type of prevention (primary or secondary) and type of device (associated cardiac resynchronization therapy or not). RESULTS: Between January 2009 and July 2017, 121 elderly patients (mean age 78 ± 3; 83% male) matched with 242 controls (mean age 66 ± 5) were included. At 5 year follow-up after ICD implantation, overall survival was 78%, 57%, and 29% (P = 0.002) in the elderly with a CCI score of 0-1, 2-3 and ≥4 respectively, and 72% in controls. There was no significant difference regarding ICD appropriate therapy between the 3 subgroups despite a trend towards lower rates of therapy in CCI ≥ 4 points patients (34.2%, 39.7% and 22.8% respectively; P = 0.45). Median potential survival gain after an appropriate therapy was >5, 4.7 and 1.4 years, with a CCI score of 0-1, 2-3 and ≥4 respectively (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with CCI score ≥ 4 had the lowest survival after ICD implantation and little survival gain in case of appropriate defibrillator therapy. More than age alone, the burden of comorbidities assessed by the CCI could be helpful to better select elderly patients for ICD implantation.

[Screening and diagnosis of atrial fibrillation]. / Dépistage et diagnostic de la fibrillation atriale.

Screening and diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) is crucial as this arrhythmia is asymptomatic in a third of patients and 5% of patients present a stroke as the first manifestation of their AF. The European Society of Cardiology recommends opportunistic screening of AF in patients over 65 years of age and systematically in patients over 75 years of age. The simplest way is pulse taking, but the number of connected devices for AF screening allows to multiply the frequency of screening and thus increase sensitivity, with another advantage of a digitalized transmission of the tracing. However many questions remain. No scientific evidence has demonstrated a benefit for AF screening. We do not know what duration and frequency of screening is relevant. The burden of AF which increases thromboembolic risk is not known. What population should be screened and how to consider subclinical AF? We will obtain answers to our questions in the coming years thanks to the results of the various studies in progress.

Dépistage et diagnostic de la fibrillation atriale. Le dépistage de la fibrillation atriale (FA) est primordial, car cette arythmie est asymptomatique chez 15 à 30 % des patients, et 1 patient sur 20 est victime d'un accident vasculaire cérébral comme première manifestation de sa fibrillation. La Société européenne de cardiologie recommande le dépistage de la FA de manière opportuniste chez les plus de 65 ans et de manière systématique chez les plus de 75 ans. Le moyen le plus simple est la prise du pouls, mais les objets connectés permettent dorénavant de multiplier la fréquence de dépistage, et donc d'augmenter la sensibilité, avec aussi l'avantage d'une transmission numérisée du tracé pour la plupart. Enfin, ils sont moins contraignants que les appareils les plus anciens. Toutefois, de nombreuses questions demeurent. Il n'y a pas encore de preuve scientifique ayant démontré un bénéfice du dépistage de la FA. Nous ne savons pas quelle durée et quelle fréquence de dépistage sont pertinentes. La durée de fibrillation à partir de laquelle il existe une augmentation du risque thromboembolique n'est pas connue. Quelle population faut-il dépister et comment faut-il considérer la fibrillation infraclinique ? Nous obtiendrons des réponses à nos interrogations dans les prochaines années grâce aux résultats des différentes études en cours.